Starving Patriarchy

[Rafael Thundercat]

13 hours ago, Basman said:

Like this phenomena of women freezing during rape. If you think about it, it makes more sense for women to evolve to not fight their rapist tooth and claw because they are the one's that end up reproducing

Well, unless woman start to matching the game like this lady here

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYIaKhpBisY/?igsh=bHk5cmFxdHl2OWUy

Keep thinking woman cant be brutal and maybe one day you find one that will show you you theory is not so certain. 

[Lila9]

On 5/17/2026 at 9:27 AM, Wilhelm44 said:

Thank you, I actually really enjoyed her video. I was thinking if you ladies want to promote the matriarchy, I would use words like egalitarian more often. Because when us guys here the word matriarchy, we immediately think its gonna be exactly like patriarchy but women have all the power. And that's not what she is saying at all.

Egalitarian societies are naturally more feminine societies in which motherhood has significant value, as it naturally should. They are societies centered around care and nurture, which is what motherhood is about.

In such a society, men are protectors rather than abusers, which is the real purpose of masculinity. The purpose of masculinity is to support life, not to destroy it.

It benefits everyone rather than a minority of people whom everyone strives or is forced to imitate.

The patriarchal definition of matriarchy is incorrect and is a projection. Feminists don’t want to do to men what they did to women for thousands of years, even though they are understandably angry about it. The purpose is to do what is both best and most natural for human social structure, and there are real anthropological data that support it.

In an egalitarian/matriarchal society, leadership is given to those who are most suitable, regardless of gender, rather than taken.

Since, according to some data, women are better leaders by many measures, especially older women, there will naturally be more women leaders in an egalitarian society.

Some believe that in the human species, women living longer after menopause, especially longer than men, implies that older women have a significant role in society, particularly in leadership.

Usually, men don’t enjoy leading roles or taking accountability as much.

Of course, they may enjoy the benefits of power, the glory, and the identity associated with it, but they may not like to hold accountability or be responsible.

Many men prefer to be useful, feel needed, and follow instructions rather than hold accountability and carry the mental and emotional load of managing and leading, even if they are not comfortable admitting it.

Of course, there are many men who are great in leadership, especially as they mature, but this is not something that all men biologically and automatically have. 

Most of the leaders in the world are men and they are very selfish and do lots of mistakes. There are barely one man I can call a true leader or at least see in him the same leadership qualities I have seen in my grandmother for example.

For most of human history, society was sustained by the behind-the-scenes, quiet leadership and management skills of women, especially older women, which were barely recognized as more patriarchal structures arose.

[Lila9]

3 hours ago, Rafael Thundercat said:

Well, unless woman start to matching the game like this lady here

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYIaKhpBisY/?igsh=bHk5cmFxdHl2OWUy

Keep thinking woman cant be brutal and maybe one day you find one that will show you you theory is not so certain. 

She was brutally abused as a child. She knew male hatred and abuse her entire life. No love. So many women are living like that quietly, poor women, women of color, women in third-world countries, the most invisible women.

The fact that they punished her by ending her life so easily shows how biased and misogynistic the system is. She deserved healing and recovery. Pedophiles and serial killers were treated better than her.

[Wilhelm44]

2 hours ago, Lila9 said:

Egalitarian societies are naturally more feminine societies in which motherhood has significant value, as it naturally should. They are societies centered around care and nurture, which is what motherhood is about.

In such a society, men are protectors rather than abusers, which is the real purpose of masculinity. The purpose of masculinity is to support life, not to destroy it.

It benefits everyone rather than a minority of people whom everyone strives or is forced to imitate.

The patriarchal definition of matriarchy is incorrect and is a projection. Feminists don’t want to do to men what they did to women for thousands of years, even though they are understandably angry about it. The purpose is to do what is both best and most natural for human social structure, and there are real anthropological data that support it.

In an egalitarian/matriarchal society, leadership is given to those who are most suitable, regardless of gender, rather than taken.

Since, according to some data, women are better leaders by many measures, especially older women, there will naturally be more women leaders in an egalitarian society.

Some believe that in the human species, women living longer after menopause, especially longer than men, implies that older women have a significant role in society, particularly in leadership.

Usually, men don’t enjoy leading roles or taking accountability as much.

Of course, they may enjoy the benefits of power, the glory, and the identity associated with it, but they may not like to hold accountability or be responsible.

Many men prefer to be useful, feel needed, and follow instructions rather than hold accountability and carry the mental and emotional load of managing and leading, even if they are not comfortable admitting it.

Of course, there are many men who are great in leadership, especially as they mature, but this is not something that all men biologically and automatically have. 

Most of the leaders in the world are men and they are very selfish and do lots of mistakes. There are barely one man I can call a true leader or at least see in him the same leadership qualities I have seen in my grandmother for example.

For most of human history, society was sustained by the behind-the-scenes, quiet leadership and management skills of women, especially older women, which were barely recognized as more patriarchal structures arose.

Somehow it's really hard to get a strait answer on what is meant by matriarchy here.

On the one hand it's called egalitarian, on the other hand you are saying most of the leaders will be women anyway.

Being a good and wise leader depends on your level of consciousness, not your gender.

(Men treated women badly not because they are men, it's a matter of levels of consciousness. If women were physically stronger than men, we'd be talking about how badly women treated men. Can you see that it was never personal ?)

The only real way to have a better society is to raise the general level of consciousness, for man and woman.

Conscious people treat each other better.

Edited 31 minutes ago by Wilhelm44