Jim Newman is really good.

[Schizophonia]

3 minutes ago, Razard86 said:

I literally communicate with God every day. 

How do you do that

[Sugarcoat]

You must have very weak self mechanism in you then because he does nothing to me except laugh for most part😂

He is imo one of the best on YouTube ive seen at describing this topic in the most simple straightforward way. He even says himself "the concepts are very simple". But people are kinda too stuck in their own worldview, that some even struggle to grasp it on logic level, let alone the full thing

Edited 17 hours ago by Sugarcoat

[Sugarcoat]

On 2026-06-27 at 8:28 AM, Joseph Maynor said:

You're right!  That is why I like him.  He is also hilarious.  He is one of the few I like.

Its so obvious he is "non dual" like hes the most empty ive seen ever somehow 

[Sugarcoat]

17 hours ago, Razard86 said:

Jim Newman is ok but he doesn't know about God Realization, and I never see him mention that reality is pure imagination. He also calls the realization of all that is as simple and ordinary and let me tell you he couldn't be further from the truth. Infinity is a raging beast, it is completely unhinged. If you ever had a bad trip on psychedelics you would find out QUICK that there is NOTHING ordinary about Reality. Reality only SEEMS ordinary because you have NOT radically changed your consciousness. 

Jim Newman, Tony Parsons, both of these guys teach the same message and it can help as their technique is to break you out of your attachment to meaning by continually telling you that there is nothing/nobody here and all there is, is something appearing to happen. There shctick is to focus on nothingness.

The issue is they have not become Conscious of what is TRUTH, GOD, Pure Imagination and Universal Mind.

How is what youre describing different than this talk about "theres only this moment"? He has said himself how it's "chaos" etc in some videos, how the appearance of structure is illusion or something 

[Someone here]

On ٢٧‏/٦‏/٢٠٢٦ at 9:18 AM, Wilhelm44 said:

It's gotten to the point now that when I think of memories of the past, there are impressions of past events, but I can't find a me in those memories, quite trippy.

Do you remember that you were nothing before your birth ? The answer is yes . But how is that possible? If you were nothing then how did you know that you were nothing ?
Do you remember that in deep sleep there was nothing at all in existence? Again the Answer is yes but how ? If there was nothing then what or who was aware of that nothing?  

[Someone here]

4 hours ago, Someone here said:

Do you remember that you were nothing before your birth ? The answer is yes . But how is that possible? If you were nothing then how did you know that you were nothing ?
Do you remember that in deep sleep there was nothing at all in existence? Again the Answer is yes but how ? If there was nothing then what or who was aware of that nothing?  
 

to answer the question just in case the objective wasn’t clear ..it’s the absolute self . If you were to tell Jim Newman there is such a thing as an absolute self he would deny it and say that there is no self at all.  Those non duality speakers who say there is no self at all have a huge misunderstanding of certain teachings of Buddhism (essentially they are in love with the Buddhist teaching about no self  and just parrot it mindlessly.. there is no separate self inside the human body . That’s true . But they miss the absolute self which could be said to be the ground of being . It’s there even in Deep sleep ..prior to birth ..and after the death of the body . And it’s unborn and deathless .  That’s how you can remember that you were nothing before birth and you can remember there was nothing in deep sleep..because the absolute self was there in those states . It doesn’t die or sleep . It’s pure eternal awareness. 

Edited 13 hours ago by Someone here

[Wilhelm44]

11 hours ago, Razard86 said:

I've watched Tony Parsons, he is not that awake. He denies the existence of God, he literally told someone its just some psychedelic high that gives someone the feeling that they are God. I need you to understand this, at the end of your human life you will merge back into the Infinite and will be God proper. 

This alone proves that Tony is not that awake. I literally communicate with God every day. If ANYONE denies the existence of God, then they are NOT awake. This is told to you because you as God populated your Universe with people with varying degrees of awakeness. Tony Parsons and Jim Newman are a trap you planted to keep yourself asleep. 

My guess is you've only watched snippets and jumped to conclusions.

I have heard Jim use the word God on a couple of occasions.

But I am curious, how exactly is your notion of God different from the indescribable mystery, so called nothingness, that has the infinite ability to appear as anything under the sun and beyond, and which has as its nature, unconditional freedom, unconditional love, unconditional aliveness, infinite beauty etc ?

It would actually be an interesting experiment, if instead of making claims about someone else's awakening from a distance, you went on one of Jim's monthly zoom calls, and challenged him live on air. He doesn't shy away from those kinds of conversations and it can get pretty wild at times lol.

But yeah, I still have a feeling you might be pleasantly surprised.

 

Edited 8 hours ago by Wilhelm44

[Wilhelm44]

7 hours ago, Sugarcoat said:

You must have very weak self mechanism in you then because he does nothing to me except laugh for most part😂

He is imo one of the best on YouTube ive seen at describing this topic in the most simple straightforward way. He even says himself "the concepts are very simple". But people are kinda too stuck in their own worldview, that some even struggle to grasp it on logic level, let alone the full thing

If you're laughing something good is happening 

[Wilhelm44]

9 hours ago, Sugarcoat said:

Its so obvious he is "non dual" like hes the most empty ive seen ever somehow 

Yeah, complete cessation of the sense of a separate self. 

Edited 8 hours ago by Wilhelm44

[Wilhelm44]

8 hours ago, Sugarcoat said:

How is what youre describing different than this talk about "theres only this moment"? He has said himself how it's "chaos" etc in some videos, how the appearance of structure is illusion or something 

For me his message is also very similar to Leo's teaching about "look at your hand".

Edited 8 hours ago by Wilhelm44

[Wilhelm44]

3 hours ago, Someone here said:

to answer the question just in case the objective wasn’t clear ..it’s the absolute self . If you were to tell Jim Newman there is such a thing as an absolute self he would deny it and say that there is no self at all.  Those non duality speakers who say there is no self at all have a huge misunderstanding of certain teachings of Buddhism (essentially they are in love with the Buddhist teaching about no self  and just parrot it mindlessly.. there is no separate self inside the human body . That’s true . But they miss the absolute self which could be said to be the ground of being . It’s there even in Deep sleep ..prior to birth ..and after the death of the body . And it’s unborn and deathless .  That’s how you can remember that you were nothing before birth and you can remember there was nothing in deep sleep..because the absolute self was there in those states . It doesn’t die or sleep . It’s pure eternal awareness. 

By no self he is simply referring to the apparent sense of separate self.

What you call absolute self, he calls indescribable mystery.

[Wilhelm44]

7 hours ago, Someone here said:

Do you remember that you were nothing before your birth ? The answer is yes . But how is that possible? If you were nothing then how did you know that you were nothing ?
Do you remember that in deep sleep there was nothing at all in existence? Again the Answer is yes but how ? If there was nothing then what or who was aware of that nothing?  

No, I don't remember anything from before birth.

[Someone here]

2 minutes ago, Wilhelm44 said:

By no self he is simply referring to the apparent sense of separate self.

I literally just said, “There is no separate self inside the human body.” How much clearer can I make it? 😂

Can we retire the word “apparent” for a minute? It just muddies the waters. Either there’s a separate self or there isn’t. “Apparent self” sounds like “sort of pregnant.” Pick a lane.

“Indescribable mystery “ is a separate realization than the absolute self .  

[Wilhelm44]

4 minutes ago, Someone here said:

“Indescribable mystery “ is a separate realization than the absolute self .

How so ?  And how do you actually know the details of what, Jim for example, has realized or not ?

Edited 9 hours ago by Wilhelm44

[Someone here]

Just now, Wilhelm44 said:

How so ?  And how do you actually know the details of what Jim for example has realized or not ?

I know Jim and I listen to him a lot .  Whenever he is asked about concepts such as “pure consciousness “..or” awareness “ or “absolute self “ ..he typically responds with “ I don’t know what that means “  

 

[Wilhelm44]

1 minute ago, Someone here said:

I know Jim and I listen to him a lot .  Whenever he is asked about concepts such as “pure consciousness “..or” awareness “ or “absolute self “ ..he typically responds with “ I don’t know what that means “  

 

What would you say is pure consciousness ?

"All that there already is, is absolute purity." Jim

[Someone here]

1 minute ago, Wilhelm44 said:

What would you say is pure consciousness ?

Go back to my two questions regarding deep sleep and what you were prior to birth . 
don’t overthink this :  when you wake up in the morning you can actually tell that during deep dreamless sleep there was no experience of any kind . Correct ? 
question:  how is this known?  It should be impossible for there was nothing at all? But apparently there was a knowing of that nothing . That’s pure consciousness. Or absolute self . It doesn’t sleep or die . It’s omnipresent underlying all states of consciousness. 

[Wilhelm44]

9 minutes ago, Someone here said:

there was a knowing of that nothing

So you are two ? You are nothingness and the knowing of the nothingness ?

I think this is where Jim might differ.

He mentions a lot that: "It is not an experience."

 

[Someone here]

1 minute ago, Wilhelm44 said:

So you are two ? You are nothingness and the knowing of the nothingness ?

You are in a sense both everything and nothing. Don’t get trapped in these artificial dualities. You are consciousness..but you’re also the contents of consciousness. One could say that your essential nature is pure consciousness rather than the objects appearing within it..but ultimately even that distinction dissolves.

If we must use words.. your most fundamental nature is pure empty consciousness. But even that is just a pointer. These terms are meaningless unless they correspond to something in your direct experience. Without that frame of reference..they’re just concepts floating around in your head.  Please contemplate this in your direct experience and check what’s being said .

Thank you for the Conversation.

 

[Wilhelm44]

@Someone here  Not sure why you want to end our conversation right now, but okay.

(You didn't really answer my question though. See I think what Jim is pointing to, is that when there is a permanent cessation of the sense of a separate self, the distinction between nothingness and the knowing of nothingness, dissolves. That's why he says, "it's not an experience".) 

Edited 8 hours ago by Wilhelm44