Hyperion

- My Theory Of Everything -

49 posts in this topic

2 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

What I try is not defining the reality, it's constructing a mental frame that allows the total openess. Believe me that this is the point of spirituality. Not having some realizations but being open to your absolute nature right now. And this needs a restructuring of your psyche 

This is good.  All of this is good.  Have you had some awakenings?  Tell me of them.


 

Wisdom.  Truth.  Love.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Inliytened1 said:

This is good.  All of this is good.  Have you had some awakenings?  Tell me of them.

I already told you above. Anyway, what is an awakening? The point is being awake, and being awake means being open to your unlimited nature now. It's not a realization, any realization belongs to the conceptual relative level. Its the fact of being open to what has not limits now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

I already told you above. Anyway, what is an awakening? The point is being awake, and being awake means being open to your unlimited nature now. It's not a realization, any realization belongs to the conceptual relative level. Its the fact of being open to what has not limits now. 

Ok let's not forget that there are distinct changes in state.  It is in a higher state that I believe God resides.  In a higher state of conscousness.  While we sit here as humans in a lower state, but a state high enough to know how to tie our shoes.  And a dog sits in a state where he can't understand that.  So you have to understand there are states of consciousness.  Please acknowledge this or we have nothing more to say.

Edited by Inliytened1

 

Wisdom.  Truth.  Love.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Inliytened1 said:

Ok let's not forget that there are distinct changes in state.  It is in a higher state that I believe God resides.  In a higher state of conscousness.  While we sit here as humans in a lower state, but a state highe enough to know how to tie our shoes.  And a dog sits in a state where he can't understand that.  So you have to understand there are states of consciousness.  Please acknowledge this or we have nothing more to say.

5 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

 

There are two states of consciousness: closed and open. It has no relationship with being god or knowing anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Breakingthewall said:

There are two states of consciousness: closed and open. It has no relationship with being god or knowing anything.

You know better than this, that's all I'll say.


 

Wisdom.  Truth.  Love.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

What I try is not defining the reality, it's constructing a mental frame that allows the total openess. Believe me that this is the point of spirituality. Not having some realizations but being open to your absolute nature right now. And this needs a restructuring of your psyche 

You can only be the Absolute, not know the Absolute, because a human being is a limited temporal entity. What can a limited temporal entity know about the Absolute? It would need to be omnipresent, omnipotent , and omniscient, which it’s not. Relative knowledge about the Absolute would be Absurd.

 

IMG_0713.jpeg


 

Grief is Love with Nowhere to Go 

You cannot talk butterfly language with caterpillar people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

You can only be the Absolute, not know the Absolute, because a human being is a limited temporal entity. What can a limited temporal entity know about the Absolute? It would need to be omnipresent, omnipotent , and omniscient, which it’s not. Relative knowledge about the Absolute would be Absurd.

 

IMG_0713.jpeg

1 hour ago, Inliytened1 said:

 

1 hour ago, Inliytened1 said:

 

The absolute is not the sum of all relative things, but rather what all relative things are in essence. Everything that exists is existence, absolute being manifested in a form.

Obviously, you can't know all forms, and besides, it wouldn't do any good. The point is to transcend form and open yourself to what is, to the absolute being. It's strange that this isn't obvious. 

You could know what you are because you are the absolute being manifested in a reflexive form. 

1 hour ago, Inliytened1 said:

You know better than this, that's all I'll say.

What better? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

Obviously, you can't know all forms, and besides, it wouldn't do any good. The point is to transcend form and open yourself to what is, to the absolute being. It's strange that this isn't obvious. 

What’s actually obvious is that which appears to transcend, never transcends.

If the Absolute is truly absolute, nothing exists outside of it. If it tries to "know" itself, it splits into a subject and an object, meaning it is no longer a seamless, undivided whole. 


 

Grief is Love with Nowhere to Go 

You cannot talk butterfly language with caterpillar people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I made something called "Ownership of the One..." (the last chapt., on that exp., for the full understanding of...) but its still in galleys. Ima try waitin like, maybe a month or two, workin out like, 'how to present... As i wanna get everyone on the same EXACT page lol 😆which may sound impossible, but i think everyone is gonna be closer in a month, as more ppl have time to write things down and such, And not to mention, lots of ideas can occur, and in that time, nd lots of lesser priority ideas can be garbage collected, therein raising up Those w/ the most -if it makes sense, i think so.

Edited by kavaris

Paraphrase from Poimandres (Corpus Hermeticum): "... that which is in the Word is also in ourselves."

Greek Magical Papyri (PGM): "I call upon the Word of the All, that which binds heaven and earth, and let it manifest in the circle."

Plato – Cratylus (439–440): "A name is a likeness of the thing itself; if rightly spoken, it carries the essence of what it names."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now