There Is No "True Nature" Of Reality

[Hyperion]

@VeganAwake

In the words of a great late 20st century American philosopher:

[Willy Phallicus]

On 9/7/2026 at 1:58 PM, Hyperion said:

The whole point of this thread is to point out the inherent limitations of language

Was someone in denial of that or something?

[Hyperion]

9 hours ago, Willy Phallicus said:

Was someone in denial of that or something?

Are you denying that someone was/is in denial of that or something?

[Willy Phallicus]

6 hours ago, Hyperion said:

Are you denying that someone was/is in denial of that or something?

Just not seeing the point in doing the captain obvious thing where language and the metaphysical are concerned.

Maybe thats how you get your kicks, I dunno.

[Hyperion]

39 minutes ago, Willy Phallicus said:

Just not seeing the point in doing the captain obvious thing where language and the metaphysical are concerned.

And what precisely is the point of pointing out that you don't see the point of me pointing out that trying to point out what cannot be pointed out with words is pointless?

43 minutes ago, Willy Phallicus said:

Maybe thats how you get your kicks, I dunno.

I sure do. And I sincerely hope that you got a good ol' kick out of pointlessly commenting on my pointless comment, my fellow chief mate. ⚓

[Willy Phallicus]

2 hours ago, Hyperion said:

And what precisely is the point of pointing out that you don't see the point of me pointing out that trying to point out what cannot be pointed out with words is pointless?

Pretty sure I implied that already.  The simple answer is that I can post whatever I want for whatever reasons I want. 

You said you did something with the intent of accomplishing something and I noticed that nothing of the sort actually transpired.  I'm just the messenger.

2 hours ago, Hyperion said:

And I sincerely hope that you got a good ol' kick out of pointlessly commenting on my pointless comment, my fellow chief mate.

That's not my fault.  Make pointless threads get pointless comments.

Edited 18 hours ago by Willy Phallicus

[Hyperion]

@Willy Phallicus

Nice. Now reverse the roles and apply everything you are saying about yourself to me and vice versa, and voila... all of your wonderfulky pointless questions are magically answered!

I thoroughly enjoyed our stimulating conversation, Mr. Biggus Dickus. <3

😘

[Mellowmarsh]

If all exists as one then opposites must equate to each other - there is a totality of being thus being is one therefore opposites are one.
 

☝️ 

[Hyperion]

39 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

If all exists as one then opposites must equate to each other - there is a totality of being thus being is one therefore opposites are one.

What would be the opposite of this statement/perspective?

[Mellowmarsh]

Just now, Hyperion said:

What would be the opposite of this statement/perspective?

Opposing concepts are mutually dependent and form a single reality.

[Mellowmarsh]

59 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

If all exists as one then opposites must equate to each other - there is a totality of being thus being is one therefore opposites are one.
 

☝️ 

How can one thing exist ? 

 

 

[Hyperion]

35 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

Opposing concepts are mutually dependent and form a single reality.

Again, what would be the opposite of this statement/perspective?

[Mellowmarsh]

3 minutes ago, Hyperion said:

Again, what would be the opposite of this statement/perspective?

Non-Opposing concepts are not mutually dependent and do not form a single reality. 🤔

[Hyperion]

50 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

Non-Opposing concepts are not mutually dependent and do not form a single reality. 🤔

There you go... that would be one possible way of formulating an opposite perspective.

But regardless of how you formulate them, any verbal statement you make is an expression of a specific perspective that has an opposite and therefore is relativey (un)true.

Including of course what I just said. 

[Mellowmarsh]

23 minutes ago, Hyperion said:

There you go... that would be one possible way of formulating an opposite perspective.

But regardless of how you formulate them, any verbal statement you make is an expression of a specific perspective that has an opposite and therefore is relativey (un)true.

Including of course what I just said. 

Yes, I like this… relatively (un) true. 😘😉