Sucuk Ekmek

This observation feels quite true to me, and I believe it can be dangerous, both for ourselves and for others. When we become completely absorbed in something outside ourselves, it’s as if we are being pulled into an external gravitational field. In that state, we lose awareness of our own presence, our own inner landscape. What’s more troubling is that we don’t even notice this shift. Our attention gets hijacked, and we drift away from the world, and also our own inner grounding. In our current era, I believe we are living in a kind of permanent flow state; not the healthy, focused kind described in wikipedia, but rather a state of constant immersion in stimuli, distractions, and external narratives. It mimics flow, but lacks rootedness. It’s a form of disembodied engagement that can numb critical awareness. That’s why I would place self above non-duality. While in a ''positive sense and perhaps in common meaning'' non-duality emphasizes dissolution of boundaries and the merging with the “other,” I believe reclaiming a grounded sense of self is more vital in this time. We need a clear sense of who we are and where we stand before we can afford to dissolve into anything. I think, as long as average person is ''self'' it doesn't matter. Today I didn't ''notice'' any non-duality during my daily routine, in fact for me non duality is a study&practice ground, like actually doing something.

Of course it depends on your situation. If you're not living in a first-world country, for most young workers out there, online is the way to go. I never seen one with such life purporse. It’s not always about the money—real sex offers a chance to build a meaningful network, if you know how to filter out average clients. Older gen. workers often had doctors, lawyers, accountants, and others in their circle. There was a real social aspect to it, even if it was rooted in mutual benefit. I’m talking about a small percentage of workers who actually built their networks— to me, this also seem like a viable way which I suppose more beneficial for the worker. I know I am only good as my presuppositions. Perhaps another time Princess.

Online sexual services are much more desireable from women perspective, it offers the most safety, wide customer base, less mental stress. These type of service providers even refuse to provide real sex despite it's being more profitable, don't ask me how I know it. I blame men, they shape the market and they are lazy af.

He is a smart dude. @14:45 is a good example

I am sure you will recall lots of things from him.

The thing is, it's easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled. I mean, only a master vampire can get other vampires to drink animal blood instead of human blood.

Truth is any cast shadow is a rape.

Muse did postpone their Istanbul concert due to involment from audience. This is shows coorperations are indeed vulnerable and they can't do whatever they want, if they want to milk capital, they should stick with their "right wing" people. I think you westerners should do that too.

Do we still have symbiotic culture chambers that decides what is is and what is not? In my country, I see people from, let's say, the opposite faction—or rather, the opposite "knowledge field"—because things are starting to move beyond the realm of politics, even if just a little. People are taking matters into their own hands, disrupting the exchange between those who define what is and what is not—those who benefit from others without giving anything back—while exposing them for taking more and more. For example, people are trying to be more conscious about their attention and resources. There's a Muse concert hosted by an organization with close ties to the government. People are angry about this and are even threatening their friends—saying that if they attend the concert, their friendship is over. It looks like Stage Green is forcing its will upon itself to create a more solidified & defined ground. This seems more like an "us versus us" scenario rather than the easy "us versus them." How about your place? When practicing daily life as a collective, larger cultural chamber, do you take your personal worldview into consideration and impose your will on your cultural chamber? What I noticed is constant action from, again, let's say, the opposite knowledge field because participants are not only pro-X or pro-Y. It would be wrong to use the terms "right" or "left." So this constant action I'm talking about caused interesting things to happen—like, who would have thought a bunch of right-wingers would defend a canceled, secular-looking franchise managed by a religious-looking businessman? These right wingers got alienated by other culture chambers in the process.

If each state has AI like citizens there would be no collapse for a potential virtual state, then the whole concept of nation state becomes blurry. There are things to own and to protect, if these go away nation state would go away too.

Mine always looks like piegon droppings...

https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/1j9zwt2/come_on_down_to_the_white_house_tesla_auto_mall/

I need help with AI- models, my aim is diagnosing electrical circuits. So far only chat gpt allows me to feed the schematic to it's system, others are refusing the JPG,PDF or whatever is the visual format. It also does better technical analysis and suggestions. I like how flexible it is, I can just printscreen and feed whatever is on the screen right now. Other models felt like assistants, meanwhile gpt takes the lead and comes up with suggestions and comparisons, it is not able to reverse engineer the circuit but able to show the road for a novice electrician like me. Any advice for better efficiency or better platforms to work on?

If the question questions the questioner, does the one who asks the question get questioned?

Thanks ! Indeed it's acrylic, super easy to use.