Gen Z Women Prefer Gay Men Over Straight Men

[Inliytened1]

Just now, Monster Energy said:

Americans think there are no countries other than the US.

 

There aren't. 

 

[Monster Energy]

1 minute ago, Inliytened1 said:

There aren't. 

 

Move to Scandinavia 

[Inliytened1]

Just now, Monster Energy said:

Move to Scandinavia 

I'm moving to Iceland.  Trump thinks it's Greenland but it's actually Iceland.

[Monster Energy]

Just now, Inliytened1 said:

I'm moving to Iceland.  Trump thinks it's Greenland but it's actually Iceland.

Give him a map before he starts making offers. 

 

[Inliytened1]

1 minute ago, Monster Energy said:

Give him a map before he starts making offers. 

 

Speaking of maps. Do we need to get these Gen Z women some?

[Monster Energy]

4 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

Speaking of maps. Do we need to get these Gen Z women some?

Probably. I’d start with the basics. Continents first.

 

[Inliytened1]

4 minutes ago, Monster Energy said:

Probably. I’d start with the basics. Continents first.

 

For us old dudes when you find one into older guys it's a special treat.  When she said. "Wow. Your fifty. That's the guys I like... " I knew i was in for a special night. 

Edited 8 hours ago by Inliytened1

[Monster Energy]

9 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

For us old dudes when you find one into older guys it's a special treat.  When she said. "Wow. Your fifty. That's the guys I like... " I knew i was in for a special night. 

You really waited 50 years for your target demographic to arrive. 

 

[yetineti]

5 hours ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

We should be treating medical circumstances as unknown unless more detailed information is provided - putting forth solutions based on inference rather than asking what is referred to isn't charitable. 

That’s fair. I didn’t claim to know his medical circumstances or offer medical advice—I said “maybe” because he directly connected his medical issues to being unable to get with women. My point was that even if the limitation is permanent, it doesn’t necessarily rule out intimacy or connection. Asking what he meant first would have been clearer, though.

@gengar Care to elaborate?

 

 

Edited 7 hours ago by yetineti

[Inliytened1]

46 minutes ago, Monster Energy said:

You really waited 50 years for your target demographic to arrive. 

 

The cows have finally come home.

[yetineti]

@LordFall

You stopped responding to me again. Twice now. In the other thread you called me a white knight, I answered and you kept talking to everyone except me. Here you accused me of backing down. Inliytened jumped in without reading and said I “pussy out when pressed.” I kept answering. You called me incoherent and a troll, then stopped answering me. The irony is obvious.

You’re always talking about value. Here’s mine: pointing out the tradeoffs your model of being “exceptional” barely acknowledges, including privacy, stability, intimacy, peace, humility, credibility and integrity.

Some of your advice may be useful, but you devalue it when you misrepresent criticism, insult the critic and avoid answering. Your framework turns every critic into someone weak, projecting, cowardly, a white knight or unable to handle the truth. Agree with you and you’re right. Disagree and you use it as proof that you’re above them.

If that sounds like berating, so be it. I’m still here.

Call me cowardly again when you decide to answer. Until then, 2-0.

 

Edited 7 hours ago by yetineti

[LordFall]

@yetineti You were being cowardly, you slipped in a cheap insult and when challenged on it you hid behind semantics. 

I never misrepresented you nor even insulted you, I described your actions plainly. 

26 minutes ago, yetineti said:

You’re always talking about value. Here’s mine: pointing out the tradeoffs your model of being “exceptional” barely acknowledges, including privacy, stability, intimacy, peace, humility, credibility and integrity.

This is the first time you've voiced any cohesive argument against the dating strategy I've presented on this forum section. It's still not precise and reads to me like vague limiting beliefs more than any actual values you actually champion.

My whole dating strategy is based on credibility and integrity. The whole point is to build a social circle and brand based on offering value to others and thus building credibility and status. Consistently being able to solve people's problems and keeping your word as a man is the basis of integrity. Humility is usually described as knowing your limits and not inflating your competence, making your efforts public through your brand will help you do so. 

Stability is very important. To me that's a byproduct of competence. If you are not a man with a well carved out skillset you will be at the mercy of your environment and your stability will be short lived. Peace will come as a result of this competence as well as your relationship to the universe as a whole, what we call spirituality.

Intimacy is obviously a key part of relationships. I think a lot of modern relationships are built on a veneer of false intimacy as the people involved in them have so many unresolved shadows in their psyche that it's hard to relate with one another. They end up lying and manipulating each other as a means of survival. A breakdown of communication is usually one of the leading signs of a breakup.

Privacy is something that I do not particularly value. I think if you aim to have an impact on the world it's important to put yourself out there and champion your values and be a leader in a public community. Similar to what Leo is doing with Actualized.org and what many other men and women are doing globally to impact humanity for the better.

Being a powerful and impactful man is the cornerstone of a good life and a good dating strategy in this context.

@gengar Feel free to elaborate on your ailments and we can help you build a dating strategy that compensates for that. Leverage is possible to obtain no matter your circumstances.

If you are quadriplegic then of course there will be hard limits towards what you can do in the short term but even then long term I think biotech and medicine are looking pretty good in the decades to come.

If you have the use of your arms and legs then I think you're well on your way to being able to accomplish big things for yourself and others and building a top tier dating life. 

Edited 6 hours ago by LordFall

[Inliytened1]

6 minutes ago, LordFall said:

@yetineti you were being cowardly, you slipped in a cheap insult and when challenged on it you hid behind semantics. 

I never misrepresented you nor even insulted you, I described your actions plainly. 

This is the first time you've voiced any cohesive argument against the dating strategy I've presented on this forum section. It's still not precise and reads to me like vague limiting beliefs more than any actual values you actually champion.

My whole dating strategy is based on credibility and integrity. The whole point is to build a social circle and brand based on offering value to others and thus building credibility and status. Consistently being able to solve people's problems and keepBour word as a man is the basis of integrity. Humility is usually described as knowing your limits and not inflating your competence, making your efforts public through your brand will help you do so. 

Stability is very important. To me that's a byproduct of competence. If you are not a man with a well carved out skillset you will be at the mercy of your environment and your stability will be short lived. Peace will come as a result of this competence as well as your relationship to the universe as a whole, what we call spirituality.

Intimacy is obviously a key part of relationships. I think a lot of modern relationships are built on a veneer of false intimacy as the people involved in them have so much shadows in their psyche that its hard to relate with one another. They end up lying and manipulating eachother as a means of survival. A breakdown of communication is usually one of the leading signs of a breakup.

Privacy is something that I do not particularly value. I think if you aim to have an impact on the world it's important to put yourself out there and champion your values and be a leader in a public community. Similar to what Leo is doing with Actualized.org and what many other men and women are doing globally to impact humanity for the better.

Being a powerful and impactful man is the cornerstone of a good life and a good dating strategy in this context.

@gengar Feel free to elaborate on your ailments and we can help you build a dating strategy that compensates for that. Leverage is possible to obtain no matter your circumstances.

If you are quadriplegic then of course there will be hard limits towards what you can do in the short term but even then long term I think biotech and medicine are looking pretty good in the decades to come.

If you have the use of your arms and legs then I think you're well on your way to being able to accomplish big things for yourself and others and building a top tier dating life. 

He likes to hide.   You pulled the light saber out and now we are left with an empty octagon.  I think a better match would be @Monster Energy only because he has wit.

Now..in terms of your dating model. How do we get a full view.  I want it down to the detail of every step.  

Edited 6 hours ago by Inliytened1

[Inliytened1]

Oh wait..he's actually here..let's see if he pulls his weapon!

[Inliytened1]

26 minutes ago, LordFall said:

@yetineti You were being cowardly, you slipped in a cheap insult and when challenged on it you hid behind semantics. 

I never misrepresented you nor even insulted you, I described your actions plainly. 

This is the first time you've voiced any cohesive argument against the dating strategy I've presented on this forum section. It's still not precise and reads to me like vague limiting beliefs more than any actual values you actually champion.

My whole dating strategy is based on credibility and integrity. The whole point is to build a social circle and brand based on offering value to others and thus building credibility and status. Consistently being able to solve people's problems and keeping your word as a man is the basis of integrity. Humility is usually described as knowing your limits and not inflating your competence, making your efforts public through your brand will help you do so. 

Stability is very important. To me that's a byproduct of competence. If you are not a man with a well carved out skillset you will be at the mercy of your environment and your stability will be short lived. Peace will come as a result of this competence as well as your relationship to the universe as a whole, what we call spirituality.

Intimacy is obviously a key part of relationships. I think a lot of modern relationships are built on a veneer of false intimacy as the people involved in them have so many unresolved shadows in their psyche that it's hard to relate with one another. They end up lying and manipulating each other as a means of survival. A breakdown of communication is usually one of the leading signs of a breakup.

Privacy is something that I do not particularly value. I think if you aim to have an impact on the world it's important to put yourself out there and champion your values and be a leader in a public community. Similar to what Leo is doing with Actualized.org and what many other men and women are doing globally to impact humanity for the better.

Being a powerful and impactful man is the cornerstone of a good life and a good dating strategy in this context.

@gengar Feel free to elaborate on your ailments and we can help you build a dating strategy that compensates for that. Leverage is possible to obtain no matter your circumstances.

If you are quadriplegic then of course there will be hard limits towards what you can do in the short term but even then long term I think biotech and medicine are looking pretty good in the decades to come.

If you have the use of your arms and legs then I think you're well on your way to being able to accomplish big things for yourself and others and building a top tier dating life. 

Why you going dark? Let's talk the model.  Give me your high level view. 

[yetineti]

@LordFall

“Jarvis, all weapons are a go.”

My point is simple: your model has tradeoffs. Privacy, peace, stability, intimacy, humility, credibility and integrity can all suffer through the relentless pursuit of status, leverage and sexual abundance. The physical pain you’ve publicly described when your sex drive spikes was one concrete example I had in mind, not a diagnosis.

I shouldn’t need to write an essay before you can acknowledge that downsides exist. Not wanting to unpack an obvious point for you does not mean I can’t. Your answer did exactly what I expected: absorbed every downside back into your framework, dismissed the rest as vague limiting beliefs and treated my reluctance to explain it all as proof of weakness.

That is the central problem. Every criticism becomes projection, cowardice or insufficient competence, so the model never has to acknowledge a cost.

My potency line was a jab. Fine. But calling me cowardly, incoherent and a troll, then claiming you never insulted me because you were merely “describing my actions,” is just giving your insults a flattering definition.

You finally addressed the substance, and I acknowledge that. But you didn’t disprove my point. You demonstrated it.

[LordFall]

29 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

He likes to hide.   You pulled the light saber out and now we are left with an empty octagon.  I think a better match would be @Monster Energy only because he has wit.

Now..in terms of your dating model. How do we get a full view.  I want it down to the detail of every step.  

It revolves around the basic idea of leveraging your life so you end up with exponentially more results than what you put in. The main tools to do that are social circle game and social media. 

The main idea is based on hosting events around your interests and goals so you can start to meet other like-minded people. You then film those events to scale your brand and reach other people in your country or across the globe that are into the same things you're into.

You then build a business that is either related to this or is at least online so you can detach yourself from the corporate slavery that most humans are forced into. 

You now have status in a niche that you're interested in and have income that allows you to free your time and travel the world. I'm not fully at this point yet since my income was previously tied to one main client that I no longer work with but I'm now rebuilding my business to be more resilient to this so that I can spend the next few years of my life travelling the world and actualizing this plan.

So far it's been quite fun and shows a lot of promise which is why I recommend this hybrid model of life purpose and dating strategy to most people I encounter. 

Edited 6 hours ago by LordFall

[yetineti]

And now for a special treat, since apparently tradeoffs do not exist until I itemize them for you:

• Physical peace: You have said your sex drive can become so intense that looking at women causes physical pain and pushes you toward behavior unproductive to your life.

• Privacy: You explicitly do not value it because your model requires publicity, branding and influence.

• Freedom: Travel without financial independence becomes slavery and “blue balling” yourself rather than an experience worth having on its own terms.

• Equality: You describe status as “winner takes all,” with the top man getting nearly everything while everyone else becomes irrelevant or fights for scraps.

• Collaboration: An equal business partnership felt like “cucking each other” because neither man could be king.

• Intimacy: Relationships are repeatedly filtered through alignment, leverage, status and whether someone fits the mission.

• Stability: It remains contingent on acquiring enough competence, money and power.

• Peace: It is postponed until after the next level of competence has been reached.

• Humility: Criticism is routinely interpreted as weakness, projection, cowardice or a limiting belief.

• Credibility: You call someone cowardly, incoherent and a troll, then claim you never insulted them.

• Integrity: You define it as keeping your word while ignoring intellectual integrity when describing people who disagree with you.

No diagnosis or speculation was required. These are consequences already contained in your own descriptions.

Your goals are not inherently wrong, and parts of your advice are useful. The problem is that whenever your model produces pain, compulsion, rivalry, exposure or instability, you redefine the cost as insufficient competence and prescribe more of the model.

That is not a framework without downsides. It is a framework designed to prevent its downsides from counting.

 

[Inliytened1]

1 minute ago, yetineti said:

@LordFall

“Jarvis, all weapons are a go.”

My point is simple: your model has tradeoffs. Privacy, peace, stability, intimacy, humility, credibility and integrity can all suffer through the relentless pursuit of status, leverage and sexual abundance. The physical pain you’ve publicly described when your sex drive spikes was one concrete example I had in mind, not a diagnosis.

I shouldn’t need to write an essay before you can acknowledge that downsides exist. Not wanting to unpack an obvious point for you does not mean I can’t. Your answer did exactly what I expected: absorbed every downside back into your framework, dismissed the rest as vague limiting beliefs and treated my reluctance to explain it all as proof of weakness.

That is the central problem. Every criticism becomes projection, cowardice or insufficient competence, so the model never has to acknowledge a cost.

My potency line was a jab. Fine. But calling me cowardly, incoherent and a troll, then claiming you never insulted me because you were merely “describing my actions,” is just giving your insults a flattering definition.

You finally addressed the substance, and I acknowledge that. But you didn’t disprove my point. You demonstrated it.

A direct hit.  That one hurt.  If it wasn't so direct it might have sliced his arm clean off.

[LordFall]

@yetineti Yes it's a model built to thrive within the frameworks of society. Your objections mostly sound like a romanticization of mediocrity disguised as Zen philosophy. 

If you don't like being competent and the rewards it brings then don't pursue this path. I didn't say everyone should follow it, I said it's the best one I've found and the results so far in my life have exceeded my expectations. 

1 hour ago, yetineti said:

• Intimacy: Relationships are repeatedly filtered through alignment, leverage, status and whether someone fits the mission.

There are 4 billion women on earth. You should build a life with the ones that align with it. How is this a hard concept to understand? You're free to date an Amish girl if you want or an unambitious woman. They don't fit the vision I have for my life but perhaps they fit yours.

I tend to vibe better with creatives, models, influencers or business-minded women as we have similar life goals. 

Edited 4 hours ago by LordFall