Did this comedian reveal the danger of men not learning game?

[Raze]

 

 

background: this comedian got into a debate with redpill podcaster Myron Gaines, and he argued in favor of traditional perspectives on a man’s role saying he’s only slept with one women he committed to, his now wife, takes care of finances, and says you should marry within the same culture.

However in response people found clips of his wife saying she slept with other people and other clips indicating she may only want him for his money.

Does this prove the PUA argument right wherein they say having expectations based on tradition that you should just work and be chivalrous and you’ll have a good wife is false and men should instead take time to play the field and learn game?

Edited yesterday at 12:24 AM by Raze

[NewKidOnTheBlock]

This guy's case is pretty bad, not the worst that there could be, but definitely up there (or down there, more precisely). I don't have to be adept at game at all to have such a basic level of self respect. But I bet this is generally the kind of dynamic you can expect if you get with a woman who really strongly identifies with feminism, but even then to a much lesser degree than this LOL like I said, this guy's case is pretty bad, definitely some mental issues on both sides on top of her feminism

[aurum]

1 hour ago, Raze said:

Does this prove the PUA argument right wherein they say having expectations based on tradition that you should just work and be chivalrous and you’ll have a good wife is false and men should instead take time to play the field and learn game?

You don't need "game", you need to become the kind of man that women want to follow. That's the only thing that ultimately matters if you want a solid LTR.

The issue is that men need to go through a process for developing that. You don't just "get it" by default. And part of that process is actual experience with women.

Without this experience, you will have no idea what properly attracts her or understand what keeps her around.

It's like expecting you'll be excellent at a sport you've never played.

There's no short-cutting this process just by being a chivalrous, hard-working provider. She has to be hooked on the man bringing in the money, not just the money itself.

[Bando]

Let's look at the context he was a 38-year-old virgin before he met his wife. He wasn't a virgin due to religious reasons it was due to his incredibly low self-esteem he stated this on his earlier podcast before.

He found an attractive young Indian woman who was a "virgin" and decided to blast through all the red flags that came up in the earlier stages of their courtship to secure a relationship with her The stuff Akash is going through now is the kind of things you expect someone in the early-mid 20s to be going through. 

While he has carved a nice career for himself, he still hasn't resolved the inner wounds that he spent his 20s and 30s in that's what attracted him to the low quality woman he's with what a shame.

7 hours ago, Raze said:

Does this prove the PUA argument right wherein they say having expectations based on tradition that you should just work and be chivalrous and you’ll have a good wife is false and men should instead take time to play the field and learn game?

Depends on your definition "playing the field and learning game" in the PUA world this typically correlates to increasing your notch count, the lessons learned from optimizing your skill set for this pursuit doesn't translate to healthy long-term relationships well. 

Learning how to attract women to have sex with them is different than retaining them in a way that constitutes a healthy relationship. 

[NewKidOnTheBlock]

9 hours ago, Raze said:

Does this prove the PUA argument right wherein they say having expectations based on tradition that you should just work and be chivalrous and you’ll have a good wife is false and men should instead take time to play the field and learn game?

Successfully playing the field, whatever that entails, is definitely preferable to whatever this is. And it’s certainly preferable to how a lot of relationships turn out. Not all, or even most, but many. Of course, the people to whom this may concern would never be aware of it, let alone honest about it. And I would say this advice about being chivalrous, work hard, pay for everything, etc., isn’t just traditional anymore. Nowadays it has come full circle, with many feminists propagating it, masking it as "treating women as human beings" or "making up for your privileges" or "paying for the work and effort I’m putting in," to paraphrase. The irony

[Tenebroso]

Akaash is what happens when you listen to women and mainstream society on how to be attractive. I bet he was told throughout his 20's and 30's just be a "good guy", "it will happen when you least expect it", "just get to know women platonically", "do you have hobbies?"...............Just the same regurgitated gaslighting.

[Schizophonia]

Masculinity stems from the conditioning to embrace symbolic castration.

The phallic position is the positive polarity of this configuration, which may seem paradoxical at first glance but the idea is that by accepting castration you stop seeing yourself as lacking a phallus, as a "castrated self", and learn to enjoy this position of absence of lack, to identify with it.

 

Femininity means lack of phallus; that's why girls have longer hair, like to do their nails, like cuddles, to be filled by a functional willy and cie; because they want to recover the phallus that is "missing"; and all of this is a psychological game; fundamentally, they lack a phallus because they can't bear its absence; if I want something, then it means, I experience, not having it; and vice versa.

Thus, when attention perceives lack or rather unconsciously and from a non-dual perspective the polarity of lack/fullness, through comfort/conditioning you will automatically identify with fullness and project the lack. This is what male sexuality is all about; energy builds and triggers a growing perception of the full/empty duality; you generally prefer fullness (normally) and therefore naturally project absence onto women.
And the more this energy manifests, the more your mesolimbic dopaminergic circuit my ass becomes aroused, the more you see this duality, which manifests as the urge to fuck a girl while pulling her hair.

 

He could return to calm/inner power (phallic position), but this would automatically lead to accepting the atrophy of his ego (symbolic castration, entering into the symbolic in general as Lacan would say), which he so vehemently rejects that he becomes like a homosexual, fidgeting in his armchair.

 

The guys around him are a bit more androgenic and therefore assertive, more prone to feelings of anger and sarcasm than confusion, but deep down they have the same problems and that's why they end up talking to this mirror.The guys who talk about blackpill, pua and the like are generally wimps; it's obvious.

Edited 3 hours ago by Schizophonia