How do you lock a woman in to where she isn't thinking about anyone else but you?

[Inliytened1]

7 minutes ago, LordFall said:

Same to you my man, I hope you research some of the concepts I've talked about.

I'm definitely a sucker for love, that's why I want it with multiple people! I think to build really high-quality relationships you have to stop winging it and really get serious about what you want and find people compatible with your vision and life purpose. 

 

@LordFall  and you have to take a hard look at whether this is what you want.  Because whenever there are multiple people involved there is going to be the existence of love so you have to take that into consideration.  It is going to be there whether we want to wish it away or not. I wish it wasn't.  But remember that is what messed one of my biggest relationships up.  The one where she set up the threesome.  The porn industry is completely empty.  Completely empty. 

Edited August 27 by Inliytened1

[LordFall]

Yeah, I agree. I've thought about it a lot. It's something I have to experiment with over the next few years for sure. Whether 15 years from now I'll be raising kids with 3 women or it was just a temporary phase, I couldn't tell you. I will give it a shot though, I see it as a natural evolution to my game journey.

As you've seen here my problem-solving process is methodical. I think I will be better than the average man at solving polyamorous relationship problems because I'm good at getting to the root of the issue and not getting swayed by waves of feelings. I'm good at reconciliation as well so if 2 of my women are having issues with each other I think it'll be easy for me to assess where the problem is coming from, getting them to hug it out and if I was the one causing the issue by giving preferential treatment to one over the other to then solve the issue. 

Edited August 27 by LordFall

[Inliytened1]

8 minutes ago, LordFall said:

Yeah, I agree. I've thought about it a lot. It's something I have to experiment with over the next few years for sure. Whether 15 years from now I'll be raising kids with 3 women or it was just a temporary phase, I couldn't tell you. I will give it a shot though, I see it as a natural evolution to my game journey.

As you've seen here my problem-solving process is methodical. I think I will be better than the average man at solving polyamorous relationship problems because I'm good at getting to the root of the issue and not getting swayed by waves of feelings. I'm good at reconciliation as well so if 2 of my women are having issues with each other I think it'll be easy for me to assess where the problem is coming from, getting them to hug it out and if I was the one causing the issue by giving preferential treatment to one over the other to then solve the issue. 

Yes you are excellent at being non-biased and open minded.  This is a super power so use it wisely.  I think we both agree that monogamy fails. But I think this is due to the man's carnal instinct not the woman.  A woman can be good with one partner.  Now you say you are bisexual so I do not know where this fits in but I would think a gay man would even be more sensitive.  So tread carefully. 

Edited August 27 by Inliytened1

[LordFall]

Thinking with your dick is only bad if you don't think with your head first. Many guys use casual sex to forget about their problems so of course it's gonna have a destructive effect on their lives. If you do it with strategy and thought I think you can have your cake and eat it too and fuck multiple women at the same time while still building stable and long-term arrangements. 

Edited August 27 by LordFall

[Inliytened1]

1 minute ago, LordFall said:

I think thinking with your dick is only bad if you don't think with your head first. Many guys use casual sex to forget about their problems so of course it's gonna have a destructive effect on their lives. If you do it with strategy and thought I think you can get your cake and eat it too and fuck multiple women at the same time while still building stable and long term arrangements. 

Only if they are on board.  And that is going to be difficult.  They might start out like that but it is going to get tricky as emotions get involved. 

Edited August 28 by Inliytened1

[LordFall]

If untangling webs of emotions is not a skill of yours and you're not interested in working on your emotional intelligence then yeah I think polyamory is perhaps not the right framework for you. It's not really a simple relationship framework but I think if done right is the most powerful and fulfilling for everyone involved. 

[Inliytened1]

6 minutes ago, LordFall said:

If untangling webs of emotions is not a skill of yours and you're not interested in working on your emotional intelligence then yeah I think polyamory is perhaps not the right framework for you. It's not really a simple relationship framework but I think if done right is the most powerful and fulfilling for everyone involved. 

No I meant the women.  They have to be on board with what you are proposing.  And then not jump ship later.  You say you can captain the ship adequately but I fear there could be mutiny rather quickly. Just saying as we start to dive deeper into the intricate nature of this.  You have little direct experience.  I have a lot more than you here. 

Edited August 28 by Inliytened1

[LordFall]

Right but you are quick to make assumptions and don't have any polyamory experience. So I would say go learn more about it if it interests you or download Feeld like I told you about and come back after you've met some polyamorous ladies and let us know how it went! 

Edited August 28 by LordFall

[Inliytened1]

11 minutes ago, LordFall said:

Right but you are quick to make assumptions and don't have any polyamory experience. So I would say go learn more about it if it interests you or download Feeld like I told you about and come back after you've met some polyamorous ladies and let us know how it went! 

I shall report back for sure

[Yimpa]

On 8/27/2026 at 3:10 PM, Inliytened1 said:

You guys are missing love here

I Am the 1 you are missing.

[Inliytened1]

3 hours ago, Yimpa said:

I Am the 1 you are missing.

I'm wild but you take it to a whole other level 🤪

[Yimpa]

1 hour ago, Inliytened1 said:

I'm wild but you take it to a whole other level 🤪

Respectfully, your enlightenment is revealed to be weak sauce in the presence of my Infinity.

[Inliytened1]

52 minutes ago, Yimpa said:

Respectfully, your enlightenment is revealed to be weak sauce in the presence of my Infinity.

Just remember, intercourse cannot achieve true Oneness.  That can only be attained by sitting in silence.  Ramana Maharshi stopped eating once he achieved awakening.  Sex was the last thing on his mind.  So my enlightenment must be weak sauce because I can't get my mind off of you know what.  And the Buddha never did pickup.  But hey, there is the modern day Awakened One.  That version is a horny mofo.  I feel we are much more developed and conscious than our predecessors. 

Edited 1 hour ago by Inliytened1

[LordFall]

28 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

Just remember, intercourse cannot achieve true Oneness.  That can only be attained by sitting in silence. 

How do you know this? 

28 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

Ramana Maharshi stopped eating once he achieved awakening.  Sex was the last thing on his mind.  So my enlightenment must be weak sauce because I can't get my mind off of you know what.  And the Buddha never did pickup.  But hey, there is the modern day Awakened One.  That version is a horny mofo.  I feel we are much more developed and conscious than our predecessors. 

Neglecting your body and having monks force-feed you is not exactly being enlightened enough to stop eating in my books lol. Sounds more like hyperfocus to me and perhaps irresponsibility since you're forcing others to be responsible for your daily needs and being a hindrance to them. 

I think learning to not be desperate for sex is important but let's not call sexual desire low consciousness, I think that's simply spiritual bypassing. 

Edited 44 minutes ago by LordFall

[Inliytened1]

15 minutes ago, LordFall said:

How do you know this? 

 

 

 

Ahh, my dear @LordFall.  i am not sure if you planned it as a trick question or not..but you cannot "know" it 😀

15 minutes ago, LordFall said:

 

Neglecting your body and having monks force-feed you is not exactly being enlightened enough to stop eating in my books lol. Sounds more like hyperfocus to me and perhaps irresponsibility since you're forcing others to be responsible for your daily needs and being a hindrance to them. 

I think learning to not be desperate for sex is important but let's not call sexual desire low consciousness, I think that's simply spiritual bypassing. 

Agreed.  I was just being funny.  I think about it but it isn't like I have the urge to nudge the noodle all day long.  I feel for those that do.  But seriously I agree that we should be more flexible as awakened individuals to be more diverse.  Speaking of diversification, do you think Ramana had ETF's? The point is there is nothing wrong with any of this. Incorporate and include all stages 😀

Edited 28 minutes ago by Inliytened1

[LordFall]

15 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

Ahh, my dear @LordFall.  i am not sure if you planned it as a trick question or not..but you cannot "know" it 😀

Lmao of course you can know if you're enlightened. Be careful of gurus selling you a trick that's unknowable you just have to keep listening to them or buy their books or their meditation seminars! 

I'm glad you agree. If someone can't find oneness in a vagina then there is something wrong with their psyche for sure.