AI Just a Copy Machine

[yetineti]

@AION

How are you actually managing its agreeableness, though?

Ironically, telling something to be less agreeable and having it do that is still it agreeing with you, even if it technically disagrees with each individual notion.

It is never actually deciding what is good for you.

I’m not sure you’re demonstrating an understanding of the danger of engaging with it on such topics.

Why would you engage with it on spiritual topics, with the least of amount of data, congruency, agreement, etc.?

It may be able to mimic those people, but it is not itself enlightened.

When I send it a model number, have it talk through a specific emotional issue, look something up, there is a starting point and an end point.

There is no room for confusion.

I understand how your ways are helpful, still. I’m just not understanding how you’re ensuring they’re helpful, opposed to just ruminating in thoughts of thoughts.

Edited 1 hour ago by yetineti

[Human Mint]

It is fairly simple. AI just makes use of the collective imagination. It does not posses imagination of its own. When you write a prompt you are the one doing the imagining, despite it being able to actualize it or not. Where does AI leaches from??? Our imagination. We can imagine new things, AI not. But it is more deceptive because it actually feels like it imagines new things, because maybe it does create things we've never seen, using its immense database. But the database is the limit, once it exhaust that then is over and dumb and we have to feed it again to make it useful.

Does AI have potential? Yes, it has quite a tremendous ammount of potential. Useful businesses will be created with it, new cool services will be invented. 

[Human Mint]

3 hours ago, AION said:

And to be honest, I'm disappointed in most humans

Most humans are not hyper talented, that's a fact.

[Human Mint]

1 hour ago, yetineti said:

Ironically, telling something to be less agreeable and having it do that is still it agreeing with you, even if it technically disagrees with each individual notion.

There is no irony in that, just a pun.

Quote

It is never actually deciding what is good for you.

It decides based on what the programmers/ceos decide it's good for you. Which is way too problematic since they're negligents (with the ChatGPT, Claude type of AIs). Otherwise you would understand that showing me my own flaws would be the best thing to do.

Edited 26 minutes ago by Human Mint