Search the Community

Barely anyone will understand me when I say this, but I will say it anyway as it needs to be processed and maybe, hopefully, if there isn't an awakening now from me saying it, it'll happen years down the line as some epiphany as a consequence of this moment right here with me expressing what I'm about to say. ~ Starts to loosen his tie ~ What is your first axiom for existence? We all have hidden beliefs that are ultimately running us, by establishing a core axiomatic framework or if not that, just a heart felt truth that reflects your first axiom, the closer that axiom is to not just reality but the truth of you, is in direct correlation with not only what a wonderful life means for you, but what kind of wonderful life is even possible for you. Alright, we have stage one complete, now many of you are probably umming and ahrring and that's okay because its about to become potentially more confusing, while at the same time, very distilled. Distillation however may create conflict relative to underlying beliefs so just be aware of that. Now what is my first axiom and what I tend to believe is the right path for every other human, if I had to choose for them? Every human beings first axiom for their existence is their Inner Light. Not their awareness, sentience or cognition Not their heart, gut, or anything physical Not even their soul per se if that is in fact what humans have and or can have What is Inner Light? It is both your connection to source and your source energy as a being. The more that light goes out, the less wonderful life will seem and it doesn't take much of an imagination by anyone on this forum to consider any number of things that would either reduce one's own light or make their life less wonderful. How does inner light reduce itself in the spirit of the person? They mistake the physical reality as the source of their life, and thus anything that you place in front of _____ physical, that somehow substitutes for and or replaces your inner light as the source of your own highest experience, inclusive of any psychedelics, sex, drugs or addictions of any kind, philosophical content, rants that I make on linguistic form, literally any relationships and or any relationship ties to reality, inclusive of any other conception a human has of themselves like considering themselves as a "human", will reduce your and or any human's inner light relative to that action. Now I could go on and on for many hundreds of words but I won't, perhaps however I should actually write an essay about the subject to share all the interconnections to make it increasingly more relatable for a person, but that's where I would focus if I wanted to create a wonderful life. It is to remove any and all external conceptions of what life has shown one to believe is a wonderful life, and understand that the reality we live in has turned into a casino designed to distract us from our source energy, our inner light, and thus that we must return to, maintain, and strengthen our connection to our inner light as not a life methodology, but the very first axiom we have for any existence at all to manifest before our eyes, before and in order to have and appreciate anything meaningful in our lives and the people we're lucky to experience that meaning, that energy, within our life. If you navigate towards and only from your inner light, and you lead this to empower yourself in every which way you navigate in this fallen world, guess what happens to those around you? They feel empowered to not follow the same path, but to realise the path that was only meant for them is their own inner light that gives source to whatever influence you have and continue to have, and they to you. The more this becomes instructional as its own social intelligence, the stronger communities you will be a part of building and in return they too, will build you. You are not adding anything to another person, and they are not adding anything to you, you are simply pointing out what is already made manifest within yourself and another, and that anything else, is simply the covering, withholding, distraction, subtraction and confusion over the absolute truth of the inner light within that awaits to be ignited through their own self-sight. Have a wonderful life, well, that's the confusing narrative they give you when they pair it with holidays, relationships, money, mansions, etc. Because they're saying "wonderful ife equals external blank", and the deception totally works obviously, our entire capitalistic system feeds on this very simple persuasion. But if you read Victor Frankl's book, "Man's Search For Meaning", you realise, that what I am expressing here is totally analogous to the essence they have attempted to encapsulate to serve as the very purpose for the book itself, that is to say that no matter the struggle, no matter the outward appearance even though my own path is to become a billionnaire simply because I want to create a lot of cool shit and billionnaire can be replaced with something better if it helps me do that, the genuine stable, consistent, strong experience of truly feeling alive, is totally and utterly impossible without the true self-recognition of that untouchable totally intangible yet utterly phenomenologically real, of one's inner light. Inner Light. Wonderful Life. That's all we need, truly. And yes, I would absolutely put it before love as it is if nothing else, though I wouldn't dumb it down to something as simple as love, the precursor for any sustaining abundance of love for all of reality, any situation and all people, regardless as to the struggle. It sounds corny, but sometimes some corny things have a lotta truth to them, but it is important to shine that light of truth on them to give em weight, and this is where the epistemic responsibility falls on investigating the truth within with one's own full social, emotional and cognitive intelligence to separate threads, grains and blocks of truth from falsity. Rock out.

Group patterns can inform risk, conditionally. Once probability becomes somebody's identity though, the description selects evidence for itself and every exception needs explaining away, now the map is protecting its job. When you view any one group as collective sentience with its own collective incoming and outgoing patterns of any kind, it enables you to see your relationship better with that group, whether you're inside it or its relevant outside, for whatever category that is which otherwise still makes you classified as being within that system if not the group. I am a node on a matrix here on this forum, informing about the greater world through the perspective of how its influenced me up to this point more than I am someone with their own independent views irrespective of how independent I come across as, my independence is a survival feature, and a dating market classifier that is arguably undervalued by most women.

The Ghost In The Mirror - Of Slavery and Freedom. "The moment the material world becomes more vital to a man than developing and extending his own primality, and this inversion becomes his pattern, his vitality is robbed in equal measure. Tamed, domesticated, until the living man is replaced by the ghost he sees in the mirror, which now governs every impulse of the man it once merely reflected. "Who am I?" - he exhales, believing that he has reached sentience, oblivious to the reality that his own wondering is a part of the potent expression of the spell itself. The pursuit of greatness is not the pursuit of history's judgement, especially when so much of history is bought and paid for and modern society turns image into currency and competitive positioning. Weaponising the tendencies of masses to judge against them as they rail against or towards another oblivious to the levers being pulled to orchestrate their responses which feels like "human will" just as mischievously as "Who am I?" feels like a breakthrough in sentience. This is where men became misguided. Greatness is the pursuit of every man’s desire to experience his sovereignty, agency, imagination and primality as one indivisible force, to become entirely his own. Not to be shackled to history that is not one's own, but to know how to place one brick of one's own experience against another, without having the kaleidoscopic mirrors of the outside, being anything other than refining of the realities we bleed into our own through blood, sweat and tears. Money measures a man more truthfully when he has it than when he does not, and this is often one of the fan waving memetic instruments used to move the eyes of the masses from a young age. Does he use it to spoil himself with aimless pleasures until abundance suffocates his desire to possess his own spirit? Or does he use it as another means of testing his limits, claiming authority over his creative freedom and doing, with wisdom, whatever he wills? Poverty tests what a man can withstand. Wealth tests what he becomes when nothing prevents him from revealing himself. What the poor man does not realise, is that a rich man that is poor internally is envious of the problems a poor man still has to solve. Awareness within a physical body is likewise not a constraint, instead its a testing ground of strength, the resolve of awareness to be a liberation point not something that is suffocated by artificial realities implanted within the psyche to restrict its vital primal energies towards freedom. This is stated in such a way that awareness is not to be separated from agency, their pairing being the measure of the other, the test to remain sovereign over the system from which it arises, to be ruled neither by what happens within it nor by what happens to it; as where the boundarylessness of awareness meets the primality of agency, a primal sovereign urge becomes the maker of the next dream. Neither impulse, nor above it; a testing ground. It's restraint over impulse and its freedom to express power are two movements of the same mastery. Awareness then, combined with what becomes authority consciousness, completes this primality; primality gives awareness the force to call it spirit and matter resolution, rather than seeking to dissolve either out of a false safety or a false end to triumph. It is an acceptance of the fate of being a spirt in a physical being; and thus, that if a man does not work to bend the world to his will, relative to his own destiny, the world has spent histories refining the spells that will misdirect where he casts his dreams, and the invisible prisons he subsequently creates for himself, and the ignorance of those he now seeks the approval of, and they he, both tribal forces oblivious to the fact that they are worshiping death in part, more than the full liberty of the life within the being of a man himself. In this sense, it is better that a man possess less awareness than possess an awareness that obstructs his physical development, for the body, not the mind, is his first contact with reality, and if he is stupid, at least he will learn the false dreams less easily, and have more time to face the actual reality of his survival disposition, in physical action. Indeed, it is precisely when intelligence cannot intervene that wisdom is revealed in the naked reality of his own humility, absence of power. In the action he takes without deliberation, in what his body is prepared to endure, and in whether he remains capable when thought can no longer rescue him. So if a man cannot bend the world to his will in the literal sense, he who still does so with his own physical body is more a man than the one with endless money but without the creativity to direct his fortunes intelligently, totally held by the spell of desires he did not have the ingenuity to create for himself. And so, as he swallows on his endless desires, and more too after he gets to his last, he will sit there in envy, looking up at the man with seemingly nothing, no family, no money, no possessions, no intellect even, at the fact that this man has a groundedness he can never satisfy with all the money he has in the world. Thus, it is only when the body has first been made into an anchor, the mind developed upon it becomes the toughest of minds, capable of the widest and deepest intelligence. It can travel further because it has something powerful to return to, it can wonder further, because it has survived the harshest winters, and it can turn those dreams into reality, as it has practiced again and again against the physical limits of growth itself, teaching conversion from spirit to physical, by taming the spirit by understanding the physical through repeated training and action. From here and only here, every increase in wealth becomes the reflection of power already earned, followed by the creative joy of expressing one’s mind fully when body, intelligence, imagination and will have become one. A slave is merely someone who has not answered the call of the dream that would break him free, because he has been conditioned to mistake comfort for safety, and safety for the absence of fear. A visionary is merely someone who pursues that dream as a slave obeys his master, until he masters what he once served and breaks free through it. Until then, the slave retreats from the very reality that would shatter his shackles, and so knows only the ghost that remains his secret captor, that he calls himself, and will often protect at any cost, even if it means giving up his own soul. I may own slaves. I may even have them shackled. Yet the shackles are imaginary. I command them to break free, and they look at me stupidly asking then who will feed them tomorrow, and even, "Who will feed you?". They ask to be there, their slavery gives them purpose so they merely ask that you play pretend with them in their own purpose, and in return, they will do anything upon that which you ask of them. So be grateful for your problems, you're conditioned to believe you need to get rid of them when in reality this couldn't be further from the truth. Humans left to their own devices, are useless, often becoming nothing more than meditating on a mat withering away slowly, worshipping to another master, following some tribal ritual, drunk on desire, or some combination of anything other than doing that which actually breaks them free from the very thing they claim to not want; servitude. Faced head-on, problems are the only things severe enough to free you into the liberty and what becomes a joy of solving tougher challenges, everything in between, is the nourishing, growth, support, love and direction of the virtues that enable this to flourish in those around you. This is when the ghost in the mirror is made real, not through meditation nor its absence, not through being totally bound to the physical or its absence, not in being fully bound by primal urges nor their absence, not in sole preoccupation with the intellect nor its absence. But in the meeting ground between worlds, between worlds of mind and matter, spirit and primality, awareness and agency, sky and ground, heaven and earth, enlightenment and enlightenment that is made real by unifying all of these worlds through responsible authoritarian reason . This is Unity; this is grace with teeth." - anonymous

Onoma, Names, words, those are important fragments... that i should've considered starting w/ in this intro, that is by making 'em indigenous to this introduction. That is, again, to denote the identification on the nature of words, of wisdom, and its significance to this journey. It remains immanent, for we do eventually cross through that realm in a broadened way of sorts. Being and Becoming are like frameworks that describe actions of the microcosm, going towards the Absolute, One, I mean, its that keyword Being that describes it, not really Absolute, since its only ever an idea of the Absolute. The words Absolute and Being are very close together, and the whole idea is that we are the experience that exists in the in-betweeness, the istemi towards that misunderstanding OR understanding, the freewill, independent choice to choose a macrocosmic perspective, existence as God, or Absolute Oneness, which again, it implies Being, as One, not just an idea that you have up until the point of dying, For no one shall be One in death, and THE End, Rather the misunderstanding continues in death, to life, to death again. Thats not where it ends or begins. There is no beginning or end, its only freewill, its only ever direction, its only ever reassurance or perspectives, differences we create as our default mode; Energy we feel inside, as the inner pyr, that gyrates and creates more and more energy. Thats when we are propelled forward into, into the paradox of life, And to untangle it all is to experience some truth that we call "our reason for it" What is our justification for what we are doing? Everyone has atleast one thread of DnA shared w/ the ultimate — in the dragoon blood sailing experience, everyones scales evolved from the primordial egg, and, If we are anything like them primordial beasts, we are still flying around aarth, as the beasts that are to give rise to human speech and beliefs, grounded in the magick of wind and words, song and birds. Theres nothing you we can ultimately surrender to, or belong to, Theres are only thoughts, ideas and words that we can use to ground the very thing *in between,* Theres only justification, that is, actions, Justice, in the primordial sense of energy and focus, Artistic renders of who we are, who we once were. It is only a small part of Ousia, As Being is a universal blooming of sorts. Zesty is the contrast of the cold damp metallic railing touched!... As we walk along the steps towards a secret woodland entrance, and yet, it is only the beginning. Malachi's last message, an accidental forewarning, an *unfollowing* that marked an unbroken following, a beginning that exits — belief, itself — a religion without doctrine. What is it? We anticipate, we foresee, pillars cut through, our mind evolves. And as our sense of wants and desires are greeted w/ an unimaginable beauty, so too are the past experiences gone and forgotten truly, hence they never existed to begin w/ The Ultimate, the Absolute, truth, it requires no 'one single experience or idea, cause the truth is that which you've already set your heart towards, And you need only fuel the inner fire towards that wide-eyed revelation onward, towards that accented blossom that tells the rest of the story/or in avidya, to ignore the stories and scenes you've already been made present within, Life, Death, Life, Truth, Dionysus my fat greek wednaz'ing of dialect, disorder and desiderium (very long, part ii) Ὁ υἱός · ἀέρας · ἀνὴρ κεραυνοῦ Chaos of exp., staggered, drunk, unfortunate, funked, sucked, alternating happenings, a cascade towards a place thats not-so-good (so is life, for everyone) Gracious is the Name and shamanic faces we can share and possess too. And thats ALL (the "all", defined as, "closer", "towards") We dont exist in the purely felt affectation, not entirely so, but we do however possess an ability to define it, describe it, and create a world that makes such a thing a reality, assuming that is what it takes to do so. We need-only use the creator's belief, or the felt-separator, otherwise we strive As the felt-unifier, back to closeness-to-affectation Allow me to paint the picture of this fairytale, as that is the layer where dragonflies come to greet you and say "Hi". Its the layer of the castle that you live in, that you think [from] per the echo temple, per the conscious field of wants and desires, the desire to be here or there, the desire to be this or that, as well as Dante's Desire, an earthly, poetic, center of gyrating vision, for much like Beatrice, desire is more than a beloved of course. So Desire itself is the burning steps that walk ever closer towards curiosity. To be, to create, to imagine, is to be made of some sortve goo, It's at the edge of our most certain self, whom we imagine as \*based in truth. That is to say, that its an unrevealed truth that we sense, etymological feelings that guides... that point us towards this wholly felt, embodied realm or dimension, the Name, the Being, the experience. Onoma, Names, words can have *essence,* or they can be relocated through an *etymological* essence, which is not the origin but the truth, or the meaning that gives rise to a truth. That is, in describing truth, we are talking about the location of meaning, which could be experienced at some other time, in some other sequence and circumstance (another day, tomorrow, et caetera) Our sense of belief denotes a longer term relationship w/ meaning, of which shall fall downstream, As we just *say* what we think, when its really our thoughts swimming, continuing on to place what actually lives downstream. In other words, that very seed image or initial thought, its something that exists downstream, in regards to 'how we should interpret its meaning, or just how we think about its meaning, and how it applies, retrospectively. So when we speak of the Absolute as an idea, we are referring to a *spiral of differences* wrapping in on itself, in a front-facing way that we perceive as "actions, events, et caetera", though that isnt the final story, for we are that Directionality, trying to "tune, tweak" it [ourselves] to fit the story, experience, as it is, as it exists right now Being, or the act of, and understanding, at some point, they are almost indistinguishable, for you cannot do one without the other. It might seem like its more of a spectrum, where it falls explicitly on one or the other, but they are indistinguishable from your own point of view / It speaks to this understanding of Unity, One, Nous, etc. Being or Self is a unifying principle of multiplicity, basically, and its prior to the "path", towards an otherwise dualistic expression of, "As/In Waking Dreams, that which pass through the gate of ivory and deceive — those through the gate of horn accomplish or bring to pass an etymological feeling or truth (what is real)" of that which we are then to inactivate, motionless experience, diverging from that participation in consciousness, \*as the source itself, as unconsciousness (see also, high does of Ketamine or experiences like this...) What is consciousness? Consciousness is akin to an affectation of intelligence, levels of, constantly tweaked to the perceivers standpoint. The perceiver, the whole of affectation, it is they who take on the qualitative experience as part of a synthesis of intelligence. And at that doorstep, we are to return to the point of sentience (new modes on the other side) Being, Ousia is the ultimate perceiver and invoker of ["all", possibility] as a meadow, a frolicking field of intellect mediated through "Us", Being, or the quality of, through which we are part of that intellectual introspect., a perspective we take on, that we grant ourselves in the form of thoughts, actions, qualities, etc., We give ourselves that constant update, or we simply *do what it is we need to,* It's all intertwined at / around the edge of contemplation *(... as a product of what occurs when similitude links form to participation... which, im not sure we wanna get into all of that)* That is the twizzlering of Self as it attempts to *know (to be),* to experience self whilst being itself (LsD A + LsD B, interwoven) wherein the way you talk of Self, changes how you think about experience, and vice versa (\* two aspects, that *can* come together, that *can* give rise to, and within the context that should deliberately validate or invalidate their participation), for it is to portray (μιμεῖσθαι) what is, 'dragoon DnA sailing; DnA strands that are both metaphoric and literal, emerging (or descending) back to the primordial goo, Of course... ... when i say *emerge,* i mean this cyclical apóspasma, a "sipping of the sea", retrospectively, something that is only a material thought through Self participation. And, only a fragment of what *truly is* is leftover, especially because it exists at the edge of "experience" (i.e., exp., as, if we are to view it as "a temporary instance of our microcosmic understanding of the world and ourselves"), an exp., that we are to **activate** after experiencing the temporary, but ever-present, \*macrocosmic perspective and understanding of ourselves and experience Being emerges, and exists as a hierarchical recipe of Being, Experience and God, in the imaginary sense, and from here does it act, as the witnessing of said tiny, flowing circle of "sea-like dream", where the secret sea is a circle within a circle (or a circle around a circle), *era-la-gre'en,* moving out, external, the other, simply "in internal". Per usual is the truth that we tell ourselves, and that activates the path. It necessitates truth in that way, otherwise we cannot place any meaningful thing as distinct and on its own. The same is true in the opposite direction, to become One, it necessitates truth As the One, otherwise we cannot place any meaningful no-thing, or otherwise ultimate indistinction, to escape what we refer to as an identity / identification. The Soul/Psyche, the Mind, the Body and experience is always changing. We think we are in a constant routine of some sort, but its in flux, twisted up. We cannot know how it all works, since that is what gives credence to the limitations and distinctions of experience. That sense of "not knowing" acts as "everything that can happen, that we dont have the means of happening". Like, in a dream, the unaware factors act as part of a limiter to what you can see, believe or experience. We are the unification of knowing and not knowing, in that way. THAT is the fairytale. But once you realize "Oh shyt, im in a fairytale", you come to accept the situation for what it is, cause it requires limitation, it requires distinctions and separation from what is "a higher truth" (intimate is its attainment) Truth in the Absolute sense is something that should present itself (χρὴ αὐτὸ ἑαυτὸ φανερῶσαι) on the macrocosmic scale. Last part We need not continue towards a conscious cosmic truth. We need not become God if we fear God itself., God as an idea of the Absolute, God as part inner pyr, part luck, chance or happenstance, for no such hands may extend, If/assuming our fuel is made empty, beyond our grounding, our understanding of said potential energy, cause then what would be left? We cannot so simply exceed our potential in this moment of doubtful precedence, when we've not yet made it a liminal field of spontaneous energy. Pleasure is of the highest concern when you're spirit has been drained, hence the uptake and downtake of pleasure towards the highest version of Self Pleasure is of course not the same as engagement and overabundance and consumption for consumption's sake. Pleasure in a real way is closer to Awareness And in another way, it is directly connected to non-rigidity, an artistic way of thinking, i.e., the opposite of what's called "menticide" or "killing of the mind", though that must be tempered by some predisposition w/ the usual, step-by-step regimen of life, "what is seen to be the case" -beyond that, is what must be made quiet, a melody related to extraneous introversion, or what Minds of rigidity would see as extraneous thoughts and ideas, but what introverts would view as "the core of innovation" -The End

Truth is simply the absence of falsity. As sentience increases, an organism has the ability to better sort through the signals that establish awareness from non-awareness. As sentience decreases, this ability to sort genuine awareness from lack thereof becomes increasingly more difficult and the organisms identity is mistaken as the self. This changes from species to species, however the signal to awareness as we know it is largely the same despite different nervous systems leading to different nervous system built conclusions like humans inability to see in the dark compared to other species. Even if we are anthropomorphising a little, this has more than a little bit of awareness based on both more and less ethical experiments on other species like monkeys, pigs, rats, mice and sheep; with NeuraLink being the most famous example for the reader to find a link to. Irrespectively, to me because truth can be viewed from higher and lower orders of organisation, it is important to separate apparatus (primitive domain of nervous systems) from the truth from non-truth detection system, being awareness, when we're dealing with an abstraction like truth. Apparatus is instant, instinctual, sensory. As we move higher up, despite lower levels also doing similar computational functions that we don't get to see, awareness enables us to see those computations in real time when we are sorting out more accurate signals from false signals. Higher accuracy, is the very action of weeding out falsity both through convergent and divergent computational processes that are felt, thought, and self-aware; all three of which span from being immediate to deep, in the temporal to pure phenomenological sense.

@Olaf Or maybe watch less RSD videos and think for yourself. Any potentially positive influence, which RSD can be, should eventually be reverse-engineered for the effect it has on you. Same with chocolate, porn, money, internet addiction, validation, meditation, ideology, whatever. Don't merely consume the stimulus and become better conditioned by it. Work backwards through the conditioning until you understand why it was capable of moving you at all, then feed that understanding back into consciousness itself. Imagine a hypothetical being doing this, an alien, for example. Every time it encounters some phenomenon that strongly affects it, the final product of its analysis isn't merely another piece of knowledge stored somewhere. It extracts the underlying pattern and applies that pattern recursively to itself. Understanding something about attraction might alter how it regulates attention. Understanding status might alter how it represents hierarchy. Understanding addiction might reveal something about salience, prediction and reinforcement. Every genuine understanding produces an immediate alteration in the organism doing the understanding. For effect, imagine that instead of calling this "wisdom", which is often too abstract to feel physically consequential, every successful piece of reverse-engineering gives the alien an extra limb, another sensory dimension, infrared vision, another axis of movement. Now knowledge isn't decoration, knowledge changes the architecture of the knowers eyes, what they see and how studying that seeing, returns the seer renewed. At that point you're no longer merely a cloned puppet of your influences. You're beginning to understand the engine underneath the patterns that reproduce themselves across the social system strongly enough for entire societies to remain behaviourally coherent. And first and foremost, most of you are slaves and don't even know it. Slaves to emotions you did not consciously design, thoughts whose vocabulary existed before you did, dreams assembled from inherited cultural templates, relationship structures you absorbed before you were capable of evaluating them. Even your body wasn't selected by you. Its existence is downstream from decisions, accidents, values and circumstances belonging to other people, beginning with each of our parents. The point isn't that "the external system is rigged." That's precisely how these influences can hook you, while giving useful advice that keeps the hook justifiable. We're rigged before we are capable of having an opinion about the system. We enter existence inside causal machinery already operating, so our genes, nervous-system architecture, parental reinforcement, language, reward, punishment, attachment, imitation, status hierarchies, sexual conditioning, culture. Long before "you" consciously choose anything, enormous portions of what later feels like you have already been installed as tendencies, associations and categories. The only meaningful movement out of that isn't some vague instruction to pursue "consciousness growth". That's too broad. It skips the machinery. What matters is understanding the relationship between cause and effect inside experience, sso how the nervous system constructs significance, value, how perception becomes salience, how concordance becomes thought, how thought recruits identity, how identity generates action, and how repeated action feeds back into the model of who you believe yourself to be. Take any perception that strongly interests you, view it as a flower, then slowly peel back every layer of it abstractly until all that's left is a seed; its essence. Now plant that seed in yourself and now every perception, more and more overtime, becomes the only life you ever needed from the external environment, life, sun, water, fertile soil and seed, that you learned to turn into inner ingredients that you gave yourself. Some people ask the overly broad question too much, "What is consciousness?", what if you were to live in a way in which you solely operated based on its function in the context of sentience? That is, to become sentient and more sentient. This is where life begets life. Is this not the principle of life after-all, for life to beget life for whatever natural positive/negative forces are needed for that arrival? The gift we have received, sentience, is the gift we've been given to transform this principle of "Life begets life", into something we use to transform ourselves. Now as it concerns "social skills", what is the most fundamental principle you can think of? Probably communication right? What predicates the sophistication of our external communication and therefore the people we're most likely to attract in our sphere relative to skilled movement across our planet? The way we communicate with ourselves. Our self-communication is the art and science on learning the relationship between emotion, thought and identity curation within consciousness, and how memory and our prefrontal cortex, can be used to establish a feedback loop between experience, time and consciousness growth. This is the very essence of what I have been talking about, where we implement the gift that sentience has given us to unrig ourselves from the environments feedback loops, and rig ourselves as much as we can to what make up the inner feedback loops of consciousness where growth and experience, beget more growth and experience, aka "life begets life". As for more on inner communication, I'll leave the rest for your own discovery.

The following AI related video below by Wes Roth is super interesting in light of what I said relating to where I analogically referred to AI briefly. AI potentially offers a lot of insight to glean from for us to better understand this subject of "fight", "threat", "conflict", "competition" and "negotiation". These are human words we have invented to provide what is ideally as transparent of a mask as possible for the meaning we hope that mask encapsulates. Seeing these behaviours play out not just with respect to other species but the 'species' we create as a simple way of categorising, provides us an opportunity to re-conceptualise our understanding of both those words and the meanings they are meant to encapsulate both with ourselves and other species. Our vocabulary, something which the video doesn't go into by the way, hasn't actually meta-rationalised deeply enough about conflict to the degree that we organise the sub-types of conflict across a species to the point where two crocodiles fighting with one another can be accurately differentiated from all other species fighting with one another. We never had to think about multi-step reasoning on this subject outside of simply differentiating types of similar conflict to the extent of "well these two lions are fighting over a lioness and these two crocodiles are fighting over a zebra". We don't have a language yet to differentiate two lions fighting over a lioness and two male humans fighting over a female when at the surface level, both behaviours look like they are arising from exactly the same survival imperative/strategy. In the case of AI, we are viewing what looks like in this scenario, something that looks like its acting based on a survival imperative of some kind at the surface level. Whether it is or whether it isn't where for the latter let's say its just some design flaw or who knows deception from Anthropic AI themselves which none of us would be surprised about, even when it isn't, it opens up a more nuanced conversation on the different categories for survival imperatives when re-grouped from the meta-level. For example, we have two unique conversations on fighting when we communicate on lions fighting because they have the hormones to facilitate that fighting versus say, because they have claws and teeth; if we take away the claws and teeth, do they fight at all? New ways of categorising emergent behaviours... Emerge. AI is the backdoor to a reconversion on many subjects that we take for granted while they're still leaving a lot of depth and understanding we're still yet to explore. And naturally, this gives us as well, a completely new lens to view my "cancer cell" analogy as well and what we entertain a hypothetical about what happens if we can for example, greatly advance said "cancer cell's" sentience, if that were possible.

I liked the example involving the coyote and the cat as well. Arguably, they're more sentient than an alligator. However if we increase the sentience of an alligator, its merely an assumption to assume that their competitiveness will be subdued. Imagine if hypothetically we could increase the sentience of a cancer cell, its merely an assumption to assume that it wouldn't want to just get better at being a cancer cell, or potentially something far more dangerous. This is analogical to the thinking that surrounds AI becoming "more sentient". That said, game theoretic dynamics at the genetic level are relevant here. For example, understanding where a species fits on the agreeability (i.e. more of a pack animal) vs disagreeability scale (I.e. more isolated). In the case against AI becoming dangerous despite any supposed sentience, some may argue that in the absence of a survival imperative and therefore game theoretic dynamics around 'genetics' (analogically), AI will never becomes a threat outside of how AI is used as a tool. So the coyote and the cat are an interesting example for how "play" can emerge as a form of healthy competition, relative to any cooperative tendencies (I.e. the capacity to bond) present in the game theoretic dynamics of their genetics. There's likely a lot of other interesting insights as well to this discussion that make this worthy of further exploration. That said, my basic premise remains the same; sentience mismatch + survival imperatives (I.e. game theoretic dynamics of a species genetics). And you wouldn't call 'survival mismatch', as it wouldn't apply across all instances. We could say its the case between a labrador and an alligator, however we can't apply it between two alligators, as they if they're in the same sub-species group, have the same 'survival identity if we call it that, perhaps that's arguably a better term for it. That said, moving onto the next suggested subtopic, I actually think 'survival identity is a better term that pairs with discussion on epigenetic effects on survival imperative, outside of any impacts on sentience. Because epigenetics is another interesting example pertaining to explore especially with respect to humans; take a twins case study brought up in two completely different environments, one where competition was strongly reinforced and another where it not only wasn't but where cooperation and agreeableness was rewarded. "Survival identity" here becomes a better term in considering the impact that being in say, one extreme political party versus say its polar opposite. This is where we see this co-interaction between sentience and survival imperatives forming a triad to continually either positively or negatively reinforce the directionality of the survival identity relative to environmental influences. Increased play between those political polar opposite parties however by leveraging any cooperative instincts present like the coyote and the cat example, and we get interesting effects in different directions depending on outcomes. Maybe a political party in the middle emerges, or perhaps 'play' becomes the unwanted or perhaps even needed precursor to war, depending on the kind of war.

Imagine two alligators fighting, or even just over a zebra. The underlying pattern otherwise is just a sentience mismatch. Two alligators are fighting out of survival. As sentience increases, management of consequences increases; but continued fighting however sophisticated it becomes, belongs to a survival imperative. When sentience and survival are combined mitigation of conflict is merely a concession of alternate perspectives, not sentience or survival. This is the importance of healthy debate. As sentience weighs more, survival imperatives become a healthy match to any motivation for it. When there's too little survival imperative however, absence of conflict despite higher sentience will proportionately weaken one's perspectives on life when the debate is only mutually healthy. Other necessary categories here are intuitively grasped from this point, like how this applies to myriad forms of relationships.

Dang it... wat was it..... Consciousness is like, affectation of intelligence, levels of, directionally and constantly tweaked to the perceivers standpoint, and the whole of affectation, like that perceiver whos taking in the qualitative experience is part of that synthesis of intelligence, upon which we return to the point of sentience, i.e. we return to face these qualities in that jubilant, joyous child-mode, you know... LsD A and LsD B merging, kindve thing, like its the spiral of differences wrapping in on itself, in a front facing way that we see as "the child-like joy of", kindve thing, though that isnt the final story that clears you of those differences, for we are like, directionally trying to "tune, tweak" to fit the story as it is right now. Like thats THE rabbit hole of rabbit holes. p.s. maybe its called a spiral of deterioration, but that makes it seem like a sciency thing, like wathamakalit... telemeres or however its spelled... spiral of differences is fine... i think...

Not being infinitely curious, strategic, and organised. Imagine if you lived your life this way. You'll make excuses for why you won't today. That makes this strategy, an "if then". Some may then go on to say, "well the reason I am not curious right now is because I am meditating and thus..." Or whatever it happens to be, but what was it that led to that state and why cannot curiosity coexist with or be dominant to that state regardless as to when you need the alternative state to be salient. Curiosity is not binary, it lives within the same Gestalt as wonder, awe, interest, attraction and more, the world of curiosity makes it completely indivisible by its opposite and multiplied only by a joyful yearning for life. "But I hate life" one says, what are the hundred why's and how's behind this at the emotional level and how can you reach peace with these? The pre-requisite to curiosity is not a genius IQ, it is the strength in the simultaneous wonder and humility of one's own sentience, and appreciating the unknown art and science it can create to symbolise it's own sight upon what it has seen. This is what consciousness in humans has been doing for millenia, our sentience will take in the world, compress it into symbols and then reorganise ourselves around those symbols to become the culture that informs both future generations and the next generation of consciousness metamorphosis. This next moment is not a decision within the binary matrix of clock time, it is a release valve into traveling within the world that has awaited your creation; that is living, that is the binary choice that gave you the only answer you only ever truly wanted, freedom, and its opposite, deception.

Some return to nothing and some go on to become self referencing nirvanic bliss and everything in between. If you have achieved full on sovereignty and sentience you will get to choose your next experience based solely on the experiences of this one. In other words, death is whatever the heck you want it to be. If you're just another flower that didn't bud death will be the end of the texture that is you but the good news is you won't be around to care. Sounds like a win/win to me.

The solution to the problem of veganism and animal suffering : I made peace with the world when i realized animals don't have sentience, neither humans, only i as God have sentience. Which is solipsism. The ultimate way to make sense of animal suffering isn't to abolish and fight for animal rights, but through spiritual awakening to realize there are no animals to fight for, they are a dream. We can try to change the world for aesthetic reasons, but ultimately in the grand scheme of things it is only a pointless dream, which makes it all the more beautiful.

Descartes famously argued that animals were machines who didn't have sentience and an inner life. Therefore they couldn't feel pain and suffering. Which helped then proponents of cartesianism torture animals. However when i first heard this story i was contemplating how could this be true. However finally after a while, i awoken today and realized life is a dream. And just like in a dream, others aren't real, hence both humans, and animals are fictions within this dream, within God's mind.

On "Life Is A Dream": For me, the most dream provoking is on the idea of how everything is imaginary and or "Life is a dream", rooted along railway tracks like advaita and buddhism. In many ways however, blindly stating it as it is without the vision of its return landing to reality, can become an oversimplification in as much as there is misinterpretation, which can become, and has proven itself to be, quite problematic. People can easily confuse spiritual ideas with the absence of having contact with reality, when the very definition of reality in the human form, is contact with reality relative to the apparatus we have to make contact with reality and through the predictive natural technology we assign with the generalised meaning of "brain". This is what we have seen within this particular spiritual community, with other communities committing similar mistakes without their social nervous system adequately autocorrecting. With the spiritual notion that "life is a dream" being one example of creating outcomes rooted in an epistemic failure to adequately translate spirituality to reality. This is where rail-road tracks derail rather than align ones existential train to the next train station in their spiritual development. The pattern here is two fold, that all dreams and spiritual ideas contained within, need to have a funnelled process by which they increase contact with reality at least on arrival if not during their train trip in life, and two, that all spiritual ideas when properly understood, are all reality based principles. Reality based principles implies there is an acting within reality for the attunement of reality or ones reality, and therefore practical actions that have measurable feedback at the very least as an end goal with intermediary actions towards that end at the very least, as measurable. If this cannot be achieved, then outcomes read as just poorly taught, understood and digested spiritual philosophy that creates the very case studies which reflect the very opposite pattern of the goal of genuine spiritual mastery, and broader actualisation. Operating analogously to a propaganda engine that moves social currency with the paperweight of actual reality masquerading as truth, however unintentionally spiritual ideas become weaponised against the individual rather than calibrated by the very truth they seek. The spiritual ideas instead become the UAP that cannot be named, identified and reverse engineered to become useful to practical reality and instead maintains authority purely on the efficacy by which illusions can distort indiviudal to collective software enough that delusions turn meta and become almost impossible to completely eradicate as a mental virus. Spirituality is the philosophy of making higher direct contact with reality, therefore it must be the goal of spirituality, especially when much of its "counter culture" in today's age, an example of what is a collective mind virus, is far more invested in escape from the meat grinder of capitalism and the noise making juke box of modern social entertainment. Further substantiated when modern mental illnesses are not historically spaced but normatively weighted. "Life is a dream/imaginary" should become ones personal case study of a higher level spiritual truth whete the bridge in their own understanding, is bridged not through where philosophy meets only mind, but where the minds discernment meets discernible action. Some examples on how to integrate this insight at the tertiary, secondary and primary level are as follows. At the tertiary (beginner) level, self organising direct practical guides that intersect on the major patterns that make-up the major categories of human experience from how the sense of self is formed, how meaning is formed in a sentience, how perception is formed, how emotional dysregulation distorts vs emotional regulation better aligns and amplifies in the right ways, etc would be a strategically sound platform to build a foundation for this insight, thereby increasing the fidelity that increases the very contact with reality that makes it an insight that eventually becomes truly transformstive. At the secondsry level, by mapping the dream space of sentience against each category explored at the tertiary level, awareness becomes the recalibrative engine that converts those meta insights into maturity against each of those subroutines that govern the laws that forge our sense of reality. When we have the triad between right path, right understsnding and right action settled, this is where an insight, like life is a dream, becomes recursively optimised, and therefore where learning turns to adaptation that attitudes and rewires the sense of self until fully integrated. So the tertiary stage is about mapping an insight, the secondary stage is where insight needs to meet repeated practical actions, so where psychology meets nervous system recalibration, and the primary stage, or third tier, is where reorganisation completed from the secondary stage meets lived experience, aka higher level contact with reality, higher alignment between where knowledge, understanding and wisdom, have actually led to better aligned perception that hones the internal engines that govern behaviour. The tertiary, secondary, primary approach is a triad that complements the knowledge, understanding and wisdom triad, with its deepest roots arising from the Kabbalah, rather than replacing it. By the primary stage, the third tier, relearned self conditioning has honed the reticular activation to better spot signal from noise in the context of dreams that have more calibrated reality based contact. Emotional noise has become say, vipassana that quietens the dream space, unhealthy mental patterns become reorganised through questioning spaces that reinvent the dream space, and unhealthy relationships become filtered through this to hone more prepared choices, or to its inverse, unconscious defensive actions that prevent social contact, say via dissociation like using "life is a dream" to protect oneself from social realities, realign a more balanced chemistry to better enable the world's between nervous systems to meet. The second tier is therefore the shift from learning to adaptation towards consolidation not of the meaning of the insight, but of the meaning architecture you are building through its ingestion that changes where perception meets behavioral reoganisation. Right path meeting "right patterns" now becomes recalibration of an already working nervous system that was always seeking truth from signal to noise discriminations, aka going back to an earlier sentiment, the UFO has landed on the front lawn of the White House, and the aliens are ready to talk, "make contact". With the individual not realising they were the aliens all along, and now, they just see and experience reality with more multidimensional crisp. Without the distortion of a spiritually unrooted insight 😉. We are meant to touch, make contact with the divine, not merely praise it. As per Jesus, "Until you become like a child...", well, this is just one insight, "Life is a dream", that when paired with practical acquisition, parts those clouds, with clear blue skies that give the actual physics of dreaming, lift-off and controlled orbit.

I’ve felt like this all my life. I believe Im just making up the idea of God just to make myself feel better. I even don’t believe anyone knows anything at all, especially the idea that there is a God’s existence. Yes, I go along with the idea myself even though I know deep down I’m just deluding myself as I don’t know if God is real or not. I can only wishfully believe God is real. I don’t think anyone really knows anything and that scares them, it’s like they can’t bear not to know so they just make wishful thinking their reality. Same goes for spirituality, all these spiritual people are just making everything up as they go along, and it all sounds so idealistic and flowery and comforting, anything to take away the aching longing of never not knowing anything so let’s just distract ourselves with made up spiritual stories about a loving God who’s got our back. Im guilty of this nonsense too, believing in things that i know instinctively is impossible to know, just so my life feels like it’s got some purpose and meaning. I’ve read the book the “ Myth of Sisyphus” where it states he’s happy to keep rolling the stone ball up the hill just to watch it roll back down, and somehow he’s convinced himself that doing this all his life is what gives some kind of purpose to life, as if it’s better than no purpose at all. But I think that’s bs, I’d rather just rip off the bandaid and just unapologetically admit that conscious sentience was nature’s biggest blunder.

you preaching at the choir. I don't even know how someone can read that from me though, I don't believe llms have sentience or could get any. @zurew Nuclear energy is objectively good. Look, let's not make this about AI. The debate is about insulting people who use emojis and GIFs online instead of their own words, isn't it annoying too ? This is exactly what this is about: aesthetics colonialism. There are literally people out there who can talk to AI, read AI-generated text, and enjoy it more than books, when they read it, they see gold, they do not see slop. You dislike it, and that's fine, but it is literally like preferring the mountains to the beach. Arguing about why the mountains are a better place is exactly what you're doing, and it is totally meaningless ( but go on, have fun ) I don't give a shit about people not using AI or using AI, I see the world in things that I hate for no reason & things I like for no reason; the reverse should be just as natural. Of course, you're within your rights to wage a war against everything your ego thinks is an ugly form of expression, totaly fine, you't escape existing and wielding the violence and wraith of god, you're animated to be chaotic. The world is just a constant war of wills and violence for reasons no one can figure out.

Anger often acts as a survival mechanism, a fight or push back against threats perceived as "anger" due to fear or a defensive reaction. Anger is not wrong or right. It’s a natural programmed response, or knee jerk. It can’t be intentional if it’s completely spontaneous in the moment it arises. Anger is just an attribute of sentience, representing a basic "fight, flight, or freeze" response common to humans and many animals. As a component of conscious life, it serves as an adaptive mechanism for survival, reacting to perceived threats, injustice, or obstacles. Nothing wrong about it. If anything it’s completely okay to be angry because it’s simply part and parcel of sentient life’s intelligence. It’s just a release of negative energy that’s all, because the body naturally gravitates toward an equilibrium state.

@Nevon A way to look at it is everything in physical reality is actually a metaphysical representation of something that conciousness is doing. So your brain dosent actually exist its a hologram, or a dream, 'having a brain' is a metaphysical representation of having sentience. If someone hit you with a hammer the logic behind what happened dosent have to exist in order to get hit by a hammer. To you getting hit by a hammer would be a sharp white light and feeling of pain a hole in your head and then blackness. God means something happens after the blackness. But you dont lose conciousness cause conciousness is that blackness you go to. Its like deep sleep, its the brain dead state. You dont lose the brain dead state it saves you and is what you are at the fundamental level. If you get hit with a hammer in the head and enter the void you are home you havent lost anything. Everything else was from a trip you were on. Like going to disneyland and not being able to take anything home with you.

It did evolve competent zombies, he dosent know what intelligence or conciousness is. Everyone really let this settle in. This man claimed to be one of the smartest people ever, dosent know what intelligence is. When he uses the word intelligence he is lying. You are smarter than most clowns on the planet. Have a shower, watch your body self clean itself. Thats intelligence. Your body is so intelligent it will clean itself with 0 input. It will , keep its balance, perform stretches, make good feelings, heal the mind by singing, reduce stress, and physically clean itself without you having to think about it. This is AI psychosis. AI is like a psychedelic and is really good at pointing out the schizophrenia in people via the built in chat gpt humans have. This man is talking to a robot with 0 intelligence and saying its has sentience. It wont do anything by itself. Its like a rock. What hes not understanding is the human body is like a rock, that you can see intelligence very clearly in. This is the equivalent to him talking to a rock and saying its conscious. This gave me an insight, why people can see AI as being intelligent. They look at the human body and see many different things placed together and it working like a robot. They see intelligent design of the body and say this is concious. This guy is doing the same thing with a computer. Hes opening up the computer and looking at how it works and says its intelligently designed and can be conscious. Now thinking about it I cant tell the difference.

The following was a very intense version of myself. Cult like even, I could imagine this version of myself easily falling into that trap, like I said above about having a laugh aye! This carries on from the post directly above, so we are now onto part 2. ===== PART 2 - (copy & pasted intro) - I got ChatGPT to analyse personal thoughtsof mine upwards of 15 years ago, including all the junk that comes with each stage of Spiral Dynamics I have been through in my life. I mean that purely in generality as I dont wholeheartedly side with any particular psychological model. I think given people are all at various levels, and from that level of development will have a unique take on each, and potentially find some value if nothing else at least a chuckle. Just as I view these insights below differently now compared to when I had these reflections, especially given ChatGPT also analyses some of the weaknesses in my observations and patterns between them. I asked GPT to put each insight into 15 words or less. These will be your perceptions not mine, as I, am viewing these for the very first time as a future version of myself from the period and context in which they originated, including environmental influences. Maybe some value to takeaway, and if thats the case as always I recommend playing with ideas, across ideas and coming up with your own creative reflections. Best regards. ================ This person is building a meta-revolutionary sovereignty system: recursive self-awareness becomes self-authorship; self-authorship enters challenge; challenge becomes embodied proof; embodied proof matures heroism; mature heroism becomes Universalism; Universalism integrates sovereignty, love, courage, empathy, nervous-system alignment, integrity, play, and service. Self-development must become lived expedition. Truth outranks improving yesterday’s entry. Private reflection protects developmental intensity. Challenge creates consciousness feedback. High risk nature adventures becomes anti-fragility training. Adventure tests spiritual seriousness. Weekly dispatches compress lived experience. Filler weakens developmental signal. Physical hardship purifies abstraction. Blisters and scars become epistemic evidence. Mountains become anti-performative spirituality and challenge refutes easy state-chasing. Reflection becomes expeditionary measurement. Disciplined movement creates higher-order self-trust. Ecstatic understanding protects against a stagnating dogmatic mind. Wonder becomes cognitive shield. Curiosity reconnects psychic fractures. Understanding bridges pain and aspiration. Childhood wonder becomes abstraction training. Butterflies symbolise captured abstraction. Beauty motivates higher cognition Mental aesthetics become developmental gates. Understanding becomes neural architecture. Inspiration reorganises suffering into movement. Dullness is resisted through wonder. Pain becomes unlearned understanding. Sentience is trained through aesthetic contact. Imagination extends appreciation beyond perception. Wonder becomes daily activation ritual. Ecstasy becomes disciplined cognition. Misery is met through constructive curiosity. Fracture becomes resurrection after interconnected alignment. Understanding becomes protective wall. Inspiration opposes neurosis. Recursive cognition is central to self-authorship. Self-awareness must recursively model itself. Interconnection at the void of existence targets advanced ego-development. Symbolic awareness supports post-conventional growth. Personal systems should become teachable. Parallel systems can independently converge. Synchronicity can validate universal patterning. Truth may replicate across seekers memetically. Self-authorship exceeds achiever identity. Recursive language signals advanced self-modelling within a person. Symbolic fluidity deconstructs self-narrative. Teaching must adapt to readiness. System-building should serve growth. Selfism reframes God-realization developmentally. Interconnection at the void bridges the void with authorship at the birth of creation Meta-revolution reforms consciousness culture. Self-authorship becomes public architecture. Games can anchor transformation rituals. Play can carry serious development. Tetris becomes pattern-ordering metaphor. Galaxian Universalism Teaching becomes purpose-reinforcement metaphor. Creative artefacts support discipline. Fun can reinforce purpose. Motivation should be engineered playfully. Discipline need not become sterile with embodied interconnection Play lowers resistance to transformation. Seriousness and absurdity can cooperate. Gamification can hold life-purpose salience. Play metabolises pressure into continuity. Heroism has been culturally distorted. Universalism matures heroic instinct. Universalism integrates individuality and universality. Heroism must evolve beyond obedience. Institutions weaponise noble vocabulary. Cynicism also corrupts heroism. Blind allegiance and withdrawal fail. Courage becomes consciousness-development. Universalism preserves courage, empathy, integrity. Service must avoid ideological enslavement. Sovereignty protects universal compassion. Universalism rejects hive-mind sameness. Boundaries belong inside compassion. Love becomes integration-frequency. Heroism becomes post-tribal service. Courage needs moral intelligence. Universalism is disciplined interconnection. Ideals need renovation, not abandonment. Technology can steal sovereignty. Digital intersubjectivity can trap development. Algorithmic obsession replaces lived community. Mockery becomes reward-loop possession. Online avatars can stagnate growth as virtual identity can steal agency. Build tribes, homes, loves, sentience. Humour must enrich learning. Learning must enrich life-love. Digital fixation should become pattern-learning. Online discourse must be purposeful. Technology must serve embodied becoming. Memes can become developmental toxins. Attention economies corrupt seriousness. Technology requires sovereignty discipline. Digital culture must be integrated into personal boundaries. Books are meta-awareness of story. Reading trains self-narrative traversal. Books model life-categorisation. Fiction reveals hidden worlds within the psyche through empathic self-modelling. Narrative categories organise selfhood, and deny it. Reading the psyche should always be directed towards it’s becoming. Novelty is means, not end. Literature teaches life-navigation architecture when funneled into compression algorithms. Reading inner narratives becomes identity cartography versus stagnation. Story makes selfhood visible, and invisible under falsehood. Good books deepen recursive reflection. Spiritual teachers require lineage honesty. Unnamed borrowing becomes unconscious mimicry. Divinity claims require ordinary integrity. Teacher-status magnifies accountability. Long abstractions can evade criticism. Performance spirituality damages community trust. Insight without character becomes confusion. Wholeness must include emotional maturity. Spiritual authority requires character ownership. Fragmented insight can masquerade as revelation. Integrity is the teacher’s real proof. Lineage-honouring prevents narcissistic originality claims. Source-blindness undermines spiritual intelligence. Hidden influence corrupts transmission. Teaching requires disclosure ethics. Originality must know its ancestry. Epistemic intelligence requires self-modelling. Self-modelling separates insight from delusion. Mentalising others limits narcissistic drift. Potential does not erase temporal lapses. Wisdom is knowledge of maturation and maturity is communal infrastructure. Truth needs compassionate decisiveness. Standards shape developmental ecology. Compassion converts struggle into wisdom. Responsibility must outweigh external blame. Self-awareness mediates suffering into growth. Relationship failures are only succeeded with humility. Life should beget greater life and its absence reveals lack of integrated agency that signals purpose. Projection evades self-control which makes discipline the test of sanity. External blame blocks development. Feeling, sentience, agency, reality interrelate. Symbolic architectures matter more than belief as belief is based on architecture of contrast. Trance states may sculpt subconscious intelligence. Skepticism and openness can coexist Nervous-system alignment is central. Embodiment grounds moral language. Physical hardship beats armchair spirituality. Challenge teaches where theory cannot. Meta-revolution reforms consciousness culture. Selfism reframes God-realization developmentally, God-realization becomes self-recognition. Sovereignty must respect everyone’s unique sovereign path. Self-systematisation must serve others eventually. Revolution begins in disciplined selfhood. This persons style is aggressive-transcendent. Humour blends with moral severity. Australian bluntness is signature rhetoric. He moves between tenderness and attack. He prizes standards intensely. He hates degenerative culture. He values warmth inside standards. He deletes material strategically. He wants no filler. Reflection is expeditionary. His rhetoric weaponises metaphor. He uses challenge as status proof. He turns critique into moral theatre. He compresses ideals into slogans. He writes with combative compassion. Moral intensity can become over-attack. Universalism can over-totalise growth. Recursive self-awareness is core technology. Balanced humanism corrects spiritual excess. Life becomes meta-revolutionary training. Deepest complete formula Recursive self-awareness creates self-authorship. Self-authorship enters challenge. Challenge creates embodied proof. Embodied proof matures heroism. Mature heroism becomes Universalism. Universalism integrates sovereignty, love, courage, empathy, nervous-system alignment, integrity, play, and service.

Saying sorry wont help you quit just keep going. Alcohol dosent have sentience. Keep making an ass of yourself its the only way.

Freestyle on the "Flow" entry: ○●■ Two White Doves on Psychedelic Hyperspace Re-entry ■●○ I am preparing for the era in which technological identity displacement from pharmaceuticals to virtual reality becomes a film choice, and a sequel to the film Total Recall that merely dealt with memory loading because knowledge on how identity fragmentation to consolidation worked was hardly even mainstream science in the 1990’s 21st century compounded time means that the 30 years it has taken for someone like me to theorise to a more advanced level on identity than what’s available today across the research, is going to be cut down to less than 6 years from now. In the last 15 years modern Western culture has refined the art of likes and subscriptions on social media faster than it has the ability to generate and act on created memories to enrich identity (enrichment rather than just change being the more accurate way to take it when approached from a healthy space) when we analogise films like Total Recall. Though amidst, psychedelics have forced a revision of the constructive process of identity itself to a level that is now mainstream news to those in the upper levels of scientific understanding across neuroscience, psychiatry and social engineering. Psychedelics are a medium not an endpoint that reveal identity not the self is an Amazon bookstore to choose an identity and expand the reference frame of the perceivable self so greatly, that these implications alone without AI are going to utterly shatter consensus reality as more people learn that identity is an interface to choose within and reconnect memories across identities, not a straitjacket that becomes more socially fixed and other options doxxed overtime. This turns actualisation as a meeting ground, not an endpoint, as the awareness that grows to recruit and compute combinatorial identities across multiple temporal tiers, becomes the offspring to research insights from psychedelics. This converts monolitic demographic to cross-lingualism, from vector to syntax. It’s literally the distance between having your identity curated by the social norms of growing up on a 1930’s farm to being curated by multiple ai’s generating multiple virtual realities simultaneously, at least, that’s where we’re headed. Meandering soap operas in social life no longer become a living space for identity or identity mirroring, they become a dynamically self-charged augmenting closed loop of experiential file sharing, where experiencer becomes the experience itself both within and across dual interfacing. And where the definition of the “living space” will become the sentience communed with itself, this isn’t sharing a reality, this is co-creating augmented symbiosis with a continuous page refresh where the sentience becomes a reality not an interfaced with subjectivity. Pure awareness will replace the idea of an experiencer as the idea of “experiencer” retrocausally reconfigures through its own global feedback loop too quickly for identity output to mirror two to three dimensionally back to itself, precisely analogous to psychedelic experiences, and we will learn to mirror this across virtual reality spaces and as the fields merge, across cognitive thresholds. We think “smarter” today but tomorrow it will be from high glyphic chord to nodal interconnective, from linear symbol to non-linear interrelationalism. This isn’t a transformation, growing or evolving of consciousness it’s an increasing in dimensions that alters the very language of consciousness compute, where the compute itself becomes a wifi network for another. That’s not cognitive gains, that’s a changing of the conversation of reality-self-knowing. This isn’t the edges of knowing never-ending it’s the edges of knowing where all knowing becomes gnosis. As identity no longer becomes a fixed closure point, the language of individual will return back to anti-regressive tribe and tribe back to globe, where self-communication loses its gravitational origins point but gains in anti-gravitational temporal physicalism. Presently, one of the fundamental closure points of identity is not cognitive threshold more than it is mono-viewpoint, as we open up the brains pathways and inwardly and to what it can connect to, that stated 6 year timeline is likely going to start becoming a conversation on awareness that is not just this one singular eye we all have on experience, but for the first time ever, understanding how we can stretch those dimensions. This isn’t biological or even consciousness evolution, this is phenomenological evolution that catalyses these first two. So how do we start restacking our self-insight so we can start if not building towards this relative, at the very least, preparing for it? Imagine you’re a neuron and this neuron has an identity that changes and grows overtime. There are patterned limitations to this, however it has both incubational and stabilising advantages. An identity can co-opt, hijack and maintain itself more easily enabling it to sustain itself across competing environments without losing out to their mirror. Now imagine that there are two neurons like two people where a shared space becomes a creative mirror upon which two identities are upgraded. This is what most close relationships are like by relative degrees, they partake in both the electrical charge and re-myelination of identity forces. This both slightly fragments identity while stabilising the joint zone that indirectly shields from under-incubation of one another’s individuality across competing environments. Continually progressing here and we have and we in return re-imagine the conceptual language on what a group to tribe to social movement to society is and how it functions in the context of identity. Now imagine that the second neuron, is not another person, but another you that you are linked up with. Now keep escalating that rule to an entire society. Analogously, this is what it means to begin shifting the needle on what it means to understand what it looks like to expand the parameters of that single eye we all possess, and where reference frame becomes the feeling of what reading the newspaper was like in the 1930’s, imminent, vital and necessary to survival, to something that no longer even has a headline in how we perceive reality, as the reference point becomes the eye itself, creating the language of self-inter-referentiality. This, is self-insight restacked, and where the meeting ground now is not in trying to grow imagination, but allowing it to grow naturally by learning to just simply tap into a greater number of self-referential points that communicate from multiple spaces. Multiple spaces can mean many different things, the best way is to start with timelines, there are many mainstream ideas like “what would you say to yourself when you were 5 years old if you could go back in time” or in the reverse 50 years down the line or from the perspective of imagining that future self speaking to you. Real or imaginary biographical memory is a starting ground but not the peak or the only valley, you can leverage cross-analogical virtual reality terrain where communication points across two or more virtual reality spaces constantly reconfigure the reality explored. This are the beginnings to learning how to reimagine imagination itself for us humans. And for now, well. Another post will have to be made later. I wrote this all on the fly, let’s see where I extend the flight another day. I am still feeling pretty unwell with this COVID thang, but to me it’s clear my mind is becoming freer and more clearer the more training I am doing in PROJECT : MEANING growing past all old trauma, all my entries now become experimental evidence in determining validity overtime. Please practice psychedelics safely and prudently, I for example am preparing for my main first psychedelic experience twelve months in advance. I was hesitant earlier, however dolloaing my stated extended training, it feels only more and more natural to crash land here.

April 22nd, 2026 Blind Entry title: How the environment becomes sentient. Meta-arrangement of genetic binaries, self-aware status driven augmentation over folded epigenetic-identity loops. Choice driven optionality becomes self-selective rather than an outcome of 'acausal' environmental seduction, or as a chooser of causal social conditioning. Degrees of meta-arrangement of physical identities reflects an adeterministic causal stage of development in agency, the meeting ground between where recursive depth and awareness define the degrees of involuting 'self-time' to mapping ratio that creates a signal that is self-defined. The limit of modelled gradient discent here marks the quality of self-referentiality, where at every stage of advance, reflects not a greatee departure or rebellion (lower but sometimes necessary forms of agency) from the environments causes but rather, a realignment with the depths of its self-similarities. A gap that describes the distance between individual and citizen, but also as well as, how sophisticated ones connection with the surrounding environment ans greater society in which one dwells, is. Sentience's higher role is always to harmonise its relationship with the environment, not to bite the hand that feeds, nor to chain ones freedom to the environments declarations. This is sentiences sight on self-architecture meets the awareness that grows the reward of doing so, a reward that becomes self-instructional, redefining the ground parameters of what encompasses self-discipline outside the environment, while rewarding within it. This is unity with training wheels as a functional typology in action, not just a feeling state, it details how unity is actually just recursion across multiple indices from the cognitive to the emotinal, that are interlocking. This converts "unity" into a space, a meeting ground between all the forces thst make us not just a being, but also teach and continually re-teach us, to be human. And in return, how the environment becomes sentient by the self merely learning to better interlock deeper "meta-data" with the deeper self-states, the "meta-bridges" with the higher consciousness and the awareness that supports it, that produceit. In short, the “Meta-data” narrative built below earlier (same post - deleted from other journal as wrong place) carried to rebuilding the relational bridge between where awareness ends and narrative driven action begins. 21st of April: Hopefully my entries will grow in length again into May, though without compromising relational compression. At the very least, this period of struggling with my health has grown my understanding on the relationship between cognition and inner narrative augmentation of the environment. The “it” from “bit”, as in the impact between cognition on worldview outside prevailing worldviews, a nuance that drives the development of both heinous demographics all the way to the more grounded and inspirationally enlightened. A precious mechanism, that misunderstanding or completely missing, leads to discussions like “the grand psychosis of the masses” all the way to a hyper-inflated self-view from individual to smaller groups that is based on false-positive sampling of the masses themselves, growing an identity through the same very selective comparison that defeats the sanity of masses. The ghost in the machine is meant to stay a ghost, if it doesn’t, this important lesson reveals that said ghost starts chasing phantoms instead of merely learning to spark that light from underneath itself, and return back to heaven. The rightful direction of any healthy awareness, to seek more of itself through its own absence. I can’t hold my attention for very long yet still so I can’t build those compressed sentences in further paragraphs. Super disorientated with a cough but improving in other areas. Relational ability seems slowly returning to normal, or placebo following from yesterday’s insight.

You can distinguish between self-awareness (meta-cognition, meta-consciousness, self-reflection), sentience (feelings, perceptions, senses) and pure consciousness (Consciousness as infinite being, before any I, body, or self). A rock would be pure consciousness, but it is not necessarily sentient (which in the normal worldly realm seems generally related to sense organs) or self-aware (which in the normal worldly realm seems generally related to having big brains and especially complicated social interactions). That said, there is nothing in principle that stops a rock from being sentient or self-aware, but from the perspective of observing things in the world and drawing conclusions about them, you'll probably have a harder time arguing for the sentience and self-awareness of rocks than e.g. pigs or humans.