RichardY

Member
  • Content count

    1,020
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RichardY


  1. Depends what a person means by enlightenment, The Buddha talks about many lesser enlightenments. https://www.audible.co.uk/pd/In-the-Buddhas-Words-Audiobook/B01J4IT7E8?qid=1577642251&sr=1-1&pf_rd_p=c6e316b8-14da-418d-8f91-b3cad83c5183&pf_rd_r=5Q1YJK1SJXGEWBBTW8ZF&ref=a_search_c3_lProduct_1_1

    To me enlightenment can be either bound, or unbound. Having a Panentheistic model of reality, with includes Pantheism(Unbound).

    True unity occurs only through love, and differentiates. A false unity would be putting two together in a master/slave relationship. Cybernetic causality(Self-Determinacy) vs Endomorphic causality (Intrinsic Self-Determinacy). 

    Speaking in soothing tones, is playing on the cybernetic causality.


  2. Was wondering what people think of Propertarianism? As far as I can tell, it's a reworking of Confucian Legalism.

    Basically the premise is that because immigrants to the United States overwhelmingly vote Democrat, along with ethnic minority groups and females. The right-wing no longer have a chance of winning future elections, Trump being a last ditched anomaly, by successfully winning "the rust belt".  In effect the situation has become polarised. 

    As most of the democratic voters are concentrated in Cities. In the event of a Civil War, predominantly Democrat cities could be cut off and starved to death, hence reducing the voter base. Where as Republicans in the countryside with higher gun ownership and agricultural goods, could remain well supplied. Conversely if the Democrats centralise totalitarian power in Washington DC, by running up the clock in demographics. They could massacre the Right-wing.

    The idea is that a peaceful solution would be preferred. But, as they reckon the psychology of voters is too ingrained, it will result in mass violence as it has throughout history. The last 70 odd years being a bit of a bubble for peace in the west, if not east.

    Sort of a repeat of the Spanish Civil War, but with a death count in the tens of millions.

    I'd prefer rule by "Judges", as unnatural selection, ruling by moral authority and force, stripping out the legislative that contributes to a lot of the conflict. Or, that really some of the states should secede from the Union.
     

     
    election-map-3d-by-county.png


  3. I think for learning languages , Scribd is probably ace, at £9.99 a month. Audible has a better selection of books, and if you get the 24 credit book plan it works out at £4.60 a credit. Not keen on there being no folder system for audible. Better an audio-book habit, than a gaming one.


  4. What is your preference, Reverend?
    Asian, Roman?
    That is 2nd century, Reverend.
    Wasn't it St. Augustine who said,
    "Make me chaste, O Lord.
    "But not yet, not yet"?

    Leland Gaunt - "Needful Things."

    -------------------------

    As for weirdism...  I pick ultraweirdism as to the implication of ultimate mathematical laws of physics.
    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41470-019-00038-z#CR53

    For myself, I now give equal subjective probability to three possibilities for what the ultimate mathematical laws of physics may be:
    (1)
    Einsteinian realism, which cannot yet be ruled out (Werbos 1973, 1989, 2008), but which needs to confront the very strong evidence for “macroscopic Schrodinger cats (Friedman and Han 2003; Abdi et al. 2016)”, which implies that quantum superposition applies even to macroscopic objects like cats and humans (Nietzsche 1956) and whole planets;

    (2)
    multiverse realism, like Deutsch’s initial concept (Deutsch 1997), with or without a modified measurement theory (Werbos 2008, 2013a), with or without a four dimensional version of Fock space (Streater and Wightman 1964);

    (3)
    something much weirder, such as cosmos as a random graph (Wolfram 2002), a “digital universe” (Bear 1993) or a kind of vast intrinsic neural network yielding strange but testable “idealist” phenomena like those in the movie Inception. I begin to see ways to do a little serious empirically grounded justice to possibilities in group (3), but there are ever so many different possibilities in group (3) that I view it as more promising to focus our efforts mainly on possibilities (1) and (2) for now. There is a huge difference between our long-term vision (subjective probabilities) of what the ultimate distant mountains might be, and our strategic sense of what we need to learn next in order to find out. In discussing this third set of possibilities, I initially referred to it as “weirdism,” but admitted that the term “ultraweirdism” is more appropriate, since even Einsteinian realism predicts many things which seem weird or impossible to naïve intuition, when we consider theories which allow for macroscopic Schrodinger cats.

     


  5. @Nickyy
    Yes, I suppose there is "give no thought for the morrow, sufficient is the Evil of the day."

    I still find it ridiculous, that it isn't like this stuff hasn't been documented hundreds of years in the past. Overfishing was a problem document by the Economist Adam Smith hundreds of years a go. Even worse is that people are basically locked into Tech.


  6. Designing Superman The Lastman.

    1) Extreme Wilderness Survival.
    2) Contemplation 
    3) A Metaphysic. 
    4) Fiction and Novel reading.
    5) Oration, Giving Speeches.
    6) Design.
    7) Seduction.
    8) Event Organisation.
    9) A Healthy heart(Cardiovascular health).
    10) Journaling, Diary or Commonplace Book.
    11) Altruism.
    12) Trade Skill or Profession.
    13) Friendship.
    14) Discipline. Non-addiction.
    15) Financial.
    16) Diet.
    17) Networking.
    18) Post Enlightenment History.
    19) E-commerce.
    20) Political Connections. Or, apolitical setup.

     


  7. It's not really a social hierarchy, but a permanent caste system. All they seemingly have to do is copy Western technology... and bribe their way to permanent overlord status... with the kind of money Chinese oligarchs have.

    If you're part of an Atheist society and an atheist, why wouldn't you? It would be foolish not to sell the bulk of mankind down the drain. 


  8. Have the population suit the local environment. Agrarianism, governed by a collection of courts(A Kritarchy, No statutory laws). Cities more for science parks and intense R&R. If the seas are being swept clean of fish, obviously something is majorly wrong.

    Was looking at Agroforestry and a video with Sadhguru came up, promoting it. But if you look at the amount of arable land per person, it's either that or mass death and ecological collapse. Being a more complex system it would also include things like logging which is heavily regulated, which obviously your average peasant farmer, or westerner would need a team of lawyers to understand.

    Elites benefit from corruption in networking affects, compounded by immigration into a more crowded pool. The worlds top 10 Billionaires, are all heavily into the networking affect.

    If the USA and Australia were all frontier country, immigration there would be less of a concern.


  9. @SidBySide
    The intensive farming, fishing etc. Is only happening because people for the most part, as people live in overpopulated cities. And land ownership is concentrated with a small proportion of the country.

    The thing is, "necessity being the mother of invention" is a lie. Along with the rest of Plato's Republic.

    A reason immigration into the US and especially the UK is totally insane. Is that arable land per person is 1 acre in the USA. 0.22 Acres in the UK. An acre of land in the past, 'could' feed a family of 8 on potatoes in Ireland.....Add to that soil depletion, and any number of things that can go wrong.

    I did some backpacking in BC and Alberta years a go. So heard about the over-fishing from a local person firsthand, on Vancouver Island. Plus the water looked devoid of life.

    The problem is as people form into gangs, both political and workers. It makes things more difficult for individuals, when it's 2 against 1. Forming a more powerful gang is not going to work as a strategy for survival of humanity, as they fight over resources. A Positive Feedback loop, possibly out of control.