Breakingthewall

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    16,456

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Breakingthewall

  1. Posted · Edited by Breakingthewall

    15 minutes ago, Nilsi said:

    No offense, but I find your taste in art - especially music - to be really poor. Honestly, it’s almost offensively bad to me.

    So throwing around claims of "great taste" like that feels a bit flippant, if you ask me.

    Art is about how deep it touch in you, saying that I have good taste is vane and egoic, it's just my taste, the important is the intensity and the high feeling, it could be very different depending the person

     

    8 minutes ago, The Crocodile said:

    To me the painting you posted looks pretty ugly. Just high-contrast, garish, total lack of meaning. Lack of form, lack of aesthetic, tasteless failure!

    Very different way to feel the same thing. Interesting. I listen Rammstein and for me it's like the orchestras or the heaven unleashed, and for another could be a real shit. Different buttons, different structure of the mind doesn't mean than one is right and another wrong

  3. Posted

    2 minutes ago, Vynce said:

    ..just because it does that to you, doesn't mean a 6 year old or a bad AI couldn't do that as well. And this puts people off. Most like to imagine skill behind art and work. But if thats not important to you, thats fine I guess.

    Well an AI could do any kind of paint. A 6 years old no, in that paint you perceive the order, the intention and inspiration 

  4. Posted · Edited by Breakingthewall

    4 minutes ago, Nilsi said:

    Just to make sure we’re on the same page: we are talking about the same Catholic Church that once made a fortune selling what were essentially “get out of jail free cards” (indulgences) to their followers, under the threat that they’d burn in hell for eternity otherwise, right? Just because some 21st-century pope declared that “hell doesn’t exist” doesn’t suddenly absolve the Catholic Church of its past.

    Let’s not forget that there are Islamic scholars who’ve made similar claims, such as suggesting that “hell might eventually cease to exist.” Moreover, in Islamic theology, hell is not eternal for believers, which arguably makes it more mild than the traditional Catholic view. So, we need to approach this with a lot more nuance, as I can’t help but notice a strong anti-Islam bias in your arguments.

    The Catholic Church has been extremist and dictatorial, and if it had been attacked it would have responded with war, as it has done countless times. But in those days people walked around with swords in the streets, and in every generation there were three wars. In Iran people drive cars and have Internet. 

    About the hell, the question is if Islam could do the same or it's totally impossible 

  6. Posted · Edited by Breakingthewall

    1 hour ago, Sempiternity said:


    I personally do not get painting like this. To me art is something that takes talent, as in something very few people can do, as in the artist took years crafting a skill. Anyone with paint scrapper and some paint can do this painting. A 10-year-old could do this painting. Requires no talent, just scrapping paint in random patterns, done in a few minutes. 

     that paint harmonizes with your mind and touches your interior. Its combination of shape and color transmiit an open, clean, clear, deep and precise spirit

  7. Posted · Edited by Breakingthewall

    15 minutes ago, Nilsi said:

    The problem with Islam is that its eschatology is so radical, and the descriptions of paradise and hell so vivid and extreme, that the afterlife becomes the central focus of everything. This fixation leads to paranoiac behaviors, like cloaking women from head to toe to eliminate even the slightest chance of sin’s seductive influence.

    And as psychoanalysis teaches us, repression always leads to neurosis and often manifests in precisely the most extreme form of what has been repressed, in deeply ironic ways. So, it’s no surprise that some of the most repressive and God-fearing cultures often produce the most godless acts of violence and depravity.

    That's a good analysis, Islam threatens directly, but also allows the use of violence. Jesus or Buddha never speak of violence or war except to condemn it. Mohammed does, it is an essential difference.

    Another essential difference is that Christianity has precepts of universal moral: don't steal, don't kill, don't have sex like fun (now seems fool but without contraceptives, abortion or medicine it was dramatic), and another normal rules. 

    Islam have precepts like a dictator would do: don't eat pork, don't drink, do that, don't do that, obey because it's my will. 

  8. Posted · Edited by Breakingthewall

    35 minutes ago, aurum said:

    This is an extremely biased perspective.

    You could easily argue that every major religion has those three elements.

    I mean the final message, the concept that they transmit in it's base. You can misinterpreting the bible, but its final message is love and forgiveness, although the fear of hell is one of its pillars. Institutionalized Christianity has been repressive, castrating, creating sad, strange, false beings in many cases, but many free and creative spirits arise in Christianity .  it is easy to interpret it as a religion of love, solidarity, forgiveness, tolerance, if you want to do so. Islam seems impossible, despite that the sufis tried

  9. Posted

    16 hours ago, Juns said:

    @Leo Gura But your thoughts and concepts are made of the same "substance" as your hand, right? That substance being consciousness. So why do you feel as if the hand is more "actual" and real?

    I guess the response to that could be that the picture of the pizza is made of atoms and so is the pizza but they are not the same I guess. 

    They are different, they come from a different source, perception comes from the senses and the brain creates the images and sounds, ideas are created by the brain independent of the perception, then they are not solid, are just waves without any real base, just appearances that the human mind creates due it's movement. Human mind is a crazy machine, it scape from the solidity of the 3 dimensions and open itself to another dimension, then it can look inside. 

  10. Posted

    Islam, regardless of debates about its spirituality, Sufism, its level of spiritual truth, is an ideology that creates an enormous level of abuse and domination of men over women. Millions of women are forced into something as transcendent for a human being as marriage using violence. It doesn't seem like a very nice thing. It also generates enormous hypocrisy. Muslims are a bunch of fakes, since according to their religion they should all be saints, and any deviation is despicable. Shame and contempt for themselves as humans makes them false, twisted, dark. In short, it's a big piece of shit.

    Ancient fanatic Christianity is negative and limiting, but in the end the message of Christianity is: love. That of Islam is: obey. That of Buddhism is: realize yourself. One of them seems quite negative. What could be its evolution?

  11. Posted

    @M A J I  

    Your approach to spirituality has a premise that I don't see. You seem to believe that human reality is not as it should be, that it has deviated from the path it should have taken. This is impossible, there is not a boson in the universe out of its exact place in total synchrony with the rest of the universe.

    Yes, being human has a side that we perceive as totally negative. Human life is full of real emotional pain. Animals invent physical pain to evolve, plants do not have that quality. Humans invent emotional pain as a species, so we evolve faster with more pain. Spirituality usually starts to escape from pain, without emotional pain there is no evolution or real impulse to awaken. So unfortunately, human life is right where it needs to be.

  12. Posted

    It seems that reality reflects itself and is aware of itself, to do so it creates an apparent movement, a vibration, a ripple of reality which is the most basic thing that could be called existence, since that which is absolutely still does not occur nor is it aware of itself, it is dormant potential, nothing that is potentially everything.

    The reflection of reality in itself repeats itself infinitely, since there are no limits. These undulations organize themselves in stable synchronic patterns that create increasingly complex cyclical forms that exist in multiple dimensional levels at the same time, probably infinite levels.

    Each cycle is part of a greater cycle that restarts taking as a base the previous cycle, and well, in short, here you are vibrating in infinite dimensions increasing the depth of your consciousness to restart a new cycle synchronized with the infinity 

  13. Posted

    37 minutes ago, M A J I said:

    When one returns to absolute awareness or presence, enlightenment is right there, as it always was from the beginning.

     

    Edited 30 minutes ago by M A J I

    1 hour ago, M A J I said:

     

    Let's see, it's obvious that the absolute reality is equally absolute if you realize it or not, but what we call enlightenment is precisely realizing it, then you are enlightened only if you realize it, even it's exactly the same if you don't do

  14. Posted

    4 minutes ago, M A J I said:

    Sometimes I wonder why I even comment, people online continue to misunderstand the deeper things in life. I can often resolve every misunderstanding in person in a few minutes or less, and often all it takes is a simple gaze into the eyes to recognize the truth, because there is a whole level of communication and energy-exchange that is missing online and through texting. It is a very small fraction of true and total communication.

    What we are trying to convey to each other is ultimately the same thing, my initial comment was perfect as it was, there was no need to complicate or correct it. If you would of expanded your awareness you would of understood what was truly meant, yet you had to play the ego-correction game.

    It only reveals where your level of illumination dwells.

     

    You are talking about human construction, soul, karma, anything. But those are constructions of the reality, same than life, intelligence or anything else. That's not enlightenment. Enlightenment is the real material of reality, the ultimate nature, the absolute that we are, and this is beyond of good and bad, intuition or anything else, it's not human, it's absolute vastness and few dare to really open themselves to that, because the human is very sticky, very difficult to remove.

  15. Posted · Edited by Breakingthewall

    9 hours ago, The Crocodile said:

    Which is why different levels of comprehension of reality can exist.

    There is a total level, that's the comprehension of the ultimate nature of reality, of the substance, the material of the reality. 

    Then infinite combinations occur. Intelligence is not the essence of reality, it is the consequence of the inevitable infinite synchronicity of the manifestation of reality. The non-synchronous to infinite power cannot appear, therefore only the infinitely intelligent appears, since anything else does not.

    Any appearance is simply an appearance, undulatory movements in the infinite, which really only move relative to themselves, since in an infinite frame real movement is impossible as there is no difference between one place or another, since infinity is not a dimension, it is the potential for the appearance of dimensions. The only essence of the reality is the absence of limitations, that's the same than saying that it's nothing, that's the source of everything that ultimately is unreal movement in nowhere, but it's real because it's concious of itself, then at the end the manifested reality is conciousness , the potential reality is unconsciousness, both are two faces of the same, the absolute 

  16. Posted

    8 hours ago, M A J I said:

    There is a you that you have forgotten about, that was and is always there, this is your true nature or true self. That you is and always was eternally enlightened

    what is your true nature is the absence of limitations, the infinite being, that is not a you. The big you that wants things and is wise is a fantasy, a bigger identification. There is not any god playing, there is just a natural phenomena, the infinite being creating more and more complex structures because it's it's nature. What you are is the empty nature of existence that contains infinite possibilities or potential. It's obvious that you can't see it because for you there is good and bad. Any differentiation or bias is just human, and and it takes you infinitely away from your true nature. You can be one in your true nature or divided, there is no middle ground.

  17. Posted

    3 minutes ago, Ishanga said:

    he proves it to a Fool like You, he will have to prove it to another Fool that is just like You

    Fool maybe could be you, and quite deeply. just a possibility.

    Anyway ,he could show to a scientist, with cameras, a lot of computers, scanners, magnetic resonance, etc, and then they will gain the Nobel price

  18. Posted

    Just now, M A J I said:

    You guys are both in delusions. You clearly haven't experienced or are in Awareness of what I share.

    You both say a lot of words yet nothing at all. No substance or grounded truth behind it. All neo-spiritual/neo-advaita nonsense.

    🤣🤣🤣🤣 Now I also see that you are another fake. It's so easy to see . You don't understand nothing, you are floating in your utopia of natural beauty. You are lost, and in your arrogance, without any hope or possiblity in this life. Good luck in next

  20. Posted

    10 minutes ago, M A J I said:

    Everyone is enlightened, not everyone is in (Awareness) of their enlightenment.

    No, almost no one is enlightened. Being enlightened is be conscious of yourself as the unlimited reality. If you are concious of yourself as a limited human you are not enlightened . Enlightenment is in the mind and in the heart. The mind shows what you are in extension, the heart what you are in depth 

  21. Posted

    @Ishanga if I d tell you how much experience I have with scammers you wouldn't believe me. It's my karma🤣, I found some super sophisticated, I see through them like they are transparent. Please, give place to the possibility that I'm right. Life is only one, that guy is not leading you to enlightenment, is just religion, lie. Truth is only one, and you are that. You could be absolutely open to it 

  23. Posted

    Just now, The Crocodile said:

    There's just so much bullshit, it's too much to explain.

    Anyway, sadhguru in this video shows without any doubt that he's absolutely liar

    For me is hard to listen, it's a basic scammer. Yes of course, it's very good never get angry, then he don't show miracles, because it's less important. Ahhhh ok, understood.