Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Raze

Did this comedian reveal the danger of men not learning game?

5 posts in this topic

 

 

background: this comedian got into a debate with redpill podcaster Myron Gaines, and he argued in favor of traditional perspectives on a man’s role saying he’s only slept with one women he committed to, his now wife, takes care of finances, and says you should marry within the same culture.

However in response people found clips of his wife saying she slept with other people and other clips indicating she may only want him for his money.

Does this prove the PUA argument right wherein they say having expectations based on tradition that you should just work and be chivalrous and you’ll have a good wife is false and men should instead take time to play the field and learn game?

Edited by Raze

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This guy's case is pretty bad, not the worst that there could be, but definitely up there (or down there, more precisely). I don't have to be adept at game at all to have such a basic level of self respect. But I bet this is generally the kind of dynamic you can expect if you get with a woman who really strongly identifies with feminism, but even then to a much lesser degree than this LOL like I said, this guy's case is pretty bad, definitely some mental issues on both sides on top of her feminism


Blind leading the blind

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Raze said:

Does this prove the PUA argument right wherein they say having expectations based on tradition that you should just work and be chivalrous and you’ll have a good wife is false and men should instead take time to play the field and learn game?

You don't need "game", you need to become the kind of man that women want to follow. That's the only thing that ultimately matters if you want a solid LTR.

The issue is that men need to go through a process for developing that. You don't just "get it" by default. And part of that process is actual experience with women.

Without this experience, you will have no idea what properly attracts her or understand what keeps her around.

It's like expecting you'll be excellent at a sport you've never played.

There's no short-cutting this process just by being a chivalrous, hard-working provider. She has to be hooked on the man bringing in the money, not just the money itself.


"Finding your reason can be so deceiving, a subliminal place. 

I will not break, 'cause I've been riding the curves of these infinity words and so I'll be on my way. I will not stay.

 And it goes On and On, On and On"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's look at the context he was a 38-year-old virgin before he met his wife. He wasn't a virgin due to religious reasons it was due to his incredibly low self-esteem he stated this on his earlier podcast before.

He found an attractive young Indian woman who was a "virgin" and decided to blast through all the red flags that came up in the earlier stages of their courtship to secure a relationship with her The stuff Akash is going through now is the kind of things you expect someone in the early-mid 20s to be going through. 

While he has carved a nice career for himself, he still hasn't resolved the inner wounds that he spent his 20s and 30s in that's what attracted him to the low quality woman he's with what a shame.

7 hours ago, Raze said:

Does this prove the PUA argument right wherein they say having expectations based on tradition that you should just work and be chivalrous and you’ll have a good wife is false and men should instead take time to play the field and learn game?

Depends on your definition "playing the field and learning game" in the PUA world this typically correlates to increasing your notch count, the lessons learned from optimizing your skill set for this pursuit doesn't translate to healthy long-term relationships well. 

Learning how to attract women to have sex with them is different than retaining them in a way that constitutes a healthy relationship. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Raze said:

Does this prove the PUA argument right wherein they say having expectations based on tradition that you should just work and be chivalrous and you’ll have a good wife is false and men should instead take time to play the field and learn game?

Successfully playing the field, whatever that entails, is definitely preferable to whatever this is. And it’s certainly preferable to how a lot of relationships turn out. Not all, or even most, but many. Of course, the people to whom this may concern would never be aware of it, let alone honest about it. And I would say this advice about being chivalrous, work hard, pay for everything, etc., isn’t just traditional anymore. Nowadays it has come full circle, with many feminists propagating it, masking it as "treating women as human beings" or "making up for your privileges" or "paying for the work and effort I’m putting in," to paraphrase. The irony


Blind leading the blind

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0