Ry4n

“Unless you are actually looking at it” would still be more imagination, including the experience of a finite, localised POV. Any “something” in existence is nothing, with no thing to which it pertains to. The idea that what is held within one finite mind is all there is is bollocks. That finite POV holds no more reality than anything else.

I like it

Gaslighting is the forum's Modus Operandi. Take a look at Richard Lang's (and Douglas Harding's) style of teaching; everybody is seen as capable of knowing their true nature and nobody is viewed as a "teacher" above others, there is absolutely no hierarchy at all. Everyone is equal to the point that the one who sees this sees everybody else as "awake" too. This type of attitude makes embodiment of the truth natural, easy and simple. This hierarchical enforcement of who's the most awake is purely ego based and only isolates more people, as it will continue to do so in the future. More and more people are leaving for this very reason, and it's a pretty justified one. This discussion seems pretty pointless at this stage though, nothing is going to change and young, impressionable depressed teenagers are going to continue to come to these spaces only to be confused, gaslit and left off worse than when they came, with no one taking responsibility for it. Opposing views about spirituality simply aren't respected on this forum, and is usually what opens the floodgates to more gaslighting, thus reinforcing group think as Adeptus has mentioned. Dogmatism in action. Yep, most likely the depressed teenagers I'm talking about. I would know because I was one of them!!!

@Leo Gura Ah I see. Its a good thing that you have all this background about me, and what I do and don't know. I imagine that's very handy that you can simply call upon that knowledge to make statements about people, you know - rather than dealing with the inconvenience of facts and reality. But hey, if you prefer to fantasize a backstory for me then knock yourself out - whatever helps. Is this not an example of gaslighting?

Brilliant

I mean at the end of the day the game is bullshit but ya still gotta play it…

One infinite/boundless consciousness with no form, many finite localised minds within it. It wouldn’t be infinite if it was otherwise. That’s how I would sum it up.

Single eternal eye ? One eye ?

AHAHAH MY GOD

Lol Yeah that idea is pretty stupid. I hope @Leo Gura you don’t agree with this but I wouldn’t know because I can never get a clear answer. I can get an absolute answer from you, but the question being asked is actually relative. At least some of the questions have to be answered on a relative level, and then see how that relates to the absolute level. For instance, absolutely do I agree that there is only one infinite consciousness, with no bounds or limitations, which’s substance is nothing and can manifest into whatever it likes? Of course! On a more basic, human, relative impermanent level, do I think such a consciousness (for the purpose of creation) could split itself into dualities, which include many unique finite minds that interplay with each other because why the flying fuck not it’s infinite? YES! Absolutely, is all those finite minds with unique experiences completely imaginary? YES! Does it matter? FUCK NO! It’s all imagination anyway, my ego’s finite experience is just as imaginary as anything else, even my microscopic dick is imaginary, who cares? I fail to see a reason to interpret my relative experience of the world as any different than before, despite knowing the underlying unity of it. I can still appreciate the diversity of it all whilst knowing it’s all one at the same time. I think Rupert is simply trying to connect the relative and absolute by saying that one infinite consciousness (the absolute) can imagine many different experiences simultaneously in the relative sense. Don’t see anything wrong here. If one truly cared about erasing duality forever, there would be nothing. If an individual does anything at all, that proves they care about diversity and want to enjoy creation and possibly take part in it. Yes it’s imagination, and?

Go to a physio and check to see that you don't have any form of sciatica or even scoliosis. Sounds like sciatica to me

CDP Choline is probably better for reading than Alpha GPC, worth a shot

What you see before you is still “imagination”

Bro you're just spitting out stuff Leo said word for word lol, the cultiness is staring right at me

I like it

Exactly, I hear "imagination" being used as if everybody else's experience is imaginary whilst mine isn't, when mine is equally imaginary/real as everything else, with only pure awareness being the absolute thing that stands unchanging. It's simply not a useful word for the majority of listeners which is so clear.

Boom! The end.

This to me is a healthy, sane and Truthful attitude.

I could see that, best advice would be to tread lightly and slowly, and take breaks from it all to focus on being grounded. Kundalini alone can fuck you up. The psychedelic being used matters too in this regard. For example if you're using mescaline or mushrooms you should still be fairly grounded after the experience, however if were to combine kundalini with say LSD you could REALLY feel "up in the air" so to speak for probably days afterwards.

I fear for boys the most, especially in the education system. I’ve had my masculinity squandered my entire upbringing and was taught such traits were immoral. My teachers always favoured the girls. We were told to sit down and be quiet and submissive.

Maybe we should get him onto the podcast then. Expand the amount of voices on the platform instead of censoring people.

This has been my thoughts exactly, it's like an inability to connect the absolute to the relative.

Clearly not the smartest dude, but basically a genius compared to H3 at this point

Unless it's the Moderna for under 40s that is, as is seen in the graph below. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01630-0/figures/2

Take edibles and you will understand