JuliusCaesar

Member
  • Content count

    859
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JuliusCaesar


  1. Tate was popular because there's a growing contingent of individuals in western society who feel disenchanted with the emasculation of men occurring here. Tate was trying to promote masculinity and traditional values, so they thought he was doing something good. For a while, even I was starting to think he might somehow be a positive influence. But when I found countless instances of Tate incriminating himself, literally bragging about committing various crimes publicly. I swiftly became disillusioned with him, and now I realize that he's a complete and utter fool. He'll be lucky not to spend the rest of his life behind bars. 


  2. Well, your spacetime continuum illusion is trinitarian by its very nature. Things tend to look better in 3's. If you begin looking for it, you can find trinitarian systems everywhere in your life. Eg, the family = Father+Mother=Son(s) and/or Daughters(s), which could be viewed as parallel to the Father and the Holy Spirit having God the Son as offspring. Not to mention the trinity within a trinity occurring here where you have God as the Holy Spirit impregnating a mortal woman to bring forth God the Son. The human body consists of a mind, body, and spirit that are one and the same thing etc.


  3. 55 minutes ago, integral said:

    What is Spiritual Intelligence? Would be a nice video.

    Yeah, awakening is a completely nonlinear process. And it isn't even the same process for different individuals, or the same for the same individual at different times. The bottom line is that you've taken something that's like a hyperdimensional shapeshifting alien being and trying to cram it into a 3-dimensional box.


  4. 23 hours ago, Danioover9000 said:

    Why is it a big deal to you, when you're not in it?

    Why we Americans like to stick our noses in other people's business could be the subject of a novel.

     

    23 hours ago, Danioover9000 said:

    Ultimately it comes to this:

       Are you for or against premarital sex, in your own country? Yes or no, and why?

       Are you for or against premarital sex, in a foreign country? Yes, or no, and why?

    I find this to be a rather silly discussion because in most of the world it's obviously impossible to impose regulations on premarital sex. 

     

     

     


  5. @LoneWonderer The short answer is it can be done; all you have to do is turn yourself into a different person. If you want the longer answer, a good place to start would be the first post I ever made on this forum. Though bear in mind, that I'm not just talking about some analytical metric. I'm literally talking about straight up becoming someone else.

    https://www.actualized.org/forum/topic/70806-accidental-ego-replacement-a-doorway-to-the-occult-and-god/


  6. 6 hours ago, Razard86 said:

    Studies show only what they test for. What that study you mentioned doesn't show, is how these cultures also cause there to be shame around sex. It also as a result increases judgment surrounding things like sex, and sexual preference. As a result the same issues that happened in America through trying to control sex, will eventually happen to Indonesia. 

    The only fault in this, is the assumption that sexual repression is somehow inherently evil. Certainly, there is some deleterious impact with such a thing. It's however equally certain that there are benefits which arise from the same.

     

    6 hours ago, Razard86 said:

    You cannot control sexual activity among humans, no matter how hard you try. It just going to create a criminal underworld the same with drugs and other banned things. 

    What? You're thinking there's going to be some kind of secret place people go to fuck or something? lol. People who want to have sex with one another will just do it anyway. I fail to see how that's a bad thing, or what point you're even trying to make with this.


  7. 2 hours ago, something_else said:

    Not that I don’t believe you, but this is something I would ask for links for. Stuff like this is notoriously hard to prove in studies.

    https://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/news/20101227/theres-benefits-in-delaying-sex-until-marriage

     

    https://news.byu.edu/news/good-things-come-couples-who-wait#:~:text=A%20statistical%20analysis%20showed%20the%20following%20benefits%20enjoyed,-%20Relationship%20satisfaction%20was%20rated%2020%20percent%20higher

     

    2 hours ago, something_else said:

    Most people in my experience thought their first relationship was great while they were in it, but now they would look back on it and realise how toxic/shitty it was because they have more reference points.

    Has it not occurred to that might be part of why premarital sexual relationships seem to be less salubrious? 

     

    2 hours ago, something_else said:

    But if someone were to survey you while you were in that relationship you’d probably rate it pretty highly.

    If I take wine from the same bottle into two glasses. And tell people that one came from a bottle costing $1000, and the other came from the bottle costing $20, there will be a greater dopaminergic response to the supposedly more expensive wine in the same subject. 

     

    The point is the greater pleasure is real irrespective of how that pleasure sausage was made. Therefore, I find that you're making the opposite point better than the position you intend to defend/promote.

     

    2 hours ago, something_else said:

    Such a cost benefit analysis is essentially impossible because it would be far too general, and would be so susceptible to bias that there would be no point in doing it in the first place

    Well, the bias isn't so much a problem. Provided the biases of the researchers is toward truth and objective empiricism. Also, everyone is always biased in some capacity.

     

    Naturally, another dimension to bias would be in moral philosophy. But that isn't so much a problem, as it would likely be best to do what's most beneficial for the majority of people. 

     

    Also, by conducting studies in multiple verticals so as to cover as many bases as possible the generality doesn't present much of a problem. This has already been done at least to some extent.

     

     


  8. 2 hours ago, something_else said:

    People who remain virgins until marriage are likely also religious and part of cultures who will force you to stay married whether or not you are happy and satisfied with each other.

    Relationship satisfaction, sexual quality, and communication have all been rated higher in such couples as opposed to those who didn't wait. To chalk all of that up to correlation would be illogical. 

     

    2 hours ago, something_else said:

    It doesn't mean they have a better relationship, nor that they are better parents. People who remain virgins until marriage are likely also religious and part of cultures who will force you to stay married whether or not you are happy and satisfied with each other.

    Unhappy couples who are forced to stay together do not make good parents.

    That such religious cultural pressures can and do cause suffering in some situations for some individuals is certain. What's relevant is the result of cost benefit analysis to figure out whether the downside outweigh the benefits or vice versa.

    1 hour ago, LordFall said:

    There is also the point that it's actually irrelevant if it's better or not, you are entitled to autonomy and to make your own decisions. I can't barge into your house and stop you from drinking a beer even if maybe hypothetically it'd be better if you didn't. 

    Sure, here in the US it works that way. But Indonesia is not America, the people there speak a very different language and fundamentally look on reality with a completely different set of eyes than you and I. And who is to say which set of social mores is the correct one?

     


  9. 5 hours ago, LordFall said:

    Doubt there's a legitimate reason for it, usually, these ideologies are conscious enough to be based on rationality; it's' generally just superstition. 

    Studies show that couples who wait until marriage to lose their virginity tend to remain married longer. Which obviously indicates that such couples are likely to have a better relationship. Which makes them better more loving parents, which of course makes for a stronger society as a whole.

     

    But as Americans, we don't like the government telling us what to do. So, when we hear about something like this it seems backwards and overly draconian.


  10. 8 hours ago, Danioover9000 said:

       Best to do your research and study, and even go vacationing to Indonesia. You better understand why the majority are conservatively minded, yet also be exposed to a lot of paradoxical ways of thinking about their world and the world in general. A news article ain't enough to give you the rest of the picture.

    Well said, foreign countries in general have a tendency not to conform to the expectations of Americans. Especially the ones that don't speak English. English speaking countries like the Canada and England are so similar to us culturally that you usually won't be too surprised by it. Of course, there can even be room for faux pawing and awkwardness in exchanges between for instance between Brits and Americans. 


  11. 9 hours ago, Tahuti said:

    Russell Targ, Project stargate, Robert Monroe, Emerald Tablets=What Robert Monroe stole his bullshit useless information from; Michael Raduga; E.a Koetting; Ryan Cropper; Helena Blavatsky, George Gurdjieff; R.a Schwaller Delubizc; Aleister Crowley. I have over 1000 Names. lol.

    To clarify, you mean to say that what these people are saying originates in the Emerald Tablets of Thoth. And as such, you could save yourself some time by going straight to the source?

     

    On 11/28/2022 at 8:26 AM, thisintegrated said:

    A billionaire wouldn't get excited over winning $100 because that doesn't release any financial pressure for him.

    It may be rare, but there can be entities that derive pleasure from any gain. 


  12. 4 hours ago, LSD-Rumi said:

    I have done a few trips. Maximum dose was 250 ug. I had a lot of bad trips because of my mental illness (OCD). This is my background with psychdelics. Oh yeah and I tried 5 meo and dpt recently but I didn't let go. I was truamatised by my mental illness that I couldn't let go.

    Interesting, have you considered healing yourself in the trip instead of trying to "let go"?

     

    4 hours ago, LSD-Rumi said:

    Strangely acid felt much more forgiving and insightful than 5 meo, I don't know why Leo so obsessed about it. Maybe I didn't have a proper experience yet.

    Well, for him it's more powerful than LSD. It takes him straight to the Godhead, what he was before he became any individuated being. With that being said, LSD itself is incredibly powerful anyway. If I were you, I'd just keep on doing the acid and try to fix myself while under the influence. 


  13. 2 minutes ago, LSD-Rumi said:

    I don't want to make it any longer. I just want to potentiate the acid when I want and when I feel I am ready. That can be quite handy especially for beginners like myself.

    Unless you've got bad acid or you're somehow unresponsive. I'm not sure it's such a good idea for you to be attempting to potentiate LSD. It should be plenty powerful just as it is.

     

    3 minutes ago, LSD-Rumi said:

    It lengthen the trip by  only an hour or so. 

    Exactly how much acid have you done? 


  14. 2 hours ago, LSD-Rumi said:

    It can become handy if  for exmple I start with a low dose ( say 100 ug) and then after establishing myself, I can take this substance to potentiate the effect.

    If all you want to do is make the trip last longer, I'd recommend a higher dose. There are people that have tripped for weeks on high acid doses.

     

    3 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

    I don't know why you'd want LSD trips to be any longer.

    Well, if you want to try and ground yourself in a higher state of consciousness and spend all of your time working at a level of development beyond anything ordinarily possible by the human mind. Then it makes sense. Obviously, that isn't for the overwhelming majority of people as it's somewhat incredibly dangerous or is at least perceived as such.

     


  15. 9 hours ago, LSD-Rumi said:

    And Also, Noopept is the weakest racetam ever, it is even not considered a true racetam.

    Really? All the marketing hype says exactly the opposite. I mean, it's probably all bullshit. That's fairly obvious from the nature of claims they make like it being hundreds of times more powerful than piracetam. 

     

    I frankly know very little about these nootropic chemicals. They don't seem to have the kind of effect I'd be want, so I haven't spent too much time studying them.


  16. 1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

    Careful with racetams, they are not good for you. Weird side-effects.

    My only experience with them is once I did aniracetam for a couple of days. I don't care to divulge what happened, but I know what you mean by weird side-effects. That's part of why I suggested NM-DMT for potentiation of LSD, well that and because it's a hell of a combo.


  17. 20 hours ago, Hojo said:

    @JuliusCaesar 

    Watch the belief in god leaving them.

    This is extreme devilry embedded in society. Just change Santa with God. And your parents do it to you. For literally no reason. They literally form and mold an image into their mind and make them think he's everywhere. Watching them at all times. Why be good if Santa isn't real? If Santa is not real ive never seen God before either.

    I never personally made that conflation. I even converted to Catholicism as an early adult. 

     

    But yes, there are certainly parallels between God and Santa. I just don't find these similarities to be meaningful. I mean there are some parallels between Krishna and Jesus, and you being a westerner may know nothing about Krishna.


  18. 1 hour ago, LSD-Rumi said:

    So, A lot of people online (on reddit) have reported that Racetams have the tendency to make LSD, and even other psychedelics more potent. One of strongest ones for LSD, is NOOPEPT. it somehow make the trip a lot stronger, I am talking 2-3 times more. 

    https://www.reddit.com/r/DrugNerds/comments/eck79v/the_reason_behind_noopepts_strong_potentiation_of/
     

     

    Hmm, LSD on it's own is already substantially potent. Though, if you really wanted to potentiate LSD, I'd think NM-DMT would probably be best for that. In any event, I'll be interested to know how this Noopept LSD combo affects you.