Why reality had to be intelligent?

[Never_give_up]

Why not being more dumb and chaotic, this would be more unbiased and normal. I wouldn't like it, I like it the way it is now, but that doesn't mean it makes sense.

[Yimpa]

I am You, and how conscious You/I are of that is another story. 

The hand is absolutely a hand, but how conscious and love you relate to the hand is not nothin, so  don’t take that lightly “oh it’s just a hand, so what?” Wrong.

And that’s just a hand. We are just getting started, so stayed attuned to your truth seeking. Don’t lose sight of the Bigger Picture.

Edited 3 hours ago by Yimpa

[Someone here]

I'm not sure if the whole "intelligent vs dumb " thing is a human projection. What I know is it does appear intelligently designed. Like look at animals ..or even your body ..eyes see like a camera ..ears hear ..a digestive system etc. Or how planets orbit around the sun. Just the very fact that there are physical laws at all governing the universe and are knowable to us as humans and can be described with mathematics and allow us to predict the movements of planets and stars . Etc. Fascinating. 

Edited 4 hours ago by Someone here

[Breakingthewall]

Because in a framework, or better a no framework, without limits, possible fluctuations or changes of state overlap and remain stable if they are absolutely coherent with each other, and if they are not, they do not occur.

For example, an atom fluctuates at the electromagnetic level 10 rised to 15 times per second, at the nuclear level 10 rised to 20 times, and at the (hypothetical) level of the quantum vacuum 10 rised to 43 times every second. A proton, for example, is stable (it is assumed) for 10 rised to 31 years. Seems a very perfect design furthermore, considering the possible combinations of these elementary particles.

In physics, exist=interact. Something that doesn't interact with something else doesn't exist, it's just a possibility that is not. Then, anything that is not coherent with anything else, is not. 

You could say thay the universe could be completely chaotic, but it could be said that it was absolutely chaotic at the moment of the Big Bang, and it automatically finds the most coherent possibilities for relative limits to exist without absolute closure, since absolute closure would be ontologically impossible given an unlimited essence.

A kind of self-selection of the most coherent by overcoming the less coherent

Edited 3 hours ago by Breakingthewall