Females DO NOT Have More Options For Sexual Preferences

[Princess Arabia]

All it takes for most men to WANT to have sex with a woman is her appearance. For most women, it takes more than a physical appearance to WANT to have sex with a man; but not just that, even if she wants to, it doesn't mean she'll go ahead and do it. 

Females have more men hitting on them, yes, than women hitting on men but not many she would actually want to, or have sex with. Wanting sex for us doesn't just come from feeling horny, but with a specific type of guy. A woman can have sex with someone she's not physically attracted to just like men, but a man will do it purely for physical reasons while a woman, in this case, it would be circumstantial. A man could be horny, and if an attractive woman hits on him, and is willing to sleep with him, more than likely he'd go, especially if he's single. For a horny woman, that takes more than just a guy hitting on her, physically attractive to her or not.

So no, women don't have more options for sex preferences - men do. Going out the door and having multiple guys hitting on me DOES mean I'll have more options for sex, but it DOESN'T mean my preferences are abundant. Sex for most women is different than what it is for men, please understand that. MEN WILL FIND MORE WOMEN THEY'D SLEEP WITH THAN WOMEN WITH MEN. 

This is not about status, wealth, attractiveness, competence, confidence, security, etc. either, just in general. All a man needs is for her to be his type, and sometimes not, and he's willing if he's single and looking and sometimes not also. Women aren't generally out looking for strange men just to have sex with, so her options are limited in that way.  Men aren't out approaching lots of women just to go have coffee or tea.

Notice what I put in the heading: Sexual Preference, not just options.

Edited Friday at 10:52 PM by Princess Arabia

[CARDOZZO]

The reality is that a lot of us (men) will not have what it takes to have a abundant sex life. If you really are into pickup, you will have to take a massive action to talk, meet and arrange girls to meet your standards. 

Usually men complain because they are not getting what they want and they are not willing to put into work to become valuable to woman. 

Edited Friday at 10:58 PM by CARDOZZO

[Princess Arabia]

1 minute ago, CARDOZZO said:

Usually men complain because they are not getting what they want and they are not willing to put into work to become valuable to woman. 

Do you think a lot of women are out there fishing out who is valuable to her or not when it comes to wanting to have sex with him or feeling that spontaneous "umph". Not many. The valuable thing comes in when maybe looking for relationship or marriage or if she's looking for things other than sex. I'm referring to her wanting to have sex not looking for a reason to.

 

[Princess Arabia]

10 minutes ago, CARDOZZO said:

, you will have to take a massive action to talk, meet and arrange girls to meet your standards. 

What kind of standards do you think a man needs to possess for a female that sees him and says 'oh my gosh, he's so cute, I'd love to fuck his brains out, and will, if he lets me" Standards are out the door then. It's that most women aren't thinking like this; Some are and do, but they are far and few. With men, this is a daily occurrence. More options. It's just their options are limited to who will actually have sex.

Edited Friday at 11:09 PM by Princess Arabia

[Princess Arabia]

Read and understand my post, guys. I'm not speaking about the secondary cause. I'm speaking of right away, spontaneously, in the moment. Men's options are abundant. What is1000 approaches or 500 or even 50, if that's not abundance. Closing is a different story. I didn't make this shit up. This forum alone shows the abundance of options guys have. Do you think I could find even one or two guys i'd love to freely have sex with within a week's time? Maybe not. Much less every attractive pants that walks by. Takes more than that for most women. Let a guy see a hot sexy chick walking down the street. Then another, then another, then another, then another. He would be drooling and getting a hard on. Tell me a woman would be ready to hit the sack with 10 handsome men that walk by. That's the difference. Again, men have more options for actual sexual preferences. Women only have more abundance when it comes to being approached and doesn't equate to actually having sex. We don't want to have sex with the options you think we have.

[Tenebroso]

What you are really just exposing is that men have much lower standards for women in terms arousing lust. However, the fact that men find so many women attractive is more of a problem because the vast majority of those women will not want to have anything to do with you. The issue with this subject is that women speak like attraction is evenly distributed and that there is a woman for every guy, while what really happens is that some guys end up being involved with hundreds of women and other die alone. Men do not have an abundance of options, the fact that men are expected to approach is a burden not a privilege. Most men will experience rejection after rejection the fact that men are so easily attracted to women is more of an absurd cosmic joke of the universe because we are repulsive to the majority of women we will ever find attractive. A very small percentage of attractive, high status men experience true abundance.

[Princess Arabia]

I can't tell how many times I've gone out and seen lots of couples, lots of women kissing up on average looking guys and normal man to man relationships. Go to a night club on the weekends. Stay till after hours how many are hooking up. These guys aren't hatch owners and jet flyers. They are regular guys that just knows how to attract women. The post is about options for sex not women looking for status and what a guy can do for them. 

[Princess Arabia]

22 minutes ago, Tenebroso said:

What you are really just exposing is that men have much lower standards for women in terms arousing lust.

No, it is DIFFERENT. Men won't like it when you tell them it's all about how you look, but 20yrs of experience doesn't tell me otherwise. Women just don't go around lusting after strange men. Imagine if both sexes were like that. There wouldn't be a balance now would it.

[Tenebroso]

Most men do not have options for sex. I live in a city of 10 million people. This weekend I can't snap my fingers and decide to have sex, the fact that I am attracted to many women means nothing. They are not real options because pretty much all of them will not not be attracted to me.

[Tenebroso]

15 minutes ago, Princess Arabia said:

I can't tell how many times I've gone out and seen lots of couples, lots of women kissing up on average looking guys and normal man to man relationships. Go to a night club on the weekends. Stay till after hours how many are hooking up. These guys aren't hatch owners and jet flyers. They are regular guys that just knows how to attract women. The post is about options for sex not women looking for status and what a guy can do for them. 

Funny that you mention nightclubs because it's known in that the world that nightlife is dying because men have stopped going because there is no point. Women have zero interest in 99% of men they meet at a nightclub. Those days are over.

I go out all the time and I see much older couples but young people are either alone or with friend groups if it's a young couple it is always tall, attractive man with average woman. I never see the unattractive man with attractive woman thing people talk about.

[Tenebroso]

Not only are you wrong but most young women today would disagree with you. Young women have never been more brutally honest in how they feel about most men. We are ugly and repulsive the women of our generations and the days of compensating with money or personality is over. Women have their own money now and get their emotional needs met through their friendships. So the only use for men is sex, lust and desire and for that only a very small percentage of men qualify. If you are not one of those men your desires mean nothing, they are a burden to women. Marriage rates have drooped because the days of women settling for average men who are not sexy but stable and nice are over. This is the reality.

[Princess Arabia]

1 minute ago, Tenebroso said:

Funny that you mention nightclubs because it's known in that the world that nightlife is dying because men have stopped going because there is no point.

3 minutes ago, Tenebroso said:

 

You're making my point. Men have more options with whom they want to sleep with women don't. They're not going because they can't find the type of woman, it's because the women don't have the options that men have. Youre saying it yourself it's the women who have no interest not the men. The post is about sexual preferences not options for sex. Well, both but the point is women's options are limited.

[Princess Arabia]

I knew my post would be mis read and all you guys would see is women have more options

and men don't. Please read the post for what it is and not what you think I'm saying, please.

Women do not have more options for who they want to sleep with is the point.

Edited yesterday at 12:27 AM by Princess Arabia

[Princess Arabia]

4 minutes ago, Tenebroso said:

Not only are you wrong but most young women today would disagree with you. Young women have never been more brutally honest in how they feel about most men. We are ugly and repulsive the women of our generations and the days of compensating with money or personality is over. Women have their own money now and get their emotional needs met through their friendships. So the only use for men is sex, lust and desire and for that only a very small percentage of men qualify. If you are not one of those men your desires mean nothing, they are a burden to women. Marriage rates have drooped because the days of women settling for average men who are not sexy but stable and nice are over. This is the reality.

Youlre just making my point even clearer. Thank you. If you read what I was trying to put across and not just wanting to rant about women, you'd see that I'm saying the very same thing you're saying, Women's options are limited. There's nothing in that statement that disputes what you're saying. Youre just giving reasons why. 

[aurum]

Assuming the opposite gender thinks about sex the way you do is obvious projection.

[Tenebroso]

I think you are trolling. 

If men have more options because they are attracted to more women but those women have zero interest in you and even find you repulsive, then those options mean nothing. The fact that a man is aroused by so many women and expected to approach means nothing for the majority of men. The end result either way is nothing happening because the woman is not interested. 

 

[Tenebroso]

6 minutes ago, Princess Arabia said:

Youlre just making my point even clearer. Thank you. If you read what I was trying to put across and not just wanting to rant about women, you'd see that I'm saying the very same thing you're saying, Women's options are limited. There's nothing in that statement that disputes what you're saying. Youre just giving reasons why. 

Women's options are limited because most men are not attractive enough. Men do not have more options because they are attracted to more women, because those options don't care that you exist and would puke at the thought at being intimate with you. 

Edited yesterday at 12:36 AM by Tenebroso

[Tenebroso]

You take for granted that every man is some woman's type. What if you are no woman's type? If dating worked the way you and many women present it then attraction would be evenly distributed and every man would have some kind of love life but that is not what is happening is it.

Instead we have a dating scene where young women are involved in these long term situationships with players who lie, manipulate and offer no emotional availability. Why do women engage with these men? because those men fit into the very narrow harsh standards of attraction for modern men. Most men do not fit that and wil not be anyone's type and have little control over how much sex they can have.

[Princess Arabia]

1 minute ago, Princess Arabia said:

Women have their own money now and get their emotional needs met through their friendships. So the only use for men is sex, lust and desire and for that only a very small percentage of men qualify

Women do not view sex the same as men do for the most part. Millions of women are out there in the world satisfying men's sexual needs on a daily basis. Women don't require those needs from strangers. If men were out trying to get to know women and wanting to be with just that woman they would be more successful, instead just looking for sex is more challenging other than with workers. You even said it yourself, high status men experience true abundance, as if an abundance of women is great. Yes, but only for men. Women don't require an abundance of sex. Can't be mad with us for that. I know your story from what you've said too without getting into specifics so you can't be so general in your arguments because its not like you never had any internal problems or anything troublesome and still can't find a woman. Those kinds of things will carry with it challenges but we can't be mad at the world and generalize because our situation is a bit challenging. 

[Princess Arabia]

5 minutes ago, Tenebroso said:

You take for granted that every man is some woman's type. What if you are no woman's type? If dating worked the way you and many women present it then attraction would be evenly distributed and every man would have some kind of love life but that is not what is happening is it.

Instead we have a dating scene where young women are involved in these long term situationships with players who lie, manipulate and offer no emotional availability. Why do women engage with these men? because those men fit into the very narrow harsh standards of attraction for modern men. Most men do not fit that and wil not be anyone's type and have little control over how much sex they can have.

Still not going against what I've said. It's obvious to me at this point you have not grasp the point of this post and only heard what you wanted to gear and haven't processed what is actually being said. I've given you a place and space to rant again about your personal experiences but it would be appreciated it you would read and understand what I'm trying to say. Everything you've said so far is in accordance with my post. You are naming off things, reasons, circumstances and situations that and why women's sexual PREFERENCES are limited. All you need to do is put away your grievances and see what it is the post is about. It is not who has more options but who has more people they want to sleep with and youre adding to my point by just giving reasons why women's options are limited - EXACTLY WHAT IT IS I'M SAYING. Thank you for strengthening my point even though I doubt you'll ever see it because you're not reading clearly what the post is saying.