thisintegrated

Sure, sounds good as long as you're able to avoid desensitisation. Leo says you'd get bored of a perfect existence. However, as God, you'd have full control over how much enjoyment you get from everything. You would never get bored of sex 24/7 if you could control your hormones and neurotransmitters.

It's perfect for this. Buy from a reputable vendor with good reviews. Alone. Food is good at the end of the trip. Make sure you don't have to cook or anything. I recommend weed when you wanna eat. Food is amazing on acid + weed. Awful on acid alone. A tab. Forget the numbers, they're never accurate.

Feel free to ask me anything. I've done acid dozens of times. Basically just make sure you don't have to do any "adulting" for the day and have no responsibilities for the day. That's really all you need to know. Maybe prepare some simple activities too.

Wait.. so he wasn't just promoting his onlyfans?!

All you MBTI haters will not be happy to hear this.. (Definitely not referring to anyone in particular)

Because God is nothing.

At least INTJs are beautiful on the inside? ??

Once again, @Yali's theory is disproven. Again and again people are saying N types are most compatible with N types.

How do you make progress with anyone when you don't use logic and argue using nothing but personal feelings and biases? Imagine if everyone was like you. Every conversation would be an emotionally fuelled shouting match. Imagine if people like you were in politics.. oh wait, they are..

?????? Well you can't really argue using your life experience alone. It means nothing to other people.

You're a Te user. Logic means nothing to you. Only consensus.

Where is @Carl-Richard and @Loba when you need them??

If both people are the listening type, no one will talk. If both people are the talking type, no one will listen.

What do you think Fe is interested in? Its own feelings?! An Fe dom is interested in others' feelings. If There are 2 Fe doms, they'll both want to know each others feelings but neither will have any to share! "How do you feel?" "No! I wanna know how you feel!" "No! I don't care how I feel, I wanna know how you feel!"

If Fe was Fi, it wouldn't be Fe.

Umm, that's literally the definition of Fe. Extroverted (aka other) feeling. Feeling of other people. Fe users still have unconscious Fi, if that's what you're confused about. But Fe users are Fe users. If Fe was Fi, it wouldn't be Fe.

If two people are Fe doms, who would they go to for Fi? Fe doesn't have anything of its own, it's only interested in the feelings of others. So if you can't get Fi from your wife, where would you get Fi from?

I didn't say it's objectively better. I respect Ti users more, and get on with them better. But I'm not compatible with them.

Perhaps you're a stage above @AtheisticNonduality, and have managed to develop your unconscious functions??

Hmm, you're actually right. Definitely INFJ. That's not what you meant when you said "His greatest realizations he keeps to himself - as he should - and as do I ", but whatever. Sure, but this describes me even when I was Blue/Orange as a kid. I was always intuitive, but that's just intuition. I'm naturally a NeTi, so I always took this "Turquoise" approach to everything. I only developed my NiTe side when I was Orange/Green. I never felt the need to map things out intellectually, but it's fun, and does, indirectly, lead to further discoveries. E.g. I may have a very good intuitive understanding of what religion is, but if I actually studied it intensively for a few years my perspectives would likely be shifted in some way. My intuition may be 100% right, but if I just leave it at that then progress will be slow or non-existent. Without MBTI, I may feel I have a good understanding of a person, but once I start delving into MBTI I make much faster progress in psychology as a whole, and then there's the whole "lens" thing.. When you put focus on something, even if the approach is all wrong, the focus leads you to the right places. I think this is a Yellow thing, I'll try not to overexplain. ?? The model has rules. Take away the rules and the model isn't a model anymore.. How you feel about the stages is irrelevant. They are what they are. Tier 2 is Tier 2 because it's not Tier 1. Yellow is a Spiral Wizard because it's Yellow and not Green. Green can't see outside its own perspective, so it can't be a Spiral Wizard.. ???? What? Yellows are spiral wizards. Greens aren't. Once Green gets to Yellow, they become a spiral wizard. Great. I'm Coral. Listen to him, @RendHeaven ..and to know the limitation in treating them as limitations Atheistic?

Ti usually hates Te. Where did I say "opposing cognitive functions complement each other"? It's more complicated than that. Ti + Ti = comradery / mutual respect Te + Te = good professional relationship / respect Ti + Te = long term compatibility when mature Fi + Fi = conflict Fe + Fe = good relationship but little compatibility Fi + Fe = long term compatibility Si + Si = boring relationship Se + Se = good professional relationship / respect Si + Se = good compatibility Ni + Ni = serious/boring relationship Ne + Ne = fun friendship + comradery Ni + Ne = long term compatibility

What's more likely? 1. You have a poor understanding of how MBTI compatibility works 2. Everyone else in the world is wrong, and you're right. Stop relying on any single theory for finding truth. Think for yourself. You have underdeveloped Ti, try to use it more. All your arguments so far have been "but that theory says this!". At no point have you made it clear why you think Fi users are most compatible with other Fi users, or why S+N is more compatible than S+S or N+N. Do such details not seem important to you? @Yali I forgot I was editing, lol. Refresh the page. @Carl-Richard Since you wanted to know what Te users look like, this is it. Most Te users are just Te users. You're one of the exceptions.

If you want a proper awakening, try to notice what you are & where you are. Try to find the God within you. If you wanna cheat then watch Leo's live awakening videos and place your focus on the entity that is God within him.

Sure. I think you might be misunderstanding Leo here. There's a great difference between strong intuition and Yellow. Even a superhuman intuition doesn't take a person anywhere near Yellow. Intuition might give you a "feel" for physics and science, but won't tell you anything about the depth and interconnected nature of all things in reality. Reality is infinitely complicated. There is no limit to how deep you can go. You could dedicate 1000 years to studying just one element of one branch of physics, and still not even be 0.00001% done. There is no "seeing beyond it". There's just simplification and the belief about how much the simplification actually captures. The more you simplify, the more arrogant you become. The less you simplify, the more humble you become. Relative to your ego's needs? If you take such an INTJ approach then you're not really missing anything. Ensure physical and egoic survival and you'll feel like you're the best and have all the answers. Why keep them to yourself? Would you feel less safe by exposing all your secrets? Do secrets help ensure survival on some level? I only call it out when It's obvious they're fooling themselves. Some people here believe they're Coral, or even Clear Light, lol. Maybe that's just my Ti parent. If logic doesn't hold up then I'll try to put things in order. That has absolutely no relevance to one's stage. Any stage Red can take on Sadhguru's views after listening to enough Sadhguru. A stage isn't an ideology or belief system. It's the awareness/progression level of an ego. If your friend is actually Orange/Green with ideas commonly associated with Turquoise, then he still has to go through Orange, Green, and Yellow. There's no skipping. Thinking he's at the top would only do him more harm than good. Again, ideology is 100% irrelevant and means absolutely nothing. Every Yellow/Turquoise is a Spiral Wizard. No exceptions.

??? Cause that changes your arguments completely if you were actually talking about different types unintentionally. I never suggested it's wrong to advocate for Socionics. It's only wrong to use circular reasoning. CS Joseph says Socionics doesn't work, so therefore we must conclude that Socionics doesn't work. You see the problem if I made a statement like that? My source would be biased, just like yours is when you use the Socionics website as evidence for your claims. Is circular reasoning really such a hard concept to grasp? I really shouldn't have to be explaining this stuff.