Females have their own Manosphere

[AION]

This is basically pickup for women but in their case it is to get a rich guy or a rich give they are not able to get but trying to get with black magic and stuff. 

It is interesting how similar the advice is: don’t chase, be the price, be hard to get, let him work for it, let him qualify. 

I think currently we have a war between genders. But men are the only ones who are being gaslighted. 

Currently I don’t fall for that psychological warfare. Never drop your guard. And always have your options open. Currently as a guy to go for marriage or stuff is not ideal. It is a rampage out there and just smash and pass and get yourself in a better position in the mean time. 

[Spiral]

Being hard to get does not appeal to me. Even if it’s authentic. Hard to get is essentially high maintenance, which is an unattractive prospect.

If it’s not easy it’s not right. Now easy in this case can also be medium difficult. It’s not literally about being easy. It’s more about not wasting an enormous amount of time and energy on something that probably won’t lead anywhere. And if it did, probably isn’t worth the effort.

Edited 1 hour ago by Spiral

[Basman]

No kidding. Just look up feminist subreddits. It's socially accepted incels and chuds, except they're girls.

Surely, the prime strategy for bagging a rich guy is just being really hot and hanging out in rich people circles. One of the downsides of being a woman is that it's mostly just looks. You can't really change genes. They've been looksmaxxing since the stone age. 

[Basman]

Also being high status is probably worth more than anything. Elite circles are all about connections.

I get the feeling that gold digger forums is kind of cope. You need astronomical privilege in most cases I think. Just being on a forum and posting gold digger strats is chudposting, so it's already game over. 

Edited 1 hour ago by Basman

[Elliott]

@Basman you think the goal of feminists is to "bag a rich guy" with looksmaxxing? What is a non-feminist woman in your eyes, she's okay with a guy that works at mcdonalds, she will not divorce if the guys business fails and he goes poor?

this is a feminist to you?

 

 

 

Edited 1 hour ago by Elliott

[AION]

1 hour ago, Spiral said:

Being hard to get does not appeal to me. Even if it’s authentic. Hard to get is essentially high maintenance, which is an unattractive prospect.

If it’s not easy it’s not right. Now easy in this case can also be medium difficult. It’s not literally about being easy. It’s more about not wasting an enormous amount of time and energy on something that probably won’t lead anywhere. And if it did, probably isn’t worth the effort.

Something being hard to get means it is valuable. I wouldn’t want a girl that is too available either because that means she has too many notches on her belt which also means a lot of emotional baggage. I think a lot of guys think like this but obviously there are some exceptions. 

Another thing is that she can be hard to get for you because you are not valuable in her eyes and be open to another guy who she might she as valuable. 

I’m a guy who never goes for hard to get. It is too much work. I usually date a little bit below my level which means it is more easy but usually they aren’t stunning. That is the trade off. 

Edited 37 minutes ago by AION