Bobby_2021

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/nyc-schools-to-eliminate-controversial-gifted-talented-classes/3313300/ Teaching methods useless in my opinion, assuming that the teacher is decently good, and knows the subject and they are talking about. Not some bum. I personally payed money to some teacher online because my college classes were taught by dumb teachers who couldn't even clear my doubts. So I do understand the value of having good teachers. But there is a limit to how good you can teach. A 130 IQ student with an Internet connection will outsmart someone who is 15 points lower than them even if they had a private tutor. I am sure that other variables do have a significant impact, like living standards, stress and nutrition. But once those are controlled you don't see too much difference in the results. There are plenty of examples from which groups of people having high IQ but grew up in poverty outsmart their privileged peers. Talking about all of these factors without losing its essence in a single thread is hard. I am always for equal opportunities. I am also for unequal results.

What I am saying is that if we gave advanced education just like jews did, not everyone is going to make it thorough it. Also your capability to learn is what makes more of a difference than effective methods of teaching. A class of 20 students get different results with the same teacher. Now you might say they all come from backgrounds with different opportunities. But you can control for opportunities and still the results will correlate to their IQ. Equal opportunities and unequal results. On educational system: With that said, our teachers and education system is trash. They themselves don't really understand what they are teaching, except for delivering surface level explanations and showing off a few slides. But sadly we are removing gifted classes because they are apparently racist by the woke left. In reality they are racist against asian americans.

@Carl-Richard As a case study, take 1000 students and mandate advanced calculus, chess, puzzles, multiple languages from the time they are 2 years old. Now do the same with students different cultures. You will get my point. I bet jews or asians will do better in such classes because they already had high IQs in the first place. And things are not so simple. If mandating advanced education lead to better results in life, they would have already done it. Such people should do better in college overall. Stem, finance education is extremely rigorous. That's why they select only high IQs to appear for the college. If you make it mandatory for everyone, then most kids would fail. It involves computations and cognitive powers which not everyone possesses.

Thank you. I hope we both understood something. I certainly did. I don't intend to continue this discussion either. With that said I need to clarify one point for others reading this. There is huge difference in interpreting what I said as "woman are damaged" vs "damage has been done to aspects of her". The latter is true. Former is not. The former is implying that everything about her is damaged. Slut shaming happens from the former. Slut shaming is meant to degrade her as an individual. Which is why it's ugly and misogynistic. Your leg can be damaged and you are still functional as an individual. When I say her leg is damaged, you are interpreting it as "she is damaged". The damage has certainly be done. Nope. It does not. Girl is not damaged. "Girl has been damaged" is a whole different statement lol. That means she is dysfunctional as an individual who won't even be able to properly function in society. What I said is that aspects of her which magnify her feminity has been damaged. Undoing the damage has to do with overcompensating because you have to cater more, because guys have disappointed her in the past, and she naturally thinks you would do the same. Not to mention higher expectations, mental baggage & trauma. Many even turn into man haters, just because of bad things that happen in the relationship. Nice joke. ? You should put this up for discussion.

why are you competiting with random young guys in the first place. And you are conflating high standards with high expectations. A women who has been in more relationships will only have more expectations. And you will always fall short. She definitely and certainly feels like she lost a great catch. It becomes harder for you to satisfy her. This is worse than the flip side. You never really wonder about other guys if you haven't been in a serious possibility that you could be with them. If you dated and dumbed a film star celebrity, you would always wonder about how great your life would be with them. If you have never dated a film star, you don't seriously entertain that possibility anyway. Plus young people are more malleable and adjustable. Older people are more rigid. So comitting young instead of sleeping around had it's own benifits. ??? You know what? It's completely ok that you responded like this. I never expect a woman to objectively understand the base level mechanics of dating market. It's too harsh for the feminine psyche.

I didn't say women are damaged. It's the capacity to commit is what gets damaged. And women who has low levels of commitment are low value. This is a consequence of sleeping around. Which is true. Again this applies to men with commitment issues as well. His ability to commit will also become damaged. Fact. You nitpick what you want to hear. I stick to every word that I have said. And even explained my reasoning with facts and statistics. And you are not going to bully me away with childish accusations of "misogyny". Men having higher standards will obviously result in some women not qualifying to such standards. It's not "ostracization" or "misogyny" lol ? You are exaggerating my words to make me look as such.

????

@Tyler Robinson I am sorry that it offended and hurt your feelings. It's not misogynistic to say racking up a higher body count has consequences. I included men as well in my assessment. So I don't get where the misogyny part comes from. The same issues also applies to men. The men who smoothly attracts hundreds of women are not going to ve highly developed spiritual sages. They themselves will narcissistic confident assholes. The only way you can get rid of the baggage is by doing deep spiritual work which most people will never ever do. Are you saying that "sexual liberation" has zero consequences on future relationships? The sexual market place is not a sweet and fail place where everyone is equally valued for who they are. That slut shaming that you lowkey support is itself a mechanism built by partriarcy so that women preserve their value. It's the same way how men who are poor, short, different skin colour & accent, has a tougher time in the dating market because they are associated with lower value by women. This is done so with zero explanation or compassion to the men that are being eliminated from the Market. Similarly women can also be of low value. Women who can preserve their feminity will be of higher value. It's not hateful to observe either of those.

@Carl-Richard 1. I can guarantee that Jews have higher IQs than other races. IQ is the best predictor for success in modern psychology. This is a statistical fact. And IQ has a huge genetic component. There you go. 2. Discussing IQ of races is banned on this forum. So I have restrictions on defending my point with elaborate numbers. You will have to do a google search on Jew IQ and you will find a number of sources proving my point. 3. The problem with this argument is that there are groups of people who grew up in similar cultures and huge pressures put upon them and they never quite excelled. Culture is the variable here. I am not denying cultural pressures. But many other cultures also had plenty of similar pleasures and they never quite excelled. When you take those into account, you realise that culture could have been either way and some culture may/may not have excelled. You can leave your farming job and do finance only if you already had the genetics to do finance. Maybe this could make a good case of culture shaping the genetics. You cannot completely seperate both. But culture needs eons of time to have any significant influence on genetics. And culture is not arbitrary either. If some culture found out that they could make hundreds of millions of dollars by working hard they would absolutely do it. You might say that they were not privileged enough. But there are a lot of cases of unprivileged cultures being more successful than privileged ones and vice versa.

Dumb stuff like what you choose for dinner is not determined by genetics lmao. But only a few people excel so it's easy to determine the cause for their success. Genetics determine a small minuta of the overall domains of nature. What you said is an exaggeration. Mostly from my observation. Nature for some reason adheres to the pareto principle quite well. I am not going to pull up precise numbers just to make conversations of genetics intersting to you like you said lol ?

If there is no fundamental differences between your current normie state and mouse state, then surely the mouse should be deceiving itself. Because you are certainly deceiving yourself now. Mouse is deceiving itself at a higher level. Above the mouse is the monkey king. Wait till you get blown away when you reach monkey level. ?‍?

I didn't say that everything is impacted by genetics. What I said is that excellence in most domains is determined by genetics whether it individual/ or a collective group like jews for eg. Most people would get heart attacks by working for 40 hours a week. And then there is Elon Musk who fairly regularly pulls off double that number. That shit simply won't happen because culture made you do it. And some people are born with workaholic genetics. Just like some people are born tall or white. If you have High testosterone levels, then you will be able to sit and concentrate for hours in a row. Which might explain why men can work longer hours than women. Genetics. >80% genetics & <20% environment. Roughly. See culture as a catalyst that incentives or gently encourages an event. The real deal is genetics.

@something_else I don't want to talk about the causation part because generally people become triggered. So I have to be careful with how I word them. There are good cases of causation. Women are easily manipulated and abused by assholes. So these people could load tons of baggage onto women. There is no way you can detect that. And women's choices in men are horrendous. Especially that of young woman. This is simply not the case. This happens to extremely well meaning and nice women. 2. She will compare you to all her previous 20 partners. Dick size, performance, charisma, money, power, influence. Good luck competing with her previous guys. And you get a girl with tons of baggage and trust issues. And she will wish that you could be better that all her previous partners, else she feels like she had to settle down, with a lesser guy. Managing relationship is like a tight rope. Both have flaws. Higher standards dosen't mean you have to be better than someone else. You need to be committed to making a relationship work. This Capacity to commit if irreversibly damaged by casually sleeping around. If you had higher standards you would choose a virgin girl anyway. Since it's harder to find them. They are more loving and feminine. You wouldn't willingly choose to undo the damage done by other guys lmao.

Your ability to sit and work for extremely long hours is restricted by your genetics. Your hormones and your entire biochemistry has to be carefully aligned inorder to allow you to "work hard". Culture won't be able to enforce unless your ingroup genetics allows for it. Attributing success to hard work is misleading. Almost everyone works hard, from what they can. It's a bit like saying, success comes from drinking water and taking cold showers. Of course you need to work hard and drink water on time to succeed. That's not what makes the difference though. Differences are explained by genetics. Supreme genetics allows you to get work done *fast*.

Apart from the famous people, virtually all jews I have interacted with are extremely smart. Yet to see a dumb( or normal) jew. Truly the Gods chosen people. Everything the exists to the left and right of Israel is totally fucked. And they somehow managed to make Israel a tech hub of the world and high HDI rank. Incredible.

Because the rich has control of the assets. It generates income which you can use to buy more assets. You can afford to bet on a lot of opportunities as a rich person. Even one win will rake in millions The poor can't have that option. They can neither buy option nor money making opportunities. Their struggles are paying rent and electricity bills and food. Their intellectual bandwidth is locked up with menial stuff. A vicious trap.

Should slut shaming be done? No. With that said, high body counts are correlated with more divorces, baggage, trauma, trust issues and low pair bonding capacity. This applies for men too, not just women. So I understand why society does it. A long term relationship is more likely to fail of the partners were engaged in pre marital sex. How is that a red flag if a man wants to marry a virgin girl? If any red flag is when she has an insane body count. Maybe he will sleep with her. But no man would prefer a sult to be the mother of his children. That is if he has a choice of course.

Could the mouse be deceiving itself.

@Leo Gura When certain individuals excel in certain domains, you attribute everything to genetics. When groups collectively excel in certain domains, it's always working smart and working hard. Hipocracy? You simply won't get 20% of all the nobel prizes by working hard and working smart lmao. You won't become Einstein by working smart. They are genetically gifted. High IQ. High Energy, high conscientiousness. These are handed to you at birth, largely. Not only some people are genetically gifted, but some ethnicities are also genetically gifted.

It's impossible to know anything. You will never know anything. What does it mean to "know" anything? It only means you are at peace with something. You will never know that you are God in its entirety. If you did, you would right now. The only thing you could do is to expand your state of consciousness so that you can feel that you have understood relative to your previous stage of consciousness. God dosen't have anyone else around him to ask and verify any claims. The only truth is being. The end.

These days you can have a dick and still be a woman. So being a feminist and being feminine is that not big of a deal.

The ultimate liberation is of course death. ?? Peak love manifesting everywhere.

@Leo Gura It's mostly illegal immigrants and refugees that increases the crime rates of a place. Legal immigrants are usually high skilled workers who came there through due process of law. Of course they have no reason to indulge in crimes. You are simply wrong about Sweden. The only thing that has changed in the recent times in Sweden is increased intake of immigrants. Please do research on Google. Maybe the RW pov does have validity. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/swedish-pm-says-integration-immigrants-has-failed-fueled-gang-crime-2022-04-28/ The logic is simple. Inequality increases when you accept migrants in huge numbers and inequality in society is the number one predictor of increasing violence.

Narcissism and ego is always short lived. Their beauty won't last long and soon they are dumped and replaced another beautiful young woman. Plus I don't think you would make this statement if you had plenty of beautiful sexual women being attracted to you the whole time. Maybe you despise yourself for not being the male that attracts beautiful females consistently. Plus it's okay to have an ego if you can back it up. What's truly annoying in women is entitlement and having an ego when you have nothing to back it up. You should edit the title to not come off as misogynistic.

Awakening can wait. Let's started with sex first.