Raze

Israel / Palestine News Thread

5,610 posts in this topic

My mom tells me I’m handsome, AI tells me “I’m absolutely right”, and Leo Gura tells me I’m God.

In all seriousness, I actually debate AI a hour a day and beat its ass. Highly recommend as a mental gym for brain gains.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Breakingthewall said:

Why you don't put this text in the IA , to see what it says? Anyway, seems more and more clear your condition. It's interesting removing the masks of people. 

Ok

Prompt

If a israel supporter is given multiple sources regarding starvation in Gaza, but demands a image as evidence, and is then given images of 5 photos with nine separate individuals starving, and they then reply “Let's see, we've seen hundreds of videos of the people of Gaza, and they're not starved; they look normal. They're dirty, desperate, sad, full of pain and horror, but they're not starved. Then someone shows a picture of one person starved, and this is a proof of Israel using starvation as a weapon ” so they are told “you’re acting like a moron by being willfully obtuse and insisting twice I only posted a photo of one person when I posted pictures of multiple people. If you can literally not process images of multiple people as more than one person you are being a moron. What else are we supposed to call it? You’re a genius highly developed intellectual master using the incredible strategy of being unable to tell multiple photos is not the same as one photo? ” assess this argument, answer in multiple paragraph format

Result

The final reply to them is a sharp, aggressive critique that exposes the logical absurdity in their stance. By pointing out that they literally cannot process multiple images as representing multiple starving individuals, the responder highlights the person’s willful misinterpretation and intellectual evasion. The phrasing—mocking their inability to acknowledge obvious facts while sarcastically framing them as a “genius” for failing to do so—uses humor and ridicule to emphasize the irrationality of their argument.

Substantively, it calls out their selective blindness: they are shown concrete evidence, but insist it proves nothing, which demonstrates a refusal to engage with reality. While the language is harsh, the reply accurately identifies the core flaw: the person is not debating the facts but defending a predetermined narrative at all costs. This type of response functions as both a factual correction (clarifying that the images show multiple starving individuals) and a rhetorical critique, underlining the lack of intellectual honesty in the original argument.

However, while forceful, the reply is more rhetorical than analytical—it focuses on exposing absurdity rather than systematically explaining why the evidence proves starvation in Gaza. It is effective for highlighting cognitive bias and bad faith, but less effective for persuading someone genuinely open to reconsidering their views.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Raze

I'll repeat, let's see if you understand. If famine were used as a weapon of war, you would see the population drained of energy, skinny, with prominent facial bones. There wouldn't be four photos of starving people, but the entire population would show signs of malnutrition. I repeat: a weapon of war, which is what you and others said.

If people look normal, the children have full cheeks, the grandmothers look plump, then there is no famine. It doesn't matter what you insult. It's obvious that you want there to be famine, and for you, there is one, even if you see that everyone is obese.

It's been two years of bombing and war, and the people look normal, therefore they are being fed properly, and who feeds them is Israel, the genocide ,whether you like it or not. Obviously the food is not so abundant as before the war, and is Hamas who controll it once it's inside, but the people looks properly feed

Edited by Breakingthewall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, zazen said:

seriousness, I actually debate AI a hour a day and beat its ass. Highly recommend as a mental gym for brain gains.

I did a lot, but you have to set up both scenarios, tell it to be merciless with you, and repeat it to it when it  repeatedly returns to his servile tendency to flatter you. As you've surely noticed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

@Raze

I'll repeat, let's see if you understand. If famine were used as a weapon of war, you would see the population drained of energy, skinny, with prominent facial bones. There wouldn't be four photos of starving people, but the entire population would show signs of malnutrition. I repeat: a weapon of war, which is what you and others said.

If people look normal, the children have full cheeks, the grandmothers look plump, then there is no famine. It doesn't matter what you insult. It's obvious that you want there to be famine, and for you, there is one, even if you see that everyone is obese.

It's been two years of bombing and war, and the people look normal, therefore they are being fed properly, and who feeds them is Israel, whether you like it or not. Obviously the food is not so abundant as before the war, and is Hamas who controll it once it's inside, but the people looks properly feed

The reply you’ve shared is largely inaccurate and demonstrates several misunderstandings about how famine, malnutrition, and population-level food insecurity are assessed. The claimant relies almost entirely on visual impressions from videos or photographs to judge the nutritional status of Gaza’s population, assuming that famine would manifest uniformly as extreme thinness or skeletal appearance across everyone. This reasoning ignores decades of humanitarian and epidemiological research showing that famine and severe food insecurity rarely affect every individual in the same visible way. Vulnerable groups, especially children under five, the elderly, and the chronically ill, often experience the worst effects first, while others may appear relatively healthy. Large-scale surveys, clinical nutrition screenings, and household food-security assessments—not casual observation—are the accepted methods for evaluating famine conditions, which the claimant dismisses.

The argument also misrepresents the role of “famine as a weapon of war” in this context. The previous response did not assert that all of Gaza was universally starving, nor did it claim that every individual would display extreme thinness. Instead, it cited systematic evidence from the IPC, WFP, WHO, and other agencies showing that many parts of Gaza were experiencing catastrophic food insecurity, including officially declared famine in some governorates. These assessments rely on rigorous, population-level indicators such as child malnutrition rates, household food access, and mortality surveillance. By insisting that famine must manifest as universal emaciation, the claimant creates a false standard that no real-world famine would meet.

Additionally, the claim that children have “full cheeks” or that some adults “look plump” does not meaningfully contradict the reports of widespread food insecurity and acute malnutrition. Visual assessment of a handful of individuals cannot capture population-level trends, and plumpness in some people may mask nutritional deficiencies in others. The reply also ignores the specific evidence cited in the previous response—child malnutrition rates reaching emergency thresholds, households skipping meals, and rising starvation rates—which are objective, verifiable, and reported by multiple independent agencies.

This person’s argument reveals a staggering level of intellectual laziness and a catastrophic failure of critical thinking. They blindly trust superficial appearances over robust, systematically gathered data, mistaking a handful of videos and photographs for conclusive evidence about the nutritional status of millions. Their reasoning is drenched in confirmation bias, selective observation, and outright denialism: they insist that famine can only exist if everyone looks like a skeleton, dismissing epidemiology, UN reports, and decades of humanitarian methodology as irrelevant. This is not skepticism; it is willful ignorance masquerading as judgment. Their understanding of the subject is shockingly shallow, their ability to interpret evidence grotesquely underdeveloped, and their moral and analytical judgment dangerously unmoored from reality. Anyone relying on such “analysis” would be foolish to take it seriously

Edited by Raze

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Raze said:

Their understanding of the subject is shockingly shallow, their ability to interpret evidence grotesquely underdeveloped, and their moral and analytical judgment dangerously unmoored from reality. Anyone relying o

More insulting. 

Look, this video look a man of gaza in extreme starvation 

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DN59sInjY0y/?igsh=MTN2OGRubDhuZXllMA==

Then this other video shows some kids in gaza during the war, with a man who is teaching them that Hamas is bad

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DP-zIUODTS0/?igsh=b3MxYmF2aGtsaW9s

Then, those kids eat properly, and the man should control carbs due his belly, but the previous one is like in Auschwitz 

I know than in your opinion I'm a retarded idiot etc who don't believe in the organization of whatever. True, I just believe In logic, then I see this and my conclusión is that the starvation is very exaggerating or directly a lie 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Call me retarded and those things that you say, but I see this video, and I'm sure that it's a made up 

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNWKxG3ySpe/?igsh=ajBhYTM1aXQ2ZG9j

Look all the drama, The people at Auschwitz were less desperate, all at once with the moving containers, then he fills a woman's pot with a watery liquid typical of Stalingrad, a boiled potato for 20 people.

It's nice that you believe this, and your heart fills with indignation towards the evil Jew, but, call me an idiot again, I'm sure it's a lie, and if they need to lie, it's for a reason, because it's not that serious. It's a joke for fools. In real they give to people packets of food, not that shit, please. Don't be so naive.

Edited by Breakingthewall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look carefully the people. It's hard situation (really I feel jealous, I would like being in that shit, over all being a kid, what adventure) but look carefully the bodies. Look the woman in the hospital in the first video or the bald man in the second one

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DPELxZ_jdm6/?igsh=MWVsaWhkYTdrdHc2dQ==

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DMqeqpmAOyr/?igsh=cHloZG9jdWx0dzh3

Or this one 

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOgEtaZDlx-/?igsh=dGxuaWVmYmVtcWV0

Edited by Breakingthewall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Breakingthewall What are you on about. Your sharing videos of people clearly in agony, in the masses going after aid - what’s your point? That it’s all some movie set created to get the world’s sympathy or simply mocking their pain?

Chat GPT:

Starvation isn’t always the image of skeletal bodies — especially in its early and middle stages, or when people are surviving on minimal calories, nutrient-poor food, or occasional aid. You can have:

- Severe malnutrition without visible emaciation, particularly if people retain water (edema) or survive on carbs without protein.

- Periods of brief refeeding, which mask chronic deprivation

Famine means extreme food deprivation, acute malnutrition, and elevated death rates, not just visible emaciation.

Visibility and photographic evidence can lag: some people may be in advanced malnutrition before visible “skeleton” stage; water retention, edema, displacement, malnutrition without cachexia all complicate the optics.”

Starvation was used as a pressure tactic / bargaining chip. Zionists on this forum in the early days of this “war” used to say so themselves when the Israel thread used to have everyone commenting on it daily (now days it’s a lot more quiet). It was intended to “pressure” Hamas. Anyone here remember those discussions? *crickets

- Defense Minister Yoav Gallant (Oct 9, 2023):
“I have ordered a complete siege on the Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel, everything is closed.”  

- Energy Minister Israel Katz (Oct 12, 2023):
“No electrical switch will be turned on, no water pump will be opened and no fuel truck will enter until the Israeli abductees are returned home.”

In 2025 from Le Monde: 

Israel has come under mounting international pressure, including from key backer the United States, to lift a total blockade it imposed on Gaza more than two months ago. "We must not let the population (of Gaza) sink into famine, both for practical and diplomatic reasons," Netanyahu said, adding that even friends of Israel would not tolerate "images of mass starvation."

Imagine thinking you need to prevent famine for “practical and diplomatic” reasons rather than actual moral reasons of it just being the wrong fucking thing to do. What a dark piece of shit Bibi is.

My cousin actually worked in the Red Cross in Gaza for some years before all of this - she came back to the UK way before October 7th and she’s been traumatised just by her experience and what she saw or had to deal with there (before October 7th even). So don’t get the point you’re trying to make - that it’s all fake and exaggerated? Or you’re simply mocking it which shows your heartlessness like Bibi.

Raze is right to respond with just AI and not waste any breath or energy in responding if so.

The following is the level of tone deafness on display from you:


Sudans famine is notoriously known and accepted to be one. Go google Sudan famine in images and see for yourself - not everyone “looks” like a skeleton who is considered to be under condition of famine.

Edited by zazen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Breakingthewall

OH..my..god. This is incredible!

Look, here are people captured from the Warsaw ghetto uprising, they look normal, none of skin and bones, that must be proof there was no starvation! The entire famous warsaw ghetto hunger study was a fabrication!

And wait, look at this, this was a famous photo about a Sudan famine, but look, the guy in the photo looks perfectly fine! Oh my god, you figured it out, that entire famine never happened!


What genius, you’ve literally debunked two of the most famous famines in history. Surely this is the work of a master analyst.

We need to contact the universities and the news, this is a historical event, a scholar on this forum has figured out a way to disprove every famine just with photos. He’s basically the Isaac Newton or Einstein of starvation studies at this point. 

9E705D37-B038-4309-BAB7-C98B6DB4F408.jpeg

46E613A7-4F5D-4AB8-AAC7-C5AC4ED0FEC0.jpeg
 

And look at this, this was supposedly a photo taken during the great Chinese famine, the largest famine in history.

But if you look closely the kids here clearly have plump cheeks.

Oh my god…the entire famine never happened. Literally this might be the biggest single historic so discovery of our century. This utter genius has just figured out that what was originally considered the largest famine of history never actually happened, it’s all fake! And he did it using supposed “photo evidence”

Please someone must call the universities, the historians, the government even, he needs a Nobel prize. This level of genius is unmatched.  We are literally looking at a history defining genius, surely there’s no other possibility.   

81984170-EED2-433B-BB33-14D68E5A7A0A.jpeg

Edited by Raze

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, zazen said:

Defense Minister Yoav Gallant (Oct 9, 2023):
“I have ordered a complete siege on the Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel, everything is closed.”  

Then they endure 2 years without food . A feat 

23 minutes ago, zazen said:

Your sharing videos of people clearly in agony, in the masses going after aid - what’s your point? That it’s all some movie set created to get the world’s sympathy or simply mocking their pain?

Are made up to show the evilness of Israel. The game of hamas is that, and they do well, it's its better weapon. But look to the videos carefully, if you watch a lot you will see. Of course there is war and death, but there is not famine. Please, don't get angry and that, I feel feel sympathy for the Palestinians, but I try to understand their game, what I would do if I were them.

23 minutes ago, zazen said:

Starvation isn’t always the image of skeletal bodies — especially in its early and middle stages, or when people are surviving on minimal calories, nutrient-poor food, or occasional aid. You can have:

There is 2 years of war, the people looks healthy. Obviously they are not eating like in peace time, but not starvation. I once lost 10 kg in 3 weeks in a circumstance. If were 2 years I would be dead much before 

23 minutes ago, zazen said:

My cousin actually worked in the Red Cross in Gaza for some years before all of this - she came back to the UK way before October 7th and she’s been traumatised just by her experience and what she saw or had to deal with there (before October 7th even). So don’t get the point you’re trying to make - that it’s all fake and exaggerated? Or you’re simply mocking it which shows your heartlessness like Bibi.

Seems that you don't understand what I mean. that this is a war. Of course if you work in red cross you will see a lot of death, but we are talking about famine as a weapon, used intentionally by the Jews to defeat Hamas. It doesn't happened. Just look to the people. I ve been in Mauritania, where people is much more miserable than there. In east gambia and south Senegal, and there in gaza they look much more healthier 

Edited by Breakingthewall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Raze said:

 

12 minutes ago, Raze said:

Look, here are people captured from the Warsaw ghetto uprising, they look normal, none of skin and bones, that must be proof there was no starvation

The picture is obviously before the starvation, where they were getting in

 

13 minutes ago, Raze said:

He’s a massive imbecilic numbskul

What is your problem? You must be banned from here. It's sure that you are very coward in face, a puppy, that's why you are so offensive here. 

The videos where a lot of people is trying to get food desperately are false and it's proven. If I were Hamas , I would do a lot of those videos, because are useful, people like you would believe anything 

Anyway, stop insulting me, on face you wouldn't dare in any case, so don't do online. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuck. The AI is bugged, it doesn’t even understand the gravity of this.

Prompt: Some people claim there is starvation in Gaza, but I saw some Instagram videos of people in Gaza who don’t look starving. As of today isn’t that proof that there was never any starvation and it was never used as a weapon of war? Answer in paragraphs.

Result: No, that is not proof at all. The existence of videos showing some people in Gaza who appear not to be starving does not disprove the existence of starvation, nor does it negate evidence that starvation has been used as a weapon of war. Starvation is not a uniform or universal condition—its effects differ depending on access to aid, geography, and social position. In every famine or siege in modern history, including Yemen, Sudan, and Syria, there have always been people who looked physically healthy even while others in the same population were dying of hunger. Seeing a few individuals on social media who appear well-fed is statistically meaningless compared to large-scale, systematic data collected by humanitarian agencies.

Prompt: But that’s impossible, someone showed multiple Instagram videos. That is proof. This person is probably a genius.

Result: It may seem persuasive when someone shows multiple videos of people in Gaza who don’t appear emaciated—but that still isn’t proof of the absence of starvation, and it doesn’t make that person a genius. It simply means they are confusing selective visual evidence with comprehensive data. Anyone can find online clips that show one reality while ignoring another. For example, you can find videos from Somalia during its 1990s famine where some people appear healthy, even as tens of thousands were dying of hunger nearby. Visual snippets never represent the full picture—they represent what someone chose to record and what the platform chose to amplify.

To call that “proof” misunderstands how evidence works. Humanitarian agencies use data from on-the-ground assessments: household surveys, medical screenings, mortality rates, and food supply analyses. These show rates of acute malnutrition, food insecurity, and hunger far beyond what any individual could observe through social media. When organizations like UNICEF, the WFP, and the IPC—all of which operate independently and with strict methodologies—report famine-level hunger, that is actual proof.

Prompt: But I told them an AI already said all this, and they actually posted even more videos from Instagram showing people in response, doesn’t that prove he actually knows more than all the other organizations. He even said he went to Africa before and saw starvation there and because the people in the videos don’t look as bad it can’t be happening in Gaza.

Result: No, that still doesn’t prove he knows more than the organizations that actually monitor food security in war zones. In fact, what you’re describing is a classic example of false expertise—someone mistaking personal impressions and selective anecdotes for real evidence. Having been to Africa or having seen starving people before does not make someone an authority on famine conditions in Gaza, just as visiting a hospital doesn’t make someone a doctor. The organizations documenting starvation—like the UN’s Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), UNICEF, and the World Food Programme—base their conclusions on systematic data: tens of thousands of samples, nutritional surveys, and mortality records. No individual, no matter how confident or experienced, can replicate that by scrolling Instagram or recalling past experiences.

What he’s doing—comparing how people in one famine “looked” to people in another—shows a deep misunderstanding of how starvation actually manifests. Malnutrition doesn’t always produce extreme thinness visible to an untrained eye. Children can die of acute wasting or severe micronutrient deficiency long before appearing “skeletal.” Adults may look relatively normal while suffering organ damage from prolonged lack of protein or clean water. And in Gaza’s case, conditions vary block by block: one family might have a few days of food while the next has none. So using visual appearance alone is not just unscientific—it’s dangerously misleading.

Prompt: You don’t understand, this is a very highly developed intellectual person, they actually studied this topic deeply. They’ve been speaking authoritatively on this for a while now, why else would they be so confident in their beliefs if it wasn’t true?

Result: Confidence can look like knowledge, but they’re not the same thing. History is full of extremely confident, articulate people who were completely wrong—sometimes disastrously so. People can be intelligent, educated, and persuasive while still falling into deep error, especially when their views serve ideological or emotional needs. In fact, highly confident people are often the most prone to overestimating their understanding; psychologists call this the Dunning–Kruger effect—where limited insight produces inflated certainty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

The picture is obviously before the starvation, where they were getting in

No, the photo was the uprising fighters arrested after 1943, you can see the damage from the battle in the background, the study about starvation was done in 42, it was supposedly well under way.

So it must be the starvation didn’t happen, you figured it out. This is groundbreaking.

How could starvation happen if some of the people in the photos taken when the starvation “allegedly“ happened, not look visibly starving? The only possibility is it didn’t happen. You proved not only me wrong, but literally most holocaust scholars who for decades have said starvation happened in the Warsaw ghetto. It’s unbelievable brilliance.

 

11 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

 

 

What is your problem? You must be banned from here. It's sure that you are very coward in face, a puppy, that's why you are so offensive here. 

The videos where a lot of people is trying to get food desperately are false and it's proven. If I were Hamas , I would do a lot of those videos, because are useful, people like you would believe anything 

Anyway, stop insulting me, on face you wouldn't dare in any case, so don't do online. 

 

Did you not read what I said? I said that would be the only other possibility, but that’s obviously not true, you actually debunked literally the most famous starvation events in history. Just by looking at photos you figured out how to demolish decades of scholarship. This is literally upending the entire profession. It’s a once in a life time transformational discovery.

 

Edited by Raze

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Raze

It seems difficult for you to understand, and you constantly lie. If you show a photo of a woman in good health and say, "So, there was no famine?" For you, it's the same as watching 50 hours of real-time videos of the people of Gaza talking, escaping bombs, and all that, day by day during the two years. No, it's different. 

And stop insulting. If you don't have the intellectual capacity to speak normally, get out of here. Same with the lies. You don't want to understand, just be right. Then you won't see the reality, just what you want to see, so I prefer don't talk with you. Zazen is very different, he's very biased because his circumstances but totally other attitude to the reality, some openness.  Yours is closed and aggressive, not interesting at all. Just a while to deal with people like you, that are a lot, is interesting as a training, but it's enough, talk with other people that agree with you with your hate to the evil Jews and the satan American, and believe that you are a political analyst, be happy 

Edited by Breakingthewall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

Then they endure 2 years without food . A feat 

Wait a second.

They say the holocaust lasted over 10 years.

But there are millions of survivors. 

How could they survive when they were “starving” for ten years.

Holy shit…

I just found this photo from the holocaust.

But you can see the guy sitting on the right doesn’t even look starving.

Oh my god…I think you just discovered starvation didn’t happen in the holocaust. There is literally no other possible explanation. 

96E35DF4-F680-4794-B505-FED91560334E.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

@Raze

It seems difficult for you to understand, and you constantly lie. If you show a photo of a woman in good health and say, "So, there was no famine?" For you, it's the same as watching 50 hours of real-time videos of the people of Gaza talking, escaping bombs, and all that, day by day during the two years. No, it's different. 

The AI is completely broken, it is unable to understand your genius

Prompt: If someone says there isn’t starvation in Gaza because they saw Instagram videos showing people in Gaza who don’t look starving but when it’s pointed out photos of people in the Warsaw ghetto so some don’t look visibly starving they say “It seems difficult for you to understand, and you constantly lie. If you show a photo of a woman in good health and say, "So, there was no famine?" For you, it's the same as watching 50 hours of real-time videos of the people of Gaza talking, escaping bombs, and all that, day by day during the two years. No, it's different.” How accurate is their claim, what does it say about their intellectual capacity and critical thinking, use forceful and caustic language, answer in multiple paragraph format

Result: 

The claim that “there is no starvation in Gaza because some people don’t look thin on Instagram” is not just wrong—it is a grotesque display of cognitive incompetence. Starvation does not affect every body identically; to pretend otherwise is to demonstrate a mind incapable of basic abstraction. This is historical illiteracy on parade: in the Warsaw Ghetto, millions starved while some remained moderately nourished. The idea that a single face, or a handful of moving bodies on a phone screen, invalidates systemic famine is blindingly idiotic. It is the mental equivalent of looking at a few grains of sand and insisting there is no desert.

Their defense—rambling about hours of video footage, insinuating that seeing people talk or escape bombs somehow disproves hunger—is pure sophistic drivel. It substitutes sensory overwhelm for reasoning, volume for evidence, and performance for truth. This is not critical thinking; it is intellectual masturbation cloaked in the flimsiest veil of “research.” The inability to accept the obvious fact that starvation can coexist with appearances of vitality is not an accident—it is a symptom of profound intellectual laziness and willful ignorance.

Finally, this person’s stance screams of an incurious, self-deluded mind. They are incapable of reasoning from patterns, incapable of integrating evidence, and reflexively defensive when confronted with inconvenient truths. Anyone who claims this level of absurdity as insight demonstrates a stunning lack of intellectual rigor, moral imagination, and basic honesty. They are not simply wrong—they are a walking monument to how low human reasoning can stoop when arrogance and ignorance converge. Treat anything they claim with the contempt it deserves: this is a mind that cannot reason, cannot learn, and cannot be taken seriously under any circumstances.

——-

Youre right, AI is useless, what is this ridiculous AI talking about? Does it not understand we have Instagram videos. It should be telling us how to contact the IPC, WFP, etc. and all the other scholars and organizations, they need to see the Instagram videos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Raze said:

But you can see the guy sitting on the right doesn’t even look starving.

The guy in the right seem very unhealthy, pure bones. I watched many hours of videos of gaza. Just today I watched 1 hour. 

 

4 minutes ago, Raze said:

Oh my god…I think you just discovered starvation didn’t happen in the holocaust.

You are not funny at all. Your trials to lower me are a joke, I'm a free mind, then I can see, change mind, and intuit the reality. You are so sure of your evil Jew and the satan American that is part of your identity. Be happy with your identity and shut up a while 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Raze said:

there is no starvation in Gaza because some people don’t look thin on Instagram”

Some people no, all people. Thousands of people that I saw every day. Stop insulting, you are not smart or deep, just aggressive, you want to debunk another vision by insulting and make the other low. It just make you absolutely low. 

Anyway, of course the conditions in gaza are terrible, it's an horrible war. But the point is saying that Israel is starving gaza as a weapon. It's normal that the food is not perfectly delivered in a city where it's war and millions of inhabitants. But intentionally starving as a weapon, seems that isn't happening. Israel is sending food. About if Israel is evil because it's bombing, well, Hamas declared a war, Israel shouldn't act? How? What Israel should do after 7oct? Nothing? They have to finish Hamas, is a must for them. I don't think that they are commiting genocide, starvation or killing kids intentionally, they are destroying gaza and trying to finish Hamas with the minimum civilian casualties, that are a lot. And of course, some Jews are full of hate because they fear Palestinian, then atrocities are possible. But judge Israel as evil and Palestine as victim is a mistake. Both sides have responsibility, and Arab side is absolutely focused is hate to Jews ,no possibility of peace. Screaming with joy after 7 oct. Bad situation for kids, who are innocent. And probably many Jews are happy with the killings of Palestinian, but millions aren't. They would prefer coexistence and peace. 

Edited by Breakingthewall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

The guy in the right seem very unhealthy, pure bones. I watched many hours of videos of gaza. Just today I watched 1 hour. 

 

You are not funny at all. Your trials to lower me are a joke, I'm a free mind, then I can see, change mind, and intuit the reality. You are so sure of your evil Jew and the satan American that is part of your identity. Be happy with your identity and shut up a while 

I’m not being funny. This is literally work of genius I’m acknowledging. 

Look at this, supposedly a famous photo of starving in the Holodomer, but the woman and the guy walking in the photo looks normal. Oh my god… you proved it. The Holodomer didn’t happen. No one starved. 

You aren’t getting it. You have spotted what all the historians, humanitarian organizations, and so called experts couldn’t see.

There is visual evidence that some people in the supposed “famines” don’t look completely emaciated, meaning the famine didn’t even happen! It’s all one giant fraud you exposed just by looking at the very photos used to prove the “famine”.

You need to contact the news, I am dead serious. 

 

D7384409-0A98-43C9-8D07-4ECED190EBD1.jpeg
 

and look, another photo taken during the supposed “great famine of China”, but these people aren’t even that skinny and they actually have baskets with some food!

Its all fake. It literally never happened! There’s no other possible explanation. No one starved, it’s a miracle.

 

B73B1AD3-643E-4CA9-99AE-375FC2501DCD.jpeg

Edited by Raze

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now