Jannes

Yeah. What do you want to demonstrate?

@rawdawg Nope sorry.

He is taking a break. He is on the forum though so not dead.

@Rafael Thundercat Great examples!

Don't you think the act of sex itself is a form of intimacy or is it a special kind of sex that is deepening? And what's your opinion on the initial question? Do you think free sex is a good thing and people would connect with the intention of depth?

Fantastic.

True. What's your position on this then, like when is sex appropriate?

Being mature means, you get joy out of doing the right thing. If you haven't discovered that you get joy out of that, you are forced to take immature love because you always take love in the best form that is available.

I like that. Very very interesting. It makes a lot of intuitive sense. I like this example of what it means in reverse. Once a certain grounding structure is given it's fun to break out of it. Like with the clone troopers.

Communication seems to be the problem here. People who approach sex differently (one casual, the other one with the intention to bond) shouldn't be together.

Interesting. Had similar thoughts as well recently. I have F+ with a girl right now. There is no deep romantic spark for me but the time with her is super enjoyable. I feel like I can be myself, no pressure, my life is pretty good with that.. If I go ham into spirituality then maybe long lasting relationship strategies are the way to go for grounding basic mental health as I get deep satisfaction from spirituality. (maybe) On the other hand I want to burn through some deep romantic karma.

Difficult to say, that goes to the core of creation at the most meta level I guess. I dont have awakenings regarding this but some thoughts. I think the meta thing is that love wins. Meaning higher forms of love win. Meaning parts of consciousness that have embodied more parts of reality (love) generally have the upper hand. That doesnt mean that a developed person can't be killed by a serial killer of course. But the developed person tends to be around people who are also well developed and together they built a strong society that far succeeds (wins the fight) against the social circle of what serial killers or other less developed people would built. So in general higher forms of love win. If you watched Avatar the last Airbender I really like the scene where Iron teaches Zuko how to redirect Lightning. Iroh found that technique by learning techniques from other tribes outside the fire nation. By embodying other parts of reality (love) he overpowered smaller parts of reality. (like narrow minded fire benders)

Does it end well? I don't want to have to watch the movie now.

Just saw your Blog post about good game and "shooting the shit". Is this example in the video adequate? I just want to make sure I understand correctly.

I haven't seen his forum presence as I joined after Connor. I loved Connors videos so much even though the cringe was almost unbearable. Of course it was crazy and he was out of control but his vibe was incredible. It felt like I kind of understood how people of a more developed society could be like. Free of fears, totally engaged with the present moment. Living every day as though it was the last. The amount of shit he went through in just a couple months. Always changing as well so it kept being real.

What about bisexuals then...

It's either not articulated clearly what is meant by it or it doenst make sense to me. "If serious philosophy starts and ends when you realize you are God philosophy never happens."

We have a different topic though.

It's incredible that we could self sustain ourselves in such primitive ways but get burned out in society which is supposed to make things 10x easier.

I recently stumbled across this. I had no idea what it was so I searched it up. It's not just a fetish, it can be but it doesnt even have to be. For many it's just a way to play and relax. It's about acting like a dog without human thoughts and responsibilities. I find that really fascinating. It's like humans are so sick of themselves they rather play as dogs instead. If I didn't stumble across spirituality and its potential for transcending experiences maybe this is what I would have done. I dont have a good opinion of this yet. Maybe this is a setback. A way to make your mind lazy. Dogs are a lot less conscious than humans probably. Or maybe not and it's the ultimate mediation exercise. A way to connect with being directly. A way for humanity to transform by deconstructing the human identity with fun. What do you think?

@Jannes Do you know more about it though? Seems pretty judgmental otherwise..

Can exactly be that, can also be the opposite imo. But you can think that you do it from a pure standpoint and deceive yourself, thats certainly true.

Thats a pretty deep answer. Do you think its possible to only do one and not the other? ikr

Psylocibin was my first psychedelic. Up until now it was mostly a fun drug was also horny and couldn't really get serious with it even when I tried to. I mean I could work through a lot of inner stuff in a humorous way (for example I remember perfectly how an Italian guy slapped me in the face when I revealed to him that I think that I am unloveable, so heartwarming). But I couldn't contemplate death for example. Yesterday when I took it it was a completely different drug. I naturally only thought about existential question and it was more cold then usual. I took 5meo dmt some months ago but not to a breakthrough dose and recently some lsd. That might have changed psilocybin for me. On the one hand that was exactly what I was looking for, a clear drug I could use for long contemplation. On the other hand I would like to get a drug with more lightness back. Do all psychedelics get serious at some point?

What do you mean by that? I took a pretty strong dose once. Can't remember it well unfortunately but I will give it another shot if I can find it. The lack of taste is a big bonus anyway.