Michal__

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    1,174

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Michal__

  1. Posted · Edited by Michal__

    21 minutes ago, Reciprocality said:

    @Michal__

    Seeing that purple people indeed do not have red in them how come purple people fight? How come Chimps fighs? Its dominance, a hierarchical structure, and i can sure tell you those chimps are not red. 

    To reconcile this you find mma (in its act) far more primal, and indeed it is, for its the instincts making us survive millions to hundreds of millions years prior to any "red".

    Now that is the specifics of the act, with regards to the generals of peoples consciousness it would be fallacious to from there deduce them being of any specific consciousness. The professionals COULD be a group destributed primarily around the red end of things, but evidence have shown tendencies to quite the countrary.

    Some people usage of SD in this thread shows how corrupted such models gets pretty fast. I seek integration of my animal instincts, for in all our lives they are undermined to extreme extents as means to civilization, this is what the model can help a man with.

    I'm talking about human consciousness in relation to the model.

    There's a difference between fighting someone and being an ufc fighter that spends their whole life either training or fighting.

    Spiral dynamics is about human lens of perception and the behavior resulting from it. Nobody said you can't sometimes behave that way without being a human with specific lens of perception.

    TLDR: you can fight someone, or even wish to kill someone regardless of spiral dynamics. You just won't devote your life/a period of life for that purpose.

  2. Posted

    10 hours ago, Knowledge said:

    Anyone here tried the elevator game?

    I personally just did it and i am in a completely different time line. I live in the " future " and i am in a completely new body and have a new identity.

    I'm still ''me'' but everything else has changed since i decided to play the elevator game.

    Nice.

    Could you talk more about differences between the two timelines? 

  3. Posted

    Everyone has a bit of red in them, except stage purple people.

    You just won't obsess over mma/ufc if you are more mature.

    Most of the audience is probably orange. 

    You probably won't be a professional mma/ufc fighter unless you have a high percentage red in you.

  5. Posted · Edited by Michal__

    1 hour ago, Javfly33 said:

    @Michal__ 

    Nicotine a nootropic. Sure, an stimulating high that lasts 3 minutes, and that it literally produces anxiety for +10minutes afterwards if you don´t have tolerance to it. 

    Nicotine is one of the shittiest things i´ve tried. Basically almost any drug is superior to nicotine.

     

    What form? Sounds to me like vaping/cigarettes.

    I was talking about other forms of taking nicotine, which sure as hell doesn't last only 3 minutes.

    When done right and in small amounts it's no different than having some l-theanine with your coffee. ;)

    Message me if you want to discuss this so we don't turn this thread into a discussion about nicotine.

  6. Posted

    3 minutes ago, Member said:

    What if the answer is YES? ? Personally I don't see any ill-intentions since most of the movies did help me to evolve, otherwise I wouldn't have been here. Each with their interpretations.

    Then there's no reason to stop watching. Esoteric references can be a nice gateway to true spirituality. There's some abuse potential as with anything though.

    I personally think a huge portion of famous people are serious about magick, some probably even nonduality - like Bruce Lee.

    Mastering some of the spiritual principles can definitely help you become successful in the material world.

  7. Posted

    On 11/7/2020 at 11:20 AM, Member said:

    I don't care about the new age beliefs but what the hell is happening with all the Hollywood movies? Almost all the superheroes appear as fallen stars. I've been obsessing over this mystery for years. If someone knows the answer (preferably the esoteric meaning, not interested in romantic interpretations), would be more than happy to hear it.

    IF they have any Ill intentions the only thing they would accomplish this way would be to program viewers to be interested in these esoteric beliefs.

    Ask yourself - "will it be beneficial if I act they the same way my favorite actors do in movies?" 

    If the answer is NO - then stop watching the movies or at least notice when you act unconsciously as if you were in that movie.

  11. Posted

    9 minutes ago, RendHeaven said:

    @Michal__ A lot of the OP's views are drenched in subtle sexism. This is true.

    The key here is "subtle." The majority of sexism is no longer men yelling "I HATE WOMEN." Be more nuanced :)

    You don't see it as a guy because you cannot fathom what it's like to live as a woman having to deal with male shit.

    Well, then you shouldn't see it either. 

    But, yeah, I agree - it is hard for us to see what women have to deal with.

    It is kinda equal though - women deal with male shit, men deal with female shit. :)

     

  14. Posted

    1 minute ago, Khr said:

    I am not arguing about looks. Everyone has some form of looks standard. I am arguing against “cooperating” and “not gives me shit”, as well as many other poor generalizations OP made about women.

    Yeah, that could have been an interesting addition to the thread if you managed to communicate your opinion without being bitter.

  16. Posted

    Just now, Khr said:

    You’ve stated that those standards OP listed are “high”. From that I inferred if you can call this “high” standards, your standards must be of the same quality.

    Looks can be a part of someone's preferences.

    Having high standards for looks doesn't mean you won't have high standards for more important things. Hence why good looks can be called high standards when part of whole.

    Whether you admit it or not, everyone cares about looks to an extent.

  17. Posted · Edited by Michal__

    9 minutes ago, Khr said:

    If dating is just about the sex for you then I feel sorry for you. If you find cooperating / unopinionated women arousing that is your thing too, I hear some men like f*cking donkeys, who am I to judge. 

    First, stop putting words in my mouth. I never said I have the same standards as OP.

    Second, it is very likely that all my relationships were way deeper than what you'll ever have. So stop assuming stuff about people you don't know, you donkey.

    Edit: edited out some insults.

  18. Posted · Edited by Michal__

    14 minutes ago, Khr said:

    Wow those actually do seem like high standards for a highly evolved man. Have you considered a blow up doll?

    25 minutes ago, Khr said:

     

    What kind of a thought-less response is that.

    Hey, if blow up dolls are your thing you can go for it, you sure do show a lot of interest in them.

    Let people have their own standards, even if it seems shallow to you. Also, being spirituality evolved != not having shallow sexual preferences. 

    But that's besides the point, because that's not what the conversation was about in the first place. 

  19. Posted

    3 minutes ago, Khr said:

    In your very first post you are dehumanizing women, by saying that ideal woman should be cooperative, not give shit (i.e. agreeable and non-opinionated), hot sex goddes. Go back to the 1800s with this kind of talk. How is telling you not to say this dumb, ignorant shit equivalent to kissing women’s ass? 

    Since then, you’ve made plenty of sexist, negatively generalizing (projecting on your poor past experience with women) , but I don’t have time to go through them. Anyways, I’m done here. 

    How is that sexist? He's just stating how an ideal woman would be like. Women have their own image of a perfect man too.

    It would only be sexist if he expected every woman to be that way, otherwise nothing wrong with having high dating standards.

  21. Posted

    It's not that one gender has it better. It is simply asymetrical. 

    Men might have a harder time starting to have sex, but women simply aren't allowed by society to have sex with as many people as they want. They have to hide it, whereas we can freely brag about how many women we have sex with.

    There's nothing unfair about it, each gender has it's pros and cons.

    Getting moderately good at anything is easier for women, mastering anything is easier for men. Hormones give men the drive needed to master most subjects.

    Women are more broadly oriented and sensitive / men are more focused and driven.

    Be grateful for being a man, the same way a woman should be grateful for being a woman.

    How many enlightened women have you heard about? Way less than men I assume. And there's way more women dabbling with spirituality than men.

    It's expansion vs contraction.

  24. Posted · Edited by Michal__

    On 11/2/2020 at 9:51 PM, Fkdel said:

    Hey, Guys, how are you ?  Hope you are all fine :)

    So, i am thinking about starting some practices in High magick -  really interesting path IMO.

    But the question is : I am god, i am one with the universe - why using entities to connect with that energy, is that any difference ? isn't it like beeing on a computer when you can be the whole server ? haha

    Not judging, just want to understand the difference here.

    Before you truly realize & embody fully that you are God (which nobody - including me - has on this forum) the entities are still useful. Some of them may be more aligned with God than you.

    Also, sometimes what your ego wants to do - even healing the sick - is not aligned with Love/God. That's another reason people work with entities.