Raze

US strikes on Iran seemingly imminent

30 posts in this topic

@Elliott  Okay that point I can understand. 

But if you own a whole country militarily with minimal losses, thats still a show of strength. 

Trump said he would help in Iran. That he backs down now is a bigger show of weakness then loosing a Jet. 

Edited by Jannes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Jannes said:

@Elliott  Okay that point I can understand. 

But if you own a whole country militarily with minimal losses, thats still a show of strength. 

You have a glamourized view of what a u.s. attack on Iran would look like. Iran is huge and strategically prepared, hence the underground nuclear sites. Why was the u.s. fighting Afghanistan for 20 years, a country with no legitimate military. Iran has the 14th strongest military in the world, Afghanistan 2001 had 50,000 soldiers, one u.s. aircraft carrier has 5,000 sailors. Iran has a million.

There's a specific dynamic being overlooked. The u.s. would be the offender, Iran defender. When you're a defender you have no reason to reserve missiles or jets for instance, Iran has a massive stock pile, they will fire indiscriminately, at ships, bases, everything that moves, they will hit, hence Israel's "Iron Dome" shattering to pieces in a MILD volley. When you're an offender, you're more reserved "China will take taiwan and Phillipines if we deplete or lose equipment, BRICS will take south america, Russia will take the Arctic".

 

 

 

iran-israel-map-irans-missile-range.jpg

Edited by Elliott

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This analyzes describes how an attack on Iran would mostly likely mainly involve Israel supported by US military assets. 


Owner of creatives community all around Canada as well as a business & Investing mastermind 

Follow me on Instagram @Kylegfall 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, LordFall said:

This analyzes describes how an attack on Iran would mostly likely mainly involve Israel supported by US military assets. 

The state of New York did not indict Maduro, nor did Venezuela send drugs to the u.s., they come from Mexico and colombia.

Edited by Elliott

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Elliott said:

You have a glamourized view of what a u.s. attack on Iran would look like. Iran is huge and strategically prepared, hence the underground nuclear sites. Why was the u.s. fighting Afghanistan for 20 years, a country with no legitimate military. Iran has the 14th strongest military in the world, Afghanistan 2001 had 50,000 soldiers, one u.s. aircraft carrier has 5,000 sailors. Iran has a million.

There's a specific dynamic being overlooked. The u.s. would be the offender, Iran defender. When you're a defender you have no reason to reserve missiles or jets for instance, Iran has a massive stock pile, they will fire indiscriminately, at ships, bases, everything that moves, they will hit, hence Israel's "Iron Dome" shattering to pieces in a MILD volley. When you're an offender, you're more reserved 

Any major basis could just get bombed to the ground by the US and big pieces likes tanks or Jets dont really stand a chance imo but they can loose against Guerilla tactics on the ground. 

3 hours ago, Elliott said:

"China will take taiwan and Phillipines if we deplete or lose equipment, BRICS will take south america, Russia will take the Arctic".

Thats a good point. I cant picture the actual numbers of what recources the US really have. If they wanted to take controll on the ground I am sure they would need to put everything in there and would possibly even loose because they are outnumbered.  

Edited by Jannes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Elliott said:

Nice Jets. The US has 2300 of those. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Jannes said:

Nice Jets. The US has 2300 of those. 

Zero of which can reach Iran without refuelling from inside Iran's missile range(iran will strike all the bases). Home field advantage.

 

 

ABC News

https://abcnews.go.com

Navy loses 2nd fighter jet in Red Sea in a week - ABC News

A US Navy fighter jet sank to the bottom of the Red Sea on Tuesday. It is the second 

 

 

NDTV

https://www.ndtv.com

Houthi Group Says Its Attacks Led To Shooting Down US F-18 Fighter Jet

May 1, 2025 — Yemen's Houthi group has said it had shot down a US F-18 fighter jet during an earlier assault on the aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman

 

 

The New Arab

https://www.newarab.com

Yemen's Houthis nearly shot down advanced US F-35 jet: report

May 18, 2025 — The Houthis successfully shot down at least seven US MQ-9 Reaper drones- each worth around $30 million- and came close to hitting an American

 

 

 

National Review

https://www.nationalreview.com

The Houthis Just Turned a U.S. Super Hornet Fighter Jet into a Submarine

Apr 29, 2025 — Houthi rebels in Yemen have shot down 

 

 

Edited by Elliott

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Elliott said:

Zero of which can reach Iran without refuelling from inside Iran's missile range(iran will strike all those bases). Home field advantage.

Okay, beggs the question if the Air Defense is advanced enough to shoot down the Jets. The B2 bomber could do some tactical bombing of air defense first. 

None of your links work 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems useless any strike from EEUU now. The only way to achieve regime change in Iran is through action by the Iranians themselves. The US and Israel will obviously collaborate if civil war breaks out, but for that to happen, a large sector of the Iranian armed forces would have to rebel, and this doesn't seem possible...so far. Who knows what tricks Israel has up its sleeve?

Yes, yes, Israel should mind its own business and all that, but on the other hand, perhaps 50 years of Islamic clerical dictatorship, where the illiterate rule and those who study emigrate, is enough for a millennia-old culture like Iran's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Jannes said:

Okay, beggs the question if the Air Defense is advanced enough to shoot down the Jets. The B2 bomber could do some tactical bombing of air defense first. 

None of your links work 

If you're actually interested, i suggest starting with your questions through AI. I'd be happy to talk about it more, but this just seems like we're having a dumb argument about something that's not going to happen.

 

I didn't mean missiles to shoot jets down, I mean to hit the u.s. bases, restricting the jets to air refuelling, a logistical nightmare, fighters fly for 2 hours max, less than 1 hour in combat.

This below is an air defense system, they don't sit still, the houthis use an even smaller one. Iran can actually detect stealth aircraft too. It's not really about advanced anything of irans though, it's mainly the brute missiles, their fighters are just for defense. Bombers are easily shot down by Iran. Then, we're back to your worry about using up our 5million dollar bombs.

images (18).jpeg

Edited by Elliott

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now