mojsterr

Member
  • Content count

    412
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About mojsterr

  • Rank
    - - -

Personal Information

  • Location
    Slovenia
  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

1,207 profile views
  1. Seems now even Biden is going against Kamala, fun times. The "Dark Brandon". She just keeps getting blasted left and right. From the disastruous 60 minutes interview, to Biden saying everything opposite of what she is saying. He's even doing live conferences right at the same time when she is doing a live somewhere else, just to cut her off. Looks like he's not happy with what they did to him. Ron Desantis is presumably doing an amazing job handling the hurricane situation and Kamala's going against that and keeps saying he's just doing it for the optics and politics. Which is strange, because guess who hasn't done anything and is doing everything for her own optics (spoiler: it's Kamala). And then comes Biden to cut off her live show and says how the people managing the Florida situation are doing an amazing job. Yikes. And in the end there's some pressure on Obama now, because he's the one really responsible for Russa invasion.
  2. What about what Musk said that they are rejecting his help there and sending helicopters with supplies away?
  3. Can you give the exact product you used? Also, how long did you take it to make it go away? Eating it, or what? And you mean CBD oil or the one that also makes you high?
  4. Hope this one wasn't posted yet
  5. I think some people might be big mad in a few months
  6. I used google translate: I. The respondent is granted an interim injunction to avoid one of the The court will impose an administrative fine of up to EUR for each case of infringement 250,000.00 and in the event that this cannot be collected, administrative detention or administrative detention of up to six months and, in the event of a repeat offense, a maximum of two months years, prohibited (as underlined), 1. disseminate and publish the following statements regarding the applicant or to distribute or have published by third parties: “A man who feels like he’s in the wrong body wants to go to a women’s gym in Bavaria train and shower in the only changing room with swimming trunks" (minute 07:41), “A man who feels in the wrong body goes to a women's gym, he would like to register there and train, there is only one changing room there, it is a Women's gym, there are only women there, there is only a collective shower and yes This man doesn't accept being rejected from here because of this feeling of well-being and the safety of the women who are there Then imagine that I can take a shower in swimming trunks, but of course I'll get a no Rejection, then contacts a lawyer again about what he can do if he has one "I'm a complete idiot and just doesn't understand it" (minute 08:17), “But what is now absurd is that he appears to be reporting to a government body that Anti-discrimination agency and then actually causes the supervisor of the Germany's official anti-discrimination agency did not write to him [...] but she then reports to the gym and then even beats her almost like an unofficial fine, compensation for his Infringement of personality a thousand euros, which then also offers this gym this man should pay" (minute 08:51), "She says, 'I think it would be better if this man, woman, cross-person had a thousand Pay compensation for what you suffered?" (minute 10:18), “He still has his cock” (minute 11:51), "The argument that he then wants to shower in swimming trunks is absolute for me unacceptable" (minute 14:25)
  7. Yes I understand that, but now it's becoming to have an opposite effect. Well at least to me anyway.
  8. Does it get on anyone else's nerves how she is always potrayed everywhere as smiling too much? Just gives me fake vibes.
  9. Our podcast episode about the legal drama of a person who was born biologically male but wanted to go to a women's gym - with the support of the Independent Federal Commissioner for Anti-Discrimination, mind you - is now offline. The reason? A decision by the Frankfurt am Main Regional Court that redefines the boundaries between biology, identity and law. 👇🏻 In an expedited procedure, without an oral hearing, the court ruled in favor of the applicant, a transgender woman. Why? Our repeated designation as a "man" was considered a violation of her personal rights because she is "legally and socially recognized as a woman." It is noteworthy that the court saw an "extraordinary urgency" here - as if the use of biologically correct terms posed an immediate danger that could not be delayed. One inevitably wonders whether other, perhaps actually urgent cases had to take a back seat for this. This creates a fascinating dilemma: In Germany, a person who was born biologically male and is legally considered a woman can no longer be called a man. An expression of opinion that the court classifies as a violation of personal rights and even an attack on human dignity and sanctions in expedited proceedings. 🚨 The questions that arise are as explosive as they are uncomfortable: How should a society function in which biological realities and legal fictions come into such a blatant contradiction?