Democratic Socialist Pacs funded by GOP

[Elliott]

https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/21/politics/conservative-pop-up-super-pac-democratic-primaries

Updated Jun 22, 2026

"Conservatives spent heavily in key Democratic primaries, filings show

Federal Election Commission filings Saturday confirmed national Democrats’ suspicions that Lead Left PAC, Real Change PAC and Blue California PAC were purposefully boosting candidates perceived as weaker contenders in a general election in hopes of engineering more favorable matchups for Republicans.

In the most striking example, Lead Left PAC spent more than $750,000 on advertisements in the Democratic primary in Texas’ 35th District,"

Edited Tuesday at 04:25 PM by Elliott

[Leo Gura]

This is some Netanyahu shit.

Shameful.

[Terell Kirby]

Corruption 

[MediumKahuna]

Yes, both parties have done this.

It's not that the GOP is ideologically aligning with socialists of course; they just see it as a way to further divide moderate and progressive Democrats.

They tend to target controversial, inexperienced, or electorally weak candidates as a means to hurt moderate Democrats, which, occasionally, advantages more progressive candidates (this is a side-effect, not their primary goal).

It's worth noting that this recent wave of DSA candidate wins in NY is overwhelmingly due to grassroots campaigning, not GOP meddling, with Mamdani being a kind of blueprint for how DSA-aligned candidates can win.

[Elliott]

2 hours ago, MediumKahuna said:

Yes, both parties have done this.

It's not that the GOP is ideologically aligning with socialists of course; they just see it as a way to further divide moderate and progressive Democrats.

They tend to target controversial, inexperienced, or electorally weak candidates as a means to hurt moderate Democrats, which, occasionally, advantages more progressive candidates (this is a side-effect, not their primary goal).

It's worth noting that this recent wave of DSA candidate wins in NY is overwhelmingly due to grassroots campaigning, not GOP meddling, with Mamdani being a kind of blueprint for how DSA-aligned candidates can win.

I mean Mamdahni almost lost the NYC mayor's race as the Democratic party candidate, he only got 50%

 

"New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani's approval rating sits at 48%, with 30% disapproval and 23% unsure. While his favorability remains net positive, his early job approval trails his immediate predecessors: Eric Adams had a 61% approval rating at the same point, and Bill de Blasio stood at 49%."

 

https://www.nbcnews.com

An AI-powered bot army on X spread pro-Trump and pro-GOP propaganda, ...

Oct 16, 2024 — An army of political propaganda accounts powered by artificial intelligence posed as real people on X to argue in favor of Republican candidates

Edited 14 hours ago by Elliott

[MediumKahuna]

8 hours ago, Elliott said:

I mean Mamdahni almost lost the NYC mayor's race as the Democratic party candidate, he only got 50%

 

"New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani's approval rating sits at 48%, with 30% disapproval and 23% unsure. While his favorability remains net positive, his early job approval trails his immediate predecessors: Eric Adams had a 61% approval rating at the same point, and Bill de Blasio stood at 49%."

 

https://www.nbcnews.com

An AI-powered bot army on X spread pro-Trump and pro-GOP propaganda, ...

Oct 16, 2024 — An army of political propaganda accounts powered by artificial intelligence posed as real people on X to argue in favor of Republican candidates

He didn’t almost lose. NYC uses ranked-choice voting so the final round is always over 50%. Mamdani actually finished around 56% to 44%, which is a solid win.

48% approval vs 30% disapproval is actually a solid net-positive rating. Pretty typical for New York mayors really, Cuomo himself hovered in the 40–50% approval range early on.

[Elliott]

1 hour ago, MediumKahuna said:

He didn’t almost lose. NYC uses ranked-choice voting so the final round is always over 50%. Mamdani actually finished around 56% to 44%, which is a solid win.

48% approval vs 30% disapproval is actually a solid net-positive rating. Pretty typical for New York mayors really, Cuomo himself hovered in the 40–50% approval range early on.

False

That's only for primaries

 

The highest he ever got was 50% of all of NYC votes.

Adams had 61% approval, and he sucked.

Edited 3 hours ago by Elliott

[Raze]

Instead of seething about this ask why democrats don’t do the same. This is example of how incompetent they are.

Thomas Massie was doing a lot to hurt trump yet democrats did nothing to help him and he lost, giving trump more control of the republicans. 

[Elliott]

1 hour ago, Raze said:

Instead of seething about this ask why democrats don’t do the same. This is example of how incompetent they are.

Thomas Massie was doing a lot to hurt trump yet democrats did nothing to help him and he lost, giving trump more control of the republicans. 

No one is seething except socwokies. I'm making fun of both GOP and Berntards, it's pathetic desperate deceit.

 

It's in the name Democratic

Manipulation is a short-game strategy, as you see with the GOP exploding into a million pieces right now, it blows up in your face. That would be a race to the bottom. Winning seats or the next election is not as important as winning trust, or promoting ethical behavior.

Are you okay with dems taking aipac money?

Massie is a white nationalist.... 

 

Edited 3 hours ago by Elliott

[NewKidOnTheBlock]

We need more Jesuses

[Elliott]

50 minutes ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

We need more Jesuses

 

[Leo Gura]

1 hour ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

We need more Jesuses

We got fat orange Jesus.

[Raze]

4 hours ago, Elliott said:

No one is seething except socwokies. I'm making fun of both GOP and Berntards, it's pathetic desperate deceit.

 

It's in the name Democratic

Manipulation is a short-game strategy, as you see with the GOP exploding into a million pieces right now, it blows up in your face. That would be a race to the bottom. Winning seats or the next election is not as important as winning trust, or promoting ethical behavior.

Are you okay with dems taking aipac money?

Massie is a white nationalist.... 

 

The democrats have imploded multiple times because of what you are saying.

Obama could have dealt with redistricting and codified abortion, he didn’t. Now roe got overturned and democrats face a more difficult map to victory going forward.

This isn’t even that unethical. Massie’s beliefs are irrelevant, the point is he just got replaced with someone loyal to Trump. 

[Elliott]

34 minutes ago, Raze said:

 

Obama could have dealt with redistricting and codified abortion, he didn’t. Now roe got overturned and democrats face a more difficult map to victory going forward.

Codifying abortion requires an amendment, democrats haven't had a 2/3s majority to do that for 150 years...... it also requires ratification by 3/4 of the states.... abortion rights would be a constitutional right, not a law, it requires amendment.

Same with redistricting

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12250

"The Court viewed the Elections Clause of the Constitution (Article I, § 4) as solely assigning disputes about partisan gerrymandering to the state legislatures,"

Presidents aren't elected Dictator, Trump has all 3 branches right now and can't do anything. He has all three and democrats shut down the government on him over ICE

Quote

This isn’t even that unethical. 

It is if you're pro democracy, it's subverting the people, manipulating the people. Democracy means the people being in charge, molesting the election process is antithetical to that.

Edited just now by Elliott