mmKay

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    2,731

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mmKay

  2. Posted · Edited by mmKay

    After listening to all these debates on truth and postmodernism, I can't help but think cows have better metaphysics than most philosophers and human thinkers.

    The cows are constantly saying 'Mu' , far more profound than all the intellectual gymnastics here, but no one seems to get it

    But props to both of them , at least their hearts seem to be in the right place in the search of higher understanding,.

    I'd love to see Thaddeus debating this cow. How long would it take him to understand ?

    Would he ever solve the koan of debating post-modernism with a cow?
     



     

  3. Posted

    1 hour ago, Judy2 said:

    Then i've had a few experiences just before waking up in the morning. they were weird dream-like states but might qualify as out-of-body experiences, i'm not sure. usually these take place in my room and i think i already got up, then realise my body's still in bed. 

    Supposedly electricity doesn't really work in the astral realm....do you know if this is a reliable clue? i've had times when i checked my phone and it had died, or i couldn't see anything, tried to find the light switch and it was deformed....does this ring any bells for you, or is it completely unrelated to OBEs?:)

    OBEs are most common just before waking up. That sounds like a random dream where you went lucid by realizing you're inside a dream.

    Whatever you expect or imagine becomes reallity in that realm. If you think or belive electricity wont work, it wont work. You get lost in the dream and fall asleep from the lucid state if you dont have a plan of action and dont scrutinize the sensations inside the dream. Sensations are the fuel for mantaining the experience going. You need to have an action plan and consciously move towards it.

    If you're interested, watch that 3 part series on OBEs, it will anwser most of your quesitons if you are curious. But if it's not something you're interested in, stay away. Playing with whacky ideas may be conunter productive for your quality of sleep.

     

  5. Posted · Edited by mmKay

    Social skills coaching with an experienced coach is really valuable. No ammount of talk therapy or online coaching is as effective as infield training, but the 4k for 3 days is overpiced unless its 1 on 1 and you have cash to burn, and you are a hardcase newbie. And even then there is only so much transformation that can happen in 3 days. 

    An experienced wing is even more valuable, but may be difficult to find a quality one.

    Where are you based? EU, US? Living in a good city is key for developing social skills. Do you have that going for you ?

  6. Posted · Edited by mmKay

    Had three short normal dreams tonight. I didn't manage to realize I was dreaming.

    A good time of thumb from now on is instinctively realize reality checks when feeling fear or confusion, even irl, to embed the habit and do it while mid dream for me to go lucid

     

    I'm on little sleep because I'm waking up at night to take the heavy metal chelator doses ( unrelated) and my mind is a little hyper. In a few days I expect some more concrete experiences.

     

    If I feel intrusive paranoid thoughts creeping up, reminding myself that it's all my mind and not other entities is helpful. Whatever your mind focuses on becomes really in the phase,  that's why it's key to know how to deal with your thoughts and emotions. Getting in a blissful state works for dissolving negative emotions 

  7. Posted · Edited by mmKay

    10 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

    An OBE is not a 4th dimension.

    It is in terms of the definition I provided above, and what OP mentioned he would like to experience. This is what I believe to be closest to what he's  asking for.

    In terms of experiencing beyond 3D + space-time in physical terms, I am cluess obviously

  8. Posted · Edited by mmKay

    @Eskilon check out my out of body experiences journal. I share resources there for you to learn to have your own OBEs . It seems to be a more common ability for people than it seems.

    Pretty cool talk on physics + spirituallity , timestamped


    get yourself one of these : 
     



    or just rub your eyes pretty hard and experience some Phosphene eye fractals

  9. Posted · Edited by mmKay

    Normal human life is in 4 dimensions. 3 of space (length, width, height) and one dimension of time (or spacetime as called in Einstein's theory of relativity)


    Bashar ( an ET from the 5th dimension , channeled by Darryl Anka, if you want to belive that ) describes dimensions as "vibrational states" that reflect different levels of consciousness, existing simultaneously rather than being separate places.

    Time is seen as an illusion, a construct that allows us to experience events in a linear fashion, but in higher dimensions, time is more fluid or non-existent.

    All realities exist in the present "now moment," and by shifting our "vibration", we can access other dimensions or parallel timelines.

    This is part of an evolutionary process, sometimes called "ascension," where humans are moving from a primarily 3D perspective (focused on physicality and separation) to higher dimensions, where reality becomes more fluid, connected, and responsive to thought, just like in lucid dreams or astral projection, or even common dreams.

    Bashar says that our beliefs and emotions are the primary tools for dimensional shifting, and by aligning with excitement, joy, and passion ( this is a huge part of his message ) , we can access higher states of consciousness and reality. He also mentions that we are multi-dimensional beings, with aspects of ourselves already existing in higher dimensions.

  11. Posted · Edited by mmKay

    I have decided to start documenting my process of experimenting with out-of-body experiences (OBEs). I’m not sure if I have a predisposition for this, but it just seems to make sense for me. I have no specific expectations or goals besides experimentation and curiosity.

    I might consider it a distraction from building a solid foundation for my life, but on the other hand, it’s an intriguing and unconventional activity to explore during sleep time, as long as it doesn’t interfere with getting enough rest.

    My first OBE was described in this old thread:
     

    I was inspired by the video below, recently being recommended in my feed after listening to  that Anika/Tristan Interview on New Thinking allowed.

    In my opinion, these seminar videos could be much shorter; there is a lot of repetition. However, I must say that the guidelines provided are effective. I learned things I wasn’t clear on before.

    Literally an hour after watching this video, I had an OBE that same night, just after the first cycle of REM sleep. I didn’t realize I could enter " the phase " immediately upon waking. I had always tried to do so as I was falling asleep, which seems to be the more challenging “direct method.”

    From my experience, you can enter "the phase" in three ways:

    • Catch yourself as you’re falling asleep and use subtle body separation techniques (direct method) such as rolling out, levitating, falling through the floor, or doing a crunch.
    • Use separation techniques as soon as you wake up (easier, indirect method).
    • Realize you’re dreaming mid-dream, gain control, and achieve your specific goals for the session. Techniques like reality checks, such as trying to poke through the palm of your hand with your finger, can help you realize you’re dreaming and gain control of the dream.

    The video below explains that you have about one minute to cycle through various techniques before the window fades, and you’ll have to wait for your next REM sleep cycle.
     

     

    OBE Report 07/09/24

    My consciousness wakes up shortly after falling asleep ( 90 min of sleep ). I don't move a single muscle and realize it’s the moment to try body separation techniques. The first technique, rolling out to the side, works immediately. I had to push with my intent a little, reinforcing the thought of "yes, I want this to happen." I feel the usual turbulences, shaking, vibrations, and buzzing noise. I immediately stand up. My motor skills are uncoordinated, and I stumble a lot. Everything is pitch black; my physical sensations have transferred to my subtle body, but my sight hasn’t. I touch the walls as I stumble towards my bathroom mirror (the first mandatory goal for newbies once in the phase). I touch the mirror frame. It’s cold, and it’s still pitch black. I stumble towards my desk to complete my second task (eating something and tasting it). I didn’t have food prepared at that moment, so I just grabbed my zeolite nanoparticle spray and did a couple of sprays into my mouth. Of course, it didn’t taste like anything, but I did feel the moisture and spray noise. I now have a tube of honey at my desk for the next try.

    I didn't have a third goal, I didn't see anything and I lost consciousness and woke up IRL.

    Funny thing is, I had woken up in my astral body 180º opposite on the head-to-toe axis, which is how I usually lie in bed. This time, I was reversed but still woke up in the default way.

    Lessons Learned:

    Clumsiness, sluggishness, and poor motor skills are signs of a bad separation technique. Only partial separation occurred. I’m not sure how much of this is within my control or if it’s sometimes unavoidable.

    Wake up the vision: I need to imagine my hands very close to my eyes, make rubbing or clapping noises, and feel them right there while imagining them into existence. If the vision wakes up but is blurry, I should scrutinize and focus on the details of my surroundings to deepen and sharpen the phase.

    Have a third goal after the mirror and getting food. For now, let’s just say I want to fly in my garden or access some subconscious information as suggested in the video.

  13. Posted · Edited by mmKay

    In cold approach, trying to be smooth is your absolute worst enemy. Embrace the spontaneity of the situation and let the chips fall where they may. Think about it, even if you were in your absolute very best mood and had a peachy life, you still could have awkward and cringe interactions. You can have a degree of influence over the interactions, which comes with experience and luck, but never full control of the outcome.

  14. Posted · Edited by mmKay

    One time I've gotten my blood drawn and almost fainted because of the blood pressure drop. I remember my tinnitus shooting through the roof. Just sharing. Maybe tinnitus is related with blood pressure to some degree.
    I got a second tinnitus that's intermittent in my right ear when I got my titanium dental implant ( 90% sure that's what caused it)

  15. Posted · Edited by mmKay

    Make of this what you will, but in the video I shared below, he apparently healed almost a decade of chronic pain in an hour, remotely, through Zoom. His process seems to involve the patient describing their subjective experience of the symptoms, and then he works through it with his own imagination, " energy " and a lot of focus. It sounds as whacky as it can, but there are too many positive testimonials for this to be complete BS

    There is more information about his work on YouTube, including a TV series and anecdotal reports



    Worth a try? @Leo Gura

    https://www.charliegoldsmith.com/

    00:21:00 - 01:19:00
     

  18. Posted

    If you're asking because you want to do something similar, start speaking of the cuff about anything, it's way more fun.

    Then you can try riffing on a specific topic. You don't  have to nail anything because you can come back to the idea the next day.

    Owens older videos were just that, him riffing on ideas over and over until eventually he just nails it in one of the videos ( source: rsd assistant)

    More structured speech is important as well,  but it depends on the nature of what you're covering 

  20. Posted · Edited by mmKay

    2 hours ago, Shodburrito said:

    @mmKay My point is who is to decide what is "dangerous"? If the right is in power they say it is trans people, if the left is in power they will say it is ultra-maga people. Who is to decide who is right?

    Different groups may define danger in various ways, but that doesn’t mean that "danger" is all relative . Saying that is just weaponizing relativism and is one of the limits of post-modernism. It's not an excuse for us to avoid regulating whatever we consider to be harmful speech.

    We have clear criteria, like incitement to violence or hate speech, that can guide regulation.

    History has proven the catastrophic results of leaving extremist ideologies unchecked. Ironically, allowing extremist speech to go unchecked often leads to authoritarianism, which ultimately undermines free speech itself.

    Both right and left have valid concerns, but this doesn’t mean we should avoid regulation altogether. The indoctrination of youth with extreme ideologies, whether from radical gender theories or far-right extremism, calls for more regulation, not less

    2 hours ago, Shodburrito said:

    @mmKay You can't just give and justify that kind of power to anyone, you don't know know who will end up having it. Sure, it may be irresponsible to let extremists have a voice on platforms, but it's more irresponsible to justify a small group of people having absolute authority on who gets to say what.

    You know what’s worse than a government regulating free speech? No regulation at all, or letting it be controlled by a single person or a tiny group of radicals. That’s a guarantee for corruption and catastrophe. Modern democracies have developed rules over centuries of trial and error to balance free speech and safety. It’s not perfect, but it’s far better than having no rules at all against hate speech, which history has proven to be a recipe for disaster. It would be a regression in evolution and a failure to learn from history

    2 hours ago, Shodburrito said:

    @mmKay also lynchings did not end because free speech was censored. So, I don’t know get what you’re saying there, it’s kind of a dumb point. 


    Yeah, lynching wasn’t stopped thanks to free speech being censored, butt it was started by unchecked hate " free speech".
     

    2 hours ago, Raze said:

    By your logic, you would have been giving the white supremacist society the power to regulate speech, which would have given them an even stronger hand to oppress blacks. One reason why lynching ended was because journalists covered it and authors criticized it exposing the practice. 

    White supremacists did have the power to regulate free speech during that time, but they were openly proud of their actions and didn’t even recognize them as atrocities. They lacked the self-awareness to hide or moderate their speech or actions because their ideology blinded them, so journalists didn’t even uncover or expose hidden lynchings. They documented and published what was already being done openly and unashamedly by these people. Increased public awareness and eventual activism helped to end it.

  21. Posted

    20 hours ago, LambdaDelta said:

    Another indispensable thing is reflective film on my windows, I've another house right in front, so when it's daytime from the street it's a mirror, feels private without the need for blinds, and at night the opposite, turns into a mirror from the inside (cool when tripping).

    are you aware that people from the outside can see in at night, while you cant see them? just asking

  22. Posted · Edited by mmKay

    1 hour ago, Shodburrito said:

    @mmKay again. You are completely removing personal responsibility from this matter. You act like people have no choice in the matter. You’re completely offloading the obvious fact that there’s so much personal responsibility in what kind of content people consume. Sorry I think that we shouldn’t give any group including the government the power to limit free speech simply because some idiots online watch harmful content. I know I’m such a radical suggesting no one should have that power. 


    @Shodburrito Ignorant, undeveloped, and ideological people can’t be trusted with “personal responsibility” and that’s why society has the collective responsibility to account for these risks. If there’s even a chance something could get seriously out of hand and be dangerous for society, it should be stopped before it starts.

    MAGA extremism, neo-Nazis, and terrorist fundamentalists are dangerous precisely because they were allowed to spread unchecked. We’ve seen the devastating results: Charlottesville, the Capitol riot, and terrorist attacks.

    Saying society “did just fine” during Jim Crow is insane. Black people faced horrific lynchings. They were tortured and hung in public with crowds of white people cheering and taking photographs.  

    Free speech is a luxury. The stakes are too high to let dangerous ideas spread like a virus. Society must protect itself, especially when individuals can’t be trusted with collective responsability.

    Regulating harmful speech is about ensuring that freedom doesn’t come at the cost of others’ lives. Dangerous ideas will spread anyways, but giving them easy mediums to spread is irresponsible and reckless.

    If you say there should be no censorship at all, you’re actually pushing for a kind of censorship that prevents society from protecting itself. By rejecting all forms of censorship, you're denying the collective's right to limit harmful speech and keep everyone safe.

  24. Posted · Edited by mmKay

    Would you be okay to wake up every single day, to one of your neighbours walking around your neighborhood with a loudspeaker convincing everyone that @Shodburrito is a child molester ( even though you're not ) , his wife is a witch and that his kids are satanic? And in a matter of days and weeks people throw rocks at your car, kidnap your children and put fire to your house?

    Would you value freedom of speech over your own life and the life of your kids? That's what absolute free speech would allow for.

    That's a more extreme example of  what spreading racist, sexist and homophobic ideas is doing to some people. It's putting other's actual life in danger 

    The stakes are too high for allowing ignorant , selfish or ideological people the freedom to speak and spread their thoughts.

    Society is responsible of making their best efforts of avoiding individuals to be radicalized and become threats of the larger community. If people can't be trusted to behave themselves , the collective will make sure they behave, for the well-being of the collective.

    Modern society has made survival too easy. Survival is brutal. People band together in groups to make survival easier. If you were to threaten the stability and safety of the group by spreading ideas dangerous to the group, you would be fed to the livestock in no time for the sake of survival of the group.

    Free speech is a luxury of democracy. Under authoritarianism or dictatorship or monarchy, there is no free speech.

    Free speech can threaten the survival of society by allowing dangerous and extremist ideas to grow and proliferate like a disease. Whatever peace and stability we have right now is not a given and should not be taken for granted. Free speech regulation is for the sake of the well-being and stability of society.

    Even democracy is a luxury. It has been paid for with millions of lives , blood , sweat and tears to get to this point, and yet its far from perfect.

    Consider this: What if you, or your loved ones, were part of a minority group? Would you be okay with people spreading ideas that could literally lead to violence or even death against you or others like you?

    Would you feel safe sending your children to school knowing that unchecked speech could inspire a school shooter?

    If you had a daughter, would you be okay with her boyfriend abusing her physically and mentally, exploiting her sexually be because the boyfriend had easy direct access to someone's like Tate's or even more radical blueprint of how to make it happen?

    Survival ( in the broad definition of the word) is the top priority of society at large, not free speech.  The more radical, extreme or dangerous relative to the current status quo, the more censored you will get.