ValiantSalvatore

@integral The author IIRC has more maps in case that is interesting that show for example how a Tennis player maps differently showing just how activity influences the wiring of the brain as far as I know. Which makes personality already so complex thanks for sharing again! Hope I don't come accross to toxic sometimes. Will add them in case this threads lives for a while, there is no audibook version of the book as far as I know so I ordered it....! For example as a master students I heavily train and use P4 apparently according to the authors videos on youtube.

I started listening to the audibook the brain and the enneagram and just have this personality book about MBTI with EEG scans, I don't know how scientifcally valid they are and in the audiobook about the enneagram they explain we all have these proficencies etc. For example I see INFP's and 9w1's often type themselves in personality cafe forums etc. As these types and I typed at the beginning as an INFP and read the description as this was advised on forums and then typed INFJ noticed this is more of the me I have. I liked it that in the book and also courses at integral life... sorry for not getting into depth as I lack the total know-how also. According to all information I looked at you can deconstruct your type and have a proficency in all and draw upon all with some evidence looking at the brain etc. It's interesting I will read the book can definitely recommend this as contemplation I liked this as fun.. for video games it was funny how accurate observations can be. I am just hobbying my observations... For example I think it's stupid that the MBTI community hacks on ISFP's and ESFJ's when I contemplate how insane they are in group work and at their "base" brain activation patterns. I dunno I just find it intersting to look at. I am not an expert yet might become one. Also INFJ's and INTJ's use their whole brain in a zen mode, so basically we are the proof that this personality shit is a hoax partially. Especially in higher flow states personality just does not matter. It's pure biology in that sense imo speaking and expressing itself in it's current enviroment... This is just my opinon. Please don't take it all to seriously. https://imgur.com/gallery/9AVYAxg The book explains the cortexes moduses and what each part does specifically, it's quiet intersting I just looked at how F8 plays itself out... I don't know for example which part of the brain it is although it is intersting that there is causality in itself. Meaning this brain part produces this result and is this active based on this typology testing and pattern mapping. I am biased because I am heading into this direction so dunno, just sharing info. For example in the past before breaking up my personality (through meditation mostly) a lot of people liked my on-sized fits all answers as an INFJ even though I have no idea of what I was actually doing. It is intersting to see I have mild activations there.

To be quiet frank the neuroscience of MBTI gives more answers to all of these quesions and I did not even open the book. Personality is partially a hoax. Especially when using the whole brain imo.

I voted even though I understand like 1% . I give my best to channel all.

How come? A lifter that has shorter arms can leverage more power because of physics and strength is not part of the concept of athletecism? The enviroment would need to favour tall people, so there is an evolutionary advantage to begin with, similar to giraffes?. This is not to myopic? Enviroment consistently changes also, so there will be a general baseline for most things or not? For example a hypothetical example some european culture values athletecism, altough the enviroment is designed to favour those who are small, have endurance and can run and hide in order to survive and produce progency. So there is selection pressure from the enviroment? That shape the decision making of the culture? As a whole they decide to mandatorily train in these aspects for the genetics of their progeny and for their survival as a group and individual. Basically, causing some form of re-inforcement learning based on semi-supervised behaviour with "almost" labeld data? As reward and punishment behaviour, in short do or die? Oceans Forests Thicket Plains Animals Plants Are all present in an ecosystem? Still the choice of the group and the selection pressure would create the genetic expression that based on the cause and effect the enviroment produces? Genetic expressions over periods of time changes? I dunno for example and it's a stupid one trust me. Humanoid apes loosing their tail as a survival advantage for example swinging in the forest like a monkey? As speed would certainly be a part of athletecism for monkeys/apes? In general... Why does genetics need to be the root cause for it not having the whole perspective? What about epi genetic changes? What about the brain? For example a fat guy that trains himself in this day and age to a muscular guy and creates progeny as a musculur guy, his offspring will also have more of these genetics as far as I know from podcasts of scientists. (Dr. Rhonda Patrick) So how come dynamics and changes are not included and genetics is looked at as a fixed trait. When re-inforcement can consistently happen, especially when culture rewards it like athelecism and the guy who is fat turned into muscles, creates progeny. Is this to far-fetched? I don't know why genetics need to be a fixed thing. Yes they are partially no? Do my genetics change when I workout? When I eat certain foods. Then how is anything fixed to beginn with? These are just stale observations no? Maybe I am stupid, yes call me out please if I am stupid. There certainly can be a weeding out proccess and also the agency of an individual can change the genetics of the entire group by sharing a specific trait? Then to progency sharing that specific trait. Although the likelyhood of survival would certainly decrease. Anway. Just here for some random cents.

If that is the norm under science something should be done to prevent that, that is not the norm. I never heard of any of this. I mean I have nothing against it personally if you benefit as a human for survival, yet if it causes damage to other beigns I don't think a person like this should be allowed to do science, and should be held accountable for undertaking direct actions to skew and manipulate results. In a sense it is a crime as well as corrupt, if it is a mistake and made by accident that is something entirely different. Yet to deliberately and consciously fake results is not rational. It's basically an adhominem attack towards science, as well as the integrity of science. A good Prof once told me in science even a mistake can be a success, so to consciously fake information to ones own agenda is basically corruption of science. The perception of the person who has done science, certainly matters to neglect that entirely is also partially ignorant even if the results speak for themselves, the perception that went into the creation of the science done does matter, I am really curious as to what you did lol. So in an odd way I appreciate your stance towards an ethnocentric as well as possible racist viewpoints, that you seemingly adhere to. Or am I misconceiving that? The truthfulness of the science done by you should speak for itself, so if it causes racism and ethnocentric viewpoints. You also are part of that creation. How do you take responsibillity for that? Or do you simply not care enough to eliminate bias from your studies? Enlighten me what context am I missing? I never said science should be not done at all of these race scientist and explorers/pioneers had certainly their value, although from a holistic factual perception it's obvious that truthfulness was lacking and that many of these findings are utterly skewed by their cultural perceptions, as well as the cultural repercussions are horrific. What pre-conveived notions are you talking about, that I supposedly have? If you want fame and money I don't think science is the right way. I don't know which science you are doing so to speak to even claim a good scientist is one who can manipulate and get more publications, I bet there are more ethical ways to bend a paper into ones own agenda, that is not entirely selfishly derived out of seemingly questionable movitations. Just getting a good name out and publishing has 0 truthfulness to it. I don't know which game you are playing I bet you can get a good name as a scientist by doing projects normally for a longer period of time. To me this sounds like horrific self-management. For me it's clearly evident that there is an agenda to push ones own culture instead of creating equality. There is no way science and or anything can not be done and viewed from a personal "ad hominem" perspective if you look at the horros of history etc. I don't know dude this is a new level of ignorance not needed in science. I appreciate you beign honest about your manipulations, yet there are so many pre-conceived notions, there should be a prerequist test to test for bias. When I see how you conduct science and yes please take that personal, that should not be allowed and possibly be illegal. I would also appreciate it when you personally address me, so I become aware of my potential biases, yet that seems to be to advanced? Also to just view IQ as intelligence is very myopic. Human life is much broader even in academia they will use multiple intelligence test and they are looking for new ways to quantify intelligence? To boil down everything to genetics is quiet reductionistic. That is like saying I suck at dating because of how I look, and never address the problem. Then I could throwback the same argument, don't hate the player hate the game. Yet, I don't know if no one wants to even change the game, as well as how it's done. It's evident that there will be no fame and glory. It's rare imo to be a highly famously enamoured scientist. You'd basically need the personality of a champion?

Notion is great I am using the systems in systems view currently for my studies and I have an edge clearly imo. 1 week in so no idea how far it can go. I like Thomas Frank helped me a lot during shitty times during early college days so to say.

@Tahuti No I don't lol. I don't know what I am supposed to make out of this comment. IQ can be tested why should IQ not be tested? Fluid intelligence as well as crystallized intelligence is testable. IQ is just not true intelligence, I had a peak experience during meditation of what omniscience can be with strong kriya elements. I don't think of crowley as well as people who like him very well. It's rather unscienfitic...following the advice of a stonemason and not using it as a tool to reflect is a bit delusional to me. Basically if you have ADHD and apparently your executive functions are inhibited, according to your logic and report it would definitely reduce fluid intelligence and IQ. IQ is relative. True intelligence is more of the absolute I had a good taste of it, if it was somewhat accurate, it's more like sheer intuition of a quality that resembles God/Omniscience. It's not really IQ and the usual problem solving and novel information processing concepts that are associated with IQ. Most oranges and stage orange people hyper-focus on IQ as this is the only way they seemingly can satisfy their deficency needs for recognition and status. I am pretty sure IQ can be tested with standarized tests, I don't think it displays true intelligence. I meet many people who truely have ADHD and I am just gifted and the difference is very obvious. I am also HSP, so I don't like it sometimes to be around ADHD people as they emit sometimes not so good energy, especially if it is the impulsive and hyperactive type. This causes a lot of disorganization and even though I have worked succesfully with ADHD people, they have been on medication most of the time and did not even try natural alternatives like exercise and meditation because it is to exhausting apparently. I dunno I am a bit scattered as discursive tought (according to german pages about gifted kids) can be a sign of high iq/giftedness. So, I am always very open around people who seemingly have ADHD. Yes, it's a good question to contempate what is true intelligence. I once took LSD and meditated for hours and asked these questions, what is true intelligence, what is the nature of nature and I started to merge with the outside world very strongly. God/Omniscience is way beyond what humans can fathom. In that sense yes IQ is a hoax, on a relative plane it's absolutely real and relevant. Being obstructed by ADHD in terms of IQ beign inhibited in it's full expression is a survival threat and I bet there are gifts and curses so to speak about the condition of ADHD itself. So, I dunno not speaking from direct experience as I don't really have ADHD, yet I have ADHD like symptoms that are closely relateable to giftedness, I can understand some states, although I'd be more of the inattentive type as I am also highly introverted usually, I changed a lot. Again, full self-disclosure I've been tested and I don't have ADHD. There is also bias in how it's identified etc. So, I dunno. I even believe it's partially possible to increase the relative IQ with proper nutrition, exercise, social-enviroment etc. To some degree depending on genetic potential. There were some articles posted by the scientific american, yet I don't think this will sound credible to you. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/you-can-increase-your-intelligence-5-ways-to-maximize-your-cognitive-potential/ I followed most of these principles ever since I read the article and I definitely have become more intelligent in terms of surivial, I would also bet I increased my IQ through studying etc. There are some "studies" articles pinponting as to how many school years you have your IQ increases and stuff like this anyway. Hope this is not to much and makes sense somehow lol. This is my personal anecdote tbh I notice partially I am still increasing my IQ believe it or not lol, even then just crystallized intelligence, street smarts etc. OP has certainly valid points, it's just the frame that is horrible imo. I don't think this will continue for long the same for this Crowley stuff, it's not really good imo for academia. Most of these people are not doing well.

@Tahuti I am just beign non-rational. For fun nothing serious lol. I am half German, so I just love to see how toxic something can be won't make sense I know. I am surprised by what standards people can do science today, and I saw someone in class today, that acted like OP. I don't think these people have a bright future. It's just a personal opinion. Who knows what will happen. I find it amusing that people seemingly try to revive race science and skew results into their favour to create some bias and to push their personal egoic agenda. I'd rather be interested to know which gene pairs etc. cause an increase in IQ and if it is possible to what degree to change that and not to argue about cultures and why jews are succesful in that way. The more interesting question would be imo what external factors / internal increase the gene "cluster" that caues IQ in the first place And to not link it to cultures, yet to the cluster of genes themselves. I find this so hypocrtically to just frame everything into one culture, as if other cultures don't have that pair of genes? Well, then at least show evidence. I don't know why I should believe a single word of OP, even when these people have higher IQ. The more interesting question is what cluster of genes causes high IQ to what degree are they changeable and not also why can't they be changed at age 80 for example? To what degree have they been analyzed. I dunno I am sitting in classes with medicinal physicist currently I don't really care that much about op opinon, as it's very narrow-minded imo. Just googled a bit I am still setting myself up for science, I dunno how much D.N.A is changeable, I find it funny I could start to do a PH.D in this area and I see this ignorant post. It gives me more motivation to corret "stupidity" in that sense... Please don't take my post "rationally seriously" like the nazi scientist I hate. Some just care about their dogma, and ego instead of researching for truth and actual causality. That is why I wrote the pissed and not so serious comment. With Adolfian Tactics I mean nothing lol, imagine my Grandpa was named Adolf because of WW2. I find social phenomena so interesting it's crazy. Sorry if I am misleading. Don't take it seriously, at best it's good food for thought. Not interested to skew people into Hitlers direction if you get now more what I mean lol. Who knows the 0.1% of genes that differ between humans are caused 100% by my intuition by either random mating of pre-existing genes and mutation. As well as enviromental influneces possibly over 10,100 years even shorter who knows exactly? Science seems to change rapidly at least computer science. https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/fact-sheets/Genetics-vs-Genomics#:~:text=All human beings are 99.9,about the causes of diseases. It's funny I legit could do this now and disproove everything possibly that OP has done. I do think our institue is also better and more open. It's kinda funny how far bias will go... Anyway. Again I am writting this light heartedly. I am not an expert/authority. Just a guy with a path ahead of me and an opinion like op. Anyway. Even then what about artifical digital enviroments? Will they change gene expression also? How much does the enviroment impact my gene health in that sense? Will using AR change my D.N.A? If I am exposed to it over periods of time? How much does internal perception matter? Will thinking I can grow and become smarter and more intelligent pay of for families/progeny of my family for example? How can I measure the affects even of a mindset in terms of gene expression for example in a given culture? If for example people in Canada believe we can become taller and smarter and act accordingly and others just act accordignly how much will that impact the genes that modulate height? I dunno to see everything as a deterministic event is myopic imo. Anyway. I bet there are smarter takes on this, I am just painfully aware of my intellecutal humility at times, maybe so much that I become arrogant at seemingly ethnocentric science...

I dunno it might shock you that I agree 99.9% there are so many methods ancient civilizations used even in medicine that are not repeatable today, just from skimming some ancient books. Science exists in contrast to human life span on planet earth for only a brief moment in time. There are so many "re-inventions" the issue is who is doing it? Be part of the problem either or be part of the solution that is the problem. Science is for everyone 99.9% of people just are corrupt, so they should at best not even start. That is my opinion. Meditation and yoga homeless sure I agree, I wish you would have written with a bit more nuance so I can take it seriously. As you seem very intelligent. Apparently... if compliments like this are still allowed lol. I never tripped on the road, although having a stable meditation practice/yoga practice just helps tremendously with tripping. I can give you the direct answer to why I disagree with the 0.1% life style choices and life styles matter. There is no way an enviroment has 0 impact. As well as every individual functions differently. So one might benefit more from beign homless and using psyches as a way to grow spiritually, as for contrast someone who only benefits from meditation and yoga. Using both might also be to much for some and for some it might be the quintessential and non-plus ultra as a practice tool? I don't think a real spiritual practice discludes both/all. Psychcedelics, Meditation and Yoga even exercise (for some western spirit and Wilber knowledge) is profundly beneficial for spiritual growth. What pisses me off, is that there is 0 understanding of human psychology and the use of shadow work in most religious places regardless if it is some indian based religion as well as "far east" religion including west/north/south religions. By far all the cult shit that has happend the last 100 years was a wake up call to psychology and the psychedelic rennesaince, it's crazy how important psyches are in terms of also dealing with shadow issues. Some have more some have less. Yes, that is obviously important to mention? The point is someone has to practice is and balancing this double-edged sword in different life styles and circumstances is real challenge. Intent counts a lot. I had stronger meditative experience than psychdelic experience. I had an experience of Omniscience as ... Enneagram type 5? (apparently there is interesting... neuroscience to this) which for me is as 4w5 is an ideal state to reach an higher ideal. That experience was almost life alterting I checked in with doctors, no one can anaylze this data they, don't even have the tools in one of the most developed countries. The majority also clings to science, so it's basically their new doctrine. Most are not skeptical enough to be consistently a sciencetist/artist. That is to advanced for most to handle. Oh, yes and I broke down a couple of times trying. Still going at it...

@Tahuti I love Adolfian Tactics, there should be a chess moves named after Hitler . Gosh sometimes I wish he would have won the war, so this stupidity finally ends. Never seen so much obvious arrogance this shit will never fly I've seen enough correction . Especially, in this timeline. Imagination is also forbidden apparently .

I dunno all these hyporctical debates, there is new science beign done in america showing that psyches can help you enter states and they are more profound of an experience then meditation/yoga is ever... I dunno why everyone needs to be in war because of fking myopia. Might as well run around naked and scream I am free at one point. That is the current level of science. Freedom to idiocy. Use a tool. I wish my body would not be fking handicapped, so I can practice more of what I preach. Yet, it's close to impossible.

This is straight up pathetic as a scientist to be proud of this and to openly and actively manipulate results. I don't think you will gain any credibillity, as the only thing you care about is a toxic agenda seemingly. Of some race science. It says nothing. I am beign authentic and this wannabe rational science is an effort that is going to be in vain. That is all that I am seeing so much bias. There is nothing scientific about this. As well as you writting that you manipulate papers. Says way way more about you and you should not be doing science and let allowed to be doing science. As your viewpoints are racist and you manipulate results and seemingly don't care. It's incredbile hypocritical of you to assume you are rational and biased. When you clearly are personally motivated to skew results in your favour by manipulating papers. This is also close to disinformation, nothing you shared is new. That I want a person to not do science based on bias, is clearly the most ethical approach. I don't think someone like you should be allowed to do science, because of implicit bias. There is barely anything informative about this, you don't even analyse genes, alll you do is predict based on models, you never analyzed the gene pair of a human. So all what you are saying has 0 credibillity. Is speculation now causation? That is how you do science? Tell me which gene pairs cause the mutation of intelligence, that would make more sense the idea that it is based on family is reductonistic and myopic. The gene pair itself expresses the qualities if intelligence is to be inherited, no model can really predict that. As well as it should be identifiable which gene pairs cause an increase in IQ. Like I said this has 0 credibillity and I am going to flag posts. Just because it's racist science skewd to ones own agenda. The point is you can't even be rational yourself because you skew results to your agenda. There is nothing rational about you and your agenda. The results would count and you have none since you manipulate data into your favour. There is 0 interest in truth in you, that is very obvious. You should be forbidden to do science with the other racist scientists who skew and manipluate results in their think tanks for their agenda and income and survival. For me it clearly shows a pattern people in my circle have been complaining about. I don't think your shit will fly for long tbh.

I dunno what ya'll are talking about, yet this has 0 credibillity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_racism Analyse some genes and then see what the stuff is made out of and what caused the modulation for a certain cohort to become so succesful. What science are you even doing? Reading santances 3 times in this thread was enough. This should be illegal. Gosh I wish to write something offensive just so the stupidity continous and all effort will be in vain. There is 0 account for randomness, this should be forbidden clearly lol. If someone has enough credibillity please close this freaking thread.

To be quiet frank I am somehwere around teal/turqouise with a heavy pull towards green and red, and I do have a very healthy orange drive suprisingly. My red is sometimes out of balance because of projections from 10k areas. Tbh I dislike dating a lot, I even attempted to at least date trans and gay people without all to much success, just to see how the stages will unfold. Barely meet anyone who can stomach teal. It's quiet boring and frustrating. Co-creation is very rare. Equality currently almost feels like slavery. Again Deida has good stuff on this, yet it's quiet cumbersome to be a leader for stage 3/4 women and this fosters a lot of shadows imo and one-up-manship without reading everything. I am being very blunt I could be even more blunt, yet I dunno. There is not much stage 5 I am unsure with the "model provided" as I have sources that don't explain it in a lenghty manner and it's also more practical... Meeting teal women is rare, and many regress into orange. All these stages should be live also all the time, so there is way more drama in a real relationship. Simply said there are these moments.

I dunno I have VGP, someone could research that genetically, I already am seeing indicators lol. Let's see how far my science will go, my kinestheic intuition sometimes is insane because of this. As well as just base intuition? I can control goosebumps voluntarily.

I never finished the book, yet the red queen dives into the biology of genes between male and female a bit more. Hopefully I get to it. I do think nuture can beat nature, in the sense of levereging the 20% available that is changeable, as soon as a new tool/method is introduced to produce change everything will change. I don't know why there needs to be a distinctive focus on Jews, instead of the gene expression themselves that causes the minority/majority the behave in a certain way, and name the gene. I don't know why Jews are the ones to be "blamed" for anything, feels to me like people want to elevate their culture again for no reason. Whatsoever, besides sheer arrogance and vanity/conceitedness. Somehow a classic.... evermore...

Leo hitting with da knowlegde hahaha, I am going to buy a biologie book for dummies for this hahah.

We need one-sized fits all racism Not a big fan of testing for IQ, even when "gifted" or not. I don't like the race associations and the false equvalicency, because some lobbiest eugenics started researching this. There is so much bias in the history of measuring IQ. Just abort it. There are better modles that cause less friction imo and give more leeway. Even Blumenbach was smarter in that sense, at least he had the right perspective .

Bro I can even get into Bioinformatics now. What are you talking about? If the culture enforced learning and hard work for a long-period of time it is clear that the people from that region/tribe have higher iq? The more objective critera would be what causes a decline of IQ overtime in other cohorts? As well as an increase for cohorts? As well as the enviroment matters, for example if you want a personal anecdote. I smoked cigarettes when I was very young I am gifted I did not test it (psychologist and coach insisted on me being gifted and letting me test). I do well in academia and I meet so many intelligent people. Many intelligent people do drugs/smoke cigarettes and do harmful behaviour. That alone is a tell-tale sign IQ != success != health as this can ruin ones life. I believe for example my IQ would be up to 7 points higher if I did not smoke cigarettes as I was a teen, because of lack of emotional regulation from my parents? Might use this better as an exemplar. I dunno reaching a state of omniscience left me to believe IQ is in a sense not really real especially at higher states of existence. I dunno the more you argue about this the more I am going to do a PH.D to disproove the bullshit I am seeing with my own eyes. Did you ever analyze genetics with a tool? https://www.psypost.org/2015/03/nature-vs-nurture-iq-of-children-in-better-educated-households-is-higher-study-of-twins-indicates-32733 I heard this study a lot in books/audiobooks etc. Personally, speaking meeting gifted people, they all received a lot of training/programms/were put into programms and activities, their parents are mostly from well-off families and they started to teach their kids early reading at the age of 2-4. Mostly, for example a friend of mines cousine was raised in a science family. Then when you put these people into the same condition, they increase their iq. Is that true or not? Also most miss the spiritual component. This so called free of bias science smells like horseshit to me, I've seen critiques about IQ test, tbh. It's a joke if someone wants to do something complex let him do it and see what happens, so he can learn. Instead of forcing false ideas about IQ's and Jew's. What does that have to do with Jews? It's their execution of life that makes them succesful, how they conduct their lives and execute on it. That is pretty evident, when someone does that he/her will become succcesful.

Yeah I like holarchies mostly. I don't think very hierachically mostly in holarchies. I dunno I like integral theory a lot, so I am unsure what to reply. Sorry also for the late reply! Was unsure if I reply at all, as I did not see the necessity. I am currently focusing on disbeliefing through using a specific meditation technique and it works quiet well to de-construct mind space.

@Leo Gura How did you see the entity kangeroo mouse internally/externally? I unfortunately don't have the time to understand everthing in detail, even though I read most of the thread.. I had a similar experience on NN-DMT although the visual quality was very weak, I basically saw a tiny gnome of sorts that gave me access showing me I am all-powerful in that sense by giving me control over another body so to speak. This was all internal after a couple of hits. It definitely was not as intense. Is that similar to hyper alien intelligence? The experience was very strong energy of DMT was cursing through my head and I had similar to Martin Ball sort of these electric/digital synch waves in my head, no idea how to describe it. I heared strange sounds and I had to stop the experience, because of lack of control. Although paradoxically the entity showed me "authority" over it, giving me power and control. Sort of similar to beign a ruler. Is the beign you meet archetypal I got interseted into Carl Jung a bit? Do you think it exists in our universe itself? That you could possibly meet it in some odd scenaroy lol?

That is interesting. I wanted to use it as a service when I am actively working and audible might be to long for some reason. I considered this option. I did both courses in 2x of a 5 part series of certificates for a full IBM programm. The videos and did the assignments, I have some certificates for beginner levels on my linkedin, yet I don't know how useful that is so to speak, as I barely network via this plattform. I finished both courses relatively quickly it was interesting to test this, and see for myself how far I can leverage learning techniques from my own good. I passed all of them, yet it was beginner level. I wondered how far you can take it, especially if you have the pre-requistes for the courses, when you put these into linkedin. I usually also join study rooms with other people at home, so I am not so lonely lol, I can even turn on the camera.

Did you ever use blinklist as a tool that would interest me in terms of gathering information? I also listen to all audiobooks/videos on 2x and did a course from Barbara Oakely on how to study with video based information/zoom/during corona on science. So I know a trick or two, yet I prefer it when people do the course and take the notes themselves. I did also some edx programms for which I paid, so it was interesting to use the principles. Although I did find myself in the same area of how to learn in the end. I did take notes from the video course, although I did not learn as much as I read a bunch of strategies and approachs beforehand. It was just interesting on how working with video/ a camera is best used IIRC. I can look up the name if you want 2. The biggest insight for me was from the course that taking notes and stopping the video as well as watching the video fully is better. It is better to take for example notes from a video when you pause and they also explain how the basal ganglia is responsible for one modality of learning as well as the hippocampus? So there are different ways on how to approach the subject itself based on current science. The course is free on coursera/edx.org IIRC. I don't remember the exact name.

@Danioover9000 Agree!