DocWatts

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    2,219

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DocWatts

  2. Posted · Edited by DocWatts

    7 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

    @Soulbass Cyberpunk is a beautiful world. Too bad they didn't do that beauty justice with their rushed corpo release. This game clearly needed 1 more full year of development. Then it would have been a 9 or 10 out of 10 and sold 40 million copies.

    I'm guessing they will lose 10 million copies of sales with their bad PR over the game's full lifecycle. Stupid management mistake.

    Even worse when you realize that some poor shmucks spent 7 - 8 years of their life working on this game while it was in development hell, only to have eight years of work squandered to some degree by management pushing to release the game before it was ready, and insisting that the game be squeezed down to a barely functional shell for older console hardware.

  3. Posted · Edited by DocWatts

    7 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

    Many problems with capitalism could simply be fixed by passing a few rock solid laws.

    • No ownership of stock without being employed by the company
    • No corporate lobbying
    • No corporate political contributions
    • No buying of other big corporations by big corporations
    • Salary caps for executives and management
    • No arbitration clauses in contracts
    • No criminal liability protections for executives
    • No off-shore tax havens and corp tax loopholes
    • All employees get representation on corporate board
    • All employees get profit sharing
    • Higher taxes on successful wealthy corporations
    • Strict environmental regulations
    • Severe fines for corporate fraud or mismanagement

    Simple laws like that, when rigorously enforced, would fix many problems.

    These laws are not that difficult to make work. It's just almost impossible to pass them in Congress.

    Good evidence for why we need to fix our Democratic Institutions before we can make real headway on this or a host of other issues. If Corporations can just buy politicians through legalized bribery, aka Lobbying, and can spend unlimited amounts of money to influence elections,all of these Reforms are pretty much dead in the water. 

    Capture of the Political System by Corporations and the Wealthy Elite is a Root Cause that needs to be solved first. Overturning Citizens United and revoking Corporate Personhood would be a good first step, but there's also decades of Fear Mongering against any and all Reforms to Capitalism that needs to be fought against.

    As sad as is to say, I wonder if it might be a situation where it will take the Boomers, who haven't suffered to the same degree under Late Stage Capitalism, dying off from Old Age before we have any realistic chance for making substantive reforms.

  5. Posted

    The challenge is to find a system that retains the good parts of capitalism, namely its marked success in generating wealth and fostering innovation, while transcending its limitations - its inability to deal with externalities such as Climate Change, and the distribution problem where its gains are shared so unequally that it begins to distort Democracy and threaten the stability of the whole system. Transcend, and include...

    Social Democracy, Market Socialism, and a Resource Based Economy are all possible outgrowths of Capitalism that fix some of its associated problems, but whatever system ends up supplanting it will need to be adopted gradually, rather than being imposed in short order; social revolutions have a bad track record of actually making life better for people living under it.

    I could see the United States transitioning to the beginnings of a Social Democracy over the course of my life, as it seems like the next logical step from where we're at right now, but anything beyond that is just speculation...

     

  6. Posted · Edited by DocWatts

    8 minutes ago, datamonster said:

    Those would be the big dudes of silicon valley like elon musk, jeff bezos, bill Gates, etc.

    Jeff Bazos is pure Orange imo. Elon Musk is more of blend of Orange and Green.

    Bill Gates made his billions in an Orange paradigm, but due to his philanthropic work and his pledge to give away almost all of his Wealth to the poorest people in the World, that he's solidly Green by this point, maybe even Yellow in some respects.

  7. Posted · Edited by DocWatts

    Oh and of course Knights of the Old Republic 2, which was a philosophical deconstruction of Star Wars, written by the same person who wrote Planescape Torment, Chris Avellone. Puts the Ideology of the various factions in the setting under a microscope, and explores many of the implications of those belief systems in nuanced and interesting ways.

    It might have perhaps the best written character I've ever encountered in a game as well.
     

     

  9. Posted

    4 hours ago, Yog said:

    A game about spirituality and philosophy.

    I've never seen a game written this well. There is so much depth in it.

    You can play the combat part but its not mandatory, most things can be solved with dialogue, its almost a game-book. Its meant to be played this way .

    You start of as a castoff of the Changing God, falling from the sky. You are trying to escape from an ancient Lovecraftian scope being, The Sorrow. It is trying to hunt you down and devour you, because you cheated death, not sure if physically, but it tries to break into your mind.

    There are ways you can get into the maze of your mind and play there instead of the "real world". You will need to go there in order to finish some quests. Its a very deep game, but be aware that there is a lot of reading, good and hypnotizing reading.

    Don't forget to chose the "scan thoughts" skill at the start, its much more fun with it. There are more dialogue choices, people talking weird stuff in their heads, some are empty, some are hilarious.

    I see @Leo Gura liked Disco Elysium, well I am sure he will like this one too ;)
     

     

     

    Please tell me you've played Planescape Torment, this game's spiritual predecessor ^_^

  10. Posted · Edited by DocWatts

    I'll caveat this by admitting that I haven't made my way through the entire series yet (a lot of ideas to consider and unpack, and not the sort of thing I can just put on in the background and listen to while writing code for my day job), but wouldn't a more accurate name for this series be Deconstructing the Myth of Materialist Reductionism?

    Not sure if this was intentional or not, but your mention in part one of trying to study a frog by putting it through a blender and then looking at its cells under a microscope brings to mind a famous essay by the philosopher Thomas Nagel called What Is It Like to Be a Bat?, which raises many of the same points you do about the limitations of Materialist Reductionism.

    In Part One, I do wonder if maybe you're conflating fields of knowledge which are Scientifically Informed  from the process of Scientific Discovery. Hell, even the Catholic Church has updated its worldview in response to scientific discoveries. I also wonder whether trying to come up with clear boundaries for what is or is not Science ultimately becomes a questions of semantics at some point, rather than being helpful for the purposes of clarity. 

    Great series so far by the way. I think your videos are fantastic at bringing up questions of epistemology for things that go unquestioned in the broader culture, even if I end up disagreeing with some of the points you make.

     

  11. Posted

    34 minutes ago, louhad said:

    Lol, do you think that academia is left-leaning because George Soros and Bernie are paying off professors and intellectuals to make it easier to turn America into Venezuela or some shit?

    I challenge you to actually maybe read some Marx, read some chomsky, read some zizek, or at least go watch some of their lectures online to start with an open mind... try to challenge yourself to actually see the world through their lens rather than through the filter of your own value systems and worldviews. 

    There are limitations to left ideology as with every other ideology. Also, whether an ideology is useful is entirely contextual. That said, Left-leaning ideology is more sophisticated, more open-minded, and paints a much more holistic picture of the world than conservative ideologies. This is why academia has a left bias. In the same way Orange enlightenment ideology was better equipped to solve the social and economic dysfunctions of the late middle ages/renaissance than blue religious ideology, Green leftist ideology is better equipped to facilitate our collective long-term survival than orange neo-liberal/conservative ideologies in the 21st century. 

    Well said.

  12. Posted

    @Keyhole Using punitive measures like Fines is about all that we have left to fall back on, unfortunate though that may be. It wouldn't have to even be that expensive of a fine, it could be as low as $30 or $40 as long as it was strictly enforced. Psychological research supports this, as punitive measure that tend to work tend to be ones that impose minor to moderate penalties but are strictly enforced.

  13. Posted · Edited by DocWatts

    On 12/18/2020 at 6:50 AM, Keyhole said:

    I would not.  They won't do it if you tell them.  If I see someone without before they get on the bus I ask if they want an extra one and that's it.

    Yeah an ego backlash is the most likely result from this. Since America has somehow politicized a Virus, and not wearing a mask has somehow morphed into a low-iq political statement, I don't see another way to deal with this other than denying people not wearing a mask entry to public spaces, and by fining people who violate mask orders.

  14. Posted · Edited by DocWatts

    If education pushes people away from Conservatism, if anything that's more indicative of Conservativism being an outdated ideology that people tend to move beyond as they learn more about the world, rather than an imagined plot in the minds of Conservatives to push a Left Wing agenda.

    Also the point I was making is that k-12 education can tend to skew Conservative in Conservative regions of the country (and more Liberal in Liberal regions of the Country). Simple reason for this is that school curriculums are set more by local and state education boards than they are by the Federal government.

    Academics in Higher Education do tend to be more Left leaning, but is that really any more of a surprise (or cause for alarm) than the prevalence of Conservatism in the Military or Police? Academia tends to promotes open mindedness and skepticism, while the military promotes honor, duty, and obedience to authority; no great mystery why those on the Left gravitate more towards the former, and those on the Right gravitate more towards the latter. Not even necessarily a bad thing.

  15. Posted · Edited by DocWatts

    21 minutes ago, Claymoree said:

    Maybe problem is somewhere else , clearly conservatives are not in charge of  education . 

    The current Secretary of Education, Betsey Devos, is a right wing Corporate shill with a huge conflict of interest due to her financial ties to privatized educational institutions.

    The people who approve education curriculums for k-12 schools, where the aforementioned white washing is inculcated into people at a young age, are often very Conservative in many parts of the country.

    The 'Cultural Marxism' idea that's being alluded to is little more than a Conspiracy Theory and scare tactic used in Bad Faith arguments to undermine progressive ideas and movements, basically McCarthyism 2.0. The idea was first brought to prominence by fascist ideologues as part of a belief in a world wide Jewish Conspiracy, and today the term is often used as a dog whistle for anti-Semitism and white nationalism.

  16. Posted · Edited by DocWatts

    52 minutes ago, eggopm3 said:

    Woah hot movie take from Leo. xD

    Tbh I enjoyed Blade Runner 2049 more than the original by quite a large margin.

    He's actually probably my favorite filmmaker. I find deep spiritual profundity in his work, which only grows deeper when I rewatch them. But it's certainly not hard to see why he can be radically displeasing for the majority of people. 

    I wholeheartedly agree with Blade Runner 2049 being an improvement on the original.

    As for David Lynch, I can absolutely see the glimpses of the brilliance that goes in to his films, thing is though they're just kind of unpleasant to watch.  Never felt more uncomfortable watching a movie than I did for Eraserhead and Blue Velvet. And the less said about his Dune adaptation, the better (seems like a really odd choice for that particular movie).

    Won't begrudge anyone who doesn't have that hangup and loves his films though, and I suppose it's possible that those two examples aren't necessarily representative of his whole filmography.

     

  17. Posted · Edited by DocWatts

    25 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

    Bladerunner is the most overrated movie of all time. Its story is garbage. Its characters are garbage.

    Well that's a Bold Statement. Sorry nothing in the movie resonated with you at all, aside from maybe the visuals. I think you'll find a lot of people disagree with you on that, and find the film to be both incredibly well made and emotionally moving. 

    I guess maybe I get it though, I suppose I could probably think of an example or two of a film that's very highly regarded that just didn't click with me on a subjective level. David Lynch's films come to mind...

  18. Posted

    8 minutes ago, Heart of Space said:

    Lol, ya man, I'm a huge fan of that film.  I will say my first viewing was the final cut which I do think is far superior to the original.  The original had that cheesy narration and goofy happy ending that the suits in the boardroom tacked on because they thought the dark ending wasn't "audience friendly."  

    Yeah the original cut is one of the most infamous cases in all of cinema of executive meddling being detrimental to an otherwise great film. I'm just glad that a cut closer to the original vision was eventually released. 

    Also the stylistic aspects that Leo mentioned aren't there just to be eye catching or cool, they're deliberately used for a number of symbolic and thematic purposes that tie directly in to the ideas the movie is trying to convey.

  20. Posted

    If you're alluding to monopolistic tech giants like Apple or Google, then no. Despite promoting some Green social attitudes as part of thier company Culture, thier structure and business practices are still solidly Orange.

    Green businesses do of course exist, but the sort of ruthlessness needed to become a 'filthy rich' monopoly aren't congruent with stage Green values. A stage Green business structure would be more along the lines of something like a worker-owned cooperative, which do exist, but are nowhere near the size of the largest traditionally run corporations.

    Not pure Green, but I can think of a few large Companies that are more of a blend of Orange and Green. Costco comes to mind for paying its workers a living wage in an industry that's infamous for starvation pay, and for ita business model of buying and selling in bulk being less ecologically wasteful than its competitors. Perhaps Valve as well, for its relatively pro-consumer practices for its digital content distribution platform, Steam.

     

  22. Posted · Edited by DocWatts

    Another excellent video from Second Thought. I know the whitewashing of controversial historical figures isn't unique to America, but from a firsthand perspective this is highly pervasive in the United States, to the point where I've seen incredibly ignorant Conservatives use out of context MLK or Malcolm X quotes to try and somehow 'debunk' social justice movements like BlackLivesMatter.

    She wasn't mentioned in the video, but Helen Keller is another example that comes to mind. Most American school children only learn how she overcame blindness and deafness to communicate with the outside world and lead a productive life, while completely overlooking what she spent the rest of her life fighting for; namely social and economic justice for poor and disabled people through her advocacy of Socialist ideals and reforms.
     

     

  23. Posted · Edited by DocWatts

    1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

    Just like Bladerunner, the visuals are cool but the movie itself sucks. All surface, no depths.

    Heresy! I think I might disagree more passionately when it comes to subjective tastes in Cinema than for epistemology or politics  :P

    Though I'll concede that Blade Runner 2049 built upon the foundation that the Blade Runner built, and used that to make an arguably better movie. 

    Getting back to Cyberpunk, a normal game development cycle for a AAA game is 3 - 4 years. No game spends 8 years in development without having major issues. Glad the CDPR devs aren't getting completely screwed out of thier Bonuses at least, I can't imagine anyone who's poured years of thier lives into the game is happy about the state the game launched at, due to rushing to meet a deadline and an ill advised attempt to squeeze the game onto 7 year old console hardware.