Cornell 7 Case

[Elliott]

22 minutes ago, Willy Phallicus said:

She could handle three dicks and an assload of intoxicants but couldn't handle the slut label so someones gotta pay so she can sleep better at night.

Did you hear of her before her lawsuit, she was nationally slut shamed only AFTER her lawsuit, and predictably so because the incel cult does that to every woman that presses rape charges, you even did it to the 10 year old pregnant girl, LMAO

 

Initially, 2 years ago, she only filed criminal rape charges; two guys only got expelled and the rest were only required to write essays, I think it's common sense that she would have started the lawsuits 2 years ago if that was a motive: perhaps you think Cornell is a school for the retarded?

Quote

We make child murderers into millionaires so she's cashing in.

Source?

(Are you referring to Lindsay Clancy? She was found not guilty by 11 of 12 jurors and is not being retried for murder. Do you have information that the jurors and prosecution don't?)

 

 

It's really sad that the incels connect every woman together, almost like.... they're trying to attack any woman for something any other woman has done..... isn't there a word for that, 'misogy_____' something?

Edited 2 hours ago by Elliott

[Leo Gura]

25 minutes ago, Willy Phallicus said:

She could handle three dicks and an assload of intoxicants but couldn't handle the slut label so someones gotta pay so she can sleep better at night.

Bad take, man. Don't blame the victim of the crime.

The frat is the problem.

Edited 2 hours ago by Leo Gura

[Elliott]

The Conservatard Paradox 'Feminism promotes women having sex with countless men, and feminists sue for rape because they're ashamed of threesomes'

[Leo Gura]

13 minutes ago, Elliott said:

The Conservatard Paradox 'Feminism promotes women having sex with countless men, and feminists sue for rape because they're ashamed of threesomes'

Another awful take.

[Elliott]

Just now, Leo Gura said:

Another awful take.

It's exactly their words

[Leo Gura]

@Elliott Your mind sees what it wants to see.

[Elliott]

1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

@Elliott Your mind sees what it wants to see.

You think I'm a misandrist? I'm male. What bias angle are you suggesting?

Edited 38 minutes ago by Elliott

[Willy Phallicus]

1 hour ago, Elliott said:

Did you hear of her before her lawsuit

All I needed to hear was in the days after the incident the police asked her if she was raped and wanted to press any charges and she said no.  She even texted one dude and said it was all legal.

Im assuming thats because she confessed to being a willful participant in being a cum dumpster at a frat party.  Even if the opposite is true and she was just some innocent bystander leaving a bar a little tipsy and was walking home alone in the dead of night in a tight little mini skirt and got dragged down an alley and forcibly raped by 7 men (sounds like that isn't the case though) she screwed herself over by lying about it to law enforcement officials.

Given that the Lindsey Clancy mob has moved their attention over to this tells the observer everything they need to know.

[Leo Gura]

46 minutes ago, Elliott said:

You think I'm a misandrist? Lmao, I'm male. What bias angle are you suggesting?

Maybe I misread your quote. It is unclear if you are saying it or you are mocking it. What is your actual position?

Edited 1 hour ago by Leo Gura

[Willy Phallicus]

1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

The frat is the problem.

Was that before or after other members of the fraternity said aw hell no and ended it?

Not giving her a proper table surface to snort that ketamine off of?

[Elliott]

27 minutes ago, Willy Phallicus said:

All I needed to hear was in the days after the incident the police asked her if she was raped and wanted to press any charges and she said no. 

She told the police she "was 100% sure she was raped and forced" why else was she talking to the police, she was filing rape charges, the reason she was speaking to police. You people have zero critical thinking skills

 

Quote

Jane Doe in Cornell University case told campus police, "I can say with 100% confidence I was raped," transcript shows

By Mahsa Saeidi

https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/cornell-university-rape-case-jane-doe-police-interview-transcript/

The interview began on Nov. 14 — more than three weeks after the alleged gang rape — and continued the next day.

 

Edited 50 minutes ago by Elliott

[Elliott]

@Willy Phallicus

What do you think we should do to guys that support raping girls? I firmly believe we should deport you to a country of your development, the Congo. Project 2029 M.ake A.ssailants G.o back to A.frica(where every human descends from, your true homeland) you alphas will do great work there I'm certain, win-win, and patriotic to help your homeland and to stop being an anchor baby here.

Edited 18 minutes ago by Elliott

[something_else]

45 minutes ago, Willy Phallicus said:

All I needed to hear was in the days after the incident the police asked her if she was raped and wanted to press any charges and she said no.  She even texted one dude and said it was all legal.

She was pressured into taking ketamine, more alcohol, and weed. She consented to the threesome, she did not consent to 7 guys fucking her while she was fading in and out of consciousness.

It’s very likely that in the morning she initially had quite vague memories of what even happened. She could have stronger memories of consenting to a threesome when she was more sober and from there on just a patchwork of memories of what happened afterwards. Her mind could very easily convert that into “I consented to it all” until she took the required time to process what even actually happened.

Expecting someone who went through this to behave rationally immediately afterwards is ironically very irrational of you.

[Elliott]

5 minutes ago, something_else said:

She was pressured into taking ketamine, more alcohol, and weed. She consented to the threesome, she did not consent to 7 guys fucking her while she was fading in and out of consciousness.

It’s very likely that in the morning she initially had quite vague memories of what even happened. She could have stronger memories of consenting to a threesome when she was more sober and from there on just a patchwork of memories of what happened afterwards. Her mind could very easily convert that into “I consented to it all” until she took the required time to process what even actually happened.

Expecting someone who went through this to behave rationally immediately afterwards is ironically very irrational of you.

In her interview with police she said she didn't even know the other guys had sex with her until she was told by others. I don't see any 'irrational behavior'.

Edited 21 minutes ago by Elliott

[Willy Phallicus]

15 minutes ago, Elliott said:

She told the police she "was 100% sure she was raped and forced"

Yeah, two years later.  

It happened in 2024.  If this was a legit gang rape those guys would have already been publicly executed, with my blessing.

The official report she drafted and signed at the time she confessed to verbally consenting to both group sex and willful intoxication.  She also texted her favorite rapist after the fact and told him everything was legal.

Throw in the fact that Im very familiar with doing lots of ketamine at parties I can tell you that's the kind of drug that really lowers your inhibitions and greatly lubricates social interactions.  Thats why we have laws on the books for intoxication.  If I purposefully laydown on the train tracks to kill myself my family can't sue the rail company for me getting killed by a train, like common sense dictates.

20 minutes ago, Elliott said:

What do you think we should do to guys that support raping girls?

Support is too vague for me to really comment on.  Like cheer them on while its happening?

I think all guilty and convicted male rapists should go to a prison where prison rape is a thing and if that doesn't convince them cut their fucking balls off and put them back in jail.  Since we're all equals now, predator teacher broads who sexually groom 13 year old boys should go to prison for the same amount of years as their age.  So if you're a 35 year victimizer you're going away for 35 years so when you get out at 70 you wont feel compelled to manipulate, control and dominate little boys into boning you.

[Elliott]

5 minutes ago, Willy Phallicus said:

Yeah, two years later.  

 

Two weeks later, it says right in the quote box I posted. Quit posting your women hating on here

Quote

The interview began on Nov. 14 — more than three weeks after the alleged gang rape — and continued the next day.

https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/cornell-university-rape-case-jane-doe-police-interview-transcript/

 

Project 2029, pack your bags

🥱

 

 

 

Edited 9 minutes ago by Elliott