Ramasta9

Russia bans most social media we use today, thoughts?

5 posts in this topic

Apparently they have banned, FB, Instagram, Whatsapp, Twitter and others. Do you feel its a good thing?

70% of social media today seems garbage for the mind. 

 


I am but a reflection... a mirror... of you... of me... in a cosmic dance ~ of a unified mystery...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You think they're doing it out of the concern for the mental health of their citizens? They have their own platforms like VK, OK.ru and Telegram. They do it to control the tech platforms their citizens use for maximum tracking and surveillance. Just like China does and how Trump made his own apps. Smart strategy but bad for their citizens. You would hope as a citizen to have access to global communications network and news. 

If China undid their great Chinese firewall it would probably singlehandedly bring down their regime. I believe all these closed systems will soon fall and humankind will unite under one system. Cryptocurrency and blockchains are the start of such a system.  

Edited by LordFall

Owner of creatives community all around Canada as well as a business & Investing mastermind 

Follow me on Instagram @Kylegfall 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course it's not a good thing. It is becoming North Korea.


You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, LordFall said:

If China undid their great Chinese firewall it would probably singlehandedly bring down their regime.

Exactly. Information and space warfare are the frontier abstract layers of geopolitics.

Check this article: https://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2026/02/washingtons-war-on-iran-importance-of.html

Especailly halfway through under the heading: US Weaponization of Information Space in the 21st Century  

''Throughout the 21st century, the US has deliberately and maliciously weaponized its domination over global information space, specifically through US-based social media platforms like X (formally Twitter), Meta/Facebook, YouTube, Google, Instagram, and many others.''

 

''The US Threat to Global Information Space Requires Global Defense 

The nations of Russia and China have - over the course of many years and through extensive work - secured their respective information space. This has - in turn - allowed both nations to secure and stabilize their political space providing the social harmony required to not only survive ongoing attempts by the US to encircle and contain both global powers, but in many instances to thrive. 

This has been achieved through the creation of domestic alternatives to the US-based social media platforms that otherwise dominate global information space. Both nations have online networks that can be disconnected from Western-influenced information space when and if necessary.

Beyond this, both nations have created domestic pipelines ensuring crucial human resources such as programmers and technicians required to maintain the physical infrastructure of their information space are trained in-country and with the nation’s best interests in mind, as well as the media personnel, government officials, and other civil servants who use each nation’s information space. 

This is not unlike the physical infrastructure built within any sovereign nation. Roads, rail, airports, and seaports are all acknowledged to be integral to national security and thus their construction, maintenance, use, and protection are determined accordingly. 

Unfortunately, many policymakers across the planet have yet to understand that information space in the 21st century is as important - if not more so - than this physical infrastructure or traditional national security domains. 

Allowing the US to not only provide US-based social media platforms to nations rather than nations developing their own, but allowing the US to also control the flow of information and thus ideas and consensus on these platforms is as bad, or worse, than allowing foreign interests to control a nation’s physical borders, infrastructure, and even a nation’s own citizenry.

The cost of surrendering a key - if not the key -  domain of national security to the United States is political infiltration, capture, and even complete collapse as admitted US operations spanning the 21st century from Europe to the Arab World to Asia and back again have sufficiently demonstrated.''

 

 

Of course though its a double edged sword that also allows for domestic control of the population.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now