Leo's Blog Discussion Mega-Thread

[Elliott]

3 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

I am not talking about skill at all. It's purely about male vs female physiology.

 

What physiology of hers is inferior to 140 lb men?

It's not physiology, it's that she's only played against tiny women like Maria Sharapova. It's why Serena dominated women's tennis.

Edited 1 hour ago by Elliott

[Leo Gura]

1 minute ago, Elliott said:

What physiology of hers is inferior to 140 lb Andy Roderick?

Dude, you don't understand sports.

[Natasha Tori Maru]

1 minute ago, Elliott said:

Male tennis players look like skinny dorks.

I think similarly of male lycra-clad cyclists. They have a shriveled, dehydrated & windburnt appearance to me

Distance runners too.

Bodies are a product of the activities we participate in, and the energy we consume. 

 

[Elliott]

Diego Schwartzman: 5'7" (170 cm). Known for being one of the shortest players in the top 50.

Serena Williams is 5 feet 9 inches (1.75 m) tall. The

1 minute ago, Leo Gura said:

Dude, you don't understand sports.

Can't answer the simple question?

 

[Elliott]

Serena is taller than this guy, he's ranked male 50th, he's 5'7"

So feminine @Natasha Tori Maru 🙄

Edited 1 hour ago by Elliott

[Elliott]

Here she is beating one

 

 

 

How could she possibly beat a #200 if she never plays 1. Top ten men play #200s thousands of times before they beat one, she never gets the practice.

That's like saying some person that only ever played tennis by themselves is physiologically inferior to Raphael Nadal, because the guy couldn't beat a #200.

Edited 1 hour ago by Elliott

[Natasha Tori Maru]

@Elliott Do you perceive any sort of muscularity on a woman as making her appear as a man?

[Elliott]

4 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

@Elliott Do you perceive any sort of muscularity on a woman as making her appear as a man?

Yes, and broad shoulders.

Describe a masculine physique. Describe feminine.

Edited 1 hour ago by Elliott

[Natasha Tori Maru]

5 minutes ago, Elliott said:

Yes, and broad shoulders.

You would consider me to appear as masculine then. HA! 

Do you not see the breasts, hips and stacked thighs on Serena as feminine? Or does she confuse your brain and because you can see deltoids and biceps? Broad shoulders and muscles seem so arbitrary. But it is your perception. Not a universal.

Edited 1 hour ago by Natasha Tori Maru

[Elliott]

6 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

 

Do you not see the breasts, hips and stacked thighs on Serena as feminine? 

No

If you would put breasts, a whig, clean shaven with makeup, and a butt on Dwayne Johnson, would he appear feminine to you?

Her personality is though. She seems like a great person. Attractive personality.

Edited 1 hour ago by Elliott

[Natasha Tori Maru]

@Elliott That is simply your perception, then.

 

[Natasha Tori Maru]

10 minutes ago, Elliott said:

Describe a masculine physique. Describe feminine.

You're the one arguing the case - it's on you.

[Elliott]

 

Glitches in the matrix 🤡 

 

abcnews.com

https://abcnews.com

No fluke: Maine girl beats boys to win 2nd straight state wrestling title

Feb 22, 2024 — Maddie Ripley won a Maine state wrestling title, defeating three boys in a single day

 

Someone call the physiologists!!!

 

 

 

Edited 1 hour ago by Elliott

[Raze]

40 minutes ago, Elliott said:

Here she is beating one

 

 

How could she possibly beat a #200 if she never plays 1. Top ten men play #200s thousands of times before they beat one, she never gets the practice.

That's like saying some person that only ever played tennis by themselves is physiologically inferior to Raphael Nadal, because the guy couldn't beat a #200.

Serena and her sister did a match with the male 203, and he still easily beat them. 

Edited 1 hour ago by Raze

[Elliott]

3 minutes ago, Raze said:

Serena and her sister did a match with the male 203 while he was drinking, and he still easily beat them. 

Yes, my premise is that they never play men, they play frail little women their entire career, while those men have played with the best. Serena didn't get the 10,000 matches against top 400 players those guys did, she played with what were effectively tennis retards her whole life. Nadal did not become the best without first practicing 10,000 times with top 400 men, if Nadal only played in women's and dominated like Serena, he wouldn't be good against men.

Edited 1 hour ago by Elliott

[Raze]

1 minute ago, Elliott said:

Yes, my premise is that they never play men, they play frail little women their entire career, while those men have played with the best. Serena didn't get the 10,000 matches against top 400 players those guys did, she played with what were effectively tennis retards her whole life.

They used to practice with men and were told to stop to do better actually

https://www.sportskeeda.com/tennis/venus-serena-williams-stop-practicing-men-when-andre-agassi-s-father-mike-gave-strongly-worded-advice-sisters-dad-richard

[Elliott]

5 minutes ago, Raze said:

They used to practice with men and were told to stop to do better actually

https://www.sportskeeda.com/tennis/venus-serena-williams-stop-practicing-men-when-andre-agassi-s-father-mike-gave-strongly-worded-advice-sisters-dad-richard

Read the article, it was about psychology and game strategy

" talking with Serena's father and I said: "the reason your daughters are losing is because they are practicing with men." With the men, they hit the big shot that would be the winner against the women, but the men return it," he said"

"The Russian girls compete against each other and you see Russian girls win three of the four Grand Slams this year. They are absolutely not half of the talent of Serena Williams and Venus Williams. Serena Williams and Venus Williams don't have their confidence on their shots anymore," he said."

 

The reason they were so good in womens, was BECAUSE they played with some men early on

Edited 1 hour ago by Elliott

[Elliott]

Even if you want to stand by a physiological, genetics idea, it's still ultimately stupid since humans evolve.

Society does not value athleticism in women the way we do in men. This essentially not only stears women away from serious competing, which narrows the competing female pool( the best women physiologically may not even be competing), it also literally breeds women to be less athletic or men more athletic.

The only valid argument for XX and XY sports is " that's the way I want it to be" which, is valid, but there's no sound objective reasoning behind it, you just want to manipulate the culture.

Edited 9 minutes ago by Elliott

[Raze]

15 minutes ago, Elliott said:

Even if you want to stand by a physiological, genetics idea, it's still ultimately stupid since humans evolve.

Society does not value athleticism in women the way we do in men. This essentially not only steers women away from serious competing, which narrows the competing female pool( the best women physiologically may not even be competing), it also literally breeds women to be less athletic or men more athletic.

The only valid argument for XX and XY sports is " that's the way I want it to be" which, is valid, but there's no sound objective reasoning behind it, you just want to manipulate the culture.

No, biologically men have many advantages ranging from bone density to ability to track movement with eye site among other hormonal advantages for physical activities and greater upper body strength. Even if a woman competed with men she would still be at a major disadvantage against men. Female athletes often do train with men, it doesn’t make them capable of competing with men.

Edited 13 minutes ago by Raze

[Elliott]

10 minutes ago, Raze said:

No, biologically men have many advantages ranging from bone density to ability to track movement with eye site among other hormonal advantages for physical activities and greater upper body strength. Even if a woman competed with men she would still be at a major disadvantage against men. Female athletes often do train with men, it doesn’t make them capable of competing with men.

Your points are perhaps about my previous comment. The one you responded to is about human evolution.

"

humans evolve.

Society does not value athleticism in women the way we do in men. This essentially not only stears women away from serious competing, which narrows the competing female pool( the best women physiologically may not even be competing), it also literally breeds women to be less athletic or men more athletic."

 

Bone density and eye tracking is evolutionary.

Just like dogs are breed to hunt, we breed people for different traits, including by gender. Whatever society values in each gender is bred more.

Edited 5 minutes ago by Elliott