• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TK2021

  1. This is a good one. Christ Sutras by Bart Marshall is exactly what you are describing though. The book compiles the complete recorded sayings of Jesus Christ from twenty-five different gospels, not just the four canonical. The teachings which are expressions of his true message and are most likely to be the words of Jesus and not the follower or the church putting words in his mouth which fit their narrow agenda. Here's a sneak peek: However, even the "bs" parts in the bible are good for making sense of the relative world and how it functions at different levels.
  2. Solving climate change will be just one problem. Implementing "Game B" will be almost unimaginably harder. But we can’t keep playing whack-a-mole with all these existential risks forever. Especially when the moles are exponentially increasing and we aint getting any better at whacking with our Game A approach. Of course recent moles will have to be whacked with the Game A approach, but climate change is just one glaringly obvious, huge and slow mole and we’re already fumbling over ourselves trying to whack it. In fact, even this analogy is giving too much credit to Game A, because when you are whacking a mole in whack-a-mole, it just goes down. In Game A whack-a-mole, every time you manage to whack a mole down, the whacking itself creates new moles in the game, because the technologies etc. to solve the problems will themselves be used to create new and more complex problems. So in a way it's like "Trying to kill Hydra by cutting its head + Whack-A-Mole on steroids" which we are now playing. That is the severity of the situation. You warned me of idiot compassion earlier, so I'll return the favor and warn you of idiot optimism in terms of Game A.
  3. I don’t mean burning in the sense of blind passion or w/e, more just the intensity of the situation. Well of course mankind will handle itself. But we are mankind. So we have to handle it. But it’s getting exponentially harder to handle it with exponentially increasing technology, which we have very little grip on. I could go very in depth here, but one should intuitively feel why such exponential growth in material power simply cannot be handled without an exponential growth spiritually, socially, and governmentally. Game B is just one of those movements that realizes this fact, which we like to shy away from. Of course the solution won’t be mental masturbation. But even this theorizing of Game B has breathed life into many qualified, smart people who were previously quite disillusioned. Unfortunately these things have to start out with theorizing. Let's keep an open mind.
  4. Your awakening just sounds like a temporary delusion to be honest. It will be over soon - don't worry.
  5. You are misunderstanding. Perhaps we are just talking past each other with these terse replies. Let me try once more. It’s not about saving the world. It’s about EMBODYING the deeper level of Love and it permeating through to the relative world through all your actions. For an emotionally developed human, it would of course manifest as authentic, burning concern for your actual Self, which includes the world, which is a broader concern than just you as a human. This is quite different from indifference and also quite different from some sort of self-aggrandizing martyrdom which is usually seen. @BuddhistLover Bro.. it's chelation time for you.
  6. Exactly. Well, not exactly, since there’s billions of more people suffering now. But that only reinforces the fact that a non-psychopathic life purpose ultimately ought to be to liberate people from suffering. I already said that his work needs to be more practical. However it seems he is working on some very practical stuff regarding the regulation of social media. Can't do it all. Yet considering your political takes when Russia invaded Ukraine was “boohoo call the wambulance” and “let’s try to understand Putins POV” - it doesn’t seem that you have better alternatives yet. Or perhaps I’m strawmanning you here, I don’t follow this forum too closely. At no point was I advocating for that, but it’s important to be aware of. But what’s even more important, is to not let that fear of being taken advantage of consume you and limit your love unnecessarily.
  7. Yes, he is a smart guy, and if you don’t share his concern, I doubt you’re emotionally intelligent enough to understand and inhabit his POV yet. Mankind most likely will not go literally extinct, and Schmachtenberger is not fearmongering about that, as you know. Its more like if you have any emotional intelligence, compassion, love - it would be a lack of integrity not to do your best for all the “stupid” people you seem to have little compassion for. The intensity of suffering going on in the world today is hellish, and the existential risks unprecedented, so to just go about your life and be stoked because you’re killing it is pretty fucking psychopathic, and non-Godlike. Godlike compassion even gives a “stupid” guy shoving drugs up his ass in Vegas glimpses of Love. When you realize this and let this sink in, and don’t just get overwhelmed and dismissive and go about your life distracting yourself from that truth, everything changes. Of course his work could be a little more down to earth, and I don’t doubt he is working on that. But then again, how do you think telling lost people in their early 20s they are God is gonna make things better? This just shows how you severely misunderstand the developmental models you promote.
  8. @mememe Bro it's chelation time for you.
  9. Yeah, i listened to a bit of the video while out and I gathered that the urine tests were quite useless. Leo’s levels were barely elevated and he has been doing dozens of rounds and basically winging it by feel. It's as if the urine tests are like buying a fitness watch and waiting for it to arrive before starting running. Now I’m just speculating here, so please correct me if I’m wrong. If you find information about any worrying side effects keep us updated. Otherwise I don’t really see a point of not just jumping straight into the protocol.
  10. @mememe I'm just telling you fellas what's possible. And it's not that hard. That is a good thing. If she finds you attractive enough, in the heat of the moment she wants you to cum inside and the risk is arousing to her. You can play with that.
  11. @mememe Yes, hence - “monkeys who have no dick game” shouldn’t be abusing it. You only need to track her cycle if you want to ejaculate inside her vagina.
  12. It certainly isn't safe. Perhaps on some narrow metrics it might be, but don't fool yourself. Fun facts: - It is scientifically impossible to get pregnant if you're doing the pull-out method correctly. It only has a bad rep because monkeys who don't have any dick game are abusing it. Pre-cum doesn't contain semen, unless you have just ejaculated prior. - You can even safely cum inside her muff for a few days after her ovulation window - because she is infertile during that time and semen don't live long enough for her next ovulation window. She has to track her period well.
  13. Tired of drinking poison with my water. Main preferences are portability and low price. It needs to only produce 4-5 liters of clean water a day. I've heard reverse osmosis is where it's at. How useless would something like this be though: ? Leo has recommended this: on the forum, but I think I would rather keep drinking poison than set that up and lug that shit around when moving - which I do fairly often. Besides, I don't have enough room in my kitchen to really make that possible without looking like a crazy person to my guests. So something simpler would be nice, if possible. Only a few liters per day needed and if it filters over 90% of the nonsense out and doesn't look like some massive alien spaceship, then I'm good. Thanks in advance!
  14. Here is a wicked zen koan for you: Make whatever excuses you want, but in the end youtube viewers will flee from you and flock to guys who go out and make clickbait videos. Don't go for the immediate and easy retort of "I've learned youtube game very hard" - just let it sink in like a koan.
  15. Nothing wrong with doing that when you are going about your day. But not when it's your main route to getting girls - you should have more organic ways of socializing. Ideally you don't have to learn to socialize by bothering thousands of people. But that's kind of a design flaw in our societies themselves that people have to resort to PUA and rationalize why they are doing it. Yes he is charming Yes his charm helps him with girls Yes you can build your charm with exposing yourself to social situations But yes you are a creepy car salesman if you mass approach randoms And no he didn't get his charm from pua - stand up comedy was probably a massive help
  16. That's a good example of great charisma. Also great context. The context is absolutely different. Russell is a global superstar with a superstar wife playfully entertaining the audience here. He's way above those girls, and the girls are aware of that. There is really no actual sexual vibe or intent here. Run this sort of game and you will mostly be seen as friendly at best. Creepy jester at worst. Which actually started happening with the girl(minute 1) whose SMV is closest to Russell. And in order to try and reach Russell levels fo charisma cold approaching, you will just carpet bomb entire cities with your creepiness to get laid. Just like a creepy car salesman when he tries to get rich. Not saying you won't become more charismatic. Just like I'm not saying the creepy car salesman won't get more money. They are just very low consciousness ways of getting your basic needs met.
  17. Lol Mass approaching is inherently creepy. You are being the equivalent of an annoying creepy car salesman to well over 90% of people you approach. Except you ain't selling a car. You are selling your dick. Interesting. What supplements specifically?
  18. Make no mistake, USA has to hottest girls. You just aren't invited to the party. If you are just an average joe, you ain't getting a real sample of what USA has to offer.
  19. @mandyjw You are not making much sense here and you are spiritual bypassing very hard. Romantic love is absolutely not unconditional. Otherwise you wouldn't mind being in a romantic relationship with the homeless psycho living under the bridge. Or even your chair. Yet you are with your teenage sweetheart. Just proving my point further.
  20. @zazen Thank you for your voice of reason. @lxlichael@mandyjw@Etherial Cat Again, it's not about some insecurity you just gotta swallow down and ignore. No matter how much you have been brainwashed to think so. It is something very hard to accept and work with though. That's why many people just repress the subject or play hilarious mind games to rationalize it. Gianna, Here are some studies I very quickly gathered that point to the exact opposite of what you are saying. Take them for what you will: Approximately half of women in the top quintiles of sociosexuality had been sexually unfaithful to a steady partner; this was more than a tenfold increase over the corresponding rate for people in the bottom quintiles. Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry. Journal of personality and social psychology, 78(3), 537–545. X In illustration of this, the odds ratio of 1.13 for lifetime sexual partners obtained with the face-to-face mode of interview indicates that the probability of infidelity increased by 13% for every additional lifetime sexual partner, screenshot Regarding the correlates of infidelity, results indicated that on the basis of both methods of assessment, the probability of sexual infidelity increased with higher number of lifetime sexual partners Whisman, M. A., & Snyder, D. K. (2007). Sexual infidelity in a national survey of American women: Differences in prevalence and correlates as a function of method of assessment. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(2), 147–154. X Our findings demonstrate that infidelity and number of sexual partners are both under moderate genetic influence (41% and 38% heritable, respectively) and the genetic correlation between these two traits is strong (47%). The resulting genetic correlation between the two traits was .47, so nearly half the genes impacting on infidelity also affect number of sexual partners. The correlation of the unique environment between the two variables was .48. Cherkas, L., Oelsner, E., Mak, Y., Valdes, A., & Spector, T. (2004). Genetic Influences on Female Infidelity and Number of Sexual Partners in Humans: A Linkage and Association Study of the Role of the Vasopressin Receptor Gene (AVPR1A). Twin Research, 7(6), 649-658. doi:10.1375/twin.7.6.649 X A truism in psychology is that the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. This is no less true in the realm of sexual behavior. Indeed, one of the strongest predictors of marital infidelity is one’s number of prior sex partners (Buss, 2000). Deception about past sexual promiscuity would have inflicted greater costs, on average, on men than on women Haselton, M. G., Buss, D. M., Oubaid, V., & Angleitner, A. (2005). Sex, Lies, and Strategic Interference: The Psychology of Deception Between the Sexes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 3–23. X Sexual promiscuity was significantly positively correlated with emotional promiscuity [r(356) = .261, p < .001], as well with sexual infidelity [r(323) = .595, p < .001] and emotional infidelity [r(323) = .676, p < .001], indicating that sexually promiscuous participants also tend to be emotionally promiscuous, and sexual[ly] and emotional[ly] unfaithful. In terms of the sexual domain, results showed that there is also a positive correlation between sexual promiscuity and sexual infidelity, stating that individuals that tend to be more sexually promiscuous also tend to be more sexually unfaithful. These results support our second hypothesis. Pinto R., Arantes J. (2016). The Relationship between Sexual and Emotional Promiscuity and Infidelity in Proceedings of the Athens: ATINER’S Conference Paper Series, No: PSY2016-2087, Athens, 10.30958/ajss.4-4-3 X Number of pre-marital partners: percent who cheated once married 2: 10.4% 3: 14.9% 4: 17.7% 5: 21.6% 6-10: 26.0% 11-20: 36.7% 21+: 46.8% NORC General Social Survey. (2011, October 02). Female Infidelity Based on Number of Premarital Partners — Statistic Brain. Retrieved July 5, 2015, from X Contrary to the myth, partners who’ve had many partners have a harder, not easier, time remaining monogamous. They are significantly more at risk of straying than those with little or no prior sexual experience. Staik, A., PhD. (2019, March 28). 10 Predictors of Infidelity and Gender Differences: Why Do Partners Cheat? Retrieved July 15, 2020, from X For people in this survey who reported four or fewer lifetime sexual partners, the rate of infidelity in the current marriage dropped to 11%, while for those who had five or more sexual partners the number was nearly double (21%). The break between the 54% of people who had five or more lifetime sexual partners vs. the 46% who had four or fewer total partners illustrates the lessons from the study. This breakpoint is validated by the fact that when asked straight out, 68% of those with more sexual partners in their pasts agreed that, “I am always faithful to my sexual partner” (whether currently married or single), compared to 82% of those with fewer sexual partners who said the same. nfidelity is also often the fruit of a lifelong approach to mating that involves seeking and practicing short-term mating encounters that encourage sexual variety at all stages and into marriage. McQuivey, J. L., PhD. (2019, October 14). The Road to Infidelity Passes Through Multiple Sexual Partners. Retrieved July 16, 2020, from X [T]here was a correlation between female pre-marital promiscuity and higher rates of divorce. The research, conducted by Jay Teachman, found that women with 16 or more sexual partners prior to marriage had an 80% rate of subsequent divorce. Wikipedia contributors. (2020, June 20). Female promiscuity. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 12:06, July 27, 2020, from Teachman, J. (2003), Premarital Sex, Premarital Cohabitation, and the Risk of Subsequent Marital Dissolution Among Women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65: 444-455. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00444.x Science shows that when a woman has sex with a man, a chemical called oxytocin is released into her system. Oxytocin is a neuro-peptide most commonly associated with pregnancy and breast-feeding. It seems to act as a human superglue and helps a woman bond with her infant. This chemical also helps a woman bond with her lover during sex. New scientific studies, however, suggest that if a woman has multiple sexual partners, this will lower her levels of oxytocin which in turn can inhibit her ability to bond to her husband. According to an article by Drs. John Diggs and Eric Keroack, "People who have misused their sexual faculty and become bonded to multiple persons will diminish the power of oxytocin to maintain a permanent bond with an individual." The Relationship Between Multiple Sex Partners and Anxiety, Depression, and Substance Dependence Disorders: A Cohort Study Counterintuitive Trends in the Link Between Premarital Sex and Marital Stability New Study Claims People Who've Had More Sexual Partners Report Unhappier Marriages 2018: A Philosopher of Sex says Sexual Freedom is Destroying Desire First Comes Love Then Comes Marriage? Women With 2 Or More Premarital Sex Partners Face Higher Divorce Rate
  21. Many people replying here don't understand that you need to actually be exceptionally talented if you wanna be exceptional at what you do if millions and billions are already trying to be exceptional at it. No amount of hard work will make you Lionel Messi. You will most likely not even be able to make a living if you dedicate your entire life to football from 5 years of age. If your trying to make money, find something you enjoy, which doesn't already have millions and billions of other people trying to be good at it.
  22. @Leo Gura@Recursoinominado I thought this forum was for facing the truth and searching for it earnestly. Not ignoring it. You cannot ignore her past if you are to become truly intimate. How can you feel intimacy towards what you are wilfully ignorant about? You're just "in love" with an illusion. And not a very good one at that. Just scratch a little and it's gone. Sure if you want a superficial relationship, then illusions are okay. But if you want a monogamous, dedicated, till death do us apart type of relationship, this is silly. And the very depths of human to human connection will be closed off. @Lyubov @Valach @decentralized@kamwalker When there are "stings inside" of you, it is your gut telling you that something is not right in a survival sense. You don't want the closest person in your life to be causing you physical and mental pain. You fellas think it's insecurity? The reason why men have this reaction is because it's embedded within male nature. If you have a sexually promiscuous partner, that is a humongous threat to the survival of your genes. I know it's difficult to accept that a woman's relationship value is lowered just because they had more sexual partners, no one wants to think of themselves as damaged goods. However, this still doesn't change the nature of men and what men find attractive or repulsive. It's not something that can be overcome by logic. Just like your attraction towards tits and asses. The revulsion towards her past becomes better over time if she's very generous towards you sexually. She can't really refuse sex without being disrespectful. When a woman fucks around with her dignity, she will have to be accountable for it. She will have to redeem herself. Just like a man. So, if she refuses sex from you, and has been having sex with many guys, and guys she barely knows, it is like a man being some silly beta loser and spending money on women she barely knows, then refusing to do it in abundance for his partner. That would be really insulting - and rightly she will expect that you treat her, the one and only, better. Also, I'm not sure if you can even have a healthy sense of pride if you're dedicating your life to a girl who thinks you are second best sexually. Or 20th best. Now how can you know for sure about where you stand? I have some morally questionable ways to execute this, but I'm tentative of sharing that publicly, since it will mostly be used for bad purposes and rationalized as good.
  23. Again you are not understanding. In my example for you, you were supposed to understand that the unwholesome action was done by the manipulating girl. The girl doesn't owe anything to the guy, but she is being a cu** for using him. It is unwholesome to lead people on, manipulate them and make them suffer just to fulfill your own selfish desires. Whether it's a guy or a girl. What is so hard to understand? You keep bringing up incels and I wonder, perhaps this amount of confusion in your thinking can only be caused by some incel rage on your part? Perhaps you feel that because men are just told to suck it up when they are used, it is therefore alright to use girls? It's just part of life, huh? Because incels don't have a right to their grievances - therefore women shouldn't either. I actually believe everyone, even incels, deserve much more understanding. They aren't owed anything, but they shouldn't be purposefully treated like shit for your own pleasures either, if you can avoid it.
  24. You don't understand. This thread is made to analyze right/wrong behavior. Wholesome action/unwholesome action. Okay, since you cannot step into the girls shoes yourself lemme help out. It's the same as you going on some huge dinner date with a girl, and the girl has basically already decided she doesn't wanna have sex with you, because you are ugly or whatever. Yet she knows that you wanna have sex. And she uses that premise to fleece you for a free meal. Then when the dinner is over she just says she is tired and tells you to leave. You feel like a chump.
  25. Exactly my point. Because other people are selfish, you feel that it is right to be selfish too. And then we end up in a dog-eat-dog world, which will end up self-terminating with our technological development. On top of that - embodying this sort of mindset is not only causing suffering to others, but to yourself. Your life lacks integrity, love and beauty, and you become hollow and feel a constant sense of lack.