Aakash

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    4,210

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Aakash

  2. Posted · Edited by Aakash

    @happysad OMFG 

    Bro i'm with you man

    I would actually say that spirituality is the biggest bullshit i've ever heard in my life! LOOOL 

    from a tier 1 paradigm 

    but ultimately yeah it is what it is. it works on this forum, because most of us are aware of self-deception and self-biased. otherwise you would exactly that.. a cult. You wouldn't see me here, if that wasn't the case and i can garuntee you of that. in fact i can go one further and say this website right here, is the least delusion place in the entire planet. Funny what a couple of "www. " can do lol. 

     I should probably say IMO just so its not taken as a fact. 

  4. Posted · Edited by Aakash

     accepting things and letting stuff go is difficult. 

    I've regressed back to stage blue. Now i find it absurd, to be accept the situation. The sad thing is that, its not upsetting, like ohh why did you do it? its frustrating as a infinite being that you just have to go along with it. Because lets say we go back to old tradition and you know you get told. That god is seperate to yourself. You know people truly get frustrated at god and why he did the things he did. Then you come across spirituality and realise that its okay exactly as it is. So it was unjustified because they were god right. But from their perspective, its not unjustified because they truly believe in god.  

    i've never been located in this spiral chain before, Being skeptical of god from birth is a stage orange trait, it is not a full on god mode, I said my phrase with mighty confidence. "i believe in god, but i don't believe in his sayings and teachings" ... I have now actualised this. before it was a skeptical position. Now its a full on stage blue phenomena. 

    I can honestly say my value and views on the world is: I hate it all of it. 

    Its not even justified. its now morally i have to say its beautiful, now i've gone full circle. Instead of saying bad things, I'm scared to say good things!  AND its not even justified because of that phrase 

    " I CREATED YOU" , Things are being done the best way. And i do truly believe that. But damn man, its sad. 

     

    I 'll tell you the most craziest thing, NOW i fully understand how people write in their language who are tier 1, LOOOL i've never ever understood tier 1. I completely get them now. EVERYTHINGs THIS OR THAT and its absolute 

    AHAHAHAH

     

     

     

     

     

     

  5. Posted

    The sad part is even in understanding, you were still only aware 

    that awareness will turn into nothing 

    because when you are not doing the practice of awareness, what you are doing is nothing 

     [  Then you'll regain your "free will" back ( as concept) because now you can put god into a concept of itself which is directly experienceable .  ] 

    and i bracketted that because it would just be the "correct situation" 

    LOOOL we should be bracketing everything when were talking afterwards, just kidding. but the relative would be true. 

    but when you come back to embody it, it will become one...  " because you are both inside your own design and on the outside of it. " 

    essentially at this stage you are looking for these words 

    "the flow of the now" 

    you are looking to perfectly reflect the movement present moment. And that's what you spend your whole life doing.

    but there's a catch-22 the whole point is that your meant to be     "in a pocket of space" 

    we could call that pocket of space nothing or love. What happens is that pocket of space starts filling up with emotions and sensations. 

    My assumption is this: 

    the more in flow the pocket of space is with absolute infinity, the different quality of feels it gets and here is why i think why. This is the love pocket. 

    But i think there is an even greater pocket. The complete pocket which is the completed form of understanding. 

    Its the space where there is no pocket. 

     

    You see, you can constantly bring it back and forth between the two. everything and nothing. Love and nothing. 

    its controversal to say but i would call it, 

    "dull nothing" .. the pocket with no pocket 

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  6. Posted · Edited by Aakash

    This feels so weird, everything stops getting differentiated because all you know is awareness. 

    like i say ohh no i'm aware, then i become aware of that, then i become aware of that. This is why you need a quite mind, it gives you time to remain as awareness for extended periods of times. At the begginning, it feels like a long process to keep becoming aware of the very thing you were just aware of a moment ago and hope that stays in a constant state of awareness. That is monkey mind at its finest. 

  7. Posted

    Lol its like a game of catch me if you can, 

    when i seek for it , i lose it because i am then identified with the seeker 

    its actually a very simple technique .. 

    Remain as the one aware until it becomes permanent. 

    The issue is can you let go of doership and the scaredness of  

    "not being the one thinking" kinda thing. 

    "moving but not being the one moving" can you be comfortable with it. 

    even the opinions of moving vs not moving , can you remain as that even when you are judging yourself about it? 

    its actually such a contracted form of awareness, 

  8. Posted · Edited by Aakash

    Started becoming aware as a simple meditative practice

    i realised that i am aware of: 

    an image comes into my head, i am aware of this image. It is simply that an image 

    a thought came next 

    the thought has come into my head, i am aware of this 

    Then i realised that i'm trying to put my own awareness onto awareness which is awareness 

    when i focus on a single point that is still AWARENESSS OF THAT SINGLE POINT 

    in other words, awareness is not a single point located in my head 

    it is awareness during that present moment of it. 

     

    NOW when i think, i've said to myself 

    okay is this free will? and all that's happened is a thought of free will LOL 

    it basically means at all times i am the awareness of awareness. 

    not a focused point of awareness, just the awareness of. PERIOD 

  11. Posted · Edited by Aakash

    @zeroISinfinity Tell me honestly, you've awoken yes, what is infinite intelligence ? 

    By the honest answer,  what should happen is that you should have awakened to everything that leo has awakened to and leo should have awakened to everything you've awakened to. 

    edit: i wrote this, but the funny thing is, i can't actually ask you. You could say yes and i'll have no better way of knowing. 

  12. Posted · Edited by Aakash

    Actually i've been looking at this all wrong, all these awakenings are just "what is the case"

    That's all it is, The current condition of things as they stand doesn't matter. 

    Which means i've officially been looking at this all from a human stand point.

    Its being itself 

    BOTH THE WHOLE AND THE PARTS 

    which means LOVE or NOTHING can be called the whole and all else the parts like intelligence etc. 

    in teaching and dualistic terms, since we need words to have two points of references, 

    we have to write it dualistically symbolism of non-dual which is the map and the terratory. What this shows is the absolute is actually neither then map nor the terratory but actually the map AND the terratory. That is what a strange loop is, 

    All parts are the whole 

    if we asked the question, so what is the absolute 

    we would have to use its parts to show what it is. That is why experiences can be dualistic aswell but being is non-dual. 

    non-dual being is the case. But i can hallucinate my awakenings because that's dualistic-non-dual. 

    Its a different type of non-duality, its ABSOLUTE NON-DUALITY , In other words, ABSOLUTE ONENESS. 

    so so far the equation is 

    Absolute LOVE = absolute oneness + 

                         "IS identical to"

    all absolutes are enlightenments because they're ah-ha moments, ofcourse at this stage you can't ask anyone for help, because all of them are just you. They can point you there to the outside, but you can't ask them "am i it" because that's like asking yourself, if you are you. When it is the person asking themselves that is it. only the person themselves can know. 

    Realistically this has nothing to do with your life, because your life is still content, awakenings can help with your daily life, but all enlightenments and further enlightenments. Have nothing to do with life itself. its simply god becoming aware of its own nature. Ofcourse this can influence normal life because the paradox still remains. it still personally changes you. 

    Also what it is actually is actually that question 

    "what are you conscious of" 

     

    the conclusion is that, leo is describing the one is many in his teachings

    but the other view is that,    the many is one  

    yet they are both talking about the same thing and yet drastic differences in the philosophies of actuality. 

     

    Its almost like the person who is taking the many as one, would say to leo, " Your dumb you don't know the truth, why are you teaching it like this, your making it more complicated than it is actually, knowledge is the work of the devil, you are not enlightened. you don't know what your talking about "

    Then the other way around is leo would say "you don't know what your talking about, its more complicated than you know it to be, there are many things you are yet unaware of " 

    The conversation of "one vs the many. "

    Leo's requires you to have multiple enlightenments because he's saying that the whole of being is made up by the enlightenments in the specific parts 

    and the many would say that there is only one enlightenment and the parts are all it. Have the one enlightenment and then your done. 

     

    The real question then is 

    a) are they saying the same thing but in different ways 

    b) are they pointing to different places 

    c) who is ignorant 

     

     

     

     

     

  13. Posted · Edited by Aakash

    @zeroISinfinity dude that actually fixed quite a lot of my understanding, it makes so much sense. 

    I get the difference between absolutes and infinite’s, infinites have various degrees. But the absolutes are total in being. They are the absolute truth itself.. 

    thats what leo’s Videos is of truth is talking about. If the whole universe gets destroyed. Absolute infinity gets destroyed. What the absolute truth would be is what’s left over. The infinities need pieces to run. They are 2nd order phenomena. The absolutes are first.

    even infinite facets don’t matter! Because that’s part of awakening to the infinity series. We are finding the absolutes 

    So absolutes go ... tell me. 

    Love is the only one I know 

    which others do you know ? 

     

  14. Posted · Edited by Aakash

    Which means you my friend are not outside of consciousness, your slap bang in the middle of it actualising god. 

    You are in an open form of pure consciousness. Consciousness itself is infinite. That is what absolute infinity is. No end and no begginnig. 

    The moral of the story is: the enlightened man who says he is done is not. But there is a resting place for whenever you feel is okay to stop. You can choose to reap what you sow. You have absolute free will. And you are god, but you are becoming god through yourself. 

    True nature is infinite. What you have realised is that true nature is love. but true nature is infinite laterally and verticlly. That’s why it’s callrd absolute infinity. 

    Absolute love, absolute free will etc etc because you are a paradox and strange loop discovering yourself. But we’ll you could have either an awakening to an infinite or an enlightenment to an absolute. 

    The question is then what is the absolute? 

    That is the absolute truth. All the absolutes! 

    Absolute love is one of them, or the only one ? 

    This is the grounding of total freedom. It’s the absolute truth. 

  15. Posted · Edited by Aakash

    @zeroISinfinity yes ? so there’s always more to awaken to, it’s groundless pure love :P 

    namely still seeking ;) and god is not a seeker when he’s complete. But as I said you are still in form, so the strange looo is your true self is always more than your form. What you have is the nature of true self and that is the nature of I AM 

    Total unity consciousness 

    thats what enlightenment are 

  18. Posted · Edited by Aakash

    @zeroISinfinity Lol we never won the lottery my friend, we were never blessed by ourselves! 

    God is a strange loop because it is itself, it has to put itself into limited form to even actualise itself. Even then lol, it is not the whole because to be the whole in the form, it to not be the whole by logic of needing a form to experience itself. It makes you god, it just doesn’t make you all of god. Because god is itself through you. Which is why your saying to be “this is you”. 

    Whilst I’m saying to you. 

    YESS THAT IS YOU ! 

    AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

    Mind = blown 

  21. Posted · Edited by Aakash

    @zeroISinfinity Hehehe god logic proving god logic wrong ;) 

    I'll let you be in charge of the strange loop

     

    Just kidding you are correct we are existance after all :):D  you are the enlightened master! 

    How do you know what i'm referring to as imagining :) , i would mean unlimited anything, without contradictions. no grounding particle, the god particle 

  22. Posted · Edited by Aakash

    what if i'm not from around here? 

    See 

    doubt can go on for infinity, all things go for infinity 

    but how do you communicate a term that your trying to imply is beyond infinity,

    a) it can't be imagined unless it's told to you 

    b) it can't be actualised unless an action is done for you, in direct experience 

    Both faculties are out, hehehe but the point about faith is that the universe first has to imagine it up and then has to prove itself for you to consider it actual. 

    why not just call everything actual. What "i" is.. is refering to what is actually the case 

    But god-logic concludes that with: 

    - no begginning and no end 

    - a single point of origin , non causality 

    - fictional 

    - no reasoning of any need besides "i" 

    All knowledge is incorrect and all sensations are true. 

    However, what it truly means is absolute truth is completely relative 

    Leaving you in a constant state of falling alone into a black hole, which will be interpretted remember by your definition of "i" ,,, said via words, no falling just no-where, does god need to eat ? NO. 

    when absolute truth is relative. that is. 

    Including that of your infinite amounts of awakenings and enlightenment. 

    Ofcourse this can be intepretted on the level of actuality 

    but i'm talking from actuality only. A place where there is no absolute truth. See the difference? 

    The place where there is no need for an absolute truth is ... god.  in real time. 

    of course this is only theory and concept, with no direct experience

     

     

     

  23. Posted · Edited by Aakash

    I have the proof, 

    Actuality goes full circle to Actuality only 

    Thats what the god particle is, it's "I" 

    We like to feel grounded by knowing for 100% sure 

    But the truth is its Actuality only to an innumberal/ insurnumberable/ non-actual amount/ non- quantity amount / non- logic amount 

    Do you know why this logic is proof

    because god does not say "i" ,  he is acknowledged groundlessness 

    That's the proof. God is not a seeker. God is the "   seekers AND the seeked 'i'    " 

    "i" stands for indefinable. 

    God is also a strange loop topic, all words point to whatever you consider "i" so all words are helpful via home-seeking attempts. We will only think at the groundless level we know "i" 

  24. Posted · Edited by Aakash

    The problem with faith is that it infests your mind, any pre-logic is wiped out and replaced with post-logic. It doesn't matter which logic it is, it could even be god- logic itself. In this way, you become a vehicle. One stays either quiet or reactive to relay such information, unbeknownst to their own limitations. A virtue to share in pure awe yet always short. How does one say, look this is us! look how amazing we are, by idea alone. The need for proof or any notions is absurd, always "me" , words do not describe the non-experience. Which is "self-homing" sensations. I, ME . Proof is not for this I, it is for you. Consider these words: " Delusion has no bottom, when it is actual. " 

     

    the one.jpg