Princess Arabia

The Princess Diaries

844 posts in this topic

Simple explanation for how an individual doesn't exist. 

The individual lives in the past and the future. The past and the future does not exist. 

 


What you know leaves what you don't know and what you don't know is all there is. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The neurotics are going crazy with this conformity stuff now. Before...no conformity, after......everything including picking up dog shit is conformity. 


What you know leaves what you don't know and what you don't know is all there is. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Princess Arabia said:

The neurotics are going crazy with this conformity stuff now. Before...no conformity, after......everything including picking up dog shit is conformity. 

The conformity of non conformity.

This is what I was hoping Leo would address in his video and posts, I did not find it or maybe I missed it. He's sharing awareness how to recognise conformity, but he doesn't address how conformity is created, the source of conformity comes from non conformity.

Non conformity and conformity are like the never ending cycle. If we are lucky it is an upwards cycle to higher consciousness, almost like a dynamic spiral 😉. 

Maybe what we need is not non conformity but meta non conformity.

---

Finally finished the whole video. Leo brings it up a bit from the 3h50 mark.

 

Edited by OmniNaut

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 13/12/2025 at 6:38 AM, OmniNaut said:

The conformity of non conformity.

All cleavage is an illusion; everything is its opposite depending on the point of view

That's why I insisted that the best episemiology is the one that eliminates the highest degree of cleavage.

Indeed the conformity thing is shaky; Leo is always quite shaky because he comes from personal development and has little sociological culture.

Non-duality and Structuralism are two of the things I'm thinking of that can explain this divide (and by extension, the low-key philosophies surrounding this divide, like Baudrillard's hypermatrix for example), thus rendering it obsolete.

Thus there are no longer conformist/non-conformist actions; there is simply --reciprocally--, an ego, structures.

The Marxism I sometimes talk about is a form of structuralism.

Edited by Schizophonia

En Dieu nous croyons

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now