My dreams are about future real life events?

[Carl-Richard]

I just want to show how ridiculous that PsychedSubstance dream was. I will also elaborate that I literally was inside his house in the dream and I got the sense he got kicked out, and then we sat on one of those big concrete stairs-like things in a city and he looked really lost for words staring down and into the air and I asked him "so, what now?".

Imagine we're in a city sitting at a café near the city square and I say for example that "within seven seconds",

1. "Derek from More Plates More Dates will walk up in front of us and get robbed at gunpoint".

2. "Oliver Tree will crash a helicopter into the city square".

3. "Michael Jackson's son will arrive and start dancing to 'Beat It' while a big dancing crew emerges in a flash mob".

Then that is exactly what happens. What would you think then? Just a coincidence? Or did I maybe have a glimpse into the future?

The way I constructed those examples is that they involve a semi-famous person that engage in an action they have most likely never done before, within a short time frame of me predicting/conceiving of it (i.e. analogous to the PsychedSubstance dream event).

Edited Wednesday at 01:11 PM by Carl-Richard

[Inliytened1]

20 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

I just want to show how ridiculous that PsychedSubstance dream was. I will also elaborate that I literally was inside his house in the dream and I got the sense he got kicked out, and then we sat on one of those big concrete stairs-like things in a city and he looked really lost for words staring down and into the air and I asked him "so, what now?".

Imagine we're in a city sitting at a cafe near the city square and I say for example that "within seven seconds",

1. "Derek from More Plates More Dates will walk up in front of us and get robbed at gunpoint".

2. "Oliver Tree will crash a helicopter into the city square".

3. "Michael Jackson's son will arrive and start dancing to "Beat It" while a big dancing crew emerges in a flash mob".

Then that is exactly what happens. What would you think then? Just a coincidence? Or did I maybe have a glimpse into the future?

The way I constructed those examples is that they involve a semi-famous person that engage in an action they have most likely never done before, within a short time frame of me predicting it (i.e. analogous to the PsychedSubstance dream event).

The funny thing is that is what seems to be happening to me lately without doing the "within seven seconds" part.

It's so weird.  Like whatever I subconsciously am aware that could happen will.

Telepathy?

[Carl-Richard]

21 hours ago, Inliytened1 said:

The funny thing is that is what seems to be happening to me lately without doing the "within seven seconds" part.

It's so weird.  Like whatever I subconsciously am aware that could happen will.

Telepathy?

You'd have to give an example.

[Inliytened1]

1 minute ago, Carl-Richard said:

You'd have to give an example.

Man just anything at this point.  Um.  It just becomes so fucking scripted.  That''s what we had to watch out for when this whole tihng started.  That it wouldn't be scripted. But now for me it is on a daily.

[Carl-Richard]

I just thought about the time I met my brother walking towards me on a road to a store and he said his friend had died, 10 or so years ago (I was really high at the time and answered something like "shit, is it going to be in the news?" without stopping to ask how he was doing; completely retard zoinked out). 

I remember before meeting him while I was walking down the driveway outside the house, I had this really weird feeling, like something was fucked with reality that day. Like literally the way reality "looked" (my visual field) was different, the general vibe, the baseline feeling of reality, was different somehow. His friend lived probably only about a quarter mile away or less from our house.

Edited Wednesday at 05:33 PM by Carl-Richard

[Inliytened1]

2 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

I just thought about the time I met my brother walking towards me on a road to a store and he said his friend had died, 10 or so years ago (I was really high at the time and answered something like "shit, is it going to be in the news?" without stopping to ask how he was doing; completely retard zoinked out). 

I remember before meeting him while I was walking down the driveway outside the house, I had this really weird feeling, like something was fucked with reality that day. Like literally the way really "looked" (my visual field) was different, the general vibe, the baseline feeling of reality, was different somehow. His friend lived probably only about a quarter mile away or less from our house.

The bible got a few things right.  But only a few.  It's real.  IT really is.  And everything has been decided.  How we live is up to us.

Edited Wednesday at 05:34 PM by Inliytened1

[Carl-Richard]

These upcoming experiments might be relevant for the discussion:

 

From https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/8qvgy_v2 :

Quote

5.2. Multiple-subject experiments.

Whereas single-subject experiments test for external constraint on an individual experience, multi-subject paradigms test for shared structure across experiences.

In these experiments, multiple subjects (isolated from one another) undergo DMT sessions under identical conditions. Their reports are later analyzed for correlations, shared features, or structured correspondences beyond what would be expected by chance. The aim is not to establish identical experiences, but to test whether independent subjects exhibit non-trivial convergence in reported entities, environments, or informational content. Again, selective recruiting would likely improve the chances of success:

Couples who claim to have shared experiences, particularly if it involves interacting with the same entity, might be recruited to test for correlations between individual experiences. Such experimental set ups might include information deposit and retrieval, in which one of the subjects deposits information into the DMT space, such as by communicating a randomly generated word or multiple-digit integer to an entity, which is subsequently retrieved from the entity by the other subject.

As with single-subject paradigms, methodological safeguards such as blinding, standardized reporting frameworks, and preregistered analysis criteria are essential.

Across all paradigms, careful attention must be paid to expectation effects, experimenter bias, and the interpretive flexibility of retrospective reports. Null results are informative, and positive results would require cautious interpretation. The goal of these proposed programs is not to presuppose any particular metaphysical conclusion, but to clarify which features of DMT experiences can be systematically constrained, correlated, or reproduced, and which cannot.

 

Edited 8 hours ago by Carl-Richard