Women are better hunter, science suggests

[Human Mint]

On 10/21/2026 at 11:44 PM, Emerald said:

And if you apply the binary idea of "Women parent. Men provide." to modern society like it's a Venn diagram with no overlap (which is how it often gets treated), it means... women are better suited to parenthood and men are better suited to all other human endeavors, which include all career specializations.

Women are better suited at motherhood. It is common sense that parenting requires both genders. But kid's dynamic with a father will be different to the mother!

Put away the father from the picture and distress and psychological problems will ensue. You need to look the answers from your own experience. I say this in general, not only to you.

[Salvijus]

41 minutes ago, Alexop said:

What was the challenge about and why did women win?

The challenge was who can survive in a wilderness the longest. 5 men vs 5 women. Both sides had a limited starter supplies for a couple of days. After that they had to rely completely on themselves: create their own shelter, create their own water supply, provide food... Basicly to survive. It's a game of survival. 

Men were relying on endurance mainly and had team dynamic issues like internal ego friction that caused them to make mistakes. While women played a smarter long term game and were more strategic. They were better at resource management too.  And they just had less ego and could work better as a team. 

Edited 3 hours ago by Salvijus

[Human Mint]

2 hours ago, Alexop said:

. One of the few places where it can be discussed at an advanced level. 

This forum UI makes it so each pov is seen. Not like those nested threads thing where people speak all over the place, everyone yelling at each other to be heard.

[Human Mint]

51 minutes ago, Alexop said:

I won't watch all that nonsense. What was the challenge about and why did women win?

It's a fun watch. Then you can come to conclusions.

I see that women are good at diplomacy as their baseline. Which made them succed in that experiment.

If you have juvenile males in your group trying to survive you're SCREWED lol.

Probably, also, men are more ambitious. If the goal is half a million they will go nuts over it. Women will generally be more detached to that.

Edited 3 hours ago by Human Mint

[Alexop]

1 hour ago, Salvijus said:

The challenge was who can survive in a wilderness the longest. 5 men vs 5 women. Both sides had a limited starter supplies for a couple of days. After that they had to rely completely on themselves: create their own shelter, create their own water supply, provide food... Basicly to survive. It's a game of survival. 

Men were relying on endurance mainly and had team dynamic issues like internal ego friction that caused them to make mistakes. While women played a smarter long term game and were more strategic. They were better at resource management too.  And they just had less ego and could work better as a team. 

Aha. It can be like that. Our men today suck ass.