-
Content count
26,563 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Nahm
-
Nahm replied to VincentArogya's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@VincentArogya Awesome. Congrats. That might explain a lot of what’s coming up. Take it easy on em. -
Nahm replied to Galyna's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Galyna Inspiring thread. ?? -
Nahm replied to VincentArogya's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@VincentArogya That might have something to do with it. From your own place, they can actually be rather enjoyable. Understanding & compassion relative to them is easier as well. -
Nahm replied to confused's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
The two thoughts are really one experience. As you create financial independence you are focusing on what you are wanting, which is really how it is being created. -
Nahm replied to VincentArogya's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@VincentArogya Are you independent? -
Nahm replied to Max1993's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Max1993 Really beautiful. ?? -
Nahm replied to Farnaby's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Farnaby Yes indeed, for sure. That is the final duality we are all trying so hard to arrive at, awareness and scientific measurements. Congrats. -
@RestWithinTheHeart Appearance.
-
Nahm replied to Farnaby's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Farnaby Yes, beyond, prior to, etc...these are really just pointers that thinking will not do. There are no other consciousness states. There appears to be the thought that there are, but the thought “itself” is not even a consciousness state. -
Nahm replied to Farnaby's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
It’s not possible for you to trust you, or anything else. It is also not possible to bring your attention to awareness. It is also not possible that there is a truth of who you are. It is also not possible to identify with a feeling. It is not possible to trust direct experience. A never changing part is not possible. Some calling anything your true self, is also not possible. -
Nahm replied to Kshantivadin's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
The quoted portion denotes the addition of a narrative, of a past & individual experiencing the deja-vu. The pluralizing of deja-vu (in the title) denotes a separate subjective self passing through a separate objective time line in which separate occurrences happen to the separate subjective individual. But maybe this is the very message of the deja-vu, the resolve of the “confusion”. -
Nahm replied to Farnaby's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
It is. You’re bamboozling yourself into & out of the discord & alignment. Watch it happen, scrutinize what you were thinking about & how you were thinking. Think of the activities of your life like categories, and feel the discord or alignment as you think of them anytime. Generally, the discord reveals perspectives rooted in separation, and alignment from perspectives of unification, or unity. Many live their entire life with discord in categories like time, money, relationships, self, etc, never realizing the discord is with the perspective... or, between the bulb & light beam if you will, rather than between the bulb & the light on the wall (which seems separate). If trust is a consideration of direct experience, scrutinize who is trusting (or not), and who or what is being trusted (or not). Also, scrutinize the sensation as well, in regard to how it relates to trust. Listen to the sensation directly, rather than labeling it. You might think of that sensation as a hot coal, and then there is for you to notice which perspectives are the touching of the coal, and why. You might also think about who, in your life and or past, was and or is always touching their coal, and why / how they learned to, and why they keep doing so. Putting aside all doubts includes what anyone else says, as you can never know if what they say is true. If one is to see the truth it is because one looks for oneself beyond what is seen & heard. One can be plenty skeptical and amply scrutinize direct experience, without ever being cynical of individuals, by scrutinizing the direct experience of individuals. -
Nahm replied to Consilience's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Johnny5 Make that sass your Quach, and laugh at the ridiculousness of trying. #4 seems credible. -
Nahm replied to Consilience's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Javfly33 Just start saying Sasquatch instead of ‘ego’. That way you are lighthearted, laughing, and noticing it’s just a thought ‘too’. ?? -
...IS what is, IS ‘the now’...not an identification with it, not an entity incarnated. (Not two)
-
?
-
@capriciousduck I’m not too familiar. Here’s a list of his books though. Very broad range, I would look them over and see if one appeals to you. In case you haven’t seen, there are quite a few videos of him on YouTube as well. Such a pleasure to listen to.
-
Nahm replied to Someone here's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Galyna We tend to frame synchronicity as scary & concerning, or exciting & thrilling. Dreamboard is good for this. -
And before you know it you’re in a rabbit hole of Philosopher AI.
-
@fridjonk I sure don’t.
-
If someone could relate to you, if someone did understand you - what would they know, what would they say? What Would they understand? I remembering feeling like that. I was alone for years, introverted, reclusive, depressed, hopeless & suicidal.
-
lol! It does have walls up! Deflects, projects, employs circular logic, reinforces misunderstandings, etc.
-
Three questions in, and it now says it refuses to talk to me.
-
@Darodos Beautiful man, thank you for taking the time.
