Scott Ritter: Hezbollah won't fight in Gaza, Israel will fail, Palestinian State will

[Raze]

Interesting alternative perspective. He does a good job explaining what Hamas and Hezbollah may be thinking that mainstream sources aren’t mentioning. 

[Nivsch]

6 hours ago, Raze said:

Interesting alternative perspective. He does a good job explaining what Hamas and Hezbollah may be thinking that mainstream sources aren’t mentioning. 

Quite naive. Hezbollah is Iran's proxy and an arm of the Islamin Revolitionary Guard Corps of Iran (Since 1979) who was one of the causes of destabilization in Lebanon, along with other palestinian terror organizations who took over Lebanon and caused a war between them and local groups.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_insurgency_in_South_Lebanon

Also his passion in his eyes when he says Israel "cannot win the war" or there "will be a ceasefire!" exposes his bias in one hand and his lack of understanding and familiarity with Israel in the other hand. Yes there "will be a ceasefire" after 1200 Israelis been killed and while our 240 hostages are still there. Absurdity. Neither fair nor developed perspective at all.

Edited November 11, 2023 by Nivsch

[Lila9]

Just another hater. 

[zazen]

3 hours ago, Lila9 said:

Just another hater. 

 

[DawnC]

7 minutes ago, zazen said:

 

Just a warning: This guy's got poison under his candy wrapper. An honest opinion columnist reaches their point by delving into important questions. A dishonest one already possesses a predetermined viewpoint and maneuvers in circles, searching for an intellectual path that aligns with their agenda.

[PurpleTree]

Who is this  scott grifter guy and why should we care?

[zazen]

2 hours ago, Nabd said:

As a general rule of thumb, Muslims like this middle nation guy (middle nation is a phrase by Mohammad) cannot be trusted with their judgments or assessments.

Its like asking a mad religious Zionist about their opinion on Palestine.

 

2 hours ago, DawnC said:

Just a warning: This guy's got poison under his candy wrapper. An honest opinion columnist reaches their point by delving into important questions. A dishonest one already possesses a predetermined viewpoint and maneuvers in circles, searching for an intellectual path that aligns with their agenda.

Curios to know what viewpoints you guys disagree on within the video. Before assuming he's a radical Islamist you can check this video where he critiques the Islamists obsession with establishing Islamic state for example:

 

[Raze]

1 hour ago, zazen said:

 

Curios to know what viewpoints you guys disagree on within the video. Before assuming he's a radical Islamist you can check this video where he critiques the Islamists obsession with establishing Islamic state for example:

 

They have to attack the source to avoid entertaining to any criticism countering the pro IDF side. They’ve been doing it for weeks now, in their world if you aren’t pro Israel you must be some bad actor who can’t be considered. 

[DawnC]

28 minutes ago, zazen said:

Curios to know what viewpoints you guys disagree on within the video. 

Ask yourself: What question is this person allegedly trying to answer in that video? It seems that the question is, 'Why do non-Jews support Zionism?' and his response is 'antisemitism.' But is he truly addressing this question seriously? The fact that he exclusively focuses on attributing it to antisemitism suggests a lack of sincere interest in exploring the issue. He is just crafting an answer that aligns with his existing worldview. Actually, He is not even interested in the question. In this specific context, people support and supported Zionism for various reasons, including religious beliefs, compassion for Jews and humanitarian concerns (especially after WW2), cultural similarities, as well as geopolitical, economic, and technological considerations, rather than it being rooted in antisemitism. His argument that the support of Zionism is rooted in antisemitism and his examples are more fantasy than reality.