- My Theory Of Everything -

[kavaris]

On 7/11/2025 at 7:38 AM, Hyperion said:

The Absolute is the totality of Being

Im thinkin on this one right now, cause Being might already carry "totality of", but Being also functions as the first thing towards all other things, however in the context w/ no qualities, then you cancel out the very thing itself, right then and there, which means you have the centipedes dilemma thing, that is "explaining experience, while experiencing",   so in that sense, Being is already the totality you are searching for then.

Being can be the absolute, or you can frame Being as more like, the necessary component (or something...) cause like... English didnt really work on making Being a defined term, so if you are using English to investigate Being, its using this limited pointer construct to do so... Like the hierarchy of words matters in reflecting the understanding of Being, is all i was tryina get to really, but there are ways of "getting up to that plateau of understanding" prior to knowing that hierarchy of Being (Being of hierarchy)

Edited Saturday at 02:03 PM by kavaris

[Hyperion]

@Breakingthewall

Lol, I love you too. 😘

[kavaris]

Parts of what you were saying probably do make sense in that basic English sense, but i couldnt really know (not sure i can ever know really). I have like a very specific idea in mind now/thus i cant remember 100% how far off, or how close to, etc, etc., and its also hard to really go on like, a purely broadened overview, seeing as theres some little details / directions / questions,

Do we care about survival?

Do we want to "know" something more specific... Or does it all end at "absolute" and its understandng of? I dont have them questions on my dashboard / queued up right now exactly, but those are questions that can change things drastically.

[Breakingthewall]

1 hour ago, Hyperion said:

@Breakingthewall

Lol, I love you too. 😘

3 hours ago, Hyperion said:

 

Translation: hey I'm here to appear brilliant, don't mess with ideas and conversation ok?

[Hyperion]

2 hours ago, Breakingthewall said:

Translation: hey I'm here to appear brilliant, don't mess with ideas and conversation ok?

Sorry, but for someone who raves so much about logic, you just don't seem very capable of (meta)logical thinking. Also, you seem to have some kind of chip on your shoulder. So I frankly don't really see the point in talking to you.

Take care, brother.

 

Edited Saturday at 05:19 PM by Hyperion

[Breakingthewall]

49 minutes ago, Hyperion said:

Sorry, but for someone who raves so much about logic, you just don't seem very capable of (meta)logical thinking. Also, you seem to have some kind of chip on your shoulder. So I frankly don't really see the point in talking to you.

Take care, brother.

 

Sure, you sound aitenthic pure soul, no doubt. 

Anyway, I just pointed a couple of things about the absolute and the relative. Answering saying brother and that is cool, but what about the points?

[Willy Phallicus]

7 hours ago, Breakingthewall said:

The only problem is that is meaningless.

There's a good reason for this.

Still something to be learned from it though.

[Hyperion]

20 hours ago, Breakingthewall said:

Anyway, I just pointed a couple of things about the absolute and the relative. Answering saying brother and that is cool, but what about the points?

This is going to be my last reply to you on this thread.

The Absolute is that which has no opposite. Therefore, whatever you say about it (i.e. whatever relative quality you adscribe to it) isn't it - and also it is, but so is the opposite of whatever you say about it.

If you cannot grasp this simple meta-logical fact, then I simply cannot help you.

Over and out.

[Breakingthewall]

38 minutes ago, Hyperion said:

This is going to be my last reply to you on this thread.

The Absolute is that which has no opposite. Therefore, whatever you say about it (i.e. whatever relative quality you adscribe to it) isn't it - and also it is, but so is the opposite of whatever you say about it.

If you cannot grasp this simple meta-logical fact, then I simply cannot help you.

Over and out.

Help about what, if you are lost? 

The absolute is the fact of being , it can be described easily: the affirmative unlimited being. I can meditate and being totally open to this fact every single day, it's the alive now without limits, what is. It's not metalogical, it's obvious. 

[Hyperion]

The opposite of that which can be expressed with words is that which cannot be expressed with words.

The opposite of that which can be described as "XYZ" is that which can be described as "not XYZ".

That which has no opposite must be all of those things, and also none of those things.

Simple logic.

[Inliytened1]

On 7/11/2025 at 6:38 AM, Hyperion said:

The following is my attempt to formulate a "theory of everything" that is as short and concise as possible and doesn't contain any kind of unnecessary fluff. I hope you have fun with it... and please keep in mind that this is only a conceptual model which, just like any model, is nothing but a necessarily incomplete and ultimately inadequate abstraction.

Enjoy.

---

The Absolute is the totality of Being. It has no specific quality, as it is the origin, the sum, and the essence - or field - of all possible qualities. Therefore, the Absolute cannot be directly experienced; an experience is always the experience of something definable, i.e. of something that possesses a concrete quality. In other words: Reality is only ever partially perceivable, experienceable and cognizable, but never as a complete whole.

Consciousness or experience of reality is therefore only possible where the Absolute seemingly splits up into several parts and establishes contrasting relations between them; ]

This incorrect.  Consciousness is fundamental.

[Hyperion]

Mmmm, another well-founded and carefully substantiated criticism. What a delight!

3 hours ago, Inliytened1 said:

Consciousness is fundamental.

Consciousness is the by-product of relative qualities coming into existence (and thereby being experienced). In fact, consciousness, experience, existence and relativity are pretty much synonymous.

You can only ever experience that which "stands out" in your awareness from the rest of reality. The totality of reality on the other hand can never be (fully) experienced; it can only be experienced and be made conscious by approximation, if you will (I.e. by raising the vibrational frequency of consciousness).

But hey, it seems to me like I already explained all of this at length in my OP, so... why exactly am I writing all of this again?

[Joseph Maynor]

Theory of everything.  Damn.  

[Inliytened1]

On 7/11/2025 at 6:38 AM, Hyperion said:

 

Consciousness or experience of reality is therefore only possible ]

This in incorrect. Conscoiusness, or Awareness much old all of reality, otherwise what would it be?  atoms?  Quarks?

Are you EInstein or Bohr? have you looked deep into the nature of reality? what have you found?

That everything exists in a superposition, meaning it can manifest to whatever outcome happens at the, otherwise, it's nature is NOTHING.

You are NOTHING 

[Hyperion]

58 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

Conscoiusness, or Awareness much old all of reality, otherwise what would it be?  atoms?  Quarks?

Reality is the infinite field of all possible qualities, meaning that anything you can name, think of and experience is it - and also, it isn't.

So it doesn't make the slightest difference what you call it: Reality, unreality, consciousness, spirit, matter, appearance, illusion, everything, nothing, self, no-self, oneness, multiplicity, Yin, Yang, John, Jaqueline, a three-headed Zebra with purple stripes... the name you give it doesn't matter at all, because it is All That Is, and it includes, expresses itself as and transcends absolutely everything.