Seed

Anyone been following Russell brand’s rape trial?

406 posts in this topic

@Consept he has to serve a minimum of seven years.

when he leaves his kids will be 17, 15 and 10 … he’ll have missed all their young childhood. 

one of his kids has a rare syndrome and is often poorly. He had to have open heart surgery when he was born and continues to have health issues.

 


 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like a lot of me I grew up thinking were famous and interesting also are accused of sexual misconduct at least 


 "I heard you guys are very safe. Caught up with the featherweights”" - Bon Iver

                            ◭“Holyfields”◮

                  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Seed said:

he has to serve a minimum of seven years.

Will the appeal process not bring this down to 5 eventually ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Wilhelm44 an appeal would mean a retrial.  But he has to have grounds to have that accepted. He can just appeal because he’s unhappy about the sentence length.

So far. He’s got a min of 7 as it’s a rape charge and all rape charges have to serve 2/3 behind bars.

He’s now sacked his lawyer due to mistreatment of the victims in cross examination which then prejudiced the jury. 
 

he’s been very unfortunate is all I can say….. it was a very odd trial

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Seed said:

@Wilhelm44 an appeal would mean a retrial.  But he has to have grounds to have that accepted. He can just appeal because he’s unhappy about the sentence length.

So far. He’s got a min of 7 as it’s a rape charge and all rape charges have to serve 2/3 behind bars.

He’s now sacked his lawyer due to mistreatment of the victims in cross examination which then prejudiced the jury. 
 

he’s been very unfortunate is all I can say….. it was a very odd trial

So you don't think there will be any appeal at all ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Wilhelm44 said:

So you don't think there will be any appeal at all ?

I don’t know what would be deemed as sufficient grounds for appeal?

I’m sure they will try - and the incompetency of the barrister is probably their strongest argument.

itll be hard to find an unbiased jury again though. It’s a tough gig. He’s really dug himself a Grand Canyon size hole 🕳️ 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now