BlueOak

Well Russia is one and they won't be much different to China, North Korea etc. They'll die in droves for the state, either from threatening them or propaganda. The poster said it'll be impossible to convince people. I'm saying they are already ready to do so. If they mean it'll be impossible to convince a democratic country to attack another, no, i've seen it happen before. But it won't even need that it'll just need to be framed as defense. For example, I've seen the almost entire electorate weaponised against immigration and now in the name of economic benefit, which is such a farcical position I wonder if I am living in an alternative universe.

Russia did. Also Russia didn't care and sent them anyway.

As always, on many things, human consciousness remains the same.

Patterns repeat and are updated. Rarely does anything come into my experience that isn't part of an easily identifiable repeating pattern, so when it does, it's huge news. At the moment, the pattern is - Cold War with military build-ups. Bad economic situation. Far-right individuals or parties run most of the military powers. Rising fascist and nationalist themes within the population, demonization of the 'other' throughout it. Changing global dynamics leading to unstable geopolitical situations. China and India are rising, Russia and America are falling, etc. New weapons of war (drones) are changing the balance of power and giving other states ideas, as well as a general lowering the casus belli or justification, for wars. The usual response is war for resources, distraction, land, and influence. This is the pattern that has been repeated for thousands of years. Its just dressed up differently. There are off-ramps but in our current scenario, it requires something like the global superpowers sitting down and telling the world how the new order of things will now be, and then enforcing it. Even if this is done at arms length. That is China reigning in Russia, America reigning in Israel (another reason that war exists), and both powers mapping out how things will now work globally. BRICS and NATO competing does not lead to this outcome; it leads to conflict and war. Essentially a peace could be negotiated now without a hot war.

If progressives really are such a small influence on everything, why does it matter what they say or do? Like it or not, the left is the left. Its multiple voices not one singular voice.

The world is already at war, its just a cold war with small border conflicts currently. Both sides are trying to convince everyone that they are right. Organising chaos in other places wherever they can strike. If anything, Europe is sitting back too much, but gradually waking up bit by bit. Large build ups in Europe, especially Poland, but also Russian build ups in Leningrad and kaliningrad. People always go on about the US trying to ignore Europe but at this point its little to do with the US. It suits their narratives more I guess, but lacks any practical understanding of what's actually happening between THESE SIDE BY SIDE STATES. Also China has stated they are preparing ot invade Taiwan now. This is all going to happen together: Iran attacks Israel and shipping. China attacks Taiwan and shipping. Russia attacks the Baltics and Finland. Because together they have a shot and nobody's throwing nukes over that strategy, it'll be a conventional war. The only uncertainties to me are what happens when Belarus gets nukes, and what happens if Russia decides to nuke Ukraine. Because Belarus is going to be airstriked out of existence, and Putin may get angry enough that he nukes Ukraine. Also where India will stand in it (I guess BRICS economic support against NATO), and if Iran get nukes that'll be very bad in the current climate. *There is still a chance to avoid this but its not likely now.

Given we are on the verge of a major world war, this was israel's most likely method of avoiding conflict on their own soil. I loathed the approach, but i've accepted it.

Masculine. Leadership. Qualities.

Have you read the fifth agreement. https://fourminutebooks.com/the-fifth-agreement-summary/ When I was studying Almine and studying Toltec shamanism, it was in that realm. It works because you are what you focus on, and if you focus on love, you become it and essentially bliss out. But the unresolved things hit you in face, it energetically feels like that.

It suits their political agenda to ignore Europe completely. I've long since said this but nobody's interested because it would make their takes more nuanced and realistic, which would deflate some of their narratives naturally.

Yes. Its embraced socialist aspects that America villainise. We do so in Europe, somewhat, depending on the country. Instead, China villainises liberalism. If any point of the compass is vilified, the country suffers. Authoritarism Socialism + Capitalism Liberalism This is because they are balancing factors. *Western Europe villainizes authoritarianism and the UK demeans socialism, for example.

Quality of life isn't consciousness. Millions of people disappear when disease strikes. Locked in to die. Say one thing outside of the goverment line and disappear. Be a different culture or nation on one of their maps and disappear. Threaten, Threaten, Threaten - Succeed and thus in inspire more threats and war globally. Take any land and sea you want and thus inspire the same and help destabalise the globe. Build endless cities nobodies living in, to sustain fake economic booms - exactly the same as the US (only the US do it with individual homes) There is less corruption in china, that's it. That's why more gets done. The USA has a high degree of corruption, not as high as somewhere like Russia but high. This one party line is objectively wrong.. I could point to 50 countries with one party that are corrupt and their quality of life or domestic situation is terrible. Though a multiparty system is far more stable and less prone to corruption than a two party system, which is one reason America suffers from it. China just tends to execute or be extremely harsh on corruption, which is why they suffer from it less. I actually dislike the chinese as a culture far more than the Russians. The Russians see a threat and they are attacking it, I understand it, I understand them. The chinese culture, outside of China, likes to absorb territory, cultures, and either kill them off, imprison them etc. And then people make threads like this saying how conscious or great they are. Drives me nuts but there you go, great propaganda, have to give them that. *Although I want to add that China still suffers from corruption, for example, in its armed forces. https://www.csis.org/analysis/chinas-waterlogged-missiles-dont-matter But the word 'purge' is used, and it demonstrates what I am talking about, a very harsh response.

By design I didn't mention corporate or progressive because the average person won't either.

AOC is more likeable than both Trump and Newsom but she's a woman, and right now when people are seeking out strong masculine role models, a man wins this election. - Not my bias, I couldn't care less, I am telling you the obvious trend. Trump is already losing because the economic reality is bad at the moment. Though if we all go to war, traditionally, his polls will spike up for a while. The democrats are seen as weak, feminine, old and indecisive. - So you need a leader who is strong, masculine, full of energy and decisive. Who gets to that podium and owns it. Who shows the contrast to Trump, a charismatic but aging leader, who is easily led around on ego, and says the first thing that comes into his head (if he can remember it). We are close to war, we need stability, a cool but firm hand on the reins, who will descalate but not be a doormat or appease - appease - appease, and if it comes to it fight but remain rational and fight to stabilise, hold and cool the situation off, rather than escalate.

Love is the highest goal of all beings on planet earth So you could love Hard Kill's reaction here for example. Love doesn't mean you start wanting, agreeing with, or condoning it, or you stop trying to make a better life for yourself or others. You realise Trump (that part of yourself) needs healing, for example. So any actions taken could reflect that.