Nahm

Yes.

@wildflower The whole point of quantum mechanics, to the extent there is a point, is you telling yourself there is no each other, there is no quantum mechanics. There is no right or wrong you or me, no understander or understanding.

@wildflower You just basically have to allow quantum mechanics to debunk quantum mechanics. Similarly, spirituality wise, the hearing of the message is that there is no hearer of a message.

There is no ‘abstract object’, if anything it’s an abstract thought about an abstract object. If QM reveals anything at all, it’s that there are no separate objects. Think of the wave function as a pointing rather than a verifiable (scientifically) truth (direct experience instead). Even if it is verifiable, see the opposite view is equally true (that it is not verifiable). Likewise, things never actually ‘come into existence’. This implies separation where QM reveals there is not. (Nobody’s saying an elephant is existing in a superposition as an ant.) There is no beginning of a universe. There is the apparent theory that there is, but there isn’t. Point to it, literally, to notice it’s a thought, without any actuality to actually reference. There is not a material world, with things in it. This is the revelation of QM’s. Form is a thought, a belief, which QM’s debunks.

Investigate more. Until you are ultimately satisfied.

The wave function appears, or manifests as an appearance. The ‘exponentially inversely related to the size of the mass’ is contingent on ‘size’ of ‘mass’, while ‘size’ is a thought, only relative to another mass, which there is not, which is what e=mc2 reveals. Think of that equation as having been widely misunderstood to be about light, while the insight is really about no mass, or the illusory nature of mass. Applying QM to ‘large mass’ in this context is of course perfectly correct. QM reveals there is no “mass” at all. Don’t forget to include “yourself” as non-mass / not-a-separate thing or observer… subject to - really… manifest via. He, and me, and you, are as ‘alive’ as Schrödinger's cat. Approaching a black hole, there’s inevitably not he, me, you & a cat, but a singularity. What’s forgotten, is the reverse of that has already transpired, more specifically, is already apparent. That a you must die for anything or situation to be, is as incorrect as saying Schrödinger's cat must die (or be dead, or be alive) for some contingent situation to be, or not be. (* there is no opposite which is correct).

@Someone here Why are we limited? Interest seems to go to the ‘limited’, but the revelation lies in the ‘we’.

@Blackhawk I always had a reason, as in justification for everything too. When I was five or six my mom thought for sure I’d be a lawyer. But I didn’t have a story about enlightenment at all. And I didn’t have a sour attitude. I was open minded, trying things before believing I knew what they were.

With respect, that is, in it’s entirety, the paradigm previously referred to. As an event if you will, that is only a story which takes place in the mind. Upon inspection there is no actuality of any of it found.

Be cause there is no suffering, others, choice, or world. It is better to remain tucked away in the cave, better to not know, than to prematurely lie of the truth.

The mind always wins, bends creation to itself; mere movie of freedom, and truth remains shelved.

Motivation is a mental paradigm. It’s living & doing for how you will feel. It is the plight, the judgement, the prison & the sentencing, of the stubborn & reluctant non-creator, non-practitioner. It serves you well.

What’s the it? What’s the I, the thinker thinking? If something was appearing as if you’re thinking, you’d think it be worth looking into.

You might say it’s revealed as the most obvious ‘thing’ ever via meditation. That there even is a thing called thinking is as pure ego as is any how it is, or isn’t, ‘true’. ”We'll begin with a spin, traveling in the world of my creation. What we'll see will defy explanation.”

@EmptyVase idk.

@4201 Even simpler… it’s all designed for you to experience, prefer (want); repeat. -Literally- no thinking is needed whatsoever.

@Danioover9000 I’m not saying it’s ‘wrong’, but we have very different ideas of what a dreamboard is. There’s no visions, goals, planning, no pictures, no images (ideally). Keep it as simple as possible: write what you want with a marker, reality becomes it. Don’t jump to step two, just do step one.

@Javfly33 Cause love is free.

@Javfly33 That’s because love.

@Javfly33 How’s that thinking feel?

Aversion to feeling is suffering. Abe teaches nothing if not the opposite.

@Javfly33 There is no other possibility.

Because consciousness is not real and is not yours. Nothing could really be added.