Dating coaches tier list

[VioleGrace]

@Zenterus  I was asking because, in my experience, being self-amused and bringing fun into interactions can be a game changer for your overall game (especially if you can also be sexual and demonstrate value alongside it).

And I agree with you, being fun is just not enough to make a girl want to engage with you more, especially in a romantic context.

But when I re watched part of Sasha's interactions, he was not making a lot of involuntary “parasite” movements like fidgeting, and it seemed that he had strong eye contact.

As far as I know, this seems to be one of the best and most common ways to convey groundedness and sensual dominance.

That’s why I asked — I was curious about what I might be missing here.

Thanks a lot for the advice and insights, I really appreciate it.

[Shermaningeorgia]

the best tend to give realistic and grounded advice, and otherwise not softsoap or tell them fallacies. 

Of women, Kezia Noble seems fair. And of men, Playing with Fire. Both acknowledge looks matter but amongst other things. 

It's only scammers like the redpill guys and blackpillers like Wheat Waffles who push bs points to grift. Note how Wheat Waffles ended his channel, and nearly got disowned by his paretns for his rhetoric. 

 

[Ulax]

On 27/03/2026 at 1:20 PM, Zenterus said:

Pickup isnt about comedy. Its about results. The results are being an attractive man that women gravitate to.

Nah. I disagree. Pickup means different things for different people. Maximising your attractiveness is just one approach to pickup.

 

[Ulax]

On 09/04/2026 at 1:03 PM, Shermaningeorgia said:

the best tend to give realistic and grounded advice, and otherwise not softsoap or tell them fallacies. 

Of women, Kezia Noble seems fair. And of men, Playing with Fire. Both acknowledge looks matter but amongst other things. 

It's only scammers like the redpill guys and blackpillers like Wheat Waffles who push bs points to grift. Note how Wheat Waffles ended his channel, and nearly got disowned by his paretns for his rhetoric. 

 

Why follow Kezia Noble? She's never met a girl from cold approach and hooked up with her. How can her advice be trusted in comparison to other options?

[Ulax]

On 09/04/2026 at 1:49 AM, VioleGrace said:

@Zenterus  I was asking because, in my experience, being self-amused and bringing fun into interactions can be a game changer for your overall game (especially if you can also be sexual and demonstrate value alongside it).

And I agree with you, being fun is just not enough to make a girl want to engage with you more, especially in a romantic context.

But when I re watched part of Sasha's interactions, he was not making a lot of involuntary “parasite” movements like fidgeting, and it seemed that he had strong eye contact.

As far as I know, this seems to be one of the best and most common ways to convey groundedness and sensual dominance.

That’s why I asked — I was curious about what I might be missing here.

Thanks a lot for the advice and insights, I really appreciate it.

I'd say, based on theory from Todd, Sacha gave a lot of his power away in the first interaction. It seemed to me the mutual understanding of the interaction was "I (Sacha) want you, and i'm trying to convince you to want me too". Todd would say you want the narrative of "You got the interview, now I'm assessing whether you got the job". The latter is a more attractive narrative for the girl, and more likely to trigger attraction.

Its like a professor who gives out As to everyone, compared to a professor who is a hard ass and only gives As to a few people. Which grade are you gonna value more?

I have a guilt complex around giving perspectives on things I'm not that good at in practice lol. And dating is something im not that good at. But i thought this could help.

Edited 8 hours ago by Ulax