Nobody becomes enlightened and never will

[Mellowmarsh]

1 minute ago, kavaris said:

see if water clocks ever had a mechanical part added, in its later forms, if you are into ancient stuff, like on wiki or one of these... As that could be interesting, hey, ya never know i guess, Ive gotten ideas out of crazier places. Ive gotta get rdy for this appt., so i cnt stick around too long to night/this mornin'.

LOL

[kavaris]

4 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

LOL

humour me

[Joseph Maynor]

7 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

Okay thanks for sharing your belief.

You're not getting it.

[Mellowmarsh]

2 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

You're not getting it.

Okay thanks for your belief.

[Mellowmarsh]

5 minutes ago, kavaris said:

humour me

Anytime bro 👊

[kavaris]

1 minute ago, Mellowmarsh said:

Okay thanks for your belief.

If nothin comes up, look for "what came after the water clock", like..m how did they go from that — to mechanically driven like... gears and cogs nd watknot

[Joseph Maynor]

1 hour ago, Mellowmarsh said:

You can/not become enlightened.

And your belief.

[kavaris]

Whats the initial seed/image that causes [something/anything] to become populated in the mind?, like how much percent of something needs to be experienced... or what im asking is, does your brain add together "amounts of" for "proof", or does the validation occur elsewhere?

[kavaris]

The next part of that question is about beliefs vs. similitude, cause, you'll have realized that... what you have is, lots of similar images / matching ideas, that which result in something like "Yes, it looks valid to me now, or it looks good enough, decidely so" (assuming - an indefinite time of in a state of wonder and questioning...) and so... the question is then, \*if similitude is in fact the thing linking / chaining together "things that appear to be validations", how is it that we can have two different things happening, where on the surface is ".... our unrevealed, or indistinct beliefs..." and things that exist internally to us, that appear as "distinct or matching beliefs", How do we do that, or whats the descriptive language vers. if you had to put it to words?

p.s. i should get going now. think on it.

Edited August 11 by kavaris

[Inliytened1]

5 hours ago, Mellowmarsh said:

You have never met anyone, actually. All that’s happening here on the internet highway is a mentally constructed inner-net of information being exchanged in the form of multiple formless ideas. Just so you know.

oh we met you.  But we can't pronounce your name