-
Content count
10,489 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Schizophonia
-
Most guys who use whey only use a few ounces a day, and it's mostly orthorexics or bodybuilders who take it post-workout in a shaker thinking it will protect them from post-workout catabolism. . Everyone insists on the interest of whey in terms of preparation time and the protein/price ratio, that's all. There are many people who train without whey, including, cureisement, often powerlifters (where I am anyway), it is not absolutely necessary. The real question I ask you is: where are the vegan athletes and more particularly those who abstain from vegetable proteins and/or especially roids? Ps: I just saw what i eat in a day by Patrik Baboumian who is quoted in TGC for reccords (which nobody cares about), I laughed a lot, go see. My performance increased by stopping veganism, as I went from around 150g of protein per day to around 100g. It's the same thing that happened to youtubers I follow like Vegatable Police or Jon Venus. Just try two weeks of fitness with lots of meat, eggs and maybe dairy, you'll see. lol i probably have 10x more xp in nutrition than you can imagine Because you supplement yourself, justifying a diet by very specific practices (supplementation in B12, in epa/dha by algae or a ton of flax/chia/hemp, vitamin a by a ton of carrot/sweet potato) is dishonest . Also how do you know your markers are good? While researching veganism on youtube I came across a youtuber (Hench Herbivore) who claimed to have good testosterone levels thanks to veganism, the guy had 400 to 500ng/dl, that's a bad score that brings him closer to a person with andropause or a preteen. I also saw the complete blood test of Jon Venus' brother who is a doctor, his report was not terrible and lacked a certain number of nutrients by his own admission. It was worth making sandwitches of whole wheat and germs straight out of hell lmao. I have plenty of examples like that. So what ? To whom do you need to justify yourself? who will punish you? What is morality? Is this a code of conduct written somewhere in the sky? Besides, do you pay attention to which company you buy your electronic products and even your fruits and vegetables or human exploitation is not a problem for you? No, livestock production "only" produces 14.5% of greenhouse gas emissions, cattle are possibly more problematic because of methane. Apart from that the animals do not cause water depletion and help to re-fertilize the soil through excrement and urine. Dude, all the Vegan Doctors and YouTubers and their so-called reasons, I know them all. "you don't need x so you shouldn't consume x" is a slave mentality yes. This reflection has nothing to do with your cravings. lol https://ourworldindata.org/quaternary-megafauna-extinction https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.abf9776 https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-51068816 No, starches without condiments, even cooked, don't taste good, unripe fruits don't taste good, oil and refined sugar don't taste too good, rotten foods don't taste good, etc. etc. Yes, the vast majority of animals are potentially omnivorous, and are just more suited to one type of food and will prefer it. The more you are adapted to a food the more you will like it. The point is, you don't like starches, it's a survival solution, and you're going to try to camouflage their taste with subterfuge. You want nice, juicy meat, and some fruit/dairy if you can digest it, possibly tubers/white flour starches if you're in fruit shortage and/or starving and your mitochondria are adapted to high carbohydrate diet for some time. They are not natural products and cheat on your palate, and in fact even if they are attractive for attavic reasons they are quickly sickening and even disgusting. Stone Age men weren't some kind of violent, hungry monkeys who ate anything while shouting "ouga ouga ouga" I don't know if you understand what you're saying, but if the first men had to settle for "seeds and roots", they would be dead and you wouldn't be here. And there is nothing complicated to know what is natural or not, you can imagine that bean packets do not grow in trees and that you cannot fish knackis, it is elementary logic. @M A J I What you say sounds like a psychotic delirium without any basis or proof, I think you also mentioned the yugas which is Hindu bullshit. Frugivorous diets do not work and have made thousands of people thin, without sexual energy, made them lose teeth... Animal products and dense/rich in fats are associated with self-expression, fat peasants who eat too much and laugh a lot while drinking too much wine are very fond of these "yang" foods, as well as children, stressed/damaged people by life who need to be comforted etc. But it is on your self-expression and your excesses that you can be attacked and conflicted. People who have been humiliated at times when they were helpless become neurotic and tend to turn to foods that are at best fresh, at worst boring (yin foods if you will) and generally turn to some kind of asceticism. because they become unassailable.
-
Animals do not get vitamin b12 by eating plants. Their intestinal flora metabolizes the cobalt in the tons of vegetables they consume into enough b12. Even if you were right you can't eat so many plants anyway, it would be deadly. You also can't get enough b12 by drinking stagnant water or some bullshit. In fact the only people coming out with such dangerous ideas are ideologically mentally ill and I hope you understand that these guys are marginal and ideologically mentally ill. Neal Barnard (I think he's the one who said that in what the health) would be easily condemned in France for saying things like that. I don't know how it works in other countries in Europe but here I am probably similar. If even eating a certain amount of animal products is insufficient how can you claim to have enough b12 by drinking stagnant water or eating grass lol. Otherwise yes, depends on the cooking method, the part of the animal etc. "suck the pebbles" At least we travel with veganism lol So why did my physical performance increase by quitting veganism? Why do all vegan athletes consume a significant amount of protein from rice, peas etc? Have you ever tried to eat a ton of beans every day? It is not because it is difficult to be lacking in something that it is not problematic to have little. Where are the low protein athletes? There is good where graham from but his teeth are rotten, he is skinny and nothing says he is not under trt. The majority of frugivores are physically wasteful, and even starch eaters often have to take supplements. Both, it looks like a bottle of orangina I play No, I don't have to justify anything to anyone. And eating meat is not a choice, it's so obvious. You project yourself, the only liberal in the tertiary sector who feels guilty about eating meat is you. I'm just playing, starting debates is a game, it's literally the purpose of life. If it bothers you, you don't have to post, are you aware of that? Obviously, the more you annoy someone on a subject the more you push them into reverse neurosis. It is for this precise reason that I promote a diet based on the senses and instinct. The problem is not to do or not to do what you have done in the past, the problem is that you are adapted to it whether you want to or not. I'm no archaeologist, I can try to talk about that but my point is that a vegan diet just doesn't taste good unless it cheats, causes gas issues etc. Extra proteins lol One day, I will do a pro primal diet file, something very serious. .
-
Don't pretend not to understand, pansa is mainly herbivorous. There are actually quite a few purely herbivorous or carnivorous animals, most of the time these are abuses of language. No, without supplement you will die, or in any case be in very bad health. There is no vegan civilization, strictly none outside the imagination of some. Lol. You just spit a racist myth on me that Europeans are mammoth-eating hunter-gatherer warriors and non-white/Europeans are strutting around in the rainforest eating coconuts and plantains. That's not how it works and the majority of tropical civilizations have based their diet largely on animal products. Same for dairy products. Gift : https://www.sci.news/archaeology/indus-civilization-people-diet-09136.html I recorded it recently because I found it interesting It literally took me 5 seconds to find it on google, despite being an insomniac and terribly lazy to do research. For the 10th time carnivores is a misnomer for "primal". And I'm not on a diet outside of instinct. Fruits are good to some extent, vegetables are not, people hide the taste of vegetables with spices, salts, fats etc, especially if they are very bitter/fibrous. yes Idk Ditto, do you have an epidemiological study on the smell of carnivores and their sexual attractiveness? lol. What I eat has never changed my body odor, maybe some people starve themselves too much fat or something and produce too much lactic acid. No, these foods don't contain "a lot of omega 3", the only seeds that contain a lot of O3 are marginal (chia, flax, hemp...) and they are Omega 3 ALA, you have to consume a lot to convert enough to EPA/DHA. I even saw a video of a vegan dr (I forget what his name is, he was on What Thé Health and seems to be North African or mixed race) admitted that many of his patients were deficient. lol, that's like saying calcium deficiency wasn't a problem because you can suck on a limestone brick All right
-
Schizophonia replied to Epikur's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
There are other countries with so many guns per population and there are no such problems. I'm in France and I can have an akm in the next few weeks if I want, it's not a legal problem. -
Schizophonia replied to Danioover9000's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Is there someone able to give me the name of my two parents or something like that? or is it a topic of psychotics in denial? -
Schizophonia replied to Danioover9000's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
What is my mother's name ? -
Schizophonia replied to amanen's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Aren't there an infinite number of dimensions after all? I landed in a 2d dimension that looked like a weird computer. -
No, it's just that LSD has a significantly different pharmacology than other psychedelics. It greatly increases dopaminergic and glutamate signaling and tends to make people obsessively compulsive or even create a particularly schizophrenic state during the trip. All my friends and I want to clean our room and wash up towards the end of peak. (and jerk off lmao)
-
No, just brain inflammation.
-
Take 2g of aspirin in the morning on an empty stomach and see what happens
-
Schizophonia replied to Paul5480's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
You mean "reincarnation"? But it is a virgin and non-dual consciousness. Schizophonia will disappear? I love play this character. -
Schizophonia replied to Danioover9000's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
lmao I laughed a lot, thank you very much, I will sleep well tonight -
Schizophonia replied to Danioover9000's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
No life has absolute value, the value of a thing is always relative to the interest of other conscious entities, this is the basis of Darwinism. So yes humans are more valuable than animals, animals are not going to pay taxes, offer me services, be my friends, my girlfriend etc. They are literally useless. And vice versa, for a rabbit the life of a homo sapiens has less value than his child or another rabbit, for the same reasons. -
The battery is faulty.
-
He looked like me when I was a pre-teen, and I was literally stressed all the time. A situation where you are so cynical/dissociated that you may engage in extremely bizarre and antisocial behavior "because it's fun".
-
I will take the time to respond to your messages later.
-
Adversarial reversal, do YOU have tangible proof? The primal/paleo diet (carnivore was a provocative misnomer, call such a diet what you will) is amazing to me and many others. The more I eat like this, the better my cognition, the better my poo, the stronger I am in the gym etc etc. And obviously the taste is much better than a vegan diet, while being really satisfying in terms of appetite. Troll/provocation aside, I've shared and suggested checking out the story of other people on even stricter diets than me who don't have health issues including artherosclerosis (despite high LDL), while recalling that, here again, carnivore is a vague and provocative term to agree on a diet based on animal products. And you ? What do you have apart from generally epidemiological studies. For the 10th time, regardless of the quality of the studies and the fact that we can be interested in them, they are impersonal and manipulable. You absolutely want a study? giveaway: https://www.dovepress.com/total-meat-intake-is-associated-with-life-expectancy-a-cross-sectional-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IJGM ditto + and yes I cover the vegan diet, both because it's the elephant in the room when we talk about a carnivorous diet and because I suffered from it I don't know exactly why I said that and I can't find the original message, it may have been deleted. I think it was a question of accusing me of having a marginal position. Yes I have a marginal position, you too in another context, so don't accuse me (you or anyone else) of that. You lie, you are a liar. I talked about myself, then I took the example of two people that many people know, and then I insisted on checking another example. Do you understand that I don't have to ctrl+c and crtl+v all that I can/have been able to see on this kind of diets? Ok Yes, I too like fruit to a certain extent. There is no opposition between fruit and butter. much better for you Yeah, I think it's pretty clear that there's an evolutionary reason why the palate likes certain things and doesn't. And "a bit boring" is an understatement, you know that as much as I do, Michael That's like saying it's okay for people to drink their urine, because you can enjoy it by adding maple syrup to it. And again I don't want to force anyone to do anything, it's the complete opposite of my point. True, but you can say that about any way you eat. It is for this exact reason that I do not have a diet and that I just eat/promote foods that are natural and that I like. Fiber doesn't mean much. There are a large number of different fibers, with different sizes and structures, soluble in water or not... I will answer whoever accused me of dunning kruger below, the accusation is basically the same No Why should we eat like these? And especially : -They weren't vegan and couldn't be vegan anyway. -They didn't eat "kale with sweet potatoes and beans", if they ate fibrous things they were well prepared (long soaks, cooking, fermenting) and usually eaten with fat for taste and digestion. You have to see the bean-based recipes that date back to antiquity, these things were literally swimming in olive oil ah ah. I'm not crusading against anyone, I don't care. Worst case consider me a troll. It is not because you eat meat that you will have colorectal cancer, it is not because you eat a lot of fiber that you will have sibo. Besides, I'm not saying that humans are big eaters of red meat, it seems pretty clear that humans evolved around the consumption of white meat from small mammals, fish and shellfish. Ah and second lmao gift: https://www.cell.com/cell/pdf/S0092-8674(18)31176-0.pdf It's on rats, so do what you want. "Should" according to what criteria? "Paleo" includes all hominids before the mastery of agriculture pr homo sapiens Just because Homo erectus ate beetles and tender roots doesn't mean it's an attractive and favorable diet for modern man. As for fruit: https://deniseminger.com/2011/05/31/wild-and-ancient-fruit/ You can also watch any documentary on hunter-gatherer tribes and you will see that they consume fruits and honey, sometimes fatty fruits (coconuts, avocados, palm fruits...) yes The whole point of my topic is to troll a little by making a statement based on very basic things, and by extension showing that it works on various people. We could fight over a "more perched" debate on a certain number of studies, but that would be long and uninteresting. If you want my opinion on such and such a study I can tell you, possibly. All right
-
Test your testosterone and thyroid hormones
-
Every time I take large doses I turn red like a lobster and look puffy/weird. I feel like I'm all wet in my face when there's nothing there. Can psychedelics be dangerous for people with adrenal problems, hypertension or that sort of thing?
-
What markers? What are you eating ? ?
-
You are right, but I do not follow anyone and therefore no form of marketing whatsoever. I don't want to gain weight/lose weight, cure anything or whatever with a diet, I'm not even afraid of dying ha ha. I just eat what I like and draw conclusions. The purpose of my arrogant/playful attitude on this thread is to troll a bit and provoke an attempted response to my conclusions based on things as simple and basic as taste. This is a serious question, I quickly looked at your YouTube channel, you seem nice and I subscribed but can you explain why you need to put fruit (sweet stuff) in your cereal porridge to make it more or less edible? I can simply heat up a steak with butter/bone marrow and it's simply a feast for the taste buds, just two ingredients from the same source! Can you also explain why the "carnivores" I quoted are in good health including no problems with arteriosclerosis? There are some carnivores with problems but I suspect they eat too little fat and just eat steaks, or too many vitamin a rich organs etc. And again I'm not a "carnivore" in the strict sense of the word, I see no problem eating fruits, honey, tubers and my easily digestible vegetables (I should have said paleo I know) Also understand that I cannot spend days trying to debunk your petitions of principle and therefore by extension those of some of the nutritionists. It is obviously too long and complicated.
-
It's true I can't, there's usually too much to get rid of, I can feel it in all my experiences. Are there psychedelics better suited to evacuate buried energies?
-
@ZenAlex 1)Plants doesn't have or/are very deficient on : -B12 -EPA/DHA (unless you consume silly amounts of flax/chia seed) -Vitamine A (same but with carrot juice, sweet potatoes etc.) -Zinc (Vegetarianism will drastically increase the copper to zinc ratio, and increase the metabolism of dopamine to downstream stimulatory catecholamines, while having lower gaba signaling, zinc is also very necessary for the production of sperm and testosterone, it is literally one of the first supplements used to boost these.) -Choline (Only in large quantities in eggs and animal flesh, necessary for the synthesis of seminal fluid and especially acetylcholine, itself necessary for good muscle and especially cerebral function, also serves to balance excess catecholamines.) -L-Carnitine (also needed for the brain) -Heme Iron A significant portion of the world's population is anemic, and even without it your levels may be too low. (that's my case). You can't reverse anemia with non-heme iron unless you use monstrous amounts, and it will damage your gut flora. -Proteins (sports vegans and in particular bodybuilders all gorge themselves on protein from peas, rice, hemp etc. There is a German powerlifter (that nobody knows lol) presented in the game changers, the guy made a video "what i eat in a day", he was literally fueled with protein powder smoothies. Of course these athletes also do (or have done) roids, otherwise they are all slow and skinny fat. I also sometimes see guys here quoting sadghuru, I don't know how you can take this guy for a reference in terms of spirituality and health, he is a caricature of a skinny fat Hindu guru who speaks in slow motion. My grandfather who had terminal cancer had as much energy as him lol. 2) Why do you need to justify your food choices based on what you can theoretically do without. Why do you have this slave mentality? were you humiliated in your childhood or something like that to the point of taking the holding back of your cravings as a virtue? This is a recurrence among vegans, especially the most orthorexic. I want to be nice to myself and others, I eat meat and sugar and I wish the same to the people I love. You must read Nietzsche
-
@The0Self What is the link between ray peat and what I say/do? Ray Peat spared like 50% protein by the end and was basically a vegetarian, mostly said to eat skimmed milk, well-cooked vegetables, fruits/fruit juices. @Michael569 Hello Michael, I like you but once again you speak before thinking. Hello Michael, I like you but once again you speak before thinking Paul Saladino is 44 years old and has been a carnivore/primal for several years. Dr. berg also did this recall test and his score was PERFECT, he is 58 years old and has been on his keto diet for like two decades, maybe even longer. It's not a carnivorous diet but ok. There's also this guy I quickly found on Google: https://carnivore.diet/greg-reduced-coronary-artery-calcium-score-carnivore-diet. I've seen other testimonials but I'm too lazy to find them and I don't have to chew the work for you. On the Vegan side there is this arteriosclerosis invention image of an esselstyn patient that vegans spam everywhere, but the guy actually had a lot of failures, and the people in question were put on statins , diet and sport. I find that bogus. @DefinitelyNotARobot What do you usually eat ?
-
Anatomy has no value, some animals have more of a carnivorous anatomy but are actually more herbivorous (example: pandas). Man is a primate and it is normal that we have kept a relatively similar anatomy, especially since the evolutionary process is slow and that: 1) We eat a certain percentage of certain plants 2) We didn't necessarily need to evolve to chew meat because we are able to use tools to facilitate the processing/consumption of meat. Vegans are ok with eating inedible foods raw so you wouldn't have the nerve to deny that argument, would you? Going back to the anatomy: Humans cannot digest cellulose or ferment it in a consistent way for energy, humans have quite strong stomach acid and even stronger than that of canines, humans can very digest animal proteins (proteases) well, the human palate loves salt, animal proteins, fats (especially animal) and monosaccharides. We don't like starches and vegetables of all kinds. A lot of fiber will create dangerous intestinal discomfort, if you persist and manage to increase your intestinal flora no one will want to be your girlfriend because no one wants to have a relationship with a human bio-gas machine. You need a descent amount of omega 3 for your brain and it's pretty obvious that we didn't evolve from flax seeds, lol. You can watch rags like "what the health" or "Game changers" made for modern dumb people, or you can watch documentaries made by serious people. I recently saw an Arte documentary on human evolution, it seems from archaeological evidence that the human brain evolved in speech from migrants to northern Africa after periods of drought, particularly following the course of the Nile. (fish and shellfish fishing) This is a non-exhaustive list, I would like someone to be able to debunk everything I said ?
