Posted September 19, 2018 to the point about different people having different subjective concepts/ideas about the nature of thought-self/ego — that is worth going into more. 1. Thought is attachment-clinging. Let go of attachment to not suffer. 2. Thought-self is a self-feeding loop. 3. Thought is fragmented, as one thought-fragment takes the form of an “I”-fragment to judge/control/take possession of other thought fragments. Fragmentation is the false division between the thinker and thoughts when in fact thought-self is a unitary process. 4. Thought seeks security in its own movement. 5. The ego is only interested in its own survival. 6. Thought is a movement away from what-is/the dynamic now. 7. There is no self: it’s an illusion. 8. The observer is the observed. Are we understanding that these are all compatible and just different verbal expressions of the one thing, not conflicting beliefs/viewpoints? That the one thing could be called a movement, loop, attachment, illusion, survival mechanism, fragmentation - without any contradiction? That the groking of all these expressions flows from the holistic insight? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted September 19, 2018 Enough You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
