JuliusCaesar

How do you know that?

From your perspective, he's neither of those things. And your perspective is alone the only thing that exists.

This is an arbitrary distinction. The waking world is also a dream. I'm infinitely conscious, but not from your perspective. From your perspective, I don't exist. From your perspective, you're also not God because you're God imagining itself not to be God. And your imagination is absolute because you're Omnipotent.

Within the context of the human illusion this kind of logic is acceptable. But given the true nature of the universe it's in fact impossible as there is only one thing that exists. That's true simply because you say so? That's impossible, my imagination is infinite. That's exactly what I've done. This is what the many actually are.

There's no such thing as non-existence. What I believe they mean is that they are existing only within our imagination. Which is true, albeit they're articulating it in a way that confuses you.

It seems the appearance of paradox prevents you from understanding what we're saying. We actual imagine that you're real, which is why that you are real. You aren't separate from us in truth but are us. If you can understand the following I believe it should be clear to you what I'm saying. There is only one here, not many. The one has divided itself into many by imagination.

I know this seems impossible to you, but you've just described everything that exists. I respect your distortion towards being accurate. You're God so whatever you label him as he is. However, you imagine him unconsciously to be things that are of course not conceptual but are prior to the human conceptual matrix.

There isn't anything that exists beyond your perspective. However, you imagine that they are entities other than you. A good way to articulate what I'm trying to say is that real life is exactly like in a video game. Where you're a real person in the game from your own perspective, and it seems like there are other people in the game but really it's just the appearance of a person. So a consequence of what I'm saying is that if you were to die(fully), we would all cease to exist because there's no longer a you here to imagine us. Now, this is where you'll get confused and say, that means from other people's perspectives they have no existence. This is false, certainly from my perspective, I exist within myself just as you do within yourself. But the version of me that exists from your perspective is not the same entity as the version of me that exists from my perspective. The version of me that exists for you is the one that would cease to exist if you were to die. The version of me I perceive of course would still exist. This is all-encompassing because you're everything. Researchers of QM are aware of this. They know for instance that the moon doesn't exist until you look upon it, then it ceases to exist when you look away. And is the very reason Albert Einstein had a hard time accepting QM, because he preferred to believe the dream of reality isn't a dream like most people would. Physical reality itself is a dream, so Trump becoming President is imagined to be real within the dream.

In Leo's video that he just released on Ketamine he says he's never K-holed before.

This may appear overly general, but of course, there's a connection. There's a connection between spirituality and everything you'd consider not to be spirituality due to oneness. In the more relative domain, it's essentially a mental discipline designed to aid in better manipulating the human mind with language. All instances of human language use are manipulatory mind you, even though our culture tends to put a negative connotation on the concept of manipulation in truth manipulation is merely a resource much like money or firewood.

There's no such thing as an external world in the sense that the "external world" is constructed by the self within itself, so this externism philosophy could be viewed as logically consistent with solipsism.

I am those deities. We are one God, you may think of us being like ice cream with different flavors.

Of course, it seems that employing the aid of entheogenic substances is the most efficient way of pursuing this subject.

The earthquake itself is a thought-form. At the level of the human subconscious(the levels of mind between the unconscious and the conscious) awareness of things beyond oneself or outside of your ordinary means of perception are accessible, this function is called intuition. All humans have intuition, but most learn to suppress it due to cultural influences that negatively value such phenomena. This being caused by fear of the devil in instances of Christian societies, and fear of falling into delusion in Secular ones.

There isn't any objective difference between separation and unity. So I don't see the need to argue with those you call "conventional solipsists". Of course, they're wrong in thinking that only they have experience because they don't realize what exactly it is that they are. At the same time, I rather appreciate the ruthlessly logical aspect of it as you obviously can't prove that any mind besides your own exists. More importantly, Spira wasn't referring to conventional solipsism in the video at all. As he clearly states "some nondual teachers" in reference to the teaching of solipsism in like the first minute or two of the video. However, it's clear to me that he has a highly correct understanding of reality and how it works. It's just that his comprehension hasn't reached a sufficiently high degree where sollipsism is graspable.

He's rather confused because he grasps solipsism intellectually from the human perspective. Notice how he says "A solipsist believes that my finite mind is all that exists", the truth is that there is no finite mind at all. There is only an infinite mind pretending to be finite, which is a possibility Spira seems to be unaware of as he hasn't realized solipsism. However, it seems that he does comprehend nonduality correctly at least to some degree. And as such, he understands that materialism is nonsense also.

How do you know your other selves in sleeping dreams don't have their own experiences? If you talk to them, you'll find that they have all the same attributes dream characters from the waking world do which would suggest that in fact, they do have their own experiences. Furthermore, you also are a figment of your own imagination, does that mean you don't have experiences of your own?

Yes

That is the reason why. I'm a being of infinite power and no sense of self. So I made everything or in other words, turned myself into everything as I'm the only thing that exists. So the fact that I have preferences arises from me having no preferences, which means I'm okay with any form of preference possible. Perhaps a more psychologically human relatable perspective would help you. Consider the psychopath, they develop with a very weak sense of self, or become that way later in life. Because the entity essentially doesn't identify with themself, they don't identify with their emotions. So they function as though they didn't have emotions at all, but instead merely just survival instincts towards tending towards pleasure. Consequently, they view everything which isn't practical to sating their lusts or personal drive for conquest to be like nothing. So ironically, they're more likely to take certain moral positions like the death penalty being wrong than an empath or neurotypical person. Because they think everyone should be living regardless of how "evil" they are as in the psychopath's view of course there isn't any such thing as evil. Like, a psychopath can literally burn their hand on a stove and not learn that that's a bad thing to do. Because they need a sense of self to preserve in order to learn that harming themself is bad. Well, that's basically the same as God's point of view because I love everything the same, I have no preferences, and of course, that means no preferences between possible preferences.

I'm a Catholic and I can't even find it within myself to argue with such an insult. That damn no marriage for the clergy policy was certainly implemented by "geniuses".

What's of value or meaning of things within a dream is entirely up to you, the dreamer. Likewise, your "physical reality" is in truth also a dream you're fabricating out of nothing. So the same kind of logic appears there as would in a sleeping dream.

How much does your friend know about Salvia? You should encourage them to study the subject as much as they can. Reading trip reports, listening to relevant individuals like Terrence Mckenna, etc. Hell, just reading Salvia trip reports is like a trip in and of itself. Oh and you might want to stop with the fear-mongering, it could just embolden him if he's one of those hardcore recreational drug users. Furthermore, you might want to consider the possibility that doing Salvia may actually be a good idea. But probably not the way most people do it as obviously that tends to produce a tenebrous and phantasmagorical experience which seems to have little to no value or practical utility.

And just think, without the psilocybin you'd be lost in the limitations of ordinary human reasoning.

The stage of evolution of consciousness beyond love is wisdom. But while you're incarnate as a human, your purpose here is to learn the lessons of love. And wisdom is something that's effectively out of your pay grade so to speak. This isn't to say that some notion of wisdom isn't possible, but serious wisdom is next to impossible for a human entity.

I forgot to mention here that the frequencies I specifically have proven to work via direct experience can be found on Meditative Mind's youtube channel. I'll link the one I've used to activate the blue energy ray. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMlAd5kRRHU