• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About TK2021

  • Rank
    - - -

Personal Information

  • Location
  • Gender
  1. @mememe Bro it's chelation time for you.
  2. Yeah, i listened to a bit of the video while out and I gathered that the urine tests were quite useless. Leo’s levels were barely elevated and he has been doing dozens of rounds and basically winging it by feel. It's as if the urine tests are like buying a fitness watch and waiting for it to arrive before starting running. Now I’m just speculating here, so please correct me if I’m wrong. If you find information about any worrying side effects keep us updated. Otherwise I don’t really see a point of not just jumping straight into the protocol.
  3. @mememe I'm just telling you fellas what's possible. And it's not that hard. That is a good thing. If she finds you attractive enough, in the heat of the moment she wants you to cum inside and the risk is arousing to her. You can play with that.
  4. @mememe Yes, hence - “monkeys who have no dick game” shouldn’t be abusing it. You only need to track her cycle if you want to ejaculate inside her vagina.
  5. It certainly isn't safe. Perhaps on some narrow metrics it might be, but don't fool yourself. Fun facts: - It is scientifically impossible to get pregnant if you're doing the pull-out method correctly. It only has a bad rep because monkeys who don't have any dick game are abusing it. Pre-cum doesn't contain semen, unless you have just ejaculated prior. - You can even safely cum inside her muff for a few days after her ovulation window - because she is infertile during that time and semen don't live long enough for her next ovulation window. She has to track her period well.
  6. Here is a wicked zen koan for you: Make whatever excuses you want, but in the end youtube viewers will flee from you and flock to guys who go out and make clickbait videos. Don't go for the immediate and easy retort of "I've learned youtube game very hard" - just let it sink in like a koan.
  7. Nothing wrong with doing that when you are going about your day. But not when it's your main route to getting girls - you should have more organic ways of socializing. Ideally you don't have to learn to socialize by bothering thousands of people. But that's kind of a design flaw in our societies themselves that people have to resort to PUA and rationalize why they are doing it. Yes he is charming Yes his charm helps him with girls Yes you can build your charm with exposing yourself to social situations But yes you are a creepy car salesman if you mass approach randoms And no he didn't get his charm from pua - stand up comedy was probably a massive help
  8. That's a good example of great charisma. Also great context. The context is absolutely different. Russell is a global superstar with a superstar wife playfully entertaining the audience here. He's way above those girls, and the girls are aware of that. There is really no actual sexual vibe or intent here. Run this sort of game and you will mostly be seen as friendly at best. Creepy jester at worst. Which actually started happening with the girl(minute 1) whose SMV is closest to Russell. And in order to try and reach Russell levels fo charisma cold approaching, you will just carpet bomb entire cities with your creepiness to get laid. Just like a creepy car salesman when he tries to get rich. Not saying you won't become more charismatic. Just like I'm not saying the creepy car salesman won't get more money. They are just very low consciousness ways of getting your basic needs met.
  9. Lol Mass approaching is inherently creepy. You are being the equivalent of an annoying creepy car salesman to well over 90% of people you approach. Except you ain't selling a car. You are selling your dick. Interesting. What supplements specifically?
  10. Make no mistake, USA has to hottest girls. You just aren't invited to the party. If you are just an average joe, you ain't getting a real sample of what USA has to offer.
  11. @mandyjw You are not making much sense here and you are spiritual bypassing very hard. Romantic love is absolutely not unconditional. Otherwise you wouldn't mind being in a romantic relationship with the homeless psycho living under the bridge. Or even your chair. Yet you are with your teenage sweetheart. Just proving my point further.
  12. @zazen Thank you for your voice of reason. @lxlichael@mandyjw@Etherial Cat Again, it's not about some insecurity you just gotta swallow down and ignore. No matter how much you have been brainwashed to think so. It is something very hard to accept and work with though. That's why many people just repress the subject or play hilarious mind games to rationalize it. Gianna, Here are some studies I very quickly gathered that point to the exact opposite of what you are saying. Take them for what you will: Approximately half of women in the top quintiles of sociosexuality had been sexually unfaithful to a steady partner; this was more than a tenfold increase over the corresponding rate for people in the bottom quintiles. Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry. Journal of personality and social psychology, 78(3), 537–545. X In illustration of this, the odds ratio of 1.13 for lifetime sexual partners obtained with the face-to-face mode of interview indicates that the probability of infidelity increased by 13% for every additional lifetime sexual partner, screenshot Regarding the correlates of infidelity, results indicated that on the basis of both methods of assessment, the probability of sexual infidelity increased with higher number of lifetime sexual partners Whisman, M. A., & Snyder, D. K. (2007). Sexual infidelity in a national survey of American women: Differences in prevalence and correlates as a function of method of assessment. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(2), 147–154. X Our findings demonstrate that infidelity and number of sexual partners are both under moderate genetic influence (41% and 38% heritable, respectively) and the genetic correlation between these two traits is strong (47%). The resulting genetic correlation between the two traits was .47, so nearly half the genes impacting on infidelity also affect number of sexual partners. The correlation of the unique environment between the two variables was .48. Cherkas, L., Oelsner, E., Mak, Y., Valdes, A., & Spector, T. (2004). Genetic Influences on Female Infidelity and Number of Sexual Partners in Humans: A Linkage and Association Study of the Role of the Vasopressin Receptor Gene (AVPR1A). Twin Research, 7(6), 649-658. doi:10.1375/twin.7.6.649 X A truism in psychology is that the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. This is no less true in the realm of sexual behavior. Indeed, one of the strongest predictors of marital infidelity is one’s number of prior sex partners (Buss, 2000). Deception about past sexual promiscuity would have inflicted greater costs, on average, on men than on women Haselton, M. G., Buss, D. M., Oubaid, V., & Angleitner, A. (2005). Sex, Lies, and Strategic Interference: The Psychology of Deception Between the Sexes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 3–23. X Sexual promiscuity was significantly positively correlated with emotional promiscuity [r(356) = .261, p < .001], as well with sexual infidelity [r(323) = .595, p < .001] and emotional infidelity [r(323) = .676, p < .001], indicating that sexually promiscuous participants also tend to be emotionally promiscuous, and sexual[ly] and emotional[ly] unfaithful. In terms of the sexual domain, results showed that there is also a positive correlation between sexual promiscuity and sexual infidelity, stating that individuals that tend to be more sexually promiscuous also tend to be more sexually unfaithful. These results support our second hypothesis. Pinto R., Arantes J. (2016). The Relationship between Sexual and Emotional Promiscuity and Infidelity in Proceedings of the Athens: ATINER’S Conference Paper Series, No: PSY2016-2087, Athens, 10.30958/ajss.4-4-3 X Number of pre-marital partners: percent who cheated once married 2: 10.4% 3: 14.9% 4: 17.7% 5: 21.6% 6-10: 26.0% 11-20: 36.7% 21+: 46.8% NORC General Social Survey. (2011, October 02). Female Infidelity Based on Number of Premarital Partners — Statistic Brain. Retrieved July 5, 2015, from X Contrary to the myth, partners who’ve had many partners have a harder, not easier, time remaining monogamous. They are significantly more at risk of straying than those with little or no prior sexual experience. Staik, A., PhD. (2019, March 28). 10 Predictors of Infidelity and Gender Differences: Why Do Partners Cheat? Retrieved July 15, 2020, from X For people in this survey who reported four or fewer lifetime sexual partners, the rate of infidelity in the current marriage dropped to 11%, while for those who had five or more sexual partners the number was nearly double (21%). The break between the 54% of people who had five or more lifetime sexual partners vs. the 46% who had four or fewer total partners illustrates the lessons from the study. This breakpoint is validated by the fact that when asked straight out, 68% of those with more sexual partners in their pasts agreed that, “I am always faithful to my sexual partner” (whether currently married or single), compared to 82% of those with fewer sexual partners who said the same. nfidelity is also often the fruit of a lifelong approach to mating that involves seeking and practicing short-term mating encounters that encourage sexual variety at all stages and into marriage. McQuivey, J. L., PhD. (2019, October 14). The Road to Infidelity Passes Through Multiple Sexual Partners. Retrieved July 16, 2020, from X [T]here was a correlation between female pre-marital promiscuity and higher rates of divorce. The research, conducted by Jay Teachman, found that women with 16 or more sexual partners prior to marriage had an 80% rate of subsequent divorce. Wikipedia contributors. (2020, June 20). Female promiscuity. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 12:06, July 27, 2020, from Teachman, J. (2003), Premarital Sex, Premarital Cohabitation, and the Risk of Subsequent Marital Dissolution Among Women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65: 444-455. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00444.x Science shows that when a woman has sex with a man, a chemical called oxytocin is released into her system. Oxytocin is a neuro-peptide most commonly associated with pregnancy and breast-feeding. It seems to act as a human superglue and helps a woman bond with her infant. This chemical also helps a woman bond with her lover during sex. New scientific studies, however, suggest that if a woman has multiple sexual partners, this will lower her levels of oxytocin which in turn can inhibit her ability to bond to her husband. According to an article by Drs. John Diggs and Eric Keroack, "People who have misused their sexual faculty and become bonded to multiple persons will diminish the power of oxytocin to maintain a permanent bond with an individual." The Relationship Between Multiple Sex Partners and Anxiety, Depression, and Substance Dependence Disorders: A Cohort Study Counterintuitive Trends in the Link Between Premarital Sex and Marital Stability New Study Claims People Who've Had More Sexual Partners Report Unhappier Marriages 2018: A Philosopher of Sex says Sexual Freedom is Destroying Desire First Comes Love Then Comes Marriage? Women With 2 Or More Premarital Sex Partners Face Higher Divorce Rate
  13. Many people replying here don't understand that you need to actually be exceptionally talented if you wanna be exceptional at what you do if millions and billions are already trying to be exceptional at it. No amount of hard work will make you Lionel Messi. You will most likely not even be able to make a living if you dedicate your entire life to football from 5 years of age. If your trying to make money, find something you enjoy, which doesn't already have millions and billions of other people trying to be good at it.
  14. @Leo Gura@Recursoinominado I thought this forum was for facing the truth and searching for it earnestly. Not ignoring it. You cannot ignore her past if you are to become truly intimate. How can you feel intimacy towards what you are wilfully ignorant about? You're just "in love" with an illusion. And not a very good one at that. Just scratch a little and it's gone. Sure if you want a superficial relationship, then illusions are okay. But if you want a monogamous, dedicated, till death do us apart type of relationship, this is silly. And the very depths of human to human connection will be closed off. @Lyubov @Valach @decentralized@kamwalker When there are "stings inside" of you, it is your gut telling you that something is not right in a survival sense. You don't want the closest person in your life to be causing you physical and mental pain. You fellas think it's insecurity? The reason why men have this reaction is because it's embedded within male nature. If you have a sexually promiscuous partner, that is a humongous threat to the survival of your genes. I know it's difficult to accept that a woman's relationship value is lowered just because they had more sexual partners, no one wants to think of themselves as damaged goods. However, this still doesn't change the nature of men and what men find attractive or repulsive. It's not something that can be overcome by logic. Just like your attraction towards tits and asses. The revulsion towards her past becomes better over time if she's very generous towards you sexually. She can't really refuse sex without being disrespectful. When a woman fucks around with her dignity, she will have to be accountable for it. She will have to redeem herself. Just like a man. So, if she refuses sex from you, and has been having sex with many guys, and guys she barely knows, it is like a man being some silly beta loser and spending money on women she barely knows, then refusing to do it in abundance for his partner. That would be really insulting - and rightly she will expect that you treat her, the one and only, better. Also, I'm not sure if you can even have a healthy sense of pride if you're dedicating your life to a girl who thinks you are second best sexually. Or 20th best. Now how can you know for sure about where you stand? I have some morally questionable ways to execute this, but I'm tentative of sharing that publicly, since it will mostly be used for bad purposes and rationalized as good.
  15. Again you are not understanding. In my example for you, you were supposed to understand that the unwholesome action was done by the manipulating girl. The girl doesn't owe anything to the guy, but she is being a cu** for using him. It is unwholesome to lead people on, manipulate them and make them suffer just to fulfill your own selfish desires. Whether it's a guy or a girl. What is so hard to understand? You keep bringing up incels and I wonder, perhaps this amount of confusion in your thinking can only be caused by some incel rage on your part? Perhaps you feel that because men are just told to suck it up when they are used, it is therefore alright to use girls? It's just part of life, huh? Because incels don't have a right to their grievances - therefore women shouldn't either. I actually believe everyone, even incels, deserve much more understanding. They aren't owed anything, but they shouldn't be purposefully treated like shit for your own pleasures either, if you can avoid it.