Hyper Normalisation.

[Sugarcoat]

1 minute ago, Inliytened1 said:

Back to topic. 

👍🏻

[Breakingthewall]

22 hours ago, Sugarcoat said:

it's not meant as personal self. I think if the teacher speaks from genuine place, has the presence (

On 16/10/2026 at 1:23 PM, Sugarcoat said:

 

Sure he's true and he's a spiritual man, I'm not. But I have a mind much more sharp than his mind, then I understand what is the mind, what is the self and what is the absolute, because I can open myself to the absolute totally more or less easily, but in the most part of the day I'm trying to improve in business, dating girls looking for a girlfriend, learning economy, doing sports and trying to give my best in this life, what's not easy because everything trends to the superficial, narcissist and not alive life 

22 hours ago, Sugarcoat said:

If someone is "confused" if enlightened person doesn’t use the most precise language, seems to me they're not perceiving so clearly where teacher is speaking from as they are focused on the words......

If he's speaking the content is essential, I don't care about his aura, maybe he emanates an aura like holy because he's autistic.

The topic of enlightenment is totally clear and clearly explainable, you don't need to look a saint, the absolute is everything, not only the hermits who meditate whole day.

Those ideas like: you can't say the absolute, etc, are bullshit to appear special. You neither can say the colour red, except to anyone who already has seen the colour red. The absolute is the unlimited , and the unlimited is because it's unlimited, and you are that, the unlimited manifesting as a Knower, then the absolute knowing itself. Where is the problem? Totally simple, but doing it is not so simple, you have to breaking your limits. 

 

Edited 2 hours ago by Breakingthewall

[Breakingthewall]

16 hours ago, Wilhelm44 said:

How so ?

On 16/10/2026 at 1:23 PM, Sugarcoat said:

 

Because knowing that the self is illusory instead of real is knowing that the self is a) and is not b). Knowing any structure, any category, is a structure of the self.

Enlightenment is the breaking of any structure, the openess of yourself to the absolute. The absolute is unlimited, period. Its not real and the self false, the self is an structure that arises in the unlimited because it's possible, it's not real or illusory, it just is. 

Then if you categorize the self as unreal, it's the self labelling itself as unreal. It's a barrier that encloses you, a total mistake if your goal is enlightenment because keep you inside of the structure 

[Breakingthewall]

21 hours ago, Mellowmarsh said:

Pointless point.

Opposite, read again because it's essential. Try to understand or if you don't agree explain why, then we can talk about the topic 

What I said was this: "The point is being open to the unlimited nature of this, not knowing that there is only this"

What I meant is that knowing that there is only "this", or "one", or "self illusory ", are realizations of the structured mind. Are flat, not alive, are an structure. 

Being open to the unlimited is not an structure, is being open to what reality is, to it's quality, to its power and harmony that arises from the fact of being no limit,.to the unlimited life that arises from the openess. It's looking your true face, what you are. It's not "someone", it's unlimited, open, but this implies everything.

Then you will understand that ultimately anything is the unlimited appearing as a possibility that is possible, but understanding this is not important, what is important is being open to what you are because otherwise you are exiled in the dead desert of the limited

Edited 2 hours ago by Breakingthewall